A Masters opinion

Join Our Community

Collarchat.com

Home Login Search

A Masters opinion

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> A Masters opinion

Page: [1] 2 3 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

A Masters opinion - 4/27/2007 5:23:31 AM

MariaB

Posts: 2969
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline

I have, in my time, met a few Masters that have expressed an opinion that there is no such thing as a purist natural dominant woman. I would be interested to have some views on this.

Profile

Post #: 1

RE: A Masters opinion - 4/27/2007 5:27:18 AM

Asraii

Posts: 91
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MariaB

I have, in my time, met a few Masters that have expressed an opinion that there is no such thing as a purist natural dominant woman. I would be interested to have some views on this.

By purist natural dominant; I assume you are referring to 'being born this way'?

_____________________________

Nothing prevents happiness like the memory of happiness
Andre Gide

(in reply to MariaB)

Profile

Post #: 2

RE: A Masters opinion - 4/27/2007 5:31:21 AM

Focus50

Posts: 3962
Joined: 12/28/2004
From: Newcastle, Australia
Status: offline

Probably like many Doms and Masters, I'm not attracted to seemingly dominant women in general so whether they're "pure & natural" etc is moot. I accept there are male and female submissives who are attracted to dominant women so it seems reasonable that they certainly do exist.

Focus.

(in reply to MariaB)

Profile

Post #: 3

RE: A Masters opinion - 4/27/2007 5:35:03 AM

NakedGirlScout

Posts: 370
Joined: 1/10/2006
From: Toronto
Status: offline

I believe that natural, non-switching dominant women are just rare enough that some people would never have met one and come to the conclusion that they don't exist. The same could be said of natural dominant men, though!

(in reply to Focus50)

Profile

Post #: 4

RE: A Masters opinion - 4/27/2007 5:38:51 AM

windchymes

Posts: 9410
Joined: 4/18/2005
Status: offline

He's entitled to his opinion. We don't have to agree with it.

_____________________________

You know it's going to be a GOOD blow job when she puts a Breathe Right strip on first.

Pick-up artists and garbage men should trade names.

(in reply to NakedGirlScout)

Profile

Post #: 5

RE: A Masters opinion - 4/27/2007 5:46:21 AM

IrishMist

Posts: 7480
Joined: 11/17/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MariaB

I have, in my time, met a few Masters that have expressed an opinion that there is no such thing as a purist natural dominant woman. I would be interested to have some views on this.

Hmmm, I would have to point out to these Master's that they obviously are not meeting the right women then.

_____________________________

If I said something to offend you, please tell me what it was so that I can say it again later.

(in reply to MariaB)

Profile

Post #: 6

RE: A Masters opinion - 4/27/2007 5:55:48 AM

BBBTBW

Posts: 836
Joined: 5/21/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MariaB

I have, in my time, met a few Masters that have expressed an opinion that there is no such thing as a purist natural dominant woman. I would be interested to have some views on this.

It is my opinion and experience that any man that makes statements like that are very insecure in their own stations in life thus try to make everyone else seem as if they are less than.

_____________________________

"You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means" -- Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride

(in reply to MariaB)

Profile

Post #: 7

RE: A Masters opinion - 4/27/2007 6:01:57 AM

MariaB

Posts: 2969
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Asraii

quote:

ORIGINAL: MariaB

I have, in my time, met a few Masters that have expressed an opinion that there is no such thing as a purist natural dominant woman. I would be interested to have some views on this.

By purist natural dominant; I assume you are referring to 'being born this way'?

By ‘purist’ I mean that they do not switch, do not have a submissive side.

I will just add that I have had dominants give me that sort of knowing wink. I think to some dominants it’s a challenge. They believe that they can convert! A bit like wanting to convert a lesbian!

(in reply to Asraii)

Profile

Post #: 8

RE: A Masters opinion - 4/27/2007 6:09:36 AM

desire32

Posts: 2
Joined: 9/13/2006
Status: offline

Oooops. Ignore.... still logged into My girls account!

