Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Jihad Jane???


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Jihad Jane??? Page: <<   < prev  18 19 [20] 21 22   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Jihad Jane??? - 2/5/2007 8:54:21 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MsPoetress

quote:

Which is why when I was thinking about joining the military my top choice was the Air Force which accepted me... theirs was the "wimpiest" bootcamp around, not to mention that the goal was to reshape recruits for that service, not to break them completely down. I was pregnant the same weekend I took the oath by my husband who was also in the Air Force.


I spoke to a crappy Air Force recruiter!. I went in, talked to him, was already to take the ASVAB, and he told me that I had to enlist before I took it. Which is not what I understood to be correct. I then proceed to seek out another recruiter who tried to do the same. I gave up and found a wonderful career in retail at the time.

~poe


Well that was bad info, I took the ASVAB test before I was recruited. The details of my recruitment hinged on my ASVAB score. I did not know they did it differently than that, but I was 21 when I took it.

I had a wonderful stint as a waitress before I went back to school and now I am an Anthropologist waiting to finish my graduate school education, so I will take that over the Air Force any day. I have often wondered if I would not have been kicked to the curb from the military... I am not exactly a conformist and never have been. Private Benjamin would have had nothing on me...lol.

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to MsPoetress)
Profile   Post #: 381
RE: Jihad Jane??? - 2/5/2007 8:54:33 PM   
Sinergy


Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

Check your email.


The location of those is in an email?  Cool.

So you download MsMilitaryComplex for Internet Explorer?

Sinergy

p.s.  Hate to say it, but it sounds like you dont know how to stand up and admit that you screwed the pooch with your post. 

Dont worry, Monkeyboy taught us that if you smirk and deny long enough, people will become disinterested in your machinations.


Sinergy:
This is a jarehead thing...I would respectfully request that you shut the fuck up and butt out.  Thanking you in advance for your consideration.
thompson


Thank you for that erudite and concise rebuttal to my post, thompsonx. 

[sarcasm]
It is heart warming to know that intellectual curiosity and the ability to accept opinions you dont happen to share are inculcated into the people we indoctrinate into service in our military.
[/sarcasm]

Sinergy

_____________________________

"There is a fine line between clever and stupid"
David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap"

"Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle


(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 382
RE: Jihad Jane??? - 2/5/2007 9:00:04 PM   
MsPoetress


Posts: 1066
Joined: 4/4/2006
Status: offline
I've heard that the reasoning seems to be that if a recruit cannot be relied upon to obey orders and follow instructions in routine matters (folding clothes, standing at attention, paying proper attention to hygiene) it is unlikely that he or she will be reliable in a combat situation, where there may be a strong urge to disobey orders or flee when your unit needs them the most and puts everyone in jepoardy

Maybe if I had joined I wouldn't be the slob I am today

~poe

_____________________________

~poe

I'm mad, you're mad, we're all mad here, it's the fad for many a year, if you think we're crazy my dear, you're right cause I'M mad, YOU'RE mad, we're ALL mad here! - Mad Hatter

(in reply to WyrdRich)
Profile   Post #: 383
RE: Jihad Jane??? - 2/5/2007 9:03:11 PM   
WildnWicked


Posts: 50
Joined: 2/26/2004
From: Lancaster, California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MsPoetress

Maybe if I had joined I wouldn't be the slob I am today

~poe

My dear... I prefer to say that I am functionally disorganized!

_____________________________

We live in a society of victimization, where people are much more comfortable being victimized than actually standing up for themselves.-- Marilyn Manson

(in reply to MsPoetress)
Profile   Post #: 384
RE: Jihad Jane??? - 2/5/2007 9:05:28 PM   
MsPoetress


Posts: 1066
Joined: 4/4/2006
Status: offline
quote:

I did not know they did it differently than that, but I was 21 when I took it.


That's not the way they're suppose to do it. I just found some eager-beaver recruiters in a one horse town. Sometimes I wish I had gone on with it, I wanted to do something for my country. Though when I spoke to my doctor about it she said I would never had made it. I had R/A when I was a child, and that since I had the factor they would not have let me in.

