RE: Tea Party Crashers (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


slvemike4u -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/16/2010 11:47:56 AM)

Ouch...careful there subrob you are in danger of hurting my feelings with your oh so harsh condemnation of my lifestyle....Imagine getting judged on such a thing on such a site.Shocking to say the least [:D]
Do me a favor follow the link prior to making a bigger fool of yourself....
http://www.collarchat.com/m_3154468/tm.htm

Why do I doubt you will be impressed,nor will you allow what you find to consider that some things are jokes...some are past tense....and others are just none of your damm business.




subrob1967 -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/16/2010 1:43:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Ouch...careful there subrob you are in danger of hurting my feelings with your oh so harsh condemnation of my lifestyle....Imagine getting judged on such a thing on such a site.Shocking to say the least [:D]
Do me a favor follow the link prior to making a bigger fool of yourself....
http://www.collarchat.com/m_3154468/tm.htm

Why do I doubt you will be impressed,nor will you allow what you find to consider that some things are jokes...some are past tense....and others are just none of your damm business.


You're right, I'm not impressed, thousands of kids graduate college every spring, and some things are jokes, I'm talking to one, but I should be thankful for guys like you, you give me job security, and the brand new Tahoe is kinda nice too[:D]




slvemike4u -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/16/2010 1:51:18 PM)

Ouch,once again you hurt me to the core.....lol.As my son would say....your a tool [:)].




mnottertail -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/16/2010 1:53:57 PM)

having graduated with honors one would hope he would say 'you're a tool', to the tool.

just sayin'.




slvemike4u -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/16/2010 1:59:53 PM)

Probably...the kid has been way ahead of me for years.....lol.
But fuck you for pointing it out....[:D][:D]
Now even if I correct it....You've got it in your little quote box.[:-]




truckinslave -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/16/2010 2:26:53 PM)

I thought everyone accepted that. Seriously.




Sanity -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/19/2010 7:25:02 AM)


The New York Times board of directors:

[img]http://michellemalkin.cachefly.net/michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/nytboard.jpg[/img]


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

The only "conclusion" I have definitely,absolutly reached is that these events are not a true representation of Americans.They are just too monochromatic to be so....when you are as purely white as Ivory soap.....something is amiss.
That sort of "sameness" is not arrived at accidentally there must be a reason for it....you object to labeling tea partiers as racists....fine,do you care to offer another explanation for their overwhelming "whiteness".This country is just too diverse for something like that to occur in a vacuum




slvemike4u -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/19/2010 8:44:09 AM)

Your point Sanity? I do believe the Board of Directors of an organization such as the Times would be a merit based sort of thing....and if you look you will see that minorities and woman are represented.....by the way pal....don't you want to drop by my "brag" thread in off-topic.I know I would love to see you over there....seriously!




rulemylife -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/19/2010 8:55:28 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TreasureKY

A truly racist organization wouldn't allow membership by any race they did not embrace. 

lol... How many black Klu Klux Klan members are there? 



I know of at least one:

Black K K K Member






slvemike4u -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/19/2010 9:08:36 AM)

Shit RML if that wasn't a spoof you would have matched the number of Democrats backed by teabags....lol




rulemylife -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/19/2010 9:25:43 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

If there are any signs with miss spelled words at the rallys tomorrow, they will belong to the tea party crashers.


You must be a tea party crasher then.





subrob1967 -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/19/2010 10:56:59 AM)

You guys still whining about racist Tea Parties?

How about racist MSNBC? I mean just how many black hosts do they have?...Lets count them, shall we?