< Message edited by desire32 -- 4/27/2007 6:10:26 AM >

(in reply to MariaB)

Profile

Post #: 9

RE: A Masters opinion - 4/27/2007 6:13:08 AM

RavenMuse

Posts: 4030
Joined: 1/23/2006
Status: offline

OK am going to no doubt piss quite a number of people off here. So don't want My girl getting flack for MY opinion LOL... *Double checks* Yep here as Me this time.

I can't look at a swtich and see them as Dominant in the same way as I regard a "Natural" Dom/me... thats what I get from the loaded lable you used.... JUST Dominant, nothing else, the way they are wired, no compromise.... eg, female equivalent of Myself (Dynamic wise)

OK now we should be clear what I mean by the lable.... gonna piss off a number of Goreans because unless they where figments of My imagination I know a few. Admittedly a VERY few, women who I don't pick up at least a slight, edge of submissive from.... but I have met them, they exist.... doesn't fit in with your world view? Tough!

I do think Men are more inherently predisposed toward Dominance. But all that does is shift the numbers. Meaning that as far as natural Dominants go, there will be significantly more Males than females. It doesn't mean you won't find individuals of either gender being naturaly Dominant.

_____________________________

This above all: to thine own self be true,
And it must follow, as the night the day,
Thou canst not then be false to any man.

Owner of metalmiss

(in reply to desire32)

Profile

Post #: 10

RE: A Masters opinion - 4/27/2007 6:21:42 AM

SirDominic

Posts: 711
Joined: 11/22/2006
Status: offline

The simple answer is, of course there are. The human condition is such that there is room for all types of personalities. Always have been. Some of the women who I most admired are the Victorian Lady Travellers. At a time when a woman's place was definitely in the home, there were some who broke beyond that mold and went and did things the big boys were doing. Things like exploring deepest darkest Africa, travelling in Arabian lands with no male escorts, etc. Truly a fascinating group of women.

Now, as then, it takes a powerful independent streak; a willingness to not be brainwashed by "societal norms".

And yes, unfortunately, there are a lot of men who find all of this impossible to believe. To them, you will always be just faking it. Allow them their delusions as you won't ever likely change their mind.

From another point of view, there are purist natural dominant woman who can be very happy being submissive to the right man. My slave has lead a life where she had to be strong and be dominant to survive, or she would have been run over by the men around her (20 years in the Air Force tell you anything?). Yet her submission to me is the most joyous experience of her life. I'd like to take the credit for being Super Master, but the reality is that we simply mesh together so well. She feels comfortable with my dominance, and trusting enough in me to submit completely. So, on the flip side, there are very dominant women who do enjoy being completely submissive.

Namaste, Sir Dominic

_____________________________

You teach best what you have lived.

(in reply to MariaB)

Profile

Post #: 11

RE: A Masters opinion - 4/27/2007 7:33:48 AM

LuckyAlbatross

Posts: 19224
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MariaB
I have, in my time, met a few Masters that have expressed an opinion that there is no such thing as a purist natural dominant woman. I would be interested to have some views on this.

They are wrong. And their inability to see beyond their own limited perspective is a weakness for them.

_____________________________

Find stable partners, not a stable of partners.

"Sometimes my whore logic gets all fuzzy"- Californication

(in reply to MariaB)

Profile

Post #: 12

RE: A Masters opinion - 4/27/2007 7:35:01 AM

LuckyAlbatross

Posts: 19224
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MariaB
By ‘purist’ I mean that they do not switch, do not have a submissive side.

Cuz us switches are impure, we're icky and taint the gene pool.

_____________________________

Find stable partners, not a stable of partners.

"Sometimes my whore logic gets all fuzzy"- Californication

(in reply to MariaB)

Profile

Post #: 13

RE: A Masters opinion - 4/27/2007 7:41:43 AM

mstrjx

Posts: 2045
Joined: 11/27/2005
Status: offline

I believe that there are as many 'different' types of orientations as there are, well, people.

A person can be 'born' a certain way, or they can have inclinations that they wish to develop or not, as the case might be.

I think that there are far fewer 100%/0% people out there than espouse themselves to be. The 'other side' might be repressed, unknown, or untouched. Guilt might or might not be a factor.

Jeff

_____________________________

Know thyself. It's the best gift you can ever give yourself.

