Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: A Dominants Responsibility


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> RE: A Dominants Responsibility Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: A Dominants Responsibility - 6/7/2007 6:53:35 AM   
jimbo747


Posts: 109
Joined: 10/6/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thetammyjo


That isn't putting his needs before yours.

That's dealing with reality that comes up in our lives.

If you routinely and consistantly put his needs or desires before your own and then asked me what I thought about it... I would personally think you were not a dominant so much as a good top or perhaps a service dominant.


A person is free to define herself however she wishes. I would hope that finding someone with compatible definitions is a good first step to finding a partner period. Beyond that you cannot control how others define you especially if you express different criteria than they themselves use to define a term or title.

If someone doesn't want opinions that do not agree with her own, she should not post questions or scenarios on public forums.



Agree. You may care about your submissive but Your needs come first as a Dominant or else in what way does that differ from traditional relationships? Redefining the term Dominant or ignoring the use of Service Dom should not happen.

(in reply to thetammyjo)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: A Dominants Responsibility - 6/7/2007 10:51:16 AM   
GuidingLite


Posts: 233
Joined: 12/10/2006
Status: offline
quits crying coz i call it like i see it. you cant handle the truth. to bad. sorry if you got all upset. and i got much love for these womens in here even if they are top servicer doms or not. take your i hate strong women out in the other sites. theres disrespect all up in here everywhere and you come crying to me when its me. okay pot calling kettle black. peaceout daddy.

(in reply to pixelslave)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: A Dominants Responsibility - 6/7/2007 5:54:15 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pixelslave


You know Guiding Lite, I do my very best to ignore your posts here on CM. Rarely are they helpful or constructive in their nature to anyone. Instead, they're always critical and negative of others, rarely contributing anything useful to the conversation.


I like her b/c she's rough and doesn't pull any punches. I've dished some in her direction too.

(in reply to pixelslave)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: A Dominants Responsibility - 6/7/2007 5:57:32 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: subiugo

i am a male submissive and a firm believer of Female Supremacy.


Do you watch the WNBA over the NBA too?

(in reply to subiugo)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: A Dominants Responsibility - 6/7/2007 6:09:04 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MsCfromMelbourne


in reality, in my experience over the last 10 years or so, submisisve men don't really want "nice", "sweet", "thoughtful", "kind", "considerate" and all the other things that make up.....well frankly.....a good vanilla partner. Not really. Many a Mistress has been dumped for being "too nice".

They want dirty, nasty, bossy, demanding, arbitrary, selfish and cruel. Especially selfish and cruel.


I think submissive men want an intelligent, engaging combination. After a short while, bitchiness wears thin, real thin, whereas dominance endures better.

Next, when it comes to reading books, seeing movies, sharing culture, and discussing / evaluating personal experiences --- you want someone you admire and respect (not a bitch, but a quality person.)

To me, the key for a successful dominant is knowing when to be so. The perfect ideal is part librarian, part body builder, a pinch of CEO, a dash of maternal expertise, with hardwired kinks that rule the bedroom and a guy's erotic imagination.

(in reply to MsCfromMelbourne)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: A Dominants Responsibility - 6/7/2007 8:19:47 PM   
RealDom69


Posts: 64
Joined: 4/7/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MHOO314

This post is not Mistress specific, but I like it in these chambers, so am posting here----I am from the old school, or perhaps an old school, I take being a Domina very serioulsy---I feel a great responsibility for My submissives--for their health, for the well being--for their happiness---even to the extent that it may not make Me happy---however if  it is in the best interest of the submissive, then it is what it is----I watched My dear Fiend MoGA do the very same thing----we just feel very strongly about that--I do not understand nor can I comprehend why people would insist that We need to be self centered- greedy--selfish---that is it always OUR happiness, OUR needs that must be considered-----am I alone in this thinking?


I always think of my submisives as my most valuable posession and will care for her as such, she will be used but not abused and cherrished and nurtured and disciplined weither part time or 24/7 it's all the same, I also have a responsibility to be the best Dom for her, as my most prized posession she deserves it and this attitude brings out the best in both of us..

:))
Johnny Reble

_____________________________

"Winners make things happen; losers let things happen."

(in reply to MHOO314)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: A Dominants Responsibility - 6/8/2007 5:10:03 AM   
undergroundsea


Posts: 2400
Joined: 6/27/2004
From: Austin, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GuidingLite
okay pot calling kettle black.


I think of pot calling kettle black when you talk of others being disrespectful or rude, as shown in the post below from another thread. Your attempt to call it as you see it will be of more value if you can do it in a coherent and respectful manner.

http://www.collarchat.com/m_836558/mpage_3/key_/tm.htm#839178

quote:

ORIGINAL: undergroundsea

quote:

ORIGINAL: GuidingLite


Perhaps you think your post in this thread is an isolated incident. It is not. My response and impression is an accummulation of countless such posts you have made.

I have pasted below a post I had begun to type in another thread where you attacked Pixel and then mocked BlkTallFullFig for disgareeing with you to speak in favor of Pixel. Before I completed my post, BlkTallFullFig diffused the matter in a gracious manner, and I let it ago. However, I saved what I had typed because I sensed it would be needed again.

Here is what you said against Pixel in this thread because he said something with which you disagreed:
http://www.collarchat.com/m_793603/mpage_4/key_/tm.htm

quote:

ORIGINAL: GuidingLite
Don't read any of his mile long posts demistress.  Hes rude to alot of mistresses except his few favorites adn i know everyone can guess which ones thsoe are coz they always come running to defend the "sub".  teehee.   just ignore his babbles and passive aggresive long lectures.  he just likes to hear himself think so he can tell himself and the rest that his really an okay guy.  i think he has a lot of mad feelings inside so dont give his lectures a second thought.


When BlkTallFullFig disagreed with you in that thread and said your claim against Pixel was not fair, this is what you said to her:

quote:

ORIGINAL: GuidingLite
its fair and so very  true but your to busy with your cheers to notice.  look you dropped your pompom. teehee


Like BlkFallFullFig, I also see your statement as unfair and untrue, and think Pixel has a generally respectful demeanor. You seem to equate disagreement with disrespect, which is an invalid equivalence. If you think he is disrespectful, please provide an example that supports your point. In the absence of that example, your statement is an untrue assertion.

I will even demonstrate how you can support your case.

For example, I think you go off on people when they disagree with you and you respond in a manner that is not respectful. Here is why I think so.

Here is what you said to LadyEllen in the same thread above when she disagreed with you for calling Pixel rude.

quote:

ORIGINAL: GuidingLite
of course you have never known him to be rude coz never did he show that to you but to others he has and he's been rude, sarcastic and lectures condenscendingly and since you and him are alike and cut from the same cloth I knew it was a matter of days before you came running out of the corner to defend your boyfriend.  teehee.


And then you immediately came to post another attack at LadyEllen for disagreeing with you:

quote:

ORIGINAL: GuidingLite
is someone constipated?  i cant tell.


Here is how you responded to Demistress upon mistakenly thinking she responded to your post to disagree with you in this thread:

http://www.collarchat.com/m_750736/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#758015

quote:

ORIGINAL: GuidingLite
give me a break.  like you know everything about everything.  <laughs>

!beg slut beg!  Now tell me that aint godd.


Here is how you responded to caitlyn when she disagreed with you in this thread:

http://www.collarchat.com/m_725554/mpage_9/key_/tm.htm#728313

quote:

ORIGINAL: GuidingLite
WHAT??  Are you kidding?  How the heck do YOU know THAT people I agree with never come across as arrogant????  What arrogance on YOUR part to tell ME how people come across to me.  Im not even going to give you an example becuz your tunnel vision could never perceive any other way but your own.


Here is how you responded to Pixel when he disagreed with you in this thread. While the tone can be misunderstood, I think there is little to be misunderstood about the personal attack by you against his photo.

http://www.collarchat.com/m_747864/mpage_3/key_/tm.htm#758176

quote:

ORIGINAL: GuidingLite
who the hell said anything about damaging a sub? Who the hell said anything about not DISRESPECTing a sub? WHo said anything about subs not being real people?  What are you threatened by?  Just becuz a sub says  what can I do for you? doesnt mean it has to be anything like the way you describe above.  you think just because a sub wants to please his mistress that she will automattically disrepect him?  damage him? not respect his limits?  why are you even bringing all these negative things up that dont apply to subs and their mistresses? 

calm down.  are you as tense and strained as your avatar photograph?


