Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Women's Rights!


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Women's Rights! Page: <<   < prev  35 36 37 [38] 39   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Women's Rights! - 3/21/2010 3:07:23 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

Oh for goodness sake.

This is not a "step backwards" - a step backwards would require something to change. This is maintaining the status quo.

Women have not lost any rights today. Our rights were not thrown away. Women still have the exact same right to get an abortion as they did yesterday.

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

I hope American woman are clear about what just happened ...their President and a few of their Democratic represenatives have just sold their rights down the river in order to advance the cause of Health Care Reform.


As a woman, I can say that not only were no rights lost, but quite a few will be gained.

The right to a mammogram
The right to a pap smear
The right to a gyno visit
The right to treatment for breast and ovarian cancer
The right to have your child in a hospital surrounded by trained staff, without a bill that equals a couple years of that child's higher education

I'm sorry but really if you're saying that funding for abortion is more important than health care reform it might interest you to know that there are far more pressing issues regarding womens' health than what she does when and if she becomes pregnant.
Sorry that you took that one post of mine(I am a rather prolific poster...I even appear on other threads...lol) and assumed that entailed my thinking on the subject in its entirety...but I will grant you I could have been clearer and more expansive....I allowed my anger to cloud my judgement on that post.In other posts I have expressed my belief that while this is a flawed bill.....and certain Democratic representatives bowed to either their fear of retribution at the polls ...or their own backwards religious dogma...it is a step forward.Hell it is my hope it is just the first step towards a single payer option.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Elisabella)
Profile   Post #: 741
RE: Women's Rights! - 3/23/2010 7:32:39 AM   
RCdc


Posts: 8674
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phoenixpower


quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

On that note, then you must surely believe anybody wanting an abortion for reasons other than rape or incest should be required to pay for it themselves (the whole 2 to tango thing)?



It can be provided free of charge via the NHS but as far as I know it can take rather long to get to the appointment with the NHS...as usual...


Incorrect.  Abortions don't have 'waiting' lists like some other procedures.  Depending on where it's carried out or the reason, you can even get an NHS appointment within 24 hours.  Even vasectomies have no more than around a 4(6 at most depending on your area) week wait.  You can pay private clinics for an abortion but the majority of women do not have to and couldn't afford to even if they wished.  You can however, 'top up' your abortion, in the same way you can 'top up' your birth by paying extra for a private room etc.  That can be done in some hospitals or clinics for around £10 per night, as my friend did recently.

the.dark.

< Message edited by RCdc -- 3/23/2010 7:33:20 AM >


_____________________________


RC&dc


love isnt gazing into each others eyes - it's looking forward in the same direction

(in reply to Phoenixpower)
Profile   Post #: 742
RE: Women's Rights! - 3/23/2010 8:25:04 AM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

Oh for goodness sake.

This is not a "step backwards" - a step backwards would require something to change. This is maintaining the status quo.

Women have not lost any rights today. Our rights were not thrown away. Women still have the exact same right to get an abortion as they did yesterday.

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

I hope American woman are clear about what just happened ...their President and a few of their Democratic represenatives have just sold their rights down the river in order to advance the cause of Health Care Reform.


As a woman, I can say that not only were no rights lost, but quite a few will be gained.

The right to a mammogram
The right to a pap smear
The right to a gyno visit
The right to treatment for breast and ovarian cancer
The right to have your child in a hospital surrounded by trained staff, without a bill that equals a couple years of that child's higher education

I'm sorry but really if you're saying that funding for abortion is more important than health care reform it might interest you to know that there are far more pressing issues regarding womens' health than what she does when and if she becomes pregnant.
You are of course right...and I'm happy to say so...I did ,when I made the earlier ill advised post misunderstand the particulars of the deal struck by the pro-life contingent of the Democratic Party....All that was agreed to was that the status quo was maintained where federal funds and abortion was concerned....The Hyde Ammendmant was maintained....a rider that has been attatched to appropriation bills since 1976.It would have been better had this not been necessary but...in the end the bill could not have been passed minus this agreement.
Sorry for my error.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Elisabella)
Profile   Post #: 743
RE: Women's Rights! - 3/23/2010 11:19:17 AM   
barelynangel


Posts: 6233
Status: offline
Fast Reply based on the OP and some of the posts --

I don't know if this has been said but PEOPLE don't have the right to do with their bodies as they will --

A person cannot legally commit suicide.

A person cannot legally let someone else kill them.

A person cannot consent to being beaten in many states now.

You do not have the right to give your organs that you need to live away while you are alive.

if you were to cut of a perfectly good limb and for some reason had to seek medical care because of same, the doctors are required by law to have you investigated either incident wise or emotionally.

There are many things that people are not allowed to do freely with their bodies. Abortion simply is a procedure that as of now is allowed and only the female needs to consent.

