luckydawg
Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009 Status: offline
|
what intent is involved in showing a different huge crowd? It reflected reality. Seriously? There isn't any. and the executive editors kept blair and promoted him because they liked the way his stories leaned, for years untill people (including fox) began to raise a stink about it. But that is ok with you, got it. Your MSNBC example makes no sense at all. That would indeed be lying. But there was a huge crowd at the book signig, no bias, just a mistake. It is no differentr than having the wrong caption or date. And all you showed wiith your "doc fix" article is that you can't search a website, as they had several stories, and democratic sources in them. And where are you pretending to see me saying "fox can do anything they like"? That is just you making shit up again, because reality does not back up your position. It seems to be the only way you can debate, to make up what our oponenet thinks. Its rather pathetic Bias does not mean wrong, though wrong info can be part of bias. Now as far as using wrong footage, virtually everytime CNN CBS, NBC MSNBC ABC ect showed footage of ANWR when that was topical, they used pictures of the mountains, which while technically in ANWR was hundreds of miles away from the area that was under consideration for drilling,and a diffefrent type of ecosystem.
< Message edited by luckydawg -- 11/22/2009 3:08:11 PM >
_____________________________
I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.
|