Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Take the Fox Balance/Bias Challenge!


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Take the Fox Balance/Bias Challenge! Page: <<   < prev  16 17 [18] 19 20   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Take the Fox Balance/Bias Challenge! - 11/24/2009 8:56:18 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
uck,

You haven't any basis wherein you can lay any sort of tenuous claim to intellect. Or honesty.  

I mean you and wilbur are vying for the Abd Al-Jabbar Muhsen clone award.  And believe me, buddy, you guys are neck and neck, and I don't understand why you are lying and pretending that you are not of at least equal stature, but I suppose I can admire your willingness to debase yourself in this matter.

Ron

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to luckydawg)
Profile   Post #: 341
RE: Take the Fox Balance/Bias Challenge! - 11/24/2009 8:57:11 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Of course Newsbusters is biased, that isn't being disputed. What is being disputed is the bias of the mainstream news media, and Newsbusters is pointing out an interesting fact in that regard.

And obviously that isn't being disputed either..



So let me try and follow this.

You are agreeing your source claiming mainstream news bias is itself biased.

Ooookay!

So then, if they are claiming bias, and are themselves biased, wouldn't that tend to cast doubt on their claims?

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 342
RE: Take the Fox Balance/Bias Challenge! - 11/24/2009 8:58:59 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
or make the claims of bias less notworthy than a common fart, and just about as vivid and useful to cavil about?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 343
RE: Take the Fox Balance/Bias Challenge! - 11/24/2009 9:06:04 PM   
luckydawg


Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009
Status: offline
Hmm, I smell a troll babbeling about farts and debasement.....but I can't see her...wierd.

I guess I will just have to stick to the discussion thread.

_____________________________

I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 344
RE: Take the Fox Balance/Bias Challenge! - 11/24/2009 9:18:53 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
Life happens, Tim, but I do hope you find the time.  I'm interested in just where you are coming from.  Perhaps once you define the terms, this can be a legitimate discussion.  The phrase you used for the NPR link, for example.  Was that a direct quote from the site?  Why describe the server of a major university as "scientist's files?"  Wouldn't it be more accurate to say a "climate research unit's files?"



_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 345
RE: Take the Fox Balance/Bias Challenge! - 11/24/2009 9:27:18 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
I will, Rich. I suspect you and I are closer than it may appear at first on much of this. And I want to talk about the writing, which is where I see a lot of the problem, but that needs a structured piece, not a few points here and there. The things you're mentioning are icing.

I do like when we have thoughtful discussions. Disagreement is fine when we're learning what the other is thinking, along with reasoned points. And I think there's some legitimate misunderstanding that can be cleared up. Some of it is here, but buried inside the thread.


(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 346
RE: Take the Fox Balance/Bias Challenge! - 11/24/2009 11:24:06 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Of course Newsbusters is biased, that isn't being disputed. What is being disputed is the bias of the mainstream news media, and Newsbusters is pointing out an interesting fact in that regard.

And obviously that isn't being disputed either..



So let me try and follow this.

You are agreeing your source claiming mainstream news bias is itself biased.

Ooookay!

So then, if they are claiming bias, and are themselves biased, wouldn't that tend to cast doubt on their claims?



Would you drop the ad hominen bullshit and either come up with a relevant broadcast before their article or admit that even biased sources actually tell the truth now and then?

< Message edited by willbeurdaddy -- 11/24/2009 11:25:14 PM >

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 347
RE: Take the Fox Balance/Bias Challenge! - 11/24/2009 11:44:55 PM   
luckydawg


Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009
Status: offline
Bias has nothing to do with true or not.....It is about which elements of the truth are told and which are ignored

_____________________________

I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 348
RE: Take the Fox Balance/Bias Challenge! - 11/25/2009 12:53:44 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Of course Newsbusters is biased, that isn't being disputed. What is being disputed is the bias of the mainstream news media, and Newsbusters is pointing out an interesting fact in that regard.

And obviously that isn't being disputed either..



So let me try and follow this.

You are agreeing your source claiming mainstream news bias is itself biased.

Ooookay!

So then, if they are claiming bias, and are themselves biased, wouldn't that tend to cast doubt on their claims?



Would you drop the ad hominen bullshit and either come up with a relevant broadcast before their article or admit that even biased sources actually tell the truth now and then?


Let's see.

We're talking about bias in the media.

I pointed out bias in another poster's article declaring the media was biased.

Gosh Willbeurr, I thought that was pretty relevant.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 349
RE: Take the Fox Balance/Bias Challenge! - 11/25/2009 2:06:36 AM   
luckydawg


Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009
Status: offline
typo


< Message edited by luckydawg -- 11/25/2009 2:07:36 AM >


_____________________________

I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 350
RE: Take the Fox Balance/Bias Challenge! - 11/25/2009 2:08:53 AM   
luckydawg


Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009
Status: offline
Was that actually part of the article? or just something on the page near it. And I do assume you will consider all of the anti fox sites posted, media matters ect, also to be worthless for the same reason?

_____________________________

I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.

(in reply to luckydawg)
Profile   Post #: 351
RE: Take the Fox Balance/Bias Challenge! - 11/25/2009 2:38:08 AM   
Brain


Posts: 3792
Joined: 2/14/2007
Status: offline
If anyone is interested,

Fox Host: Public Option Would Be Tax-Payer Funded Government Health Care Program - VIDEO

You'll be shocked to learn that Fox News is misinforming its viewers about the public option.

