Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Bad Etiquette


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> Bad Etiquette Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Bad Etiquette - 4/20/2007 3:17:35 PM   
BondageTopJere


Posts: 170
Joined: 8/22/2006
Status: offline
Just a coupe of quickies  (no not that kind)

1.  I've had a very enternaining experience last night with a sub that I want to put in the form of a pseudofantasy.  I'd like to share and was thinking of posting it in my journal but...  I'm trying to gauge the reactions of people on seeing a semi-explicit post like that in a journal.

2.  What the frak is the "look"?  "THE Look" I should say.  I've had a couple of subs and doms say I can do this... thing for a lack of a better word, that silenced subs and coworkers mid-word in the past.  I've got no idea how I'm doing it and no one ever taught me to do it, I just can. I wasn't eve feeling all that "Domly" when I did it in the past.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Bad Etiquette - 4/20/2007 3:37:10 PM   
N4SDChastity


Posts: 327
Joined: 2/27/2006
Status: offline
If you don't know "THE LOOK," you are obviously NOT a parent!!!  But, I'd be willing to bet you did HAVE parents, or at least one (well, biologically, two, but that's a different explaination...  stay with me on this, willya?)  Remember that "LOOK" you'd get, when you were about to do something GALACTICALLY stupit, of just go CAUGHT doing something galactically stupit?  THAT's the LOOK!!!

(in reply to BondageTopJere)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Bad Etiquette - 4/20/2007 3:42:22 PM   
BondageTopJere


Posts: 170
Joined: 8/22/2006
Status: offline
Ohh.. that look.

Makes much more sense now... and your right I'm not a parent

Thx

(in reply to N4SDChastity)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Bad Etiquette - 4/20/2007 3:49:30 PM   
MadRabbit


Posts: 3460
Joined: 8/9/2006
Status: offline
If you read a body language book, its when you stare at the center of their forehead, right above between the eyes without blinking. Its referred to as the "Power Stare". Arnold Swartzingar (God I so misspelled that) is notorious for it.

I would suggest doing a ltitle reading for any dominant. It has some interesting information about how body signals are used to establish dominance.

_____________________________

Advice for New Dominants
The Unpolitically Correct Lifestyle Definitions

Obama is NOT the Messiah! He's just a VERY NAUGHTY BOY

(in reply to BondageTopJere)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Bad Etiquette - 4/20/2007 4:15:46 PM   
Suleiman


Posts: 1127
Joined: 9/9/2004
Status: offline
Folks have posted fully explicit fantasies in their journals before. Just don't refer to anybody by their real name or their collarme profile name unless you have their permission. Don't go overboard with the seriously extreme stuff. Other than that, write on!

_____________________________

Think of my verbosity as a sort of litmus test for our relationship. I write in a manner identical to how I speak and how I think. If you can not cope with what I have written here, it is probably for the best if we go our separate ways.

(in reply to BondageTopJere)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Bad Etiquette - 4/20/2007 5:29:25 PM   
BondageTopJere


Posts: 170
Joined: 8/22/2006
Status: offline
Madrabbit, got any specific recommendations?  Sci-fi and fantasy authors I know, kinda clueless on where to start for that sort of book.

(in reply to Suleiman)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Bad Etiquette - 4/20/2007 5:56:23 PM   
windchymes


Posts: 9410
Joined: 4/18/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: N4SDChastity

If you don't know "THE LOOK," you are obviously NOT a parent!!!  But, I'd be willing to bet you did HAVE parents, or at least one (well, biologically, two, but that's a different explaination...  stay with me on this, willya?)  Remember that "LOOK" you'd get, when you were about to do something GALACTICALLY stupit, of just go CAUGHT doing something galactically stupit?  THAT's the LOOK!!!


I  thought this exact same thing when I read the OP, lol.  My son is 24 and he still cringes when I do it.  When he and his brother were young, I could telegraph it across the grocery store!

_____________________________

You know it's going to be a GOOD blow job when she puts a Breathe Right strip on first.

Pick-up artists and garbage men should trade names.

(in reply to N4SDChastity)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Bad Etiquette - 4/20/2007 6:43:09 PM   
hisannabelle


Posts: 1992
Joined: 12/3/2006
From: Tallahassee, FL, USA
Status: offline
greetings jere,

1. plenty of people put semi-explicit posts in their journals...whether they be recountings of actual events, dreams, stories, fantasies, or whatever.

2. some people just have an aura about them - a look, a gesture, a feeling, whatever, that just gives off a particular kind of energy. i've run into strangers on the street who had a look that immediately drew me to them (although not necessarily sexually or in a d/s way).

respectfully,
annabelle.


