RE: CIAW (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


AquaticSub -> RE: CIAW (3/11/2007 4:43:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Celeste43

quote:

ORIGINAL: AquaticSub

Since when is not being perfect an excuse for inflicting non-consentual emotional pain on an entire family?


My neighbor ought to be celebrating 40 years of marriage this year. Instead he's spending it as he has the last several, waiting for his wife to die of Lou Gehrig's disease. She hasn't been able to talk for two years. She can't even sit in a wheelchair and go into the sun or fresh air.

I hope to god that he has an old friend, widowed as he soon will be, who is comforting him with physical affection. I doubt it but I hope so. Because him going off to see a friend for lunch or coffee and winding up with her in her bed wouldn't destroy his family or hers. Not unless some heartless nurse's aide leans down and whispers in her ear that he was screwing someone on the side.

And having known her for twenty years, I wouldn't be surprised if in her heart, she hopes he's getting some love and affection occasionally to keep him going strong as he's there for her day in and day out.


So because of this it's ok for most cheaters (who have partners quite capable of physical affection but there are relationship issues that both people are responsible for working out) to cheat?




GeekyGirl -> RE: CIAW (3/11/2007 4:46:42 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: gooddogbenji


don't think it's wrong, but I don't see myself ever doing it.  It's good to be on a high horse, aint it?

Yours,


benji


How can something which causes emotional harm to a person be anything other than wrong?




hisannabelle -> RE: CIAW (3/11/2007 4:47:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Celeste43

quote:

ORIGINAL: AquaticSub

Since when is not being perfect an excuse for inflicting non-consentual emotional pain on an entire family?


My neighbor ought to be celebrating 40 years of marriage this year. Instead he's spending it as he has the last several, waiting for his wife to die of Lou Gehrig's disease. She hasn't been able to talk for two years. She can't even sit in a wheelchair and go into the sun or fresh air.

I hope to god that he has an old friend, widowed as he soon will be, who is comforting him with physical affection. I doubt it but I hope so. Because him going off to see a friend for lunch or coffee and winding up with her in her bed wouldn't destroy his family or hers. Not unless some heartless nurse's aide leans down and whispers in her ear that he was screwing someone on the side.

And having known her for twenty years, I wouldn't be surprised if in her heart, she hopes he's getting some love and affection occasionally to keep him going strong as he's there for her day in and day out.


this would be one of those 1% of cases where i'm not in the ciaw camp.




SusanofO -> RE: CIAW (3/11/2007 4:47:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SusanofO

You are so brave cloudboy. I am reading the rest of the article now. Back in a few.[:)]


Okay, I'm back. I mostly agree with the author of the answer to the question, and the rest of the statement. But I'll add that I think if two married people can work out an arrangement, then I think what works for them is fine. I can't imagine why it wouldn't be, simply because I mostly consider a lot of that stuff just none of my business. How other people run their love or family lives, unless it directly affects me , is not anything I really get on a soap box about.

If children are involved, then of course they might want to be more careful how the arrangment is presented, and consider it might be difficult to put up a unified "front" as far as agreeing on discipline, etc (I think maybe this is important as far as giving kids a sense of consistency, but I also see kids who don't get this to the hilt that are surviving okay. I think the love and basic sanity of the parents are more influential as far as that stuff goes. I really do.)

I cheated on my husband after 11 years of dwindling, to almost no, sexual interaction, and his refusal to try anything after one experiment with Viagra that ended w/him refusing to try anything else (like Cialis, etc). He left marriage counselling sessions after 2 months, claiming that since I was the one who was worried about no sex, I was the one who should learn how to deal with the "problem".

Yes, I had an affair that lasted well over a year with someone who (initially) made me feel like a whole new part of life had re-opened for me. I felt appreciated, affirmed, and once again like a sexual and renewed, whole human being. I don't regret doing it. 

After awhile, I told myself I felt guilty about it, but think that was mostly due to my Catholic upbringing, and I also wondered whether I was stiill actually interested in the man I was seeing. I don't think my husband cared much, or would have been "devastated" had he found out. In fact, I think he strongly suspected it. I'd already let him know that my having an affair was a possible consequence of not trying to put more of himself into the marriage and a sexual relationship. I think even then saying he'd care if I did, was mostly just his love of adhering to social convention talking, more than how he felt about me (and that is not a rationalization, it is how I honestly perceived the situation).

