Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: "Acts of God" Riddle


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: "Acts of God" Riddle Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 11:40:10 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
All of this is based on the absolutely incorrect premise that a god (closely identified with current judeo-christian thinking) exists.............

You buy the assumption, then you buy the deal.

Doubting Thomas (and therefore by definition; righteous in the eyes of YHWH!)

on a tombstone:

Of course God forgives me, it's his job


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to EmeraldSlave2)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 12:14:09 PM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: EmeraldSlave2


quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin

No I do not. I believe acts of nature are simply that. Acts of nature. They have sound scientific reasoning and explanations. I believe God does not intervene but allows nature to take it's course. Perhaps in a perfect world without sin things would be different, but as it is, nature will happen. Tragedies will happen. Tidal waves, monsoons, earthquakes, disease, volcanos. All will happen as a result of sound scientific reasoning. Not because God caused it to happen. That logic does not make sound Biblical sense.



Then why did you say:
quote:

[Acts of Nature] are not "Acts of God". Simple. God allows these things [Acts of Nature] to happen (this [Acts of nature] is a result of man's sin, but that is another story),


Anyway, god still allows it to exist when he knows it causes evil and suffering for no reason .

Here's a reasonable link that summarizes the issues The Problem of Evil


That is right. He allows it.. Key word ALLOW. He does not cause it. Science causes it. What do you prefer? Someone who dictates your every move, or someone who allows you to come to Him of your own volition? I know which one I prefer, and based upon your lifestyle it is more than obvious which one you prefer as well.


_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to EmeraldSlave2)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 12:16:22 PM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

All of this is based on the absolutely incorrect premise that a god (closely identified with current judeo-christian thinking) exists.............


Prove that it is incorrect.. See, you can not. You cannot prove it one way or the other. In fact, science leaves a lot of holes that only the existance of a supreme being can fill.

So, I would not be hasty to say that for certain God does not exist. That is like a horse running down the track with blinders on. I thought W/we were supposed to be shining examples of people with open minds, but I see very little existance of that unless it suits them personally.

_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 12:29:13 PM   
EmeraldSlave2


Posts: 3645
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin

That is right. He allows it.. Key word ALLOW. He does not cause it. Science causes it. What do you prefer? Someone who dictates your every move, or someone who allows you to come to Him of your own volition? I know which one I prefer,


Except if you believe in god and miracles, he interferes with people's volitions.

Science was created by god, thus god created it.

Here is another, brief, way of putting the argument.

A morally reasonable person will try and stop evil and badness when he can because that is the good and right thing to do.

God is supposedly the ultimate and infallible morally good "being" and thus would stop evil and badness because it is the good and right thing to do.

God obviously does not stop evil and badness, and in fact not only CREATES it in many forms, but is even evil enough to stop it in SOME circumstances, leaving others.

Either god is not omnipotent or god is not infallibly morally good.

quote:

and based upon your lifestyle it is more than obvious which one you prefer as well.

I have no clue what this means.

(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 12:43:10 PM   
kisshou


Posts: 2425
Joined: 2/11/2005
Status: offline
Why can no one give 'I don't know" as an answer?

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 1:09:10 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

Dear SirKenin,


All of this is based on the absolutely incorrect premise that a god (closely identified with current judeo-christian thinking) exists.............
Prove that it is incorrect..
Bring the son-of-a-bitch to me; and "let us sit down and reason together" (Isaiah)

See, you can not.
A difference of opinion, methinks.

You cannot prove it one way or the other.
God does or does not play dice...............let him answer for himself.

In fact, science leaves a lot of holes that only the existance of a supreme being can fill.
If you attribute to me the notion that I walk out of doors on a bright and beautiful day, and find a fine pocket watch on the ground I then say, well, you see the wind was from the east, the temperature inversion was just right, and what with the dew on the ground, and the unique arrangement of atoms in this particular soil--- a fine pocket watch was formed...............you think too much of me.... I will retreat to thinking something afoot.

So, I would not be hasty to say that for certain God does not exist.
Again, I only say that one doesn't... not that Gods/Goddeses may not indeed exist................


Ron

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 1:22:59 PM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
Kenin,

Two questions for you:

1. Why does an omnibenevolent God even ALLOW natural disasters?

2. How does free will cause earthquakes?

Lam

quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin

That is right. He allows it.. Key word ALLOW. He does not cause it. Science causes it. What do you prefer? Someone who dictates your every move, or someone who allows you to come to Him of your own volition? I know which one I prefer, and based upon your lifestyle it is more than obvious which one you prefer as well.


(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 1:28:42 PM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kisshou

Why can no one give 'I don't know" as an answer?


I do not know.