Good luck on your degree. Anthropolgy is fascinating.

~poe

< Message edited by MsPoetress -- 2/5/2007 9:06:06 PM >


_____________________________

~poe

I'm mad, you're mad, we're all mad here, it's the fad for many a year, if you think we're crazy my dear, you're right cause I'M mad, YOU'RE mad, we're ALL mad here! - Mad Hatter

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 385
RE: Jihad Jane??? - 2/5/2007 9:07:35 PM   
MsPoetress


Posts: 1066
Joined: 4/4/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WildnWicked

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsPoetress

Maybe if I had joined I wouldn't be the slob I am today

~poe

My dear... I prefer to say that I am functionally disorganized!


Hey yeah!

I do know where things are in this mess of mine. I will tell that to my boss the next time he complains about the mess on my desk.

~poe

_____________________________

~poe

I'm mad, you're mad, we're all mad here, it's the fad for many a year, if you think we're crazy my dear, you're right cause I'M mad, YOU'RE mad, we're ALL mad here! - Mad Hatter

(in reply to WildnWicked)
Profile   Post #: 386
RE: Jihad Jane??? - 2/5/2007 9:14:12 PM   
WyrdRich


Posts: 1733
Joined: 1/3/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MsPoetress

quote:

ORIGINAL: WildnWicked

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsPoetress

Maybe if I had joined I wouldn't be the slob I am today

~poe

My dear... I prefer to say that I am functionally disorganized!


Hey yeah!

I do know where things are in this mess of mine. I will tell that to my boss the next time he complains about the mess on my desk.

~poe


      This is a 'single standard' household, Poe.  So I assume you'll not be mentioning the mess on my desk again?

(in reply to MsPoetress)
Profile   Post #: 387
RE: Jihad Jane??? - 2/5/2007 9:25:59 PM   
MsPoetress


Posts: 1066
Joined: 4/4/2006
Status: offline
I shall not be a hypocrite!

~poe

< Message edited by MsPoetress -- 2/5/2007 9:26:36 PM >


_____________________________

~poe

I'm mad, you're mad, we're all mad here, it's the fad for many a year, if you think we're crazy my dear, you're right cause I'M mad, YOU'RE mad, we're ALL mad here! - Mad Hatter

(in reply to WyrdRich)
Profile   Post #: 388
RE: Jihad Jane??? - 2/6/2007 3:15:38 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WyrdRich

    Hehehehe...  Yeah, it was an early morning, followed by a day long enough to put me in traffic hell coming home.

   Poe is correct.  The various boots are designed to the needs of the service.  Contrary to what Thom offered (with such civility), every vet I've known will tell you much of the first few weeks is a blur of 'hurry up-wait,' men in funny hats (best NOT to laugh) yelling, and intentionally brutal culture shock. 

   Some things remain vivid, I recall the haircut very well, and a washout's sobbing meltdown that we all knew was coming.

   The AF needs people who can perform technically precise work under stressful conditions.  If you are incompetent to fold a pair of tighty-whities into a perfect 6 inch square, with an R. Lee Ermey wanna-be breathing down your neck, you won't be much good to repair a radar system before the next wave of bombers comes in.  It doesn't really matter if you can march 30 miles in full pack and sleep on rocks.


WyrdRich;
Lee Ermey is just as abrasive in real life as he is on tv.
When I have confronted Lee about his less than perfect   knowledge about the marine corps he rants and raves and stomps off.  He is a typical lifer as opposed to carear marine.  Gregg Boyington and chesty Puller,  were carear marines.
thompson

(in reply to WyrdRich)
Profile   Post #: 389
RE: Jihad Jane??? - 2/6/2007 6:43:52 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
quote:


So technically, a sitting President who uses information he knows is incorrect would be guilty of lying?


