LillyoftheVally
Posts: 1826
Joined: 7/22/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MasterAramis People have bandied the definition of the word "training" and the reality is I don't believe this word "training" has evolved to mean something else, at least not yet. I do concur that words can change over time but I fail to see it here in this case. I do not think that the word training has changed, but I think that it is a word that is far too harsh for use in a relationship. I work on training logs where I work, they are formal and a great way to mark progress, training is organised and implemented to make sure that the person can do the job. If the mark falls bellow a certain percentage then they fail, I just think when you are talking about a relationship between two people you need something with more room for error. Thats a totally personal thing, some words just set me on edge and thats one of them. I agree that the word hasn't changed meaning quote:
As it relates to the Dictionary debate, the beauty behind Webster's dictionary is that it is based on the American English language. Which means the word color is not spelled colour. While the Oxford version is perhaps much older and perhaps more inclusive, that probably is reflective of its age. The colour example is not a sign that it shows its age, its a sign that it shows the word that we use in englad. Just like realise is spelled with an s no matter how many times my bloody laptop tries to tell me its with a z
_____________________________
'My doctor says that I have a malformed public-duty gland and a natural deficiency in moral fibre, and that I am therefore excused from saving Universes.' Nah I am not happy to see you either
|