I think many people believe they have an all out right to do with their bodies what they will but there are many things that would have them either brought up on charges or held involuntarily for evaluation for doing same.

angel

< Message edited by barelynangel -- 3/23/2010 11:20:59 AM >


_____________________________


What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.
R.W. Emerson


(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 744
RE: Women's Rights! - 3/23/2010 12:01:42 PM   
RCdc


Posts: 8674
Status: offline
Maybe not in the states.  But in other countries some of those are perfectly legal.
But then, whether it's legal or not, it doesn't matter for someone who makes the decision to take things away from the state or law and pay the consequence.

the.dark.

_____________________________


RC&dc


love isnt gazing into each others eyes - it's looking forward in the same direction

(in reply to barelynangel)
Profile   Post #: 745
RE: Women's Rights! - 3/23/2010 12:10:45 PM   
Sanguinarian


Posts: 474
Joined: 8/13/2008
Status: offline
I am just curious, but what about Human Parthenogenesis? ( In laymen's terms, a virgin pregnancy where no sperm or other male hormone has been introduced into the female's body whatsoever. )

Since the chick did keep her legs closed, but she still got pregnant. So.... can she have an abortion?

( And try to keep to the question and not bother with the fact that there has been no proven documented cases of Human Parthenogenesis. I am asking for the theory of abortion related to this non-sex-related pregnancy.) 

(in reply to came4U)
Profile   Post #: 746
RE: Women's Rights! - 3/23/2010 12:16:29 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
Okay...keeping to your hypothetical...I still will be forced to ask one little question...why go to the trouble of arranging to be impregnated...only to abort.It seems,on it's face,more than a little silly....even as a theoretical proposition.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Sanguinarian)
Profile   Post #: 747
RE: Women's Rights! - 3/23/2010 12:29:22 PM   
heartcream


Posts: 3044
Joined: 5/9/2007
From: Psychoalphadiscobetabioaquadoloop
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: barelynangel

Fast Reply based on the OP and some of the posts --

I don't know if this has been said but PEOPLE don't have the right to do with their bodies as they will --

A person cannot legally commit suicide.

A person cannot legally let someone else kill them.

A person cannot consent to being beaten in many states now.

You do not have the right to give your organs that you need to live away while you are alive.

if you were to cut of a perfectly good limb and for some reason had to seek medical care because of same, the doctors are required by law to have you investigated either incident wise or emotionally.

There are many things that people are not allowed to do freely with their bodies. Abortion simply is a procedure that as of now is allowed and only the female needs to consent.

I think many people believe they have an all out right to do with their bodies what they will but there are many things that would have them either brought up on charges or held involuntarily for evaluation for doing same.

angel


Why caps "people"? I dont get it.

People do have the all out right to do with their bodies as they will. Our legal system is not based in ultimate truth at all and to think it is is silly. Yeah like then you could write, PEOPLE do not have the right to have doggie style sex because in some states it is illegal.

That is a stupid law and many of the laws are. Supporting the law as though it were God is really worrisome position and says so much about the person on the soap box supporting this wrong reality. Women used to have no right to vote, if they though they had an all out right to vote I would think these women had a brain not the shrill yelling at them that the law would not allow it.

People have thought they have an all out right to freedom but the friggin law said otherwise and a black man running away from this ridiculous an damaging 'law' would 'lawfully' be gunned down, hung and so on and so forth.



_____________________________

"Exaggerate the essential, leave the obvious vague." Vincent Van Gogh

I'd Rather Be With You

Every single line means something.
Jean-Michel Basquiat



(in reply to barelynangel)
Profile   Post #: 748
RE: Women's Rights! - 3/23/2010 12:32:17 PM   
Sanguinarian


Posts: 474
Joined: 8/13/2008
Status: offline
Ah ah, I never said it was 'arranged'. In all of the species that have births via Parthenogenesis, it is not arranged. In humans, it is said that this cannot be medically arranged for, either, due to the complications of the imprint to the fetus genome that is supposed to come from two sources ( male and female parents)

So, I ask again, but perhaps in a slightly different way. If this phenomenon happened just randomly, meaning that the female was practicing abstinence and not having any extra-curricular sexual activities, would she be able to have an abortion if she chose to?

( Or in another case, a child born with both sets of sexual organs and both sets are fertile, and so, can cause "Virgin Pregnancy" can this still be done?)

My question is more for those who allege that a woman having sex is responsible for any child that comes of it and should not have the option of abortion like a rape/incest/medical necessary victim/person should have. Would a person who has never had sex, or done sexual activities but is pregnant for any reason, be able to make the choice for herself?

Any takers?


< Message edited by Sanguinarian -- 3/23/2010 12:34:07 PM >

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 749
RE: Women's Rights! - 3/23/2010 12:44:51 PM   
heartcream


Posts: 3044
Joined: 5/9/2007
From: Psychoalphadiscobetabioaquadoloop
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanguinarian
Would a person who has never had sex, or done sexual activities but is pregnant for any reason, be able to make the choice for herself?