This was after 5 years of "seriously" talking "things" like this over about every 6 months, and us both saying things would get better, and vowing (especially on his part) to act a lot more caring in general (which he was defintely capable of doing, when he wanted to do it). But, I'concluded he was actually asexual, after several years. The situation for several years made me feel incredibly rejected, and after awhile I just got weary of it. After awhile, I simply just angry, instead. One of the main things that helped keep both of us there was not wanting to be ostracized by our ultra-Catholic families.

Even though other parts of our life were not disastrous, and some even pleasant, the communication could have been a lot better, and I concluded that we had some in common, but much less than I'd previously thought. We did maintain a basic civility, and did family stuff together, and made occasional efforts to do other things together we both found interesting (boating, music concerts). We did not absolutely hate eachother. 

He just didn't apparently have the concern to do anything much about our sex life really (like take Cialis, or Levitra). And he also got really riled at the idea of a divorce. It would just be "hard to explain" to family, co-workers, etc. My family was strongly opposed to the idea of divorce as well. I would certainly not have been opposed to working out a situation where we'd both of been more open in pursuing our separate romantic interests, such as they were.

I am not sure he'd have been completely opposed to that, either - given how opposed he was to the idea of divorce. At the time, it reallly didn't occur to either of us a a serious option, simply because, I believe niether of us really knew anybody who operated along those lines, maybe. I decided I didn't have a problem with the idea of divorce - I still didn't like it, but I was not as opposed to it as he was, at first. After awhile, I wanted one and he did not. I didn't have to face having to actually leave (but was ready and willing to do it, and planning on it, had seen an attorney and discussed it). 

*There is a man who lives in my neighborhood, whose wife has been institutionalized for the past 20 or so years. When he married her, he loved her so much, and still makes sure she is well taken care of. His heart must be breaking. She developed schizophrenia and he has her cared for in an insitituion that is very expensive and supposedly pretty well-managed. He is a local newspaper editor. He has not divorced her (I think this may have something to do with insurance coverage for her, as much as loving her still, but I am just not certain). I think if this guy is having extra-marital sex, who could ever really blame him? I have no idea if he is or isn't, and it's none of my business. I would just say it certainly would seem fine to me, if he did. And he has (mostly grown) children. If his children had to find out about this, maybe they'd understand it. Although he could probably find a way to just not let them know, I suppose if he wanted to try that.  

In my situation, we had no children (and I can truly say that I now think that was a fortunate occurrence, but I can't say that if the situation had continued, I'd not have divorced him, kids or no kids. 

- Susan




AquaticSub -> RE: CIAW (3/11/2007 4:47:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: hisannabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: Celeste43

My neighbor ought to be celebrating 40 years of marriage this year. Instead he's spending it as he has the last several, waiting for his wife to die of Lou Gehrig's disease. She hasn't been able to talk for two years. She can't even sit in a wheelchair and go into the sun or fresh air.

I hope to god that he has an old friend, widowed as he soon will be, who is comforting him with physical affection. I doubt it but I hope so. Because him going off to see a friend for lunch or coffee and winding up with her in her bed wouldn't destroy his family or hers. Not unless some heartless nurse's aide leans down and whispers in her ear that he was screwing someone on the side.

And having known her for twenty years, I wouldn't be surprised if in her heart, she hopes he's getting some love and affection occasionally to keep him going strong as he's there for her day in and day out.


this would be one of those 1% of cases where i'm not in the ciaw camp.


*nodnod* I wanted to add that but the edit button went away.




velvetears -> RE: CIAW (3/11/2007 4:48:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: hisannabelle

i think people have a right to their own morals and beliefs, and a right to state the kinds of things that they find morally wrong, and a right to avoid situations and people where those things are present....... i don't think i'm a moral authority, but i do have the right to decide what i will and will not accept, behaviorally, from the people i associate with. if that means i stop associating with them, then that's what it means....... i really don't give a damn what people think of me because of it.


As long as you agree others have that same right i have no problem.  i highlighted what i believe to be the crux of this whole argument... i assume this belief or "right" applies to cheaters as well [;)]




GeekyGirl -> RE: CIAW (3/11/2007 4:48:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: hisannabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: Celeste43

quote:

ORIGINAL: AquaticSub

Since when is not being perfect an excuse for inflicting non-consentual emotional pain on an entire family?


My neighbor ought to be celebrating 40 years of marriage this year. Instead he's spending it as he has the last several, waiting for his wife to die of Lou Gehrig's disease. She hasn't been able to talk for two years. She can't even sit in a wheelchair and go into the sun or fresh air.

I hope to god that he has an old friend, widowed as he soon will be, who is comforting him with physical affection. I doubt it but I hope so. Because him going off to see a friend for lunch or coffee and winding up with her in her bed wouldn't destroy his family or hers. Not unless some heartless nurse's aide leans down and whispers in her ear that he was screwing someone on the side.

