Musicmystery
Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005 Status: offline
|
~FR~ OK, let's focus here.... I think everyone agrees that news should come from more than one source, and that news organizations can't literally be without bias (but can strive for it). Further, at least most seem to agree that Fox is not "fair and balanced," but rather sees itself as presenting bias to balance what it perceives as other bias. Now... I keep getting Times and NPR sources (the bulk of my news, along with some BBC and Canada's "As it Happens"; other sources are sought when relevant for particular reasons) dismissed as "liberal bias." Honestly, I'm just not seeing it. I can fault them at times for poor investigation or sloppy writing, but since I write professionally, I'm critical of writing period, and these faults are across news agencies (ABC/CBS/NBC turned to fluff years ago) and in the case of the Times and NPR, across the board, not targeted at any particular content or viewpoints. In short--I'm just not seeing the pattern of liberal bias, a bias so consistent that people insist these sources are unreliable. I'm asking for specific examples, please. Head to head stories, your reliable source next to the Times/NPR/CNN story. Thank you.
|