_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to kisshou)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 2:02:09 PM   
onceburned


Posts: 2117
Joined: 1/4/2005
From: Iowa
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: EmeraldSlave2
You're basically contradicting yourself. You can't say god doesn't interfere and wants things predictable AND he does interfere and makes things unpredictable.


Taken in absolute terms, yes, it is a contradiction. But in pragmatic terms, I am merely saying that there are occasionally exceptions to the rule. The bigger the fuss that is made over exceptions, the more disruptive and destructive they are to order. So miracles, when they occur, tend to be un-flashy.

quote:

Unless you want to say god is cruel and wants to do miracles to make some people happy and others die and suffer.


I do not want to say that God is cruel, but I do not understand the motives of God. Why He intervenes in some cases and not others is a mystery to me. But yes, just and kind people often suffer - it would be nice to demand that God do something.

(in reply to EmeraldSlave2)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 2:09:38 PM   
onceburned


Posts: 2117
Joined: 1/4/2005
From: Iowa
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: EmeraldSlave2
If god allows them, god causes them. God allowed sin to be created, god obviously felt it was the right thing to have in the world.

If you go with the idea that god is omnipotent, then EVERYTHING happens because god allows it, because god feels its the right thing to happen.


I get the impression that you see God as some kind of movie director - telling the actors what to do, editting out anything which doesn't please him.

The omnipotence of God does not mean that God crushes everything in his path. He gave us free will and wants us to choose to follow him. He isn't a puppet master.


quote:

When it comes to god, the thing that people consider the omnipotent creator, allowing and causing IS the same thing.


I don't understand the reasoning in that statement.

< Message edited by onceburned -- 7/15/2005 2:21:31 PM >

(in reply to EmeraldSlave2)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 2:09:53 PM   
AAkasha


Posts: 4429
Joined: 11/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: onceburned

quote:

ORIGINAL: EmeraldSlave2
You're basically contradicting yourself. You can't say god doesn't interfere and wants things predictable AND he does interfere and makes things unpredictable.


Taken in absolute terms, yes, it is a contradiction. But in pragmatic terms, I am merely saying that there are occasionally exceptions to the rule. The bigger the fuss that is made over exceptions, the more disruptive and destructive they are to order. So miracles, when they occur, tend to be un-flashy.

quote:

Unless you want to say god is cruel and wants to do miracles to make some people happy and others die and suffer.


I do not want to say that God is cruel, but I do not understand the motives of God. Why He intervenes in some cases and not others is a mystery to me. But yes, just and kind people often suffer - it would be nice to demand that God do something.


As a non-religious person, I've gotten the impression that there is supposedly a purpose for every loss that to us seems without warrant. It might not be evident to the people that are affected by the loss, but it serves some greater purpose in the long run or bigger picture (or something like that).

But, more importantly, for people with faith, mortal life isn't the ultimate purpose in the grand scheme of things anyway, right? That's why the faithful say things like, "She is in a better place now," or whatnot.

I mean, it would make sense, if you could believe it. So it makes sense how that line of thinking could help people get through tragic loss without self destructing.

Akasha

_____________________________

Akasha's Web - All original Femdom content since 1995
Don't email me here, email me at [email protected]

(in reply to onceburned)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 2:32:44 PM   
EmeraldSlave2


Posts: 3645
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: onceburned
I get the impression that you see God as some kind of movie director - telling the actors what to do, editting out anything which doesn't please him.

Interestingly enough, here are the only instances I have used the word *I* in this entire thread (barring this one of course)

"The Problem of Evil when you believe in a monotheistic benevolent god...I'm not touching this one. :)"
"I can dig up some of my old texts from my religious courses if you want some good sources on this."
"I mean it works if you throw out the idea that god is benevolent or cares about humans, but most people don't want to do that."
"I know you believe acts of nature and disease are a result of sin as well, yes?"
"I have no clue what this means."

This was a very specific and conscious decision on my part. At no place in this thread have I expressed what *I* feel is the answer to the Problem of Evil, or what I think about the entire idea itself.

I stayed true to my very first post- I didn't touch this post at all, I simply summarized, reiterated and asked the same questions that philosophers have been asking for thousands of years.

Remember, I do have a BA in philosophy, I had to research and work through this problem quite thoroughly from a very logical and thorough perspective.

Actually, I don't believe in a monotheistic system at all. The Problem of Evil only applies if you believe in a single god who is omnipotent, omnipresent, and infallibly morally good.

(in reply to onceburned)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 2:43:23 PM   
onceburned


Posts: 2117
Joined: 1/4/2005
From: Iowa
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: EmeraldSlave2
Remember, I do have a BA in philosophy, I had to research and work through this problem quite thoroughly from a very logical and thorough perspective.


Yes, Doctor.