_____________________________

a'ishah (the artist formerly known as annabelle)
i have the kind of beauty that moves...

(in reply to BondageTopJere)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Bad Etiquette - 4/20/2007 6:56:47 PM   
N4SDChastity


Posts: 327
Joined: 2/27/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: windchymes

quote:

ORIGINAL: N4SDChastity

If you don't know "THE LOOK," you are obviously NOT a parent!!!  But, I'd be willing to bet you did HAVE parents, or at least one (well, biologically, two, but that's a different explaination...  stay with me on this, willya?)  Remember that "LOOK" you'd get, when you were about to do something GALACTICALLY stupit, of just go CAUGHT doing something galactically stupit?  THAT's the LOOK!!!


I  thought this exact same thing when I read the OP, lol.  My son is 24 and he still cringes when I do it.  When he and his brother were young, I could telegraph it across the grocery store!


My Mom din't have the LOOK, She snapped her fingers, instead.  Hearing "the snap" generally meant an ASS WHUPPIN was soon to ensue.  Mind you, this was back when CPS was a couple of beauracrats in a two-person office, downtown...  somewhere.

But, as an NCO in the Army, I developed THE LOOK all by myself.  Actually, I had it down pat long before I became an NCO, I was a parent long before I pinned on my stripes.  Being an NCO enabled me to PERFECT the LOOK!!! <---insert evile laugh, HERE!!!

(in reply to windchymes)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Bad Etiquette - 4/20/2007 7:53:29 PM   
TemptingNviceSub


Posts: 3054
Joined: 10/1/2005
Status: offline
Hums..."You've got the look I want to know better"....makes you kinda want to go out and but some shampoo...or is it hair coloring?...Tempting

(in reply to N4SDChastity)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Bad Etiquette - 4/21/2007 3:43:50 AM   
Dastardly


Posts: 58
Joined: 5/30/2006
Status: offline
Apparently I had 'the look' when I was a teenager - my Dad was reprimanding me one time and almost burst a blood vessel when I gave him 'the look' *grinning* and it's gotten better with age

(in reply to TemptingNviceSub)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Bad Etiquette - 4/21/2007 3:48:59 AM   
jayded34


Posts: 293
Joined: 2/12/2007
Status: offline
at my house......they call that look......"The evil Momma one eye brow lifted Lazer Gaze".......its been known to cut people in half......lol...........

_____________________________

You don't love a woman because she's beautiful,
She is beautiful because you love her.
~ by Anonymous ~

Being deeply loved by someone gives you strength,
While loving someone deeply gives you courage.
~ by Lao Tzu ~

(in reply to Dastardly)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Bad Etiquette - 4/21/2007 6:34:35 AM   
dawntreader


Posts: 3045
Joined: 11/23/2006
Status: offline
my sister has that "look"! And motherhood has perfected it! It even has a name - the medussa look and even though i am older than she - if she turns it my way it stops me midsentence and i look the other way for fear of turning into stone! LOL!

_____________________________

It is choice - not chance - that determines our destiny~
Jean Nidetch

There is a war going on for your mind...if you are thinking, you are winning~
Flobots

(in reply to jayded34)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Bad Etiquette - 4/21/2007 9:39:29 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
N4SDChastity,

Not all of us got The Look growing up, I think. At least, I can't remember one; I was reasonable enough to take a hint when talked to, except at an age when the only thing that would help was physically removing me from what I was doing. A bit of an explanation might be helpful. 

I did get caught doing something galactically stupid on occasion, the most memorable one being accepting two half-pound sticks of dynamite from a friend back in school. To make matters worse, I nabbed a bundle of detonators later on, because I wanted to try blowing up the dynamite. I don't know the names for the various levels of school in English-speaking countries, but I think this was before my teens. Anyway, I didn't get any other look than a rather undecipherable and conflicted one, followed by an explanation along the lines of "I've done some stupid things ... played with gunpowder, improvised rifles ... and I get why you might be fascinated, but this was beyond stupid", although more verbose, finished off with "Don't tell your mother about this. She'll lose it completely." Of course, I got it, and in retrospect I'm very glad he handled it as well as he did.

I also can't remember having done any special Look at any time, unless you count the one that makes people take a step-and-a-half back and make a mental note to seriously rethink whatever they were doing if they live to see another day, but I don't have much conscious control over that one.

