Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Sen. Arlen Specter Switches Parties - Becomes Democrat


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Sen. Arlen Specter Switches Parties - Becomes Democrat Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Sen. Arlen Specter Switches Parties - Becomes Democrat - 4/28/2009 10:12:00 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY


quote:

ORIGINAL: painpup

Well i've always been for Term limits if You don't get results for The People then out You Go .... I also believe in K.I.S.S princapull too I really believe Gov't has indeed Grown far to big


Failure to implement term limits was one of the Republican's greatest mistakes.

Firm


You mean one of the republican`s greatest broken promises.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

There are term limits.

The dems limited the terms of a dozens of republicans in the last election.

Just as the Founders wanted,by election.
`



_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Sen. Arlen Specter Switches Parties - Becomes Democrat - 4/28/2009 11:27:19 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY


Failure to implement term limits was one of the Republican's greatest mistakes.

Firm


You mean one of the republican`s greatest broken promises.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

There are term limits.

The dems limited the terms of a dozens of republicans in the last election.

Just as the Founders wanted,by election.


The founders also wanted the State Legislatures to appoint all Senators. Electing them by popular vote was an abomination to the system of checks and balances against Federal power, transferring their primary allegiance from their State governments, to the Federal government. But we changed that anyway.

The founders also did not forsee a National Federal Income tax. And there is a good reason to believe that the 16th Admendment authorizing it was never legally ratified. But we did it anyway.

Should I go on?

The founders assumed that elected officials would be citizens who take time off from their normal careers and lives to perform a short period of public service. They did not envision a professional political class. This professional political class has come into being due to the increased usurpation of individual and state's rights by the federal government of which the two examples above are important, but not the only examples.

We changed part of the structure of the checks and balances, which now allows this parasitic political class at the national level, but we did not take sufficient care to rebalance the system, and now we see the unintended consequences.

Term limits seems to be about the only realistic method to return some of the required balance.

Unless you want to repeal the income tax, and return the right to appoint Senators to the States ....?

Firm

< Message edited by FirmhandKY -- 4/28/2009 11:29:03 PM >


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Sen. Arlen Specter Switches Parties - Becomes Democrat - 4/29/2009 12:29:49 AM   
ThatDamnedPanda


Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomImus

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda
Well, let's start kicking around some of the ramifications of this. First of all, when Franken is seated the Dems will have a filibuster-proof majority. For better or worse. I'm not entirely happy about that, but as obstinate and obstructive as the Republicans have been the first few months of the Obama Administration, overall I'd say it's a positive.


I think it's a short term positive but a long term negative. You're right that the Republican party has made its own bed by its unwillingness to work together. Anytime either party has absolute control it tends to breed arrogance over time and particularly so after following a period when said party did not have the upper hand. Our system only works well when we have two strong parties that are willing to work together for the common good.

As far as the whole filibuster issue is concerned there is a difference between having the theoretical numbers and getting 60 of them when you need it. There are very few if any senators who vote with their party's majority all of the time.


Absolutely, and that's precisely why I finally decided this was something I can live with. The principal value of this is that it may keep the republicans a little more tractable. It's really nothing more than a psychological motivator - the republicans will always have to factor into their calculations the possibility that no matter how hard they may want to fight a particular piece of legislation, it's now mathematically possible (or, a little more possible)  that they would have no way to block it. This is not going to change things much, but it does give the dems a slightly stronger hand to play.


_____________________________

Panda, panda, burning bright
In the forest of the night
What immortal hand or eye
Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?


(in reply to DomImus)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Sen. Arlen Specter Switches Parties - Becomes Democrat - 4/29/2009 3:56:32 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

I think you would find that most Conservatives are happy that Specter is leaving, and only wish that he's take all the other Rinos such as McCain and Lindsey Graham with him.

Yeah... Give the Democrats more rope. That's okay with me.



quote:

ORIGINAL: BKSir
Hmm, but 72 year old McCain with a history of heart problems is fine?  Just curious on how that works...



