juliaoceania
Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006 From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: antinomy quote:
ORIGINAL: Smutmonger When you have a bunch of people who are "refusing any sort of label-because I am too speshul to be defined"......These disagreements are myriad and chaotic. The conversations soon become a bit like watching a room full of drugged cats doing backflips. Lots of sound and fury-amusing in the extreme-but no sense whatsoever. I'm using your post to respond to, because of your reference to the word "speshul", it's what got me thinking... Now, after considering this for a while, I started thinking about labels in general. Doormat does seem to have negative connotations for some people- and obviously, not so much for others. The people that's don't see it as a big deal think, hey, a submissive does things that in the world at large could be construed as doormatish. Being the one doing the submitting, the sub or slave MIGHT do some things that a vanilla partner would find offensive or refuse to do (again, might, as every relationship is different). But...because of this...it comes down to some people having the feeling that if it's looks like a duck (doormat), walks like a duck (doormat), and quacks like a duck (doormat)- it's a duck (doormat). Except... How many people here have commented on osf's avatar? Told him what a cute little duck he has? I, for one, did. I was quickly corrected. It's not a duck, it's a gosling. Looks like a duck to me. But, I took it on osf's authority as owner of the critter that it's a gosling. Why did he correct me in the first place? Was it because his duck is "speshul", and takes offense at being called a duck? No, he corrected me because I labelled it wrong; and it was important enough to him to point it out to me. Now, if he feels that way about a pet- why is it so hard to understand that submissives who do not associate with the term doormat take offense at it? Not because they are "speshul" and are trying to avoid being labelled, but because they don't want to be labelled incorrectly. If we can afford a gosling that courtesy, should it not extend to human beings as well? I loved this entire post, because it is true from my perspective... One thing you highlighted, some in the Vanilla world would call submissives doormats, I wanted to mention they would also call dominants abusers... so instead of dom, master, sir, daddy... we could just call all submissives doormats, and all dominants abusers... doesn't matter what the words really mean...right?
_____________________________
Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt
|