RE: Climategate

RE: Climategate (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Climategate (1/29/2010 10:19:23 AM)
Manipulation, exaggeration and no evidence of any significant warming in the 20th century. Written by Joseph D'Aleo & Anthony Watts Saturday, 23 January 2010 Authors veteran meteorologists Joe D’Aleo and Anthony Watts analyzed temperature records from all around the world for a major SPPI paper, Surface Temperature Records – Policy-driven Deception? The startling conclusion that we cannot tell whether there was any significant “global warming” at all in the 20th century is based on numerous astonishing examples of manipulation and exaggeration of the true level and rate of “global warming”. That is to say, leading meteorological institutions in the USA and around the world have so systematically tampered with instrumental temperature data that it cannot be safely said that there has been any significant net “global warming” in the 20th century.

mnottertail -> RE: Climategate (1/29/2010 10:52:44 AM)
Yeah, talk radio fuckheads, thats about as close as you will ever come. Trouble is, if you ever did come up with anything aproaching reality, nobody would ever believe it after all the fucktarded shit you have done here. So you sat in a meeting, I've sat in meetings. It doesn't take alot of brain to sit down. So to have diesel engine particulate filters and by 2023 get SOME diesel engines up to 2010 EPA code is going to lose 1 million jobs, when?

Musicmystery -> RE: Climategate (1/29/2010 10:56:31 AM)
We have more registered vehicles on the road than registered drivers. Literally. And more competition abroad. Manufacturers are going to suffer in this industry, no matter what. Market saturation.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Climategate (1/29/2010 11:42:19 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Yeah, talk radio fuckheads, thats about as close as you will ever come. Trouble is, if you ever did come up with anything aproaching reality, nobody would ever believe it after all the fucktarded shit you have done here. So you sat in a meeting, I've sat in meetings. It doesn't take alot of brain to sit down. So to have diesel engine particulate filters and by 2023 get SOME diesel engines up to 2010 EPA code is going to lose 1 million jobs, when? Its an interview with a Senator. Open your brain and let some fresh air in that rotting shell.

mnottertail -> RE: Climategate (1/29/2010 11:55:29 AM)
which senator? I thought you were the source of losing 1 million jobs quote, so its a fucking senator, and we are aware of their track record. how about you come up with something with some basis in fact once in awhile, laffer curve and making money in Reits and financial analyst without one? Again though, talk radio, how about you get some at least surfacely plausible facts rather than op-ed political bullshit, grow a mind in there.

Jeffff -> RE: Climategate (1/29/2010 11:59:27 AM)
The implementation of the new standards will actually create roughly 1.15 millions jobs. Jeff

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Climategate (1/29/2010 12:27:31 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail which senator? I thought you were the source of losing 1 million jobs quote, so its a fucking senator, and we are aware of their track record. how about you come up with something with some basis in fact once in awhile, laffer curve and making money in Reits and financial analyst without one? Again though, talk radio, how about you get some at least surfacely plausible facts rather than op-ed political bullshit, grow a mind in there. A Ca State Senator knows a helluva lot more than a moron from Mn.

mnottertail -> RE: Climategate (1/29/2010 12:28:39 PM)
Oh, thats right, big government wilbur. more of your socialst policies.

domiguy -> RE: Climategate (1/29/2010 12:35:08 PM)
I am still waiting for Wilbur to explain this one.... quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy Since 65% of FNC viewers are either liberal or independent, the "what they want to hear" line is bullshit. No problem spreading the manure...Just hate to have the shit thrown back into your face. Still waiting.....

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Climategate (1/29/2010 12:37:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Oh, thats right, big government wilbur. more of your socialst policies. You mean more of the Dems socialist policies, of course.

domiguy -> RE: Climategate (1/29/2010 12:40:52 PM)
What about this? quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy Since 65% of FNC viewers are either liberal or independent, the "what they want to hear" line is bullshit. You apparently have no ability to be honest and will say anything if you think that it furthers your position. Well, were waiting....

luckydawg -> RE: Climategate (1/29/2010 12:42:50 PM)
angry trolls demand an answer.....

Jeffff -> RE: Climategate (1/29/2010 12:43:36 PM)
Don't forget.. servant says NPR gets 48% of it's funding from the government! 46% must come from a secret slush fund. NPR is a CIA Black Op.

domiguy -> RE: Climategate (1/29/2010 12:53:00 PM)
Luckydawg...You have no problem being loose with the facts as well. You could care less about the quality of the posts you make, honesty and the truth be damned. Why you fuckers have such a time being honest with your posts is beyond me. It's fine to have opinions and occasionally one might say something that is not 100% accurate. Why is it so fucking hard to admit that you were mistaken?

truckinslave -> RE: Climategate (1/29/2010 3:33:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: domiguy I am still waiting for Wilbur to explain this one.... quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy Since 65% of FNC viewers are either liberal or independent, the "what they want to hear" line is bullshit. No problem spreading the manure...Just hate to have the shit thrown back into your face. Still waiting..... I've heard Bob Beckel, as a guest on Hannity, say something very similar, but I cannot remember the exact percentages. He was developing the idea that by appearing on FNC on one night that he was speaking to more independent voters than by spending a week on PMSNBC.

luckydawg -> RE: Climategate (1/29/2010 5:38:02 PM)
Ok ill play with the domitroll for a bit. Mistaken about what?

luckydawg -> RE: Climategate (1/29/2010 5:53:40 PM)
And domitroll does have a point. the 65% number is not correct. The correct number is 55%. Most fox viewers self identify as Independant or Democrat. Only 39% as Republicans. Willbes point, that most Fox viewers are Democrat or Independant is 100% correct. And the premise that Fox just preaches to the Choir as an arm of the Republican party is false. And shown to be false by the numbers. Even though he got the exact % wrong. Domitroll is so excited to have finally found a small point to be correct about, he is spamming the boards, like the nasty little troll he is. While not beign smart enough to see the willbes point was essentially correct.

Jeffff -> RE: Climategate (1/29/2010 6:14:27 PM)
Among regular Fox News Channel viewers, 39% identified as Republican, 33% as Democrats and 22% as independents. Among regular CNN viewers, 51% identified as Democrats, 23% were independents and just 18% were Republicans. In short, Democrats comprise a larger share of the Fox News audience than Republicans do of CNN's audience. However, it should be noted that there are more Democrats than independents or Republicans in the general public. In the 2008 news consumption survey on which this analysis is based, 36% identified as Democrats, 29% as independents and 25% as Republicans. Here are the numbers from Pew. Luckydawg, in a forum where the tiniest details are nit picked to death 9 percentage points is way off.

luckydawg -> RE: Climategate (1/29/2010 6:26:07 PM)
well some folks nit pick at tiny details......yet as I stated his point was correct and you ruined it. I didn't link tot he real numbers because I wanted domitroll to insult me and call me a liar, before I posted em. Like I did with RML and the Kerry filming issues.

Jeffff -> RE: Climategate (1/29/2010 6:32:29 PM)
Yeah, those swift boaters sure are something. You also totally ignored Ron's link about their respective records. You won't ever get it, but you are sad.

Page: << < prev 23 24 25 [26] 27 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875