Falkenstein
Posts: 187
Joined: 7/22/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: happylittlepet quote:
ORIGINAL: NihilusZero quote:
ORIGINAL: happylittlepet and i believe a good relationship will do more than therapy I would suggest a relationship that (initially) does not involve BDSM/sex. So that the person who needs healing gets not more confused. I find that to be a counterproductive suggestion. Either she withdraws from relationships period until she can fundamentally understand what she wants and needs enough to seek it out without some twisted personal shame or guilt following her coattails or she jumps in headlong, being honest about the fact that she's actively working to getting to that mental state as she goes. Let's keep that quote in context. A good friend who one is not in an intimate relationship with is also able to support without sexual intimacy/BDSM. After abuse there are often boundary issues where it is not clear what one wants for oneself and what one is willing to do to please someone else. A D/s or M/s relationship is based on that desire of the s to please the dominant partner. This is why it is so easy for a victim of abuse to be revictimized if this is not understood. If one is lucky enough to find a partner who is willing to work out those boundary problems, this will lead to greater trust and understanding. One can work part of this out by oneself, but actually practicing it is a totally different ball game. If the dominant partner is willing to give the recovering submissive partner this space, it will show the submissive that her wellbeing is more important to the dominant than getting all his needs met, and this will help her regain her trust, while also giving the desired closeness to a partner. I am sure there are many variations on this scenario. Also, I do not agree with this: quote:
FR: I'm actually going to dissuade you from figuring out the "whys" for any purpose other than objective introspection. What you need to do is decide on your personal definitions of "abuse" and "being owned" to where you can isolate what separates the two. It doesn't matter why you end up wanting to be owned or how that feeling came about, it matters only that you are honest with yourself about wanting it and about the fact that it fulfills you. From there, you surrender to it. Trying to fight something natural to you because you can draw inferences or correlations to it from a negative event in your past is only going to serve to confuse you and keep you running in circles, ever paranoid of whether you are just succumbing to psychosis. There are many abuse victims who cope unhealthily in that they seek re-exposure to the abuse, and they do not know how to stop that cycle. To me, it was very important that I figured out why I have my submissive tendencies (to say the least): because something is broken in me because of the abuse or because this is naturally who I am. We do not know whether the OP has a natural inclination to be submissive or whether she seeks re-exposure in a hopefully safer setting. GM stated that quote:
OP: I think that the abuse needs to be dealt with first then you can explore sexual proclivity and kinks.. The REASON:? One must be absolutey clear on the whys of it.. If someone tells me and I always ask..that there has been abuse ..I OFTEN will NOT engage in any BDSM with them.. I do not want to trigger anything from before and make it worse. I would like to add a practical, very candid, dominant point of view to the excellent analysis and thoughtful advices of happylittlepet and GM. If I were the new boyfriend/dominant of Screaming, I would want to explore the bondaries of our relationship, i.e. what gives her pleasure and not, what is hurting her and her ability to live as a independent person or not. The last thing I want is her to say amen to whatever I propose: I need her to state, indicate, whatever her personal preferences, fantasies, disgust etc. are. Recently, I had to explain to a sub that "non" is a commonly used word in French, and if she did not like the sound of it, she could also say "merde" to me. Thus, slowly we established together that she was a very moderate sub, and she was utterly relieved to see that I am a rather moderate dominant. I am doing kitchen table psychology here, but I suppose that she was saying yes to almost any idea I put on the table because she felt it necessary to not sink the relationship or wanted it for some unhealthy past-related reason. As for my plans to keep her as a milked cowgirl in my mad-doctor Frankenstein Castle, we are discussing whether to get them through the US Senate, or through the European Union parlement. But we have made progress in our decision making since we created a paritary commission to find out which one is the slowest ;-)
_____________________________
Henry, Part of that power which still Produceth good, whilst ever scheming ill.
|