_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to BKSir)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Sen. Arlen Specter Switches Parties - Becomes Democrat - 4/29/2009 4:54:02 AM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BKSir

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

I saw that on the News tonight.
They also said that he's SEVENTY NINE YEARS OLD!
He won't LIVE 'till the next election!
What the hell is it with those senators? Their "median age" has to be in the 70's by now!
Another good reason for term limits and *age limits!*   ***Seventy and O-U-T!***!"
Look at Bird and Kennedy, Bird is 90, in a wheelchair and slobers on himself and is senile!
Kennedy's always been senile and now he's having seizures on a regular basis and not the booze kind either.
The American People need to start putting these guys out to pasture. No-one should be in office for 20 years let alone 40!
And if Spector's constituents don't like him as a R why would they like him as a D? If he lives that long he'll probably be defeated. Let some young guy in his 50's run.
These guys are BUICK drivers, Herbert Hoover was president when they were born! Hell, Woodrow Wilson was president when Bird was born!
C'mon out there people, we need "Change" if your senator's been in office for more than two terms shitcan him/her!



Hmm, but 72 year old McCain with a history of heart problems is fine?  Just curious on how that works...



BKSir, me too!
These guys should be shopping at Costco for the giant boxes of "Depends" undergarments not trying for another six years to make it to 40 years in the senate or whatever.
Why don't we just scour the nursing homes for potential candidates?
Cripes, the guy's *79* is there no-one else in the whole state of PA. who wants to run?
We need to clean out that *geriatric ward* called the "senate" in the next few elections. Gawd, it must stink in there with all of those old farts crapping themselves.
Can you imagine being a Democrat and hearing that news that Spector wants to join your party? "Oh no! You're fucking kidding me!" Sheesh, I'm starting to feel sorry for the Democrats now!
I just can't see a lot of young people getting "excited" over Spector when he can't even get "excited."
"Spector, Spector, he's our man, couldn't get a boner in the promised land!"

< Message edited by popeye1250 -- 4/29/2009 5:09:42 AM >


_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to BKSir)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Sen. Arlen Specter Switches Parties - Becomes Democrat - 4/29/2009 4:58:08 AM   
PanthersMom


Posts: 2215
Joined: 11/26/2007
From: Cleveland Ohio
Status: offline
does it really matter which team of crooks he plays with? 

PM

_____________________________

That which does not kill me, better run pretty damn fast

I miss my ex, but my aim is improving!




(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Sen. Arlen Specter Switches Parties - Becomes Democrat - 4/29/2009 5:25:21 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY
there is a good reason to believe that the 16th Admendment authorizing it was never legally ratified.

Present your case then.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Sen. Arlen Specter Switches Parties - Becomes Democrat - 4/29/2009 5:31:49 AM   
MarsBonfire


Posts: 1034
Joined: 3/6/2005
Status: offline
Yeah, all kidding aside, Spectre has always been his own guy. His switch to the Dem side really doesn't count for crap, other than maybe getting him a shot at making it to the general election. (You can be sure he'll "play ball" at least until the primaries are over, after that, it's anybody's guess.) He's a moderate (which these days means he's generally NOT a right wing extremist asshole). The most enjoyaboe thing about his switch over was his parting shot to the GOP: "There should be a rebellion within the party. The GOP has become far too extremist for it's own good."

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Sen. Arlen Specter Switches Parties - Becomes Democrat - 4/29/2009 6:02:11 AM   
Cagey18


Posts: 662
Joined: 9/7/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

I think you would find that most Conservatives are happy that Specter is leaving, and only wish that he's take all the other Rinos such as McCain and Lindsey Graham with him.

Yeah... Give the Democrats more rope. That's okay with me.


Translation into reality-speak:  Give the Democrats in Congress more power to advance their agenda, and that of President Obama. 

"Conservatives" might be happy, but Republicans are shitting their pants.


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Sen. Arlen Specter Switches Parties - Becomes Democrat - 4/29/2009 6:05:23 AM   
Cagey18


Posts: 662
Joined: 9/7/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MarsBonfire

Yeah, all kidding aside, Spectre has always been his own guy. His switch to the Dem side really doesn't count for crap, other than maybe getting him a shot at making it to the general election.

Actually that was the main reason for the switch.  And now he's not only going to make it to the GE, he's favored to win a sixth term, since the GOP doesn't have a decent moderate candidate who can win increasingly-blue Pennsylvania.

(in reply to MarsBonfire)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Sen. Arlen Specter Switches Parties - Becomes Democrat - 4/29/2009 6:50:33 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
Philosophy was his 1st and strongest reason.He was quite honest,almost brutally so that he didn`t want to be judged by the Pennsylvania`s con primary voters (ie ,folks similar to what leads the GOP presently).They after all, are what`s leading the party off the cliff,......right Sanity?("more rope",bwah-ha ha ha!)