In reality, the public option would be available, as one option among many other private options, to people shopping in the health insurance exchange. Any of those 30-or-so million consumers could buy into it. And with the exception of the fact that it will be a). not for profit, and b). accountable to the government (as opposed to to shareholders), the public option will have to behave exactly like a private insurance company--financed and stabilized by consumer premiums, without any subsidy from the federal government.

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/11/fox-host-public-option-would-be-tax-payer-funded-government-health-care-program.php?ref=fpb

(in reply to luckydawg)
Profile   Post #: 352
RE: Take the Fox Balance/Bias Challenge! - 11/25/2009 10:00:18 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain

If anyone is interested,

Fox Host: Public Option Would Be Tax-Payer Funded Government Health Care Program - VIDEO

You'll be shocked to learn that Fox News is misinforming its viewers about the public option.

In reality, the public option would be available, as one option among many other private options, to people shopping in the health insurance exchange. Any of those 30-or-so million consumers could buy into it. And with the exception of the fact that it will be a). not for profit, and b). accountable to the government (as opposed to to shareholders), the public option will have to behave exactly like a private insurance company--financed and stabilized by consumer premiums, without any subsidy from the federal government.

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/11/fox-host-public-option-would-be-tax-payer-funded-government-health-care-program.php?ref=fpb



RML bought a bridge he's trying to unload. PM him you might be interested.

(in reply to Brain)
Profile   Post #: 353
RE: Take the Fox Balance/Bias Challenge! - 11/25/2009 10:01:56 AM   
luckydawg


Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009
Status: offline
So they took out the subsidies for those in need? Even the poorest of the poor would be forced to buy into a plan at the same rates as the rich?

This plan keeps getting worse and worse. Why you would support a reform that has no degree of progressivity is kind of confusing.


Unless it is just cheerleading for Obama, he needs some sort of plan to pass.

_____________________________

I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.

(in reply to Brain)
Profile   Post #: 354
RE: Take the Fox Balance/Bias Challenge! - 11/25/2009 10:05:43 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

So they took out the subsidies for those in need? Even the poorest of the poor would be forced to buy into a plan at the same rates as the rich?

This plan keeps getting worse and worse. Why you would support a reform that has no degree of progressivity is kind of confusing.


Unless it is just cheerleading for Obama, he needs some sort of plan to pass.



Not quite. Premiums for lower incomes are still subsidized, but they are subsidized by taxpayers, not by the government. <cough cough>

(in reply to luckydawg)
Profile   Post #: 355
RE: Take the Fox Balance/Bias Challenge! - 11/25/2009 10:10:11 AM   
luckydawg


Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009
Status: offline
Oh I see, its the Taxpayers subsidising the Public Option not the Government......Those stupid liars at Fox.....

Its difficult to keep up the silly leftisms of the day. They change so fast.

_____________________________

I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 356
RE: Take the Fox Balance/Bias Challenge! - 11/27/2009 1:01:13 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
FR

I just ran a few things through Google, with minimal results.  My search was "global warming hacked emails," followed by abc, cbs, and nbc.  Damn near nada.

I think that once this thread gets the promised infusion of thought and definition, we will certainly have to address the failure of these important broadcast news outlets to cover a very significant story.  This isn't a bias of the individual reporter who allows his/her personal beliefs to determine how a story is written and slanted.  This is a decision that can only be coming from the editorial level.

It seems that just as the scientists have conspired to keep conflicting data out of the peer-review journals, these editors and producers are doing their best to keep a legitimate story out of the mainstream press.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to luckydawg)
Profile   Post #: 357
RE: Take the Fox Balance/Bias Challenge! - 11/27/2009 1:10:45 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Have you been drinking Sanity juice?

Googling TV for press coverage?

I can tell you that both the New York Times and NPR have multiple stories on this--both sites are searchable (if you're starved for coverage).

And yes, I agree that ABC, CBS, and NBC are problems--though I think the problems are deeper and different than you surmise (I agree that editors are a main problem, though).

I'll save this for the forthcoming epic mini-series (I've started outlining it).

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 358
RE: Take the Fox Balance/Bias Challenge! - 11/27/2009 2:41:54 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Googling TV for press coverage?

I can tell you that both the New York Times and NPR have multiple stories on this--both sites are searchable (if you're starved for coverage).

And yes, I agree that ABC, CBS, and NBC are problems--though I think the problems are deeper and different than you surmise (I agree that editors are a main problem, though).

I'll save this for the forthcoming epic mini-series (I've started outlining it).




A googling of "Obama copenhagen climate" pointed me straight to the TV networks homepage, Tim.  It also found this without much hassle;  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDJ_Mz8ftqI

Those three networks are an enormous slice of the "mainstream media."  I hope you aren't planning to dismiss that.  I'm sure you aren't planning to just disqualify them for discussion on the basis that we can't compare their coverage, because they didn't cover it. 


_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 359
RE: Take the Fox Balance/Bias Challenge! - 11/27/2009 3:05:13 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

You should try gargling with it Tim - you would be amazed at everything it cures.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Have you been drinking Sanity juice?


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 360
Page:   <<   < prev  16 17 [18] 19 20   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Take the Fox Balance/Bias Challenge! Page: <<   < prev  16 17 [18] 19 20   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.215