(in reply to MariaB)

Profile

Post #: 14

RE: A Masters opinion - 4/27/2007 8:10:31 AM

MasterGremlin

Posts: 230
Joined: 12/30/2006
Status: offline

My mother could make Satan kneel and bow so he or they don't know what they're talking about

(in reply to mstrjx)

Profile

Post #: 15

RE: A Masters opinion - 4/27/2007 8:49:50 AM

MstrssPassion

Posts: 2444
Joined: 1/1/2004
From: West Palm Beach, FL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MariaB

I have, in my time, met a few Masters that have expressed an opinion that there is no such thing as a purist natural dominant woman. I would be interested to have some views on this.

I bet there are other masters out there that can & have said the same thing about there not being any pure, natural, male dominants as well.

I'm a master but I don't assume anything about other people out there because I believe to be a master one has achieved mastery of self, not the whole wide world. I'm also of the mind that it is those "few" that tend to boast & claim being such enlightened experts of the status of the entire dominant population to be the very ones who struggle with their own closeted feelings of surrendering to another.

{edited to add: I'm definitely not pure

but I'm not a switch, does that make me a freak of nature or a figment of imagination?}

< Message edited by MstrssPassion -- 4/27/2007 8:52:14 AM >

_____________________________

MstrssPassion

(in reply to MariaB)

Profile

Post #: 16

RE: A Masters opinion - 4/27/2007 8:54:40 AM

RavenMuse

Posts: 4030
Joined: 1/23/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MstrssPassion
{edited to add: I'm definitely not pure but I'm not a switch, does that make me a freak of nature or a figment of imagination?}

Freak! But a cute freak so thats OK

_____________________________

This above all: to thine own self be true,
And it must follow, as the night the day,
Thou canst not then be false to any man.

Owner of metalmiss

(in reply to MstrssPassion)

Profile

Post #: 17

RE: A Masters opinion - 4/27/2007 9:13:58 AM

JSin

Posts: 40
Joined: 3/10/2007
Status: offline

I'm actually going to agree with you, I think it is not so much an aspect of orientation but rather a reflection of social programming... This is changing though as women are asserting thier rights and the grrls being raised by these women are understanding that they don't have to be subservient to men.

If you think back to High School for example... If a grrl wanted a date she had to be a "Nice" girl, This usually ment not bitchy demanding and what have you. The aspects that were valued were well behaved demure what have you. As such Dominant Women have overcome this social pressure to some degree but the submissive aspects of that programming still exist.

This is much like the programming most men have to overcome to be compassionate, kind, ect. In younger men these are not valued nor virtuous... to demonstrate them often get's ya labled a pussy, wimp and what have you... Thus no dates.

Behavior is emulated by what is sucessful. Later these behaviors are modified by what makes us feel more comfortable and or pays off for us..

I think the social programming required to be overcome is similar in the Dominant female and the Submissive male at least in Western patriarchical Society, In a Matriarchy those patterns likely would vary.

Then again I don't think anyone is a "Natural Born" anything as far as behavior goes. They are results of a long complex social matrix. <Nature vrs Nurture argument>

JSin

(in reply to RavenMuse)

Profile

Post #: 18

RE: A Masters opinion - 4/27/2007 9:21:34 AM

LuckyAlbatross

Posts: 19224
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JSin
If you think back to High School for example... If a grrl wanted a date she had to be a "Nice" girl, This usually ment not bitchy demanding and what have you. The aspects that were valued were well behaved demure what have you. As such Dominant Women have overcome this social pressure to some degree but the submissive aspects of that programming still exist.

This only applies if you accepted that programming. Trust me, plenty of women never take that sort of programming to start with so they don't have to overcome it.

_____________________________

Find stable partners, not a stable of partners.

"Sometimes my whore logic gets all fuzzy"- Californication

(in reply to JSin)

Profile

Post #: 19

RE: A Masters opinion - 4/27/2007 9:22:10 AM

MstrssPassion

Posts: 2444
Joined: 1/1/2004
From: West Palm Beach, FL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RavenMuse

quote:

ORIGINAL: MstrssPassion
{edited to add: I'm definitely not pure but I'm not a switch, does that make me a freak of nature or a figment of imagination?}

Freak! But a cute freak so thats OK