And the post above enough was not enough so you immediately followed with another post. There is little to be misunderstood about the name calling.

quote:

ORIGINAL: GuidingLite
Puhlez, give me a break  blah blah blah DONT put words in my mouth.  Perhaps NOTHING.  Who said they don't get respect.  your making an assumption about rights or no rights.  and that's your problem.   who said anything about damaging and disrespect?  freakizoid


Here is your response to swtandsparkling in this thread:

http://www.collarchat.com/m_755077/mpage_3/key_/tm.htm#756729

quote:

ORIGINAL: GuidingLite
No freaking shit.  Your stating the obvious.  Guess what buddy people need more elaborate reasons for human behavior then your Sherlock observation.  Save your crappy "fly by the nite" advice  for someone simple minded.


There are more such posts yet.

Your response to various posters--those who disagreed with you or who otherwise held a position different than yours--make me see the following posts from you as ironic.

http://www.collarchat.com/m_781853/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#782031

quote:

ORIGINAL: GuidingLite
you should just be quiet and learn to respect ALL people when you first meet them, dominant or not. buddyboy.  let her, if she wants to be formal.  its just her style.  get over it.



http://www.collarchat.com/m_65272/mpage_4/key_/tm.htm#784117

quote:

ORIGINAL: GuidingLite
I think it [respect] should be  a right (and a right that can change at any time) and I think initially under normal circumstances one should show common curteously (respect).  I mean why not be a right if it's for a good common cause.


And your posts are in contradiction with what you say in the current thread:

quote:

ORIGINAL: GuidingLite:
instead of whinning about someone's post and how or what they wrote they should ignore it but they cant let anything they dont like or agree with go


I hope this post clarifies why I feel as I do about how you treat people.

Cheers,

Sea



< Message edited by undergroundsea -- 6/8/2007 5:14:15 AM >

(in reply to GuidingLite)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: A Dominants Responsibility - 6/8/2007 6:43:08 AM   
undergroundsea


Posts: 2400
Joined: 6/27/2004
From: Austin, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy
I think submissive men want an intelligent, engaging combination. After a short while, bitchiness wears thin, real thin, whereas dominance endures better.

Next, when it comes to reading books, seeing movies, sharing culture, and discussing / evaluating personal experiences --- you want someone you admire and respect (not a bitch, but a quality person.)


Good post.

Cheers,

Sea

< Message edited by undergroundsea -- 6/8/2007 6:56:12 AM >

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: A Dominants Responsibility - 6/8/2007 6:50:39 AM   
undergroundsea


Posts: 2400
Joined: 6/27/2004
From: Austin, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy
I like her b/c she's rough and doesn't pull any punches. I've dished some in her direction too.

 
I appreciate your optimism and your ability to see the good in all situations ;-)
 
I think being able to speak one's mind due to not fearing conflict is fair enough. However, I feel that not pulling punches out of disregard for people and manners is unendearing. What I see in her posts points more to the latter. It is not simply disareeing or a blunt statement, but namecalling, hypocrisy and more. The posts convey to me more a mean spirit than conviction.
 
Cheers,

Sea


< Message edited by undergroundsea -- 6/8/2007 6:51:21 AM >

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: A Dominants Responsibility - 6/8/2007 6:56:31 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
i prefer stupid, so i can sit on the couch all day, watch sport, drink beer and no have to hold a conversation.

edited due to low quality spelling.

< Message edited by Politesub53 -- 6/8/2007 6:57:30 AM >

(in reply to undergroundsea)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: A Dominants Responsibility - 6/8/2007 7:54:12 AM   
GuidingLite


Posts: 233
Joined: 12/10/2006
Status: offline
I front nothing daddy aand i dont pretend to be nice to idiots. i call it like i see it and you cant deal with it and neither not can your fake sub boyfriendes. but you front and your a fraud. all up in here pretending to be a sub. you can never handle a mistress with all your cryiing about equality in all your lame weak post. bbooooo hooooo i want to be equal to her , if im not, im not feeling loved. booo hhooooo why the womens get nice gestures but the mens dont. IT AINT FAIR. BOOOOOOOOO HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. thats you. you aint secure enough or confident enough to handle a MISTESS WOMAN. but you fake it trifling crybaby. you got a problem with to many this and with to many thants. shyts. im glad you take the time to read my posts and cut and paste the for me. thats twice you did it. you know you will be keep on reading my posts and learn or burn ands any which one is alrite with me.<<<<<<<<<<dammmmmmmmmmm daddy you make me feel special>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

(in reply to undergroundsea)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: A Dominants Responsibility - 6/8/2007 7:55:33 AM   
GuidingLite


Posts: 233
Joined: 12/10/2006
Status: offline
his shyt is dripping off the tip of yiur nose or is it pixells? <<<oooof>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: A Dominants Responsibility - 6/8/2007 8:29:09 AM   
undergroundsea


Posts: 2400
Joined: 6/27/2004
From: Austin, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GuidingLite


I am comfortable with how I do with respect to BDSM. My objections against you and my impressions of you come from how you conduct yourself and treat people, and they began based on how you treated people other than myself. Based on emails of support I have received, I am not the only one who thinks this way about your behavior. Have you ever considered how people in general might feel about your behavior?

I am amused. My post in the older thread came from an interest in myself to achieve my task thoroughly and effectively. If a thorough demonstration of the rudeness in your behavior and the contradiction between your words and actions helps your ego and makes you feel special, I am happy for you.

Cheers,

Sea


(in reply to GuidingLite)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: A Dominants Responsibility - 6/8/2007 9:06:57 AM   
undergroundsea


Posts: 2400
Joined: 6/27/2004
From: Austin, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
i prefer stupid, so i can sit on the couch all day, watch sport, drink beer and no have to hold a conversation.


quote:

ORIGINAL: GuidingLite
his shyt is dripping off the tip of yiur nose or is it pixells? <<<oooof>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


I am amused even more! Politesub responded lightheartedly to my post, which in turn was in response to Cloudboy's post about appreciating intelligence and substance. You mistakenly assumed Politesub was somehow insulting you.

I am curious what word in his post made you think he was talking about you?

;-) Sorry. Couldn't resist.

Cheers,

Sea


(in reply to GuidingLite)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: A Dominants Responsibility - 6/8/2007 11:41:26 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GuidingLite

his shyt is dripping off the tip of yiur nose or is it pixells? <<<oooof>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


I wasnt going to reply to this juvenille drivel but i will. I have never made any comments about you, yet you decided to be rude and childish.
Firstly, i dont care, if you were unable or unwilling to see my comments were a lighthearted responce to cloudboy. Then that says more about you than about me.

Secondly, your username suggests you view yourself a guidinglite. To me that signifies a bright beacon yet all is see is......Dimness.

< Message edited by Politesub53 -- 6/8/2007 11:42:09 AM >

(in reply to GuidingLite)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: A Dominants Responsibility - 6/8/2007 12:04:39 PM   
GuidingLite


Posts: 233
Joined: 12/10/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: undergroundsea



I am comfortable with how I do with respect to BDSM. My objections against you and my impressions of you come from how you conduct yourself and treat people, and they began based on how you treated people other than myself. Based on emails of support I have received, I am not the only one who thinks this way about your behavior. Have you ever considered how people in general might feel about your behavior?

,

Sea






shoot thats rite your happy with your bdsm saesaw and thats coz you try and change bdsm meanings to fit you and shyt. you gots a prob with dom womens becoz you dont want to be ruled and powered anywhere but in sex natured stuff in the booty room and thats why you gots all problems with a real mistress and her total control. say your a bottom dom. you aint no sub bro but you still front all like a sub. yiu got a problem with much mistress power coz your just a bottomDOM so stop coming all up in in here with you dom in sheeps clothing self perpetuating your false male ways and ask the CM peoples to give you a section for Bottom Doms so you can write aobut how you feel hated all out becoz the womens get chill regard gestures and the bois dont and how if it aint equal in a relationship you get all insecure and feel little. just bcome a dom. shyt.

