Padriag
Posts: 2633
Joined: 3/30/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MasterLark Part of the path of discovery for a sub/slave seems to be that point in a relationship (D/s or M/s) where she struggles with what she sees as being honest and with telling her Master/Dominant what He/She wants to hear, to be the kind of sub/slave expected. The dichotomy seems to me to be a false one -- either be honest (and likely disagree, object, quarrel, argue) or comply and obey saying what words He/She wants to hear, presumably burying your honesty. Does this situation sound familiar to others? No.. doesn't sound familiar at all. To be blunt, I think the whole senario is predicated on a false, or at least a bad, assumption. It assumes the dominant in the relationship ever actually wants to be lied to. I suppose there are some out there for whom that might be true... I wouldn't consider such "dominants" worth wasting time on. Just to be blunt. To explain what I mean I'll raise two points. First, I don't see that any dominant who is secure in themselves would want to be told "pretty lies." A desire for that indicates insecurity to me. Asking someone to stroke your ego with lies is a very insecure and unfair thing to do. This is not an attractive quality in a dominant, its not the kind of thing that inspires confidence. Secondly, I don't see that honesty needs to lead to a quarrel, argument, or a disagreement. To illustrate my point I'll use a fictional example. Suppose a dominant is training his slave as a puppygirl... it amuses him to do so. Part of this includes requiring her to eat from a dog dish. The slave, wanting to please her master, complies with this... though somewhat unenthusiastically. The master later asks the slave what she thinks about being made to eat from a dog dish. At this point the slave might respond in one of two ways. Option one - "I hate eating out of that damn dish and I think its stupid... I don't understand it and I don't want to do it anymore. Are you just trying to degrade me and make me feel worthless? I thought you cared about me?" Option two - "I don't like it sir, it makes me feel uncomfortable... like I'm being degraded. Can I ask why you require this of me sir?" Both options express how the slave feels... unhappy with it. The first option however is beligerant, hostile and disrespectful... it might well lead to an argument. But that argument will be more about her attitude than the dog dish. The second option still expresses her feelings honestly, but its respectful and she honestly asks for an explanation about why she is required to do this. My point being that a submissive can be honest without being disrespectful, without burying her feelings. If that were my slave and it was bothering her that much I'd want to know so that I could deal with it appropriately. I don't need pretty lies anymore than I will tolerate beligerance... either is likely to result in a submissive being dismissed.
_____________________________
Padriag A stern discipline pervades all nature, which is a little cruel so that it may be very kind - Edmund Spencer
|