And having known her for twenty years, I wouldn't be surprised if in her heart, she hopes he's getting some love and affection occasionally to keep him going strong as he's there for her day in and day out.


this would be one of those 1% of cases where i'm not in the ciaw camp.



To me, it almost falls under the "coma clause" we discussed a minute ago, which is such a rare situation that it bears little relevance to the true issue at hand.




Celeste43 -> RE: CIAW (3/11/2007 4:50:08 PM)

Not saying most. Just saying that you paint with a really wide brush that excludes any possibility of people maintaining families while still getting their needs met.

However I don't see that parents divorcing in order to then seek happiness is somehow not also inflicting nonconsensual pain on an entire family.

And it is well known that in families where the parents stay together but do not have a viable sex life that depression rates and drug use among the minors is higher than normal.

So what do you do if there is no solution? Cheating is wrong, divorcing is wrong and staying together is wrong. Unfortunately not all problems have a happy ending.




DesertRat -> RE: CIAW (3/11/2007 4:50:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: gooddogbenji
...It's good to be on a high horse, aint it?


Even better to have a rationalization for having no standards and to...er...be on a high horse about it.

Bob




domiguy -> RE: CIAW (3/11/2007 4:50:28 PM)

This is a tired and worn out thread....I know that cheating is wrong, I know at my obtained age that communication is the key to a strong relationship...If you are going to cheat don't come out here and expect a celebration over your activity that is an idiotic approach.

I will probably never again get married...I don't think the standard version of the institution and myself  exactly see eye to eye.  There is no evidence of any kind that support the notion that children are better off with parents that do not get along...They are put through much less stress and have two seperate, happy caring parents in lieu of a bitter ,angry, lying household. 

If my spouse were incapacitated, this is where bravery would truly rear it's head, do you have the strength to honestly discuss your situation?

I enjoy Dan Savage...Pretty funny guy...

But if you can't handle monogamy then don't get married, or you should  be prepared to  discuss how your relationship is going be open....If you are trapped in a loveless relationship...Leave!!  If you don't have the economic ability to leave... Then this has little to do with cheating and much more to do with your own persoanl failures to not have made "more" out of your life!





AquaticSub -> RE: CIAW (3/11/2007 4:50:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: velvetears

quote:

ORIGINAL: hisannabelle

i think people have a right to their own morals and beliefs, and a right to state the kinds of things that they find morally wrong, and a right to avoid situations and people where those things are present....... i don't think i'm a moral authority, but i do have the right to decide what i will and will not accept, behaviorally, from the people i associate with. if that means i stop associating with them, then that's what it means....... i really don't give a damn what people think of me because of it.


As long as you agree others have that same right i have no problem.  i highlighted what i believe to be the crux of this whole argument... i assume this belief or "right" applies to cheaters as well [;)]


While I realize this is not on the same level, does this mean it's ok to rape someone if you feel it's morally right?




hisannabelle -> RE: CIAW (3/11/2007 4:52:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: velvetears

quote:

ORIGINAL: hisannabelle

i think people have a right to their own morals and beliefs, and a right to state the kinds of things that they find morally wrong, and a right to avoid situations and people where those things are present....... i don't think i'm a moral authority, but i do have the right to decide what i will and will not accept, behaviorally, from the people i associate with. if that means i stop associating with them, then that's what it means....... i really don't give a damn what people think of me because of it.


As long as you agree others have that same right i have no problem.  i highlighted what i believe to be the crux of this whole argument... i assume this belief or "right" applies to cheaters as well [;)]


i do believe even cheaters, etc. have that right, i just don't have to agree with it, condone it, or enable it in any way :) in other cases, like rape, such as aquatic mentioned, neither does the law (thank heavens).




GeekyGirl -> RE: CIAW (3/11/2007 4:52:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: velvetears

quote:

ORIGINAL: hisannabelle

i think people have a right to their own morals and beliefs, and a right to state the kinds of things that they find morally wrong, and a right to avoid situations and people where those things are present....... i don't think i'm a moral authority, but i do have the right to decide what i will and will not accept, behaviorally, from the people i associate with. if that means i stop associating with them, then that's what it means....... i really don't give a damn what people think of me because of it.


As long as you agree others have that same right i have no problem.  i highlighted what i believe to be the crux of this whole argument... i assume this belief or "right" applies to cheaters as well [;)]


I will agree that all people have a right to their own values and morals.