(in reply to EmeraldSlave2)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 2:47:41 PM   
sub4hire


Posts: 6775
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
A BA is far far from being any sort of doctor.

I normally disagree with emerald, where I find myself agreeing on some points in this thread.
Which is good, I get to see a different side of her.

(in reply to onceburned)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 3:08:03 PM   
darkinshadows


Posts: 4145
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: UK
Status: offline
I think Emerald you said -


quote:

Why would an omnibenevolent god even allow the ability of evil/badness to occur in the world? If he can do anything/everything, why not create a world with fee will AND no badness?


He did create perfection - hence eden. But 'my' God isn't a dictator or someone who wants you to follow him 'just coz' - but because you have that choice. He offered choice - he gave man everything except one thing - a symbol if you like - and man chose the symbol over God. The tree or apple wasn't 'bad' - the behaviour was - the reaction. Chose or refuse - free choice. Free choice isn't evil - or bad - but to blame everything bad that happens on one man/god/community/etc is always a bad thing - cause and consequence. Even if you don't believe in a God/gods - that concept alone of self responsibility is pretty reasonable by itself.

I have read the posts from people, and it just feels that the whole thing is going around in circles.

My belief is that God - all present, all powerful doesn't just 'cause' these natural disasters. They happen for a variety of reasons. Why does God allow them to happen? I don't know. All I know is that I have to trust in God - have faith. Why do miracles happen? Again, I don't know. It could be that these people have shown such a profound trust or faith, that God intervenes. Who knows? I can't answer for Him unless He tells me directly - You either have faith in the outcome, or see it as evil and uncaring. That is the freedom of the choice God gives.

God created the Devil - sure - but again, lucifer had the choice as to whether to be satisfied and trust his God, or to try and be a god. He chose the latter and fell (according to my belief anyways) - and now the devil exists. This allows man choice. Man and woman try to be god - behave like a god all the time. I think what Kenin meant, Emerald, is that He would rather be allowed a choice of who to follow, than to be dictated to, hence the reference to -

quote:


and based upon your lifestyle it is more than obvious which one you prefer as well.

In that you prefere to have the choice on who you serve(consensual).

It's all about choice - not whether God is just or right or exists. Yes, there are of course examples(whether you believe them real or not) of God intervening ie - the flood. But to say God should be/is responsible for natural disasters is backing down from the issue of whether humans have a responsibility. People love to shout about how great they are, their achievements and perfections - but when it comes down to accepting and acknowledging their responsibility for whats happening around them - it's much easier to blame 'another persons god' or to come down on any religious belief or faction - like some escape clause to ease and remove any self guilt.

It's not the polaroid of ones own life - it's the bigger picture. I don't see any problem with evil at all. I am fear the ability of evil in that it saddens me to see evil n any type of control, but I don't fear it, itself. The only time evil is a problem is if it is feared. I think evil is necessary and important. It assists how we commence our lives and how we finish our lives. Evil isn't problematic.

Peace and Love


_____________________________


.dark.




...i surrender to gravity and the unknown...

(in reply to sub4hire)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 3:14:17 PM   
sub4hire


Posts: 6775
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

My belief is that God - all present, all powerful doesn't just 'cause' these natural disasters. They happen for a variety of reasons. Why does God allow them to happen? I don't know. All I know is that I have to trust in God - have faith. Why do miracles happen? Again, I don't know. It could be that these people have shown such a profound trust or faith, that God intervenes. Who knows? I can't answer for Him unless He tells me directly - You either have faith in the outcome, or see it as evil and uncaring. That is the freedom of the choice God gives.


I have my theories on this but I will not post them here. Because they are my personal theories. I've come to many conclusions over the many deaths I've endured over my life.
You ask yourself a lot of questions. Some you can answer, and some you cannot. In order to go on as a normal person you need answer's. So, you educate yourself and use your best judgement. Develop theories.
Although I will not defend them because I do not know for certain they are correct. I only fight about that I know is true.
They work for me though.

(in reply to darkinshadows)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 3:23:18 PM   
darkinshadows


Posts: 4145
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: UK
Status: offline
quote:

Although I will not defend them because I do not know for certain they are correct. I only fight about that I know is true.
They work for me though.


Exactly Gloria. You hit the nail on the head. You(generic) Think, question and find your own belief and reason and it works for you and it's brilliant. Everything I write, is mine only. It's not for other people - just if someone asks for my view, then I will offer it.

I, for one am glad of the way the thread went - it turned from a issue picking holes in a concept, into a really good discussion.

(BTW - If it were possible - I think I want to have Emeralds babies...)

Peace and Love


_____________________________


.dark.




...i surrender to gravity and the unknown...

