Mercnbeth -> RE: Turning every thread into a political debate (5/8/2007 11:29:31 AM)
|
quote:
Do you have any idea how many people in show business, law enforcement, or politics I have been the mock assailant for? Don't know - don't care - don't see it matters. Unless you want to go off on another tangent regarding your training of "show business", "law enforcement", and "politics". Besides, I'd imagine that Brazilian waxing and your added treat of "butt-fucking" are common practices for these groups. Hell, similiar confrontations with member of those groups can be considered 'social' and could result in long term 'relationships'. The comment was addressed concerning what is said to a minor. In the example you provided, a 14 year old. I pointed out it is the similar to the examples of IM exchanges, considered inappropriate and ultimately illegal if done in person, when adult men use them in their dialog with underage individuals. In those cases these exchanges are used to capture those who are considered "predators" of 14 year olds. Any implied fault isn't with you, if you are "just following orders". I understand you are not being complicit; you're "just the assailant". Seems obvious that whoever designed the program lacks the ability to train or motivate without resorting to these tactics. 'Intent' can be used to rationalize any behavior or action. Any parent who puts their child in a situation where they'd be confronted with butt-fucking or Brazilian waxing is more complicit than any assistant. I'm sure that the methods of the course, documenting the use of referencing 'butt-fucking' and 'waxing' are fully disclosed since they are so common in real world examples. I'm just out of touch. If a 14 year old is commonly confronted at a mall or any public venue by a predator suggesting a "Brazilian wax", or a "butt-fuck"; I stand corrected.
|
|
|
|