According to 18 USC 371, if someone has reason to even *suspect* the information is inaccurate, but doesn't fully disclose his suspicions, and misrepresents the trustworthiness of that information, they are guilt of a crime.



_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to Sinergy)
Profile   Post #: 390
RE: Jihad Jane??? - 2/6/2007 7:55:48 PM   
Thadius


Posts: 5091
Joined: 10/11/2005
Status: offline
Evening,
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

Check your email.


The location of those is in an email?  Cool.

So you download MsMilitaryComplex for Internet Explorer?

Sinergy

p.s.  Hate to say it, but it sounds like you dont know how to stand up and admit that you screwed the pooch with your post. 

Dont worry, Monkeyboy taught us that if you smirk and deny long enough, people will become disinterested in your machinations.


No need to smile and deny anything.  The only mistake I made was in my wording, as I never went through Corps bootcamp.  I enlisted in Uncle Sam's Canoe club, and at reup I transfered branches.  Discussing specifics about my duty stations or billeting, is reserved for private discussions.  Hence an email.

I find it much easier and wiser to discuss personal issues with somebody in private (well as private as email can be via this medium).  If you have an issue with anything I have said personally, feel free to email me.  If not then let's stick to the topic, and debate its merits.

I wish you well,
Thadius

_____________________________

When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends." ~ Japanese Proverb

(in reply to Sinergy)
Profile   Post #: 391
RE: Jihad Jane??? - 2/7/2007 8:03:25 AM   
pantera


Posts: 210
Joined: 1/7/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: pantera

So, why are we talking about this traitor chick again?


pantera:
Traitor chick??? I am curious how she can be a traitor.  She was exercising her first ammendment right.  We had not declared war on Viet Nam.  We were illegally in their country killing their people.  Is the first ammendment only for those who agree with you.
thompson


Hey- I'm just exercising my first amendment right to say what I think about her - or is the 1st amendment only for those who agree with you? (and don't like capitalism, blame america while they're at it)

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 392
RE: Jihad Jane??? - 2/7/2007 8:22:30 AM   
Sternhand4


Posts: 422
Joined: 3/6/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pantera

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: pantera

So, why are we talking about this traitor chick again?


pantera:
Traitor chick??? I am curious how she can be a traitor.  She was exercising her first ammendment right.  We had not declared war on Viet Nam.  We were illegally in their country killing their people.  Is the first ammendment only for those who agree with you.
thompson


Hey- I'm just exercising my first amendment right to say what I think about her - or is the 1st amendment only for those who agree with you? (and don't like capitalism, blame america while they're at it)


Here's why shes a traitor..

http://www.26thmarines.org/janefonda.html

<image deleted>

< Message edited by ModeratorEleven -- 3/24/2007 2:13:03 PM >

(in reply to pantera)
Profile   Post #: 393
RE: Jihad Jane??? - 2/7/2007 8:36:20 AM   
BOUNTYHUNTER


Posts: 9259
Joined: 2/5/2004
Status: offline
YEP thats the traitor bitch there is another one of her standing by smiling while the gooks were shooting at our \planes..I"LL find it and post it..THE bitch shouldn't be allow back in the country...BH

_____________________________

US going to hell in a hand basket/

(in reply to Sternhand4)
Profile   Post #: 394
RE: Jihad Jane??? - 2/7/2007 8:39:06 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
Again, the lawfullness of Fonda's actions is dependent on whether the USs actions were Lawful.

That hinges on if Diem's government was Lawful, specifically after refusing to obey the UN.

So, was Diem's Government Lawful? If so, why wasn't Hussein, since BOTH governments refused to obey UN mandates.



_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to BOUNTYHUNTER)
Profile   Post #: 395
RE: Jihad Jane??? - 2/7/2007 8:39:52 AM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
Uhhhmmmmmmmm, just a question buuuuuuuuuttttttt, didn't that happen just a little more that a few years ago??

Nothing like dwelling in the past.


