sexyred1
Posts: 8998
Joined: 8/9/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ForcefuIHands Wow, just wow. I suppose being the OP, and since there's been a long queue of comments posted, mostly from "red" (interesting that you would single ME out, when actually, many, many posters here agreed with me about how snarky and condescending you were) about haw snarky and condescending I have been in my posts. If this is the impression I have given I apologize. I was surprised to see posts from Annabelle in agreement, considering I enjoyed her original post on this thread as well. I'm sorry I didn't laud you before in praise in an immediate reply, but I thought your post was insightful, I just thought the other person had gotten deeper to the crux of the question I was proposing. red, take a few deep breaths. (don't need to; did not spare you or this thread another thought, it is all in a day's work on the forums) I wish I could read between the lines as deeply as you seem to, because I could get so much more out of the books I buy. I never said that a submissive is only really submissive if she's willing to cut her hair. When I made comments about that, I meant that I wanted to hear someone else say that yes, the hair is a stopgap of submission. I don't know why you choose to take your hair so personally, (I did not take it personally, I am cracking up that you see my difference in opinion as such, you are making an assumptive judgement of me, tsk tsk) or why you choose to go to a dark place (I have a dark place? pray tell, where might that be, grasshopper?) where you feel the need to bring such rage (rage? you think this is rage? LMAO, oh boy....poor thing) to a simple discussion as you have brought here. Great, you wouldn't cut your hair for a Dominant. And? That's your choice. The reason I chose to applaud the efforts of someone willing to take a moment and say to themselves, "Hey, why do I respond so emotionally when I think about cutting my hair?" is because provoking genuine introspective thought in an internet forum is so genuinely rare, I thought it deserved some reward. Moreover, from post one, you have shown an obvious disdain for even the broaching of the subject. (You are a liar. I answered as did anyone else. You CHOSE to view my reply as it differed from yours as disdain. Your issue, not mine, your interpretation, not my intent.) As my colleague in crime pointed out, not only have you provided as much as the knee-jerk "I would NEVER" reaction, you proceed to display your contempt on a simple question about submission and haircuts (a frivolous subject, no less, that has turned into a hot debate) by immediately displaying your contempt with nothing but cynicism and derision. (again, you and your colleague, have decided that anyone who disagreed with you both must be contemptible, must go to a "dark" place, must take things "personally" and must be "cynical" and "derisive". Did I get all that right?) With that, I am done dealing with your drama. (my drama? You created this drama boy, not me. )Best wishes. I'm also not making the connection between haircuts and date rape as suggested by someone else. That could just be me though. Perhaps you will learn to grow up and when you next post a thread, think before you start a topic that might stir different opinions. I find it highly amusing that my writing style so offends you and your colleague when so many other posters here agreed with me and many disagreed with you and your colleague. Perhaps you will learn that open debate is not a license for you to judge the opinions of others in the matter you have chosen to dissect all of my replies as evidenced above. I have no further interest in communicating with you on any topic, now that I see how you are unable to discern other opinions than your own..
|