(in reply to sub4hire)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 4:02:15 PM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
And that's called argumentum ad verecundiam. Maybe they covered that in your philosophy coursework. Normally I agree with you, and generally I agree with what you're saying on this thread, but it really does not matter to your argument whether you have a B.A. in philosophy.

Lam

quote:

ORIGINAL: EmeraldSlave2

Remember, I do have a BA in philosophy, I had to research and work through this problem quite thoroughly from a very logical and thorough perspective.


(in reply to EmeraldSlave2)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 7:00:05 PM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
I can't help noticing that no one has responded to this, and I'm honestly curious to know how a serious believer would answer these questions, because whenever I get into a discussion with someone about God, the communication ends at this juncture. Generally one of three things happens:

A. I get no response.
B. I get a response that makes absolutely no sense. (For example, that human beings supposedly polluted the workings of the universe through their sinfulness, and that's why there are natural disasters today, though they did not exist in God's originally perfect creation. Of course, they had to have done this in a time before time.)
C. The other person gets seriously pissed off and starts insulting me.

Can ANYONE try to explain to me how the other side sees this? How did mankind's sins succeed in disrupting God's creation? Why did the omnibenevolent God allow this to happen? Why should innocents suffer today because of other people's sins? And what on earth does free will have to do with a tsunami?

Lam

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

Kenin,

Two questions for you:

1. Why does an omnibenevolent God even ALLOW natural disasters?

2. How does free will cause earthquakes?


(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 7:09:24 PM   
pleasureforHim


Posts: 171
Joined: 7/2/2005
Status: offline
Well, as long as Lam's happy...ROFLMAO.

Good grief. Once again..i ask the question..do You guys always sit around thinking of ways to annoy one another by announcing/trashing one another's beliefs?

Seems to me it sorta goes like this: the atheist, for whom what you see is what you get.

The religious zealot, for whom there is no satisfaction in his own beliefs, only in the conquest of another person's belief system.

The believer, for whom a measure of peace and tranquility has been achieved, and for whom a system of morality is drawn from sources beyond his own life experience.

i still wanted to know the orthodox jewish answer, which nobody gave, so here it is:

In Judaism, there is reward and punishment--but, as mentioned above, generally beyond our understanding of how it works. Sometime, it may be obvious, but sometimes not. And in Judaism, there are two planes of existence: the physical, and the spiritual. The physical existence is this universe. And the spiritual existence is called the World to Come. The World to Come is where you are before you're born, and where you go after you die. If you're good or evil, G-d may reward or punish you here, or He may reward or punish you there--in the World to Come. What is the World to Come? Indescribable. Beyond time. Beyond place. Beyond dimension. Dispose of Heaven and Hell and planets and science fiction--they are false. The World to Come is not physical or dimensional at all. Images of angels, clouds, and 70 virgins for every martyr are complete nonsense--the World to Come is just totally beyond our imagination. And neither is it borrowed from another religion. The prophets refrained from descriptions because words couldn't possibly paint the full picture. But it's a place, if it can be called that at all, a form of existence, where you're washed in a "cosmic washing machine" before you may absorb good incomparably beyond the greatest pleasures of physical existence. The washing erases all traces of physical existence and restores you to your pristine, pre-birth state of spiritual existence. Once restored, you reconnect with G-d at the level of spirituality attained during physical existence. The washing is your "punishment," and the reconnecting is your "reward." Both are good--no "Hell" here! However great the World to Come may be, it should not be one's goal. Maimonides describes this as serving G-d out of fear of consequences or anticipation of benefits, thus ultimately, self-concern. Rather, the great sage elaborates, one's relationship with G-d should be built on love--and love is giving, not getting, selflessness, not selfishness.

http://www.askmoses.com/qa_detail.html?h=239&o=214&pg=2

This makes the most sense to me. Catholics have an very stylisized view of Heaven, with different levels of angels and St. Peter at the Gate, etc., etc., and are somewhat encouraged to do good so as to attain a place in Heaven..and likewise to avoid a place in Hell, which seems to have been best described in Dante's Inferno. The false note here is the self-centeredness of it all. Rather than to reach out to an abused child for the sake of the child, one does it as an on-going effort to maintain one's "assets and liabilities" in good form. (Then throw in the Act of Confession and Absolution for even greater confusion.)

From what i gather, Jews are not motivated by a desire to see themselves at a closer place to God in the after-life, but rather because to do good is IT"S OWN REWARD. i seriously question the mental health of anyone who has reached age 14 and cannot grasp the inherent charm of the Ten Commandments. Healthly human beings are self-aware and are supposed to develop empathy and a conscience. We may differ in gray areas, such as pre-marital sex, but we should be capable of agreeing in rather broad ones, such as child murder.

pleasureforHim


< Message edited by pleasureforHim -- 7/15/2005 7:16:08 PM >

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: "Acts of God" Riddle Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.320