Also there`s a "sore loser" law in Pennsi that doesn`t allow a primary loser to quit his party and then run as an independent,like sore loser Joe Lieberman did.

I really don`t think it`s a super big deal either way,but it book marks history quite well and reaffirms what everybody already knows.

I do enjoy the discomfiture though.lol

~~~~~~~~~~

I suggest anyone wanting a belly laugh and some insight into the GOP should tune in today to any righy-wingy radio talk show.

Some of the words I heard used to describe Specter yesterday.  Listed in order of said most.

Prostitute

Whore

Backstabber

Traitor

Let a murderer skip bail (not sure what that was about but I promise we all will know soon)

RINO

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 4/29/2009 6:59:00 AM >


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to Cagey18)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Sen. Arlen Specter Switches Parties - Becomes Democrat - 4/29/2009 8:14:54 AM   
philosophy


Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Philosophy was his 1st and strongest reason.


...i had nothing to do with it. Nothing, i say.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: Sen. Arlen Specter Switches Parties - Becomes Democrat - 4/29/2009 8:19:33 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: Sen. Arlen Specter Switches Parties - Becomes Democrat - 4/29/2009 9:30:30 AM   
UncleNasty


Posts: 1108
Joined: 3/20/2004
Status: offline
Given the degree to which our elected officials disregard their own constituents and the law I don't believe it makes any difference which party any of them are affiliated with, or who is in any given office.

Not a solution oriented comment.

I like the idea of holding them accountable to their oathes of office, to the limits and disabilities of the US Constitution, and the Constitutions of their respective states.

Uncle Nasty

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: Sen. Arlen Specter Switches Parties - Becomes Democrat - 4/29/2009 9:36:16 AM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Okay Firm,that is where we part company in my eyes a middle course is not only preferable but it is to be desired. An unfettered free market leaves too many on the outside looking in,not to mention leads to far too many abuses of the working class.While a "collectivism" tends to stifle the entrepenurial streak that makes this country great.Better a tight rope walk of balance that keeps the best of both methods uneasily co-existing.

Of course there needs to be a balance. The question is, where should the balance point be?
Therein lies the crux of the issue,it is my beleif that right now we are too far right....and are in need of a correction to the left
And collectivism doesn't just stifle the "entrepreneurial streak". It stifles the very core of humanity and individual freedom.
Agreed...to a point....attatching the label collectivism would seem to be a tactic used by some to paint as evil any attempt to see to the common good....sometimes at the expence of individualism.And that is a necessary evil.
Government is a necessary evil. Necessary - but by definition and inherent structure - evil in that it intrudes on the sovereignty of the individual.
Couldn't disagree with this more.Government is not,and should not be viewed as an evil.Government doesn't posess intrinsic evil qualities....it is up to the electorate to ensure that their representatives address their issues.Anarchy is evil....the tyranny of the majority is evil.Government is our only defence against either of these excesses.
When the the majority ... or even a large minority ... of the voters rely upon the government for the forcible transfer of funds from the other half ... then there can be nothing more than increasing demands for such support.
When the minority perverts Government to nefarious ends...and as a consequence the majority fall further and further behind.....the middle class faces extinction.

We are currently at about that half-way point. I suspect the current administration - before it is out of office - will see it tip over.
I suspect the current administration will spend most of its first term redressing the inequities of the last 8 years....amid much hand wringing from the minority that had benefited from those failed policies.Too soon to know what will be the focus of the second term...lol
And you confuse "unfettered free-market" with a desire for rapacious greed. An increasing collective government turns into a much worse system, with much worst rapacious greed going on.
No Firm,unfortunatly an "unfettered free market" inevitably leads to rapacious greed...much like day follows night.It is the human condition....

In fact, a strong, centralized, collective government gets in bed with the worst of companies and individuals who will always seek to use the growing power of government to increase their profits and personal power, and turn the power of government to their advantage.
Checks and balances Firm...and the ultimate power of the electorate ...the voting booth.

So, by demonizing the free enterprise system, and encouraging the growth of government you are philosophically responsible for the growth of a much more tyrannical and unfair system.
No one here(least not me) is demonising the free enterprise system,just recognising a need for checks on such a system ...a balance between open markets with fairness and transparency imposed...open to all,not just a select few who "game" the system.

The correct way to effectively control greed, and the worst of excess is internally, through a moral system and structure which teaches internal self-control, delayed gratification, social conscience, the dignity of the individual, and encourages private and free associational charity.
You show an amasing amount of beleif in your fellow man,while evidencing a strong disbeleif in that same moral code if the man enters public service.....please explain the loss of morality and structure once a man enters public life?

This is the only type of system which will actually achieve a stable, livable society in which the sovereignty of the individual can be respected, and in which true freedom can flourish.
Our current situation would seem to belie your beleif in a self governing market...

The growing power of government turns this on it's head, and makes all social controls a matter of law, not personal choice, and social approval or disapproval. It is a system based on force, not freedom.
Again it would seem to me you fear the control of government ,while granting to the market place the ultimate in economic control.

Firm


_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: Sen. Arlen Specter Switches Parties - Becomes Democrat - 4/29/2009 10:27:16 AM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Philosophy was his 1st and strongest reason.He was quite honest,almost brutally so that he didn`t want to be judged by the Pennsylvania`s con primary voters (ie ,folks similar to what leads the GOP presently).They after all, are what`s leading the party off the cliff,......right Sanity?("more rope",bwah-ha ha ha!)

Also there`s a "sore loser" law in Pennsi that doesn`t allow a primary loser to quit his party and then run as an independent,like sore loser Joe Lieberman did.

I really don`t think it`s a super big deal either way,but it book marks history quite well and reaffirms what everybody already knows.

I do enjoy the discomfiture though.lol