_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to BOUNTYHUNTER)
Profile   Post #: 396
RE: Jihad Jane??? - 2/7/2007 9:02:07 AM   
Sternhand4


Posts: 422
Joined: 3/6/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Again, the lawfullness of Fonda's actions is dependent on whether the USs actions were Lawful.

That hinges on if Diem's government was Lawful, specifically after refusing to obey the UN.

So, was Diem's Government Lawful? If so, why wasn't Hussein, since BOTH governments refused to obey UN mandates.




Actually there is no requirement  that the US be commited to war or any other action for a treason charge.
It's your actions that determine whether or not you have commited treason.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articleiii.html

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 397
RE: Jihad Jane??? - 2/7/2007 9:03:46 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sternhand4

quote:

ORIGINAL: pantera

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: pantera

So, why are we talking about this traitor chick again?


pantera:
Traitor chick??? I am curious how she can be a traitor.  She was exercising her first ammendment right.  We had not declared war on Viet Nam.  We were illegally in their country killing their people.  Is the first ammendment only for those who agree with you.
thompson


Hey- I'm just exercising my first amendment right to say what I think about her - or is the 1st amendment only for those who agree with you? (and don't like capitalism, blame america while they're at it)


Here's why shes a traitor..

http://www.26thmarines.org/janefonda.html

<image deleted>


But boy oh boy, wasn't she a hot chick back then!

< Message edited by ModeratorEleven -- 3/24/2007 2:13:34 PM >


_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to Sternhand4)
Profile   Post #: 398
RE: Jihad Jane??? - 2/7/2007 9:08:04 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sternhand4

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Again, the lawfullness of Fonda's actions is dependent on whether the USs actions were Lawful.

That hinges on if Diem's government was Lawful, specifically after refusing to obey the UN.

So, was Diem's Government Lawful? If so, why wasn't Hussein, since BOTH governments refused to obey UN mandates.




Actually there is no requirement that the US be commited to war or any other action for a treason charge.
It's your actions that determine whether or not you have commited treason.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articleiii.html


So, the people who supported Diem's Unlawful Government in the United States are the ones committing treason?

Remember, it all comes down to "WHY IS THE US SUPPORTING A CRIMINAL IN VIETNAM, BUT OVERTHROWING ONE IN IRAQ?" when BOTH Diem and Hussein were guilty of refusing to comply with UN Mandates.

IF the US was wrong to support Diem and South Vietnam, isn't ANY resistance justified?



_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to Sternhand4)
Profile   Post #: 399
RE: Jihad Jane??? - 2/7/2007 9:27:11 AM   
Sternhand4


Posts: 422
Joined: 3/6/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sternhand4

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Again, the lawfullness of Fonda's actions is dependent on whether the USs actions were Lawful.

That hinges on if Diem's government was Lawful, specifically after refusing to obey the UN.

So, was Diem's Government Lawful? If so, why wasn't Hussein, since BOTH governments refused to obey UN mandates.




Actually there is no requirement that the US be commited to war or any other action for a treason charge.
It's your actions that determine whether or not you have commited treason.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articleiii.html


So, the people who supported Diem's Unlawful Government in the United States are the ones committing treason?

Remember, it all comes down to "WHY IS THE US SUPPORTING A CRIMINAL IN VIETNAM, BUT OVERTHROWING ONE IN IRAQ?" when BOTH Diem and Hussein were guilty of refusing to comply with UN Mandates.

IF the US was wrong to support Diem and South Vietnam, isn't ANY resistance justified?




I think your failing to grasp the concept of treason.  Its an act commited against your own country. Acts commited against foriegn powers are policy decisions.

"IF the US was wrong to support Diem and South Vietnam, isn't ANY resistance justified?"

No giving aid and comfort to the enemy is never justified. You want to protest,fine, or work to change the goverment here to reflect your opinion, great. But to go to a foriegn country, put on parts of their uniform, take pictures of yourself in their guns ... nope your a traitor...





(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 400
Page:   <<   < prev  18 19 [20] 21 22   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Jihad Jane??? Page: <<   < prev  18 19 [20] 21 22   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.133