Cheaters have the right to think what they do is right and I have a right to think they're messed up people for believing that. Such is life. Lots of people believe what they do is "right" even when it isn't. I know a whole floor of inmates at my jail who thinking harming UMs is "right" and I'm a messed up person for not understanding their point of view. Oh well, in my mind what they did will always be WRONG.




velvetears -> RE: CIAW (3/11/2007 4:59:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AquaticSub

While I realize this is not on the same level, does this mean it's ok to rape someone if you feel it's morally right?


i'd rather stick to the topic and not discuss or disclose my personal morals or ethics. 




gooddogbenji -> RE: CIAW (3/11/2007 5:01:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: hisannabelle

benji,
......GIANT BLOCK OF TEXT.... because of it.


First off, the only reason I read most of that is that it was directed at me.  Even so, it was just too much at once.  A few spaces in there would have made it far more legible.

Secondly, I agree with you that I can choose with whom I associate, and do so all the time.  I choose what behaviours to tolerate in people around me.

As to murder and rape being wrong, I will give you a quick breakdown as to how I came up with my idea:

In our culture, cannibalism is wrong and taboo.
In many other cultures, it was a daily part of life, with some beatiful ideas behind it. 
There is no rational argument against cannibalism per se, only against some forms of it (serial killers and such)
Therefore, despite it's condemnation by my society, it is only a cultural thing.
In other cultures, it is either accepted or never discussed, or even encouraged as a habit.
How can I condemn someone for their culture?

So, take rape.  Currently, the issue of women being raped in the middle east is a hot topic.  It's a horrible, horrible thing.  These people are evil.  The rapists should be strung up in a row, and other moralist sloganry.

However, the men who do these things have been made to do so by their culture.  In their culture, women do not have the rights they have here.  That is their worldview. 

Our worldview is very different, and to them, as horrible as theirs is to us. 

Who are we to decide that their culture is wrong? 

In the same way, a young man in the south may be brought up with a racist worldview.  He will see other races as evil, and maybe kill some people over this.  His upbringing made him like this; who am I to judge him from 5000 km away with a vastly different worldview and the luxuries of truly free speech?

If I call his actions "wrong," I would need to condemn his upbringing as "wrong," otherwise he may have turned out normal.  So I claim I could live his, and his parent's lives better.

Am I really that arrogant?

Yours,


benji

PS:  I do not believe that murder, for example, should be tolerated.  I believe that laws should exist to protect society from harm, but not moral harm.




gooddogbenji -> RE: CIAW (3/11/2007 5:03:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GeekyGirl
How can something which causes emotional harm to a person be anything other than wrong?


That post caused me emotional harm.

Fucking wrongdoer, burn in hell.

Yours,


benji

PS:  This argument may have a bit of validity if you qualify with "deliberate," but even then it's shaky.




GeekyGirl -> RE: CIAW (3/11/2007 5:05:30 PM)

Being raised a certain way is not an excuse. You have a choice as an adult to form your own worldviews.

I was raised by a dad who hates homosexuals. That didn't keep me from utilizing the brain I was given by mother nature to work through the subject and come to my own opinion that my fathers belief was wrong.

Yes, how you are raised effects things..but we still have a choice in it. How many were raised to believe that cheating was right/ok? Let's see a show of hands to determine how relevant this argument is.




gooddogbenji -> RE: CIAW (3/11/2007 5:06:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesertRat
Even better to have a rationalization for having no standards and to...er...be on a high horse about it.
Bob


LOL

Actually, I have very high standards for myself, and choose carefully with whom I surround myself.  I just make no claim to know what's best for anyone other than little ol' moi.

Yours,


benji




domiguy -> RE: CIAW (3/11/2007 5:07:16 PM)

True there are usually no absoloutes and this is no different...Most people...Oh I don't know...But I'm going to take a stab at this one....Lets say that 99% of the people who cheat do not have a spouse that is suffering for two or more years from some horrid disease...Please keep the conversaton germane to the issue.  There are always exceptions...Some old dude pumped full of viagra who's wife has alzheimers...Cheat away... No arguments...Your kids probably wouldn't even care.




GeekyGirl -> RE: CIAW (3/11/2007 5:07:30 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: gooddogbenji

quote:

ORIGINAL: GeekyGirl
How can something which causes emotional harm to a person be anything other than wrong?


That post caused me emotional harm.

Fucking wrongdoer, burn in hell.

Yours,


benji

PS:  This argument may have a bit of validity if you qualify with "deliberate," but even then it's shaky.


Let me rephrase: If you do something with full knowledge that it will cause harm to another person, then that action is wrong.






Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875