Cagey18
Posts: 662
Joined: 9/7/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TheHeretic And of course it's torture, and a highly effective form that goes directly to the panic center. That's why we use it. "Highly effective"? Wrong as usual: quote:
As you probably know, a subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary is holding the first public congressional hearing on the Bush Administration’s detention and interrogation program since the release of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel’s (OLC) memos authorizing torture. One of the leading witnesses is Ali Soufan, one of the FBI's top interrogator and the man who -- by using standard (i.e., non-torture) techniques -- was able to get crucial information from Abu Zubaydah which led to the capture of Khalid Sheik Mohammed and Jose Padilla. You might recall that Soufan recently went public with his experience on the torture revelations (see here and here). Talking Points Memo has this nugget from Soufan's testimony:quote:
This is fascinating... Sheldon Whitehouse is leading Ali Soufan through questioning. What Soufan is saying is that when he used lawful interrogation techniques against Zubaydah, he got actionable intelligence within an hour, including the identification of Khalid Sheik Mohamed as the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks. However, when a contractor came in and began using harsher techniques, Zubaydah clammed up. It became clear that Zubaydah had received training on how to resist torture. http://www.politicalbase.com/profile/Mark%20Nickolas/blog/&blogId=7202 and quote:
FBI Agent Ali Soufan's congressional testimony on the seminal issues involving traditional interrogation versus torture. Here's Soufan explaining how and why traditional interrogation techniques work very well:quote:
The Informed Interrogation Approach is based on leveraging our knowledge of the detainee’s culture and mindset, together with using information we already know about him. And here's why torture does not:quote:
The harsh technique method doesn’t use the knowledge we have of the detainee’s history, mindset, vulnerabilities, or culture, and instead tries to subjugate the detainee into submission through humiliation and cruelty. The approach applies a force continuum, each time using harsher and harsher techniques until the detainee submits. And despite the full-court press by Bush-Cheney sympathizers, Soufan adds that their oft-repeated talking point about how waterboarding allowed us to gain actionable intelligence which saved lives is complete bullshit:quote:
Many of the claims made in the memos about the success of the enhanced techniques are inaccurate. For example, it is untrue to claim Abu Zubaydah wasn’t cooperating before August 1, 2002. The truth is that we got actionable intelligence from him in the first hour of interrogating him. http://www.politicalbase.com/profile/Mark%20Nickolas/blog/&blogId=7203
|