farglebargle
Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005 From: Albany, NY Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY Ok FB, went and read the transcript. Nothing about a "wall" in Baghdad that I could find. Did I miss it? I did skim a little, so it's possible. So, what the hell is all this stuff you are carrying on about a "wall in Baghdad"? See earlier response. quote:
On partisanship: There are other important issues than just the hypocrisy of the Democratic leadership in their stance in Iraq. I think the most important one, is the utter lack of adherence to deciding the best policy for all Americans, and supporting that policy and plan - whatever it is. That would be obedience to the LAWS of The United States and adherance to The Constitution. Since Bush did NOT obey the Laws of The United States or The Constitution, we need to address those alleged crimes first, shouldn't we? Otherwise, what of your Laws and Constitution? Did you see Dick Durbin mention how the Iraq AUMF is obsolete and irrelevent now? What LAWFUL BASIS exists for Bush's actions then? " Their policies are reactive, not proactive." That's because the GOOD GUYS don't hit first. FWIW, GOOD GUYS don't torture prisoners in their custody, and provide an arraignment with representation, and a trial. You may have forgotten that lesson when you accepted torturing prisoners in your name, and denying due process. "They are sacrificing their higher moral obligations" From someone who doesn't seem to have a problem with torturing prisoners, denial of due process, and permitting high crimes to go uninvestigated? "the sure path to the destruction of our nation, and the loss of our freedoms." Like the way Bush is having all internet usage and phone usage monitered without a warrant, as indicated in the court documents in evidence in EFF v. AT&T? And don't deny it's happening until you go read the ads from the comany selling the technology to the feds to do it. See core router? See tap on core router? See packets copied to Feds? quote:
It's sad. Like the Commies, giving allegience to their Party first, rather than their State. And your comments in post 246: Therefore I only insulted those who a) Are Neoconservatives and b) Put The Party before Their State. Just change the political labels, and I think you might just be looking into a mirror. Not at all, as a Traditional Conservative, i've always opposed the actions of the Conservative Party as they sucked up the the RNC, and consequently the RNC's cocksucking of the Neocon Nuts. You think I hate Bush because he's a Conservative. Wrong. I hate Bush because he's always PRETENED to be competent, and the Neocon Party Whores enjoyed the pep rallys so much it didn't matter if he would wreck the economy, and destroy our privacy, freedom, and liberty. The trashing of the Writ of Habeas Corpus was an unpleasant surprise. I had *thought* the pathetic remains of the Republic left after Lincoln's assassination would be resistant enough to it, but hey, before Hitler the Germans were "Democratic" too, eh? Fools and the Weak Willed and Minded live in every nation.
_____________________________
It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show. ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים
|