MzMia
Posts: 5333
Joined: 7/30/2004
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MsCfromMelbourne
In our jurisdiction, the simple and useful definition of sexual penetration in the Crimes Act is:
sexual penetration means-
(a) the introduction (to any extent) by a person of his penis into the
vagina, anus or mouth of another person, whether or not there is
emission of semen; or
(b) the introduction (to any extent) by a person of an object or a part of
his or her body (other than the penis) into the vagina or anus of
another person, other than in the course of a procedure carried out in
good faith for medical or hygienic purposes;
This usefully covers anal sex, oral sex and fisting as "sex" and I think that is right. The definition is used for the crime of rape and I am sure you will agree with me that rape is rape.......
there should be no defence for violating another human being anally or vaginally that you used an object such as a dildo
I doubt the Californian statute is much different (possibly even a wider definition is used).
However, I do think the SF judges know a bent cop full of BS when they see one.
Bent over nicely I am sure, Diane :)
BTW I think the defintion of "sex " is even wider than "sexual penetration". Giving subs a hand job (known in the pro industry as "tie'n'tease"), queening and smothering (with the bare vagina) and "forcing" subs to wank all count as sex to me.
But I realise that performing sex acts for money is prostitution and - bizarrely - prostitution is still illegal in most US states (unlike other OECD countries such as Australia, NZ and the UK) so the pretence "pro-dommes don't have sex" has to be maintained.
No-one professional (in the US) would or should admit on a board like this they are performing kinky sex acts and hence breaking the law.
What really puzzles me is why non-professional Dommes also deny they are using subs for wild sexual gratification. What else are the sweet boys for (if you get a really cute one in your evil clutches!!!!)?
Wonderful post MsC!
You have articulated what I feel in these situations SO much better than I ever have.
I have always felt that any contact with genitals is a form of sexual gratification, it may NOT be
penetration, but they are sexual activities to ME.
I remember a submissive that I had been talking to for a month or so, that "played" with a Dominant he had just met at his local dungeon.
To this day, he does not understand why I felt that the CBT activities/ strap on play in a hotel room were what I considered sexual activities, and why I was no longer interested in him.
Many here have "different" defintions of what I see as very clearly defined sexual activities.
For those that do NOT consider this a form of sexual activity, I ask THIS question.
Would you consider it cheating if your husband or boyfriend was out allowing a total stranger to
perform CBT on him, play with his balls, and insert a strap-on in his rectum, without your permission?
Would you REALLY be okay with this?
No one is touching my submissive's, my boyfriend, or my husband's, or even MY man's cock, balls, or rectum, without MY permission or my being there.
period
< Message edited by MzMia -- 12/3/2007 5:09:11 AM >
_____________________________
Namaste'
To Each His/Her Own
"DENIAL ain't just a river in Egypt." Mark Twain
What's your favorite fetish?
"My partner's whisper"--bloomswell
|
RE: Strap on sex is sex folks - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread