Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Naughty Mistress!!


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> RE: Naughty Mistress!! Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 6 [7]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Naughty Mistress!! - 1/28/2010 5:04:08 PM   
LadyAngelika


Posts: 8070
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: notinferior

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika


quote:

ORIGINAL: Domin8tingUrDrmz






The Akasha, myself and a few others here have been followed by individuals on these boards who's Modus Operandi is to discredit us. Yesterday I had to deal with one that has been following me for months, usually simply correcting the typos in my posts but this time he took it to whole other level by literally taking words I said and making a conclusion that I said something totally different. .

We all have our own ways of dealing with this but the bottom line is that we should be able to handle little pests the way we see fit, within reason of course. And telling him to stop twisting my words around was not unreasonable. If someone did to me in real life what they did to me here, they would get the same talking to. I do not come here for strife, I come here to exchange.


- LA



That you have a right to answer, I agree.  However, and with all absolute respect.... the reason these individuals post here is because they have tried to get a good flame war going via email and failed.  Here, they have more success because SOMEBODY is going to want to prove them wrong.  They are unsinkable fish.  You cannot prove them wrong.  They don't "win" by proving you wrong with a logical argument, they "win" by pissing you off enough to respond.   Nobody is dumb enough to take the things they say with any credibility... why lend credibility to it by answering?  Proving the circular logic does nothing to discredit a loud mouth.... all a loudmouth wants is an audience.  ignore them, eventually they find another way to get attention.  Just chuckle at the posts, everyone else does.

I have read your stuff and the other person's, you know... what's-her-name, so has everyone else.  We can all see there is a considerable gap in brain function.



What's her name? No seriously... ;-)

Thanks. And I agree with you. Then on the other hand, I will stand firm on the way I reacted. But thank you for your insights and more importantly, for your kind words :-)

- LA

_____________________________

Une main de fer dans un gant de velours ~ An iron hand in a velvet glove

(in reply to notinferior)
Profile   Post #: 121
RE: Naughty Mistress!! - 1/28/2010 6:21:11 PM   
Kyoki


Posts: 69
Joined: 5/3/2009
Status: offline
That's terrible. I wish I had more to say, but I didn't think women would be so shameless to even ENTER a club like that just to be pampered.

(in reply to Lockit)
Profile   Post #: 122
RE: Naughty Mistress!! - 1/29/2010 1:16:58 PM   
Rhodes85


Posts: 445
Joined: 11/15/2008
From: Nova Scotia, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

If I see two guys going at it and one is six six weighing in at 300 lbs and the other is five ten weighing in at 135 lbs, my money's going on the big guy.  That is why we have weigh ins at boxing matches..... because its a HUGE advantage.


Being realistic, boxing is not fighting. Boxing is boxing. Boxing has rules that are very different from an actual fight and are quite constraining in that respect. One of the first principles taught in hand to hand combat is to use your oponents own size and strength against them.

quote:

In this case, my original post pointed out that the guy had options.  He did not need to punch her.  What he did was reprehensible, made more so because of her gender.  No, he did not need to hit her.  A woman slapping a man is not adequate reason for him to punch her.


I'm not saying he needed to, or even should have hit her, as there was no actual threat. What I meant was that she should not haul off and hit him and not expect a similar response. I do not condone hitting a woman without a very good reason, i'm simply saying that she should expect to get treated the same way she treats others. Which in this case, in hitting someone, its not unreasonable to expect him to hit back.

quote:

The original post points out that in the end, the woman was bloodied and the man unscathed.  So, yeah, he escalated the violence from a slap to a punch. 


Well in fairness the fact that she was bloodied and he was not is more to do with the fact that she did not expect nor defend herself against getting hit back. In other situations there are many times where one person is untouched and the other in lying on the floor. Its nothing to do with gender. Whether it was a punch of a slap matters little. She hit him and he hit her back. He didn't escalate the situation, he merely responded to it. Males are much less likely to slap someone than they are to punch them.

quote:

a guy walks into a sex club that caters to femdom kink wearing a schoolboy outfit.  Its not a stretch to assume he is kind of looking for domination of some stripe or color.


I see your point and I agree, but she made assumptions instead of finding out what sort of domination he was looking for. As was pointed out before, who know how he might have responded, he could have gone completely off the deep end at getting yelled at or slapped. He didn't, but you never know what could have happened.

quote:

As for your fighting advice, I don't know your background.  I will say though that most of what you say is great in theory, and always applicable in Hollywood.  In real life.... when a 96 pound guy goes up against a 200 pound guy, the 96 pounder loses.  When two guys attack one, the one loses.  Ten years of study in karate can account for fifty pounds of difference in a fight.  Six years of karate will get your ass kicked in a real fight (I know, its not that way in Hollywood).  In Hollywood, any woman can kick any man's ass.  In real life, it just doesn't work that way.  Even in karate tournaments, people are classed by size and weight. 


My background is military hand to hand combat training, knife fighting techniques, some judo and jujitsu and a great deal of additional training from bouncers and enforcers. Not the nicest people but they know what they're doing. Hollywood has nothing to do with it. Just because one guy is 96 pounds and the other is 200 does not mean the 96 pound guy is going to lose. When two guys attack one and the one guy is trained to defend himself properly he stands a good chance of winning. Soldiers for example are specifically trained to deal with such situations. They're not as hopeless as you seem to think. Not two months ago I watched a guy that isn't more than 150lb take out two blowup boy types, armed and twice his size in less than 30 seconds. You should have seen the look on his girlfriends face. Ironically he ended up with a job offer because of that. Heh, go figure. My point is simple. Knowing what you are doing makes a huge difference. Karate is fine in a fair fight, but it has its limits. Again, size and strength do not count as much as agility, this isn't boxing. Though strength is useful for breaking certain holds.

quote:

But if you want to win a fight, a real fight, taking a couple years of karate lessons isn't going to help much.  Spend that time pumping iron and eating steaks and get some bulk on you and it will go a lot further in a real fight


Until your opponent pulls a gun or knife and shoots you in the face or stabs you. Quite correct, karate doesn't help. Nothing i've been talking about has anything to do with karate.

quote:

Another thing about all this woo-shoo stuff.  I know that the military teaches a certain amount of martial arts to troops (mostly to build confidence) and that people make a ton of money teaching woo-shoo to kids who think they are going to learn to beat up the school bully with it.  In real life, though, it isn't the panacea lots of guys think it is.


They teach a considerable amount depending on the service and which military you're referring to. While it does build confidence, what they teach isn't so much designed to fight as it is to outright kill or disable your opponent. Military training isn't the same thing they're teaching 10 year olds at the local dojo.

quote:

In Hollywood, any woman can kick any man's ass


Thats a little sexist. I can think of a few women I know I wouldn't dare take a swing at. Women are just as capable of winning a fight as men are.

quote:

Speed and agility, in an actual fight, are not of much use once some guy has you slammed up against a wall and is bashing your skull into the concrete.


Speed and agility are what prevent that from happening in the first place. If you ended up in that situation its unlikely you knew what you were doing anyway.

quote:

The Saracens were big on speed and agility in the crusades.... and they never won a battle against the heavily armored crusaders unless they outnumbered them about fifteen to one.  Even then, they frequently lost.


Thats a little out of context. Crusaders frequently wore plate armor which is not easy to penetrate even at close range the Saracens wore lighter armor and usually did not have the appropriate weapons for use against that sort of armor. The fact that the Crusaders were also better led (for the most part) counts for alot as well. In this case they should have used their superior speed to outmaneuver and outflank, if not surround, their opponents - rather than carrying out full on head to head fights. Though that goes against the pitched battles that practically made up all of medieval warfare. Now, Saladin....theres a man who knew the value of such tactics and how to exploit weaknesses in the Crusaders capabilities.

quote:

 Finally, and I say this because you are a man who appears to be a decent sort, it is NOT okay to hit a woman.  If she has a gun or even a knife, then, well all bets are off.  If she is some amazonian monster, then maybe.  Aside from that, no, only a coward hits a woman (unless its consensual).


I never said it was ok to outright hit a woman. At least not unless you are doing so in self defense. Though the same could be said about a woman hitting a man.


_____________________________

This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. Had this been an actual emergency you would all be dead by now. Have a nice day and remember: Friends don't let friends vote Republican.

(in reply to Lockit)
Profile   Post #: 123
RE: Naughty Mistress!! - 1/31/2010 2:43:04 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Loki45

quote:

ORIGINAL: notinferior
Finally, and I say this because you are a man who appears to be a decent sort, it is NOT okay to hit a woman.  If she has a gun or even a knife, then, well all bets are off.  If she is some amazonian monster, then maybe.  Aside from that, no, only a coward hits a woman (unless its consensual).


After all this you still make such assertions about only a coward hitting a woman. I can only hope one day a 'woman' lays you out. Then we can all point and laugh at you for not defending yourself against a 'little woman.'

By the way, what you profess to know about martial arts is bullshit. I know a guy personally who took on multiple opponents after only 2 years of instruction and they lost, he survived. In another incident (same amount of instruction) said guy took out two other guys, one of whom was armed with a gun. So don't speak about that which you do not know.

None of that even matters when you consider what I said about my female friend who's literally half my size (about 5' nothing and a 115 lbs) and had to be pulled by THREE MEN off of one guy who sparked her anger, or the ex-husband she laid out with one shot.

People call me a sexist, but your sexism is showing badly.



I am afraid you fail to make your point.

So what IS the point?

(in reply to Loki45)
Profile   Post #: 124
RE: Naughty Mistress!! - 2/3/2010 10:05:42 PM   
Peregrinus1716


Posts: 14
Joined: 7/26/2009
Status: offline
Excuse me Ladies for entering this conversation with my 2 scents but as it touches on a subject that i have ran into myself i feel that i have a couple points that i wish to bring up.
                  I for one can throughly enjoy rough treatment if i have given consent. however due to having fairly well established self defense instincts i cannot do so with out knowing at least somewhat what will happen or with out consent. It is dangerous to assume that some one regardless of being sub or otherwise will be ok with a stranger striking them or even someone that is known but not well known to you will be fine with such treatment. I have had case where i have been struck with out any prior expectation of it which has called unfortunate results. Please for anyone new to the lifestyle keep this in mind. Though one is submissive there is always the chance that if you do not know the person striking them or otherwise doing something that is unexpected may case a reflex action such as the person striking back in some cases they do not even mean to do so .
                                                 

(in reply to Lockit)
Profile   Post #: 125
RE: Naughty Mistress!! - 2/4/2010 12:22:48 AM   
stella41b


Posts: 4258
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: SW London (UK)
Status: offline
What wins fights isn't gender, or size, or martial arts training, speed, agility, body building, etc but mindset.

I spent parts of my childhood growing up in some really rough districts in town, and that includes living in social housing on estates where the police come prepared. I've lived in some of the worst areas of London. These are places where you do what you can not to get into fights, because your adversary just might be carrying a knife or some other weapon. Therefore learning to fight and physically defend yourself is much less important than learning how to communicate with other people.

The way I see it is, barring obvious exceptions, if you are an adult and have to resort to physical means to get your point across then you've already lost. Doesn't matter if you win the physical fight and put the other person in hospital, you've still lost. Winning to me is settling amicably through dialogue or walking away.

_____________________________

CM's Resident Lyricist
also Facebook
http://stella.baker.tripod.com/
50NZpoints
Q2
Simply Q

(in reply to LadyAngelika)
Profile   Post #: 126
RE: Naughty Mistress!! - 2/4/2010 1:44:41 PM   
Loki45


Posts: 2100
Joined: 5/13/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy
I am afraid you fail to make your point.

So what IS the point?


Don't you worry about my point. It's the kind of point that doesn't require a tinfoil hat to understand, therefore you will never get it. Just move along.


_____________________________

"'Till the roof comes off, 'till the lights go out
'Till my legs give out, can't shut my mouth."

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 127
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 5 6 [7]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> RE: Naughty Mistress!! Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 6 [7]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.055