~~~~~~~~~~

I suggest anyone wanting a belly laugh and some insight into the GOP should tune in today to any righy-wingy radio talk show.

Some of the words I heard used to describe Specter yesterday.  Listed in order of said most.

Prostitute

Whore

Backstabber

Traitor

Let a murderer skip bail (not sure what that was about but I promise we all will know soon)

RINO


Owner, that's the problem in this country, our government is crippled by only having two political parties that rarely cooperate to get The People's business done.
So Specter's on his fifth term already?  Thirty years? What do Kennedy and Bird call him, "hey kid?" That's if Bird can even talk anymore.

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: Sen. Arlen Specter Switches Parties - Becomes Democrat - 4/29/2009 10:44:30 AM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
And you know this how?

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Anita Hill was a liar.

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: Sen. Arlen Specter Switches Parties - Becomes Democrat - 4/29/2009 3:50:45 PM   
Truthiness


Posts: 251
Joined: 11/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Philosophy was his 1st and strongest reason.He was quite honest,almost brutally so that he didn`t want to be judged by the Pennsylvania`s con primary voters (ie ,folks similar to what leads the GOP presently).They after all, are what`s leading the party off the cliff,......right Sanity?("more rope",bwah-ha ha ha!)

Also there`s a "sore loser" law in Pennsi that doesn`t allow a primary loser to quit his party and then run as an independent,like sore loser Joe Lieberman did.

I really don`t think it`s a super big deal either way,but it book marks history quite well and reaffirms what everybody already knows.

I do enjoy the discomfiture though.lol

~~~~~~~~~~

I suggest anyone wanting a belly laugh and some insight into the GOP should tune in today to any righy-wingy radio talk show.

Some of the words I heard used to describe Specter yesterday.  Listed in order of said most.

Prostitute

Whore

Backstabber

Traitor

Let a murderer skip bail (not sure what that was about but I promise we all will know soon)

RINO


He's been a RINO and called such for a long long time.  That's nothing new.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: Sen. Arlen Specter Switches Parties - Becomes Democrat - 4/29/2009 3:53:04 PM   
Truthiness


Posts: 251
Joined: 11/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u
Therein lies the crux of the issue,it is my beleif that right now we are too far right....and are in need of a correction to the left


Nah, right now we're going from "far left" to "extreme ludicrious left".

Bush was one of the most fiscally liberal presidents we've had - he met every problem and situation with more spending, and more government.

I think we need a correction in the opposite way, not even MORE left.

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: Sen. Arlen Specter Switches Parties - Becomes Democrat - 4/29/2009 3:58:05 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Truthiness

Nah, right now we're going from "far left" to "extreme ludicrious left".

Bush was one of the most fiscally liberal presidents we've had - he met every problem and situation with more spending, and more government.



Yes, because Bush was such a leftie  .

_____________________________



(in reply to Truthiness)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Sen. Arlen Specter Switches Parties - Becomes Democrat Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.188