< Message edited by Aswad -- 4/21/2007 9:47:34 PM >


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to N4SDChastity)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Bad Etiquette - 4/21/2007 9:45:40 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MadRabbit

If you read a body language book, its when you stare at the center of their forehead, right above between the eyes without blinking. Its referred to as the "Power Stare". Arnold Swartzingar (God I so misspelled that) is notorious for it.


Just out of curiosity, why would one stare at the center of their forehead, instead of staring into their eyes? I'm seriously not very good with body language on a conscious level, and my own body language is way off, according to people who are.

quote:

I would suggest doing a ltitle reading for any dominant. It has some interesting information about how body signals are used to establish dominance.


Any resources you'd reccomend?

I've mostly noticed differences in the way people walk, the tilt of the head, and the way one uses the spine. For me, these tend to be influenced by the Martial Arts body dynamics training, so they might not correspond to ordinary use.

I have noticed that there is a nonverbal component, as I never got a second glance from anyone during the depth of my depression, while when I'm functioning normally, people tend to give way, rent-a-cops avoid eye-contact, dopeheads pick someone else to hustle, the girls tend to get all smiles, etc. But that's instinctive, and I'd like to get a conscious handle on it as well.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to MadRabbit)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Bad Etiquette - 4/21/2007 10:46:53 PM   
patina


Posts: 493
Joined: 9/14/2006
From: no
Status: offline
Thankfully i do have THE LOOK and it was very handy when i had 23 heathens running around ranging from preK to 2nd grade for an hour once a week after school.  The mothers of some kids would ask me how did i make their kids mind?  I said i just looked at them.  They could never figure it out.  If my sons were out of eye sight a snap of fingers always brought them running.  If I had to snap more than 3 times they were in big trouble. 

When i started working with troubled teens THE LOOK came in handy then too.  It put those kids down real quick I even stopped an adult from the court with it one day.   

patina

_____________________________

a diamond in the rough

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Bad Etiquette - 4/21/2007 10:55:42 PM   
N4SDChastity


Posts: 327
Joined: 2/27/2006
Status: offline
For those who don't have the necessary experience level to call up "the LOOK", try looking at someone and imagining that, using ONLY the power of your mind, you could LITERALLY turn them inside-out, in an instant...

Practice in the mirror, first.  When you make yourself wet your pants you have it perfected

(in reply to patina)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Bad Etiquette - 4/22/2007 1:07:34 AM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: N4SDChastity

For those who don't have the necessary experience level to call up "the LOOK", try looking at someone and imagining that, using ONLY the power of your mind, you could LITERALLY turn them inside-out, in an instant...


If this is usually accompanied by wanting to, considering, or planning to turn them inside-out, I'm thinking this is the same step-and-a-half-back look I referred to.

Never tried using it in a D/s context, though, except for a "lite" version with a woman who thought it would be acceptable and doable for her to turn the tables on me because she'd just finished serving as a "marine hunter" (no useful translation; USMC or SEAL is the closest equivalent). The lite version served its purpose, though. Guess I'll experiment a bit.

quote:

Practice in the mirror, first.  When you make yourself wet your pants you have it perfected


Sounds like a plan.

Thanks for the advice.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to N4SDChastity)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Bad Etiquette - 4/22/2007 4:22:40 AM   
Rafters


Posts: 266
Joined: 3/9/2006
Status: offline
I used to use a combat version of "The Look" in self defense when covering riots.
Inside the temporarily, rule free anarchy, someone would take offense to me carrying a camera and Suggest I give it to them and their mates.
I would Look at them and Suggest otherwise.

It's a cocktail of body language, and really hard to explain, since its more reaction than something artificial you construct.

+ Like a punch, you don't aim the Look at them, instead through them.

+ Their actions have flicked a switch, crossed a line, broken a social contract that protected them from you.

+ Whatever they have counts for nothing, in fact will probably hinder them. Whatever you have will be what will be imposed.

+ The personal space around each of you, is now yours. You will be reaching out to prove this, within seconds.

+ They are a paper-thin cartoon character thats run off a cliff edge, but hasn't fallen yet. Either they backtrack or the whole planet will rise up to hit them, they have no other options.

+ They're aren't trapped, since you have left them an escape route that will cost them a small amount of dignity in comparison to the alternative.

Question: Would they now really like to rollback time, so the last fraction of a second and it's causes, didn't happen [Yes/no?]
No rush!

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Bad Etiquette - 4/22/2007 7:21:01 AM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Rafters

I used to use a combat version of "The Look" in self defense when covering riots. Inside the temporarily, rule free anarchy, someone would take offense to me carrying a camera and Suggest I give it to them and their mates. I would Look at them and Suggest otherwise.


Sounds familiar. Perhaps I should try to strip that look down to something I'd be more inclined to direct at a person I wouldn't go all medieval on. ~g~

quote:

It's a cocktail of body language, and really hard to explain, since its more reaction than something artificial you construct.


Yeah, that's always been the problem for me, too. I can usually emulate "regular" body language if someone explains it to me, or demonstrates it, but I have a hard time putting it into words.

The look I've used in the past has always been an instinctual reaction, from a place that I don't go to around people I care about unless someone threatens them.

quote:

+ Like a punch, you don't aim the Look at them, instead through them.


I always thought the reason for this was that looking them in the eye tends to make you focus in a way that leaves you less attentive to clues that they're about to make a move?

quote:

+ Their actions have flicked a switch, crossed a line, broken a social contract that protected them from you.


Yeah, there's a definite sense of something coming "off the leash", as it were. I can see how one could transpose this into a D/s context.

quote:

+ Whatever they have counts for nothing, in fact will probably hinder them. Whatever you have will be what will be imposed.


For me, that's always been more a sense that, to borrow my own words from another thread, another step means one or more of you will most likely not make it to the hospital, and that you're not about to start giving any thought to whether that might be you until it's over. A fictional character put it similarly, but I'll quote it for a different wording: "A lot of fights end before they start; when his eyes meet yours, and he realizes you're willing to pay the price in blood. His, yours, it doesn't matter. You're committed."

I've never had any expectation that it will work out for me, just that it won't work out for them.

quote:

+ The personal space around each of you, is now yours. You will be reaching out to prove this, within seconds.


There does seem to be a sense of merging the personal spaces, which disappears when the threat is aborted. I try not to make the first move, though, unless there's an opening and a clear advantage. Of course, in a combat setting, this might not be a viable restraint.

quote:

+ They are a paper-thin cartoon character thats run off a cliff edge, but hasn't fallen yet. Either they backtrack or the whole planet will rise up to hit them, they have no other options.


~g~ I think most movies with the word "Acme" in them just flashed before my mind's eye, but I can relate, yes.

quote:

+ They're aren't trapped, since you have left them an escape route that will cost them a small amount of dignity in comparison to the alternative.


Vital point that people sometimes forget. Failing to leave an escape route will engender the same commitment in an attacker that didn't have it originally. I've seen people do the mistake of closing on them in a way that cuts off their retreat, and that doesn't seem to defuse things, ever. So far, I've never seen anyone verbalize their backing off, and I'm not sure they can, instead they take that step-and-a-half back, and they palpably fade back to non-aggression.

This bit could probably be transposed to D/s too, I guess.

Either way, it makes an interesting point about a sort of counterpoint to sub-space, both in relation to what I said about both parties being unable to verbalize the threat or its resolution, and also in the effects: time slows; the soundscape fades, leaving auditory clues more pronounced; exclusion of a majority of the visual field from conscious awareness; sense of clarity and calm detachment ("no-mind" as some put it). And after the event, the memory is somewhat hazy in the same way that childhood memories, or other memories acquired in an altered state, are.

Kind of interesting to consider in terms of the alpha/beta dynamic, which I suspect still has a biological presence in humans. I've been planning to write an essay/post on this for a while, and have a rough draft of a post that relates it to what Lt. Col. Dave Grossman discussed in "On Sheep, Wolves and Sheepdogs". Have you read that piece?

Perhaps it would be useful to employ some of this "dom-space", or whathever one would call it, in the D/s context.

quote:

Question: Would they now really like to rollback time, so the last fraction of a second and it's causes, didn't happen [Yes/no?]
No rush!


Yeah. I found that most people get a serious realization that they didn't think this one through, and pull back fast. It's also happened once when this exchange happened after someone attacked me "out of the blue", when I'd stepped off the line of attack. (Not really out of the blue, it never is; looking back, I recognize the clues, and would have done so at the time if I hadn't been lost in thought.)

This is part of why I don't put myself in that position in the first place, or perhaps the other way around. I know that if I'm going to be asking myself that question, the answer will be "Yes". It is only going to be "No" in those cases when I don't ask myself that question; when the commitment is already there, like if someone else initiated.

We might be straying from the topic, though I suspect the OP has his answer already, so if you'd like, we can take it to PM. I'm fine with continuing here, too, if this might have some interest to people.

edit: unfucked quoting.


< Message edited by Aswad -- 4/22/2007 7:25:15 AM >


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to Rafters)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> Bad Etiquette Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094