asissyforher
Posts: 228
Joined: 5/20/2005 From: iowa now..maybe move soon. Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: JohnathanKay quote:
ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth quote:
The person who claimed he wrote the rules has replied to this thread bashing his own contract many times. He has also sent the contract to many boasting it was his. You know what, I've ignored this thread for some time, but now that it's bothered beth it's time to address some issues. On page one post #8 I based these rules. Why? Because I wanted to join the list of people who said they were impossible to live with in real life. I wanted to see how far it would get. Then as someone who knew us pointed out, these weren't exactly our rules, but one of the foundation documents that were used in creating our rules. The person pointing that out to us was one who asked us to share our rules with them, who we've been with in person, and knows us. All aspects of the rules may not be original but in the form they exist, they are unique. For the record, when these rules were created, I used the 128 Rules and a few others as guides and for the foundation of discussion. At the time beth was not living with me full time so some aspects, like the webcam, were included. As we've counseled many to do, we communicated for many hours and went over each rule long before they became "our rules". Then a ritual was added as part of the document. Finally, at the end of the process the rules that we live by came into being. I printed them on quality paper with beth and my pictures in the background. They sit, signed and framed, on the night stand next to beth's side of the bed. This was over two and one half years ago. I wish I kept all the "plagiarized" source, but I seem to recall they were at sites where the author suggested they could be used as models for a couple contemplating a full time 24/7 relationship. If I owe any money for copy right infringement - send me the bill. Now if some sanctimonious, self important, pompous, individual can't believe that anyone can, would, or is living by those rules that's their problem. They probably don't believe you can piss with a hard on without excruciating pain even though they don't have a penis. I've never seen Everest, the biggest thing on the planet, but I trust it exists. For anyone who needs to be a modern day Thomas and to put his fingers in the holes made by the wounds you're welcome to come to Palos Verdes for you own personal verification. Meanwhile, I exist, beth exists, we exist as a 24/7 lifestyle couple under these rules. Debate their merit, their real life application, or the fanatic anal retentive mind it would take to monitor and enforce all you like. It's unfortunate that some people have seen but still choose not to believe. Although we share everything about our lives with others we don't share each other. To beth and I the lifestyle IS a 24/7 intimate, sexual, and erotic way of life. Sharing a spanking or a scene with another would be, to us, the equivalent of sex. Yes I have allowed beth to be the subject of a demonstration or even encounter a new sensation in my presence, such as the waxing by Taggard in Vegas, but those encounters were not a scene. They are sensations, not the sensational. I guess some don't believe we are as we represent. To me, that means they are either jealous, or because they haven't achieved a sense of completeness need to challenge it when others claim they have it. Whatever. Challenge the words, debate the proper amount of urine intake possible. beth's worn a bra maybe a dozen times in the 3 years we've been together and any sag is un-noticeable. she is naked very quickly when we come home, but on chilly nights she is permitted a bathrobe. My god, the need to justify or explain our relationship really pisses me off, especially when the majority of sources are on-line "grand-master" types whose only authority is over which hand they'll use masturbating while on-line. But worse are the submissives who document and dictate exactly what their "masters" are allowed to do to them, and who if the intensity it too much, "safe word". I pity them most, they'll never know what's beyond the safe word. I guess the thought of living under rules and to totally trust someone else for everything is so contrary to how they live they can not perceive that type of existence. I feel sorry for them in that regard too. If anyone has any questions, ask me or beth. If anyone has any doubt, come see us or get over it - that's your issue and problem. Thank you to you both for making this clarification. This is what I thought had happened - that you used my 128 Basic slave Rules docuement along with other writings of other authors to them make your own list of rules upon which to govern your lives by in addition to what you both have developed. And thank you for clarifying that your life can be experienced with such a set of rules as you both have worked on creating, that you can live your life with all the work it takes to make it work for you both. Appreciated. No bills to be sent, no monies to be declared. I only ask if you distribute your own list of rules to carry then the credits to those documents you did use on the list you have. That helps others to see the original documents along with yours to then create their own document/contract. Should you both get up to Seattle sometime - let me know. Would like to meet you. Johnathan Kay (aka, JK) quote:
128 Basic slave Rules docuement one hundred and twenty eight? my gawd almighty....oh lawdy ok. i'll bite..THIS i wanna see! where do i go to see this? thanks
_____________________________
"still looking for a real life domme..no more plastic wannabes for me"
|