Any takers?
[/color]


Of course why wouldnt she be?


_____________________________

"Exaggerate the essential, leave the obvious vague." Vincent Van Gogh

I'd Rather Be With You

Every single line means something.
Jean-Michel Basquiat



(in reply to Sanguinarian)
Profile   Post #: 750
RE: Women's Rights! - 3/23/2010 12:49:21 PM   
RCdc


Posts: 8674
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanguinarian

I am just curious, but what about Human Parthenogenesis? ( In laymen's terms, a virgin pregnancy where no sperm or other male hormone has been introduced into the female's body whatsoever. )

Since the chick did keep her legs closed, but she still got pregnant. So.... can she have an abortion?

( And try to keep to the question and not bother with the fact that there has been no proven documented cases of Human Parthenogenesis. I am asking for the theory of abortion related to this non-sex-related pregnancy.) 



Ah great.  Mary and the abortion debate.

the.dark.

_____________________________


RC&dc


love isnt gazing into each others eyes - it's looking forward in the same direction

(in reply to Sanguinarian)
Profile   Post #: 751
RE: Women's Rights! - 3/23/2010 12:50:29 PM   
Jeffff


Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline
Madonna or Whore?

_____________________________

"If you don't live it, it won't come out your horn." Charlie Parker

(in reply to RCdc)
Profile   Post #: 752
RE: Women's Rights! - 3/23/2010 12:51:41 PM   
RCdc


Posts: 8674
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

Madonna or Whore?


I suppose for some, that would depend if she kept the baby or not.

the.dark.

_____________________________


RC&dc


love isnt gazing into each others eyes - it's looking forward in the same direction

(in reply to Jeffff)
Profile   Post #: 753
RE: Women's Rights! - 3/23/2010 12:52:12 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Their right to be either or both, I expect.

Susan B. Anthony

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Jeffff)
Profile   Post #: 754
RE: Women's Rights! - 3/23/2010 12:57:10 PM   
heartcream


Posts: 3044
Joined: 5/9/2007
From: Psychoalphadiscobetabioaquadoloop
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

Madonna or Whore?


Madonna or Heidi Fleiss?

_____________________________

"Exaggerate the essential, leave the obvious vague." Vincent Van Gogh

I'd Rather Be With You

Every single line means something.
Jean-Michel Basquiat



(in reply to Jeffff)
Profile   Post #: 755
RE: Women's Rights! - 3/23/2010 1:01:29 PM   
Sanguinarian


Posts: 474
Joined: 8/13/2008
Status: offline
: chuckles and offers Mike pats: Sorry Mike, I tried to use layman's terms.

:P the.dark, Trust me, it isn't the Mary debate. I was just curious. But in my opinion, of some 'angel' came to visit Mary and then said Mary was pregnant and no one else knew, if I was Joseph, I would be asking some serious questions of that angel.

So... I got one in favor of the abortion choice in the Parthenogenesis theory. Anyone else?

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 756
RE: Women's Rights! - 3/23/2010 1:18:26 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanguinarian

: chuckles and offers Mike pats: Sorry Mike, I tried to use layman's terms.

:P the.dark, Trust me, it isn't the Mary debate. I was just curious. But in my opinion, of some 'angel' came to visit Mary and then said Mary was pregnant and no one else knew, if I was Joseph, I would be asking some serious questions of that angel.

So... I got one in favor of the abortion choice in the Parthenogenesis theory. Anyone else?

And now you condescendingly pat me on the head(?)....and refer to talking in laymans terms ......sheeesh you're a cruel one  I think I like you.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Sanguinarian)
Profile   Post #: 757
RE: Women's Rights! - 3/23/2010 1:33:11 PM   
Marc2b


Posts: 6660
Joined: 8/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

PEOPLE do not have the right to have doggie style sex because in some states it is illegal.




Holy shit!  Please tell me that you made this up and it's not true!  Doggie style is my favorite.  It's so God damn primal (especially if you do it out in the woods ). 

Oh, who am I kidding?  In this wacko country it probably is true.   


_____________________________

Do you know what the most awesome thing about being an Atheist is? You're not required to hate anybody!

(in reply to heartcream)
Profile   Post #: 758
RE: Women's Rights! - 3/23/2010 1:35:45 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
Will some mere law stop you from acting all primal and shit?

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Marc2b)
Profile   Post #: 759
RE: Women's Rights! - 3/23/2010 1:38:24 PM   
Marc2b


Posts: 6660
Joined: 8/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Will some mere law stop you from acting all primal and shit?


Fuck no!  In fact it will make it even sweeter.  Stupid paternalistic/moralistic laws just piss the shit out of me.  



_____________________________

Do you know what the most awesome thing about being an Atheist is? You're not required to hate anybody!

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 760
Page:   <<   < prev  35 36 37 [38] 39   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Women's Rights! Page: <<   < prev  35 36 37 [38] 39   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.126