(in reply to undergroundsea)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: A Dominants Responsibility - 6/8/2007 12:37:02 PM   
undergroundsea


Posts: 2400
Joined: 6/27/2004
From: Austin, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GuidingLite


I am unimpressed by arguments about true submission, real mistresses, and declaring anyone who does not see BDSM as you do to be unreal in some form. Generally people who make such arguments have a myopic view about BDSM.

But let's have some good communication, shall we?

How do you define true submission? What characteristics make you a real mistress?

Can you put your finger on what exactly it is on which you base the conclusions in your last post, and why that behavior is inconsistent with submission as you see it?

Cheers,

Sea




(in reply to GuidingLite)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: A Dominants Responsibility - 6/8/2007 4:24:19 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
How can you not love those posts. It makes you feel like its boys against the girls all over again.

(in reply to undergroundsea)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: A Dominants Responsibility - 6/8/2007 8:29:54 PM   
undergroundsea


Posts: 2400
Joined: 6/27/2004
From: Austin, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy
It makes you feel like its boys against the girls all over again.


On this thread, not as much. At least it is not how we came to this point. On this thread, it's about rudeness and attacks on others, which is what I questioned.

Instead of responding about the rudeness, she is going towards a discussion that really belongs on another thread. I expect she is doing so because she has no response about the rudeness and needs another direction to deflect the conversation.

As for the other thread, perhaps it has potential to become a boys versus girls matter for some people. The thread stemmed from intellectual curiousity. Rather than discuss here her response and ask questions to you, I will instead direct the questions to her in that thread: http://www.collarchat.com/m_1064592/mpage_2/key_/tm.htm

Cheers,

Sea

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: A Dominants Responsibility - 6/8/2007 10:55:38 PM   
BBBTBW


Posts: 836
Joined: 5/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thetammyjo

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBBTBW

Honestly I don't care what anyone thinks of my style. It is my own, it defines who I am. However, I still find it very judgemental that when someone's style doesn't fit into another's definition they are instantly given some obscure label.

It is my opinion that when you put lifestyle and lables before the human factor, you have an explosive combination in the long run. I for one embrace the human element in subs slaves...this includes their weaknesses as well as their strengths as I expect them to do with and for me.

I suppose we can agree to disagree on this subject. It seems we come from very different worlds.


Ok, now I'm very confused.

I didn't label you. I would never label you unless you asked me for an opinion and then I would say that this is what I would define it as -- I wouldn't say it was you.

I do have a right to my own opinions and being on this board I have a right to express them when someone asks for opinions or asks what others think. I believe I go out of my way to say that "I call," "I define" or "I use" things instead of claiming some universal useage for a term.

The only reason I might suggest that other words be used is if a person came to the group and asked for opinions or help because they keep having negative experiences or weren't finding compatible partners. At that point words may indeed matter a great deal when we try to communicate. I also think we need to look at type of person or personality we are attracted too when this happens.

I'm about success here, folks. If thinking about the words we use or the character traits we are attracted to helps us choose more compatible partners I think our chances of success increase dramatically.

I think you completely ignored all of my statements about reality which is really a great deal about those "human elements" you mentioned. Again it is hard to have success if you don't accept the reality of our lives.


I believe you are confused,  I am sorry if you thought I said you labled me...that is not what I meant.  I was speaking in general terms.  And yes, you do have a right to your opinions just as everyone else.

I just don't understand why it is that when one person has a style that suits them and the person/people they are with they are given some obscure lable such as "service dominant" or "top" Why can't someone just be a dominant with a style that differs from anothers? 

I am not sure how you think I have aimed anything at you personally.  Although I speak in first person alot, I speak in general terms.  I was only answering your responses to my posts.



_____________________________

"You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means" -- Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride

(in reply to thetammyjo)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> RE: A Dominants Responsibility Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.246