Morning Joe...............0 black hosts, 3 hosts no minorities
The Daily Rundown....0 black hosts  2 hosts no minorities
Andrea Mitchell..........0 black hosts
Dylan Ratigan.............0 black hosts
Hardball.....................0 black hosts
The Ed Show.............0 black hosts
Olberfurher................0 black hosts
Maddow....................0 black hosts

In MSNBC's defense I will say they win the Ugly Anchor Award, so they got that going for them[:D]




Sanity -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/19/2010 11:14:11 AM)

[image]http://michellemalkin.cachefly.net/michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/whmsnbc.jpg[/image]
Take a closer look:
[image]http://michellemalkin.cachefly.net/michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/msn1.jpg[/image]
White and white.
[image]http://michellemalkin.cachefly.net/michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/msnbc2.jpg[/image]
White.
[image]http://michellemalkin.cachefly.net/michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/msn3.jpg[/image]
White.
[image]http://michellemalkin.cachefly.net/michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/msn4.jpg[/image]
Pallid white and pasty white.
[image]http://michellemalkin.cachefly.net/michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/msn5.jpg[/image]
Does it get any whiter than this?
Oh, and these are the colors of the gang that sneered at Palin’s “white crowd:”

[image]http://michellemalkin.cachefly.net/michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/whitemsnbc2.jpg[/image]


http://michellemalkin.com/2009/11/23/the-indelible-whiteness-of-msnbc/




slvemike4u -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/19/2010 12:04:05 PM)

And of course you have pictures of these folks holding up hateful and rasicts signs right Sanity and Subrob...because bottom line the simple fact that most teabaggers are white isn't the only indication of their hateful bigoted viewpoints.There are the signs ,the chants and the goals that they are pursuing ...which if enacted in the method they would have thme enacted would fall squarely on one group and one group alone....the disadvantaged.

Unless you two are changing the rules of the game and the two of you are here today to proclaim simply because you are white...you are a bigot?
Wow.....I never saw that coming from the likes of you two.




Sanity -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/19/2010 1:43:07 PM)


Who's trying to change the rules of the game, mike?


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

The only "conclusion" I have definitely,absolutly reached is that these events are not a true representation of Americans.They are just too monochromatic to be so....when you are as purely white as Ivory soap.....something is amiss.
That sort of "sameness" is not arrived at accidentally there must be a reason for it....you object to labeling tea partiers as racists....fine,do you care to offer another explanation for their overwhelming "whiteness".This country is just too diverse for something like that to occur in a vacuum





slvemike4u -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/19/2010 1:47:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Who's trying to change the rules of the game, mike?


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

The only "conclusion" I have definitely,absolutly reached is that these events are not a true representation of Americans.They are just too monochromatic to be so....when you are as purely white as Ivory soap.....something is amiss.
That sort of "sameness" is not arrived at accidentally there must be a reason for it....you object to labeling tea partiers as racists....fine,do you care to offer another explanation for their overwhelming "whiteness".This country is just too diverse for something like that to occur in a vacuum


Apples and oranges sanity...one is a group of miscreants banding together with a common agenda and hateful slogans....
And the other is a merit based Board of Directors.....surely you can see the difference there(not as sure SubRob will be able to keep up...but I never took you for out and out stupid).




Sanity -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/19/2010 1:56:18 PM)


Oh no you don't. You branded the Tea Party "racists" because you claim they're all white.You wrote that that alone was enough to prove racism.

Also, its a lie that there are no people of color among them, Firm established that (though you ignored it). And the very people who handed you your race-baiting talking points, the New York Times and MSNBC are in fact exactly what you erroneously claim that the Tea Party is... lily white. And I'm not going to say racists because unlike what you try to claim (or were trying to claim), its not a crime to be white nor is a person or any group of people necessarily racist because of the color of their skin.


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Who's trying to change the rules of the game, mike?


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

The only "conclusion" I have definitely,absolutly reached is that these events are not a true representation of Americans.They are just too monochromatic to be so....when you are as purely white as Ivory soap.....something is amiss.
That sort of "sameness" is not arrived at accidentally there must be a reason for it....you object to labeling tea partiers as racists....fine,do you care to offer another explanation for their overwhelming "whiteness".This country is just too diverse for something like that to occur in a vacuum


Apples and oranges sanity...one is a group of miscreants banding together with a common agenda and hateful slogans....
And the other is a merit based Board of Directors.....surely you can see the difference there(not as sure SubRob will be able to keep up...but I never took you for out and out stupid).




rulemylife -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/19/2010 2:13:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

You guys still whining about racist Tea Parties?

How about racist MSNBC? I mean just how many black hosts do they have?...Lets count them, shall we?

Morning Joe...............0 black hosts, 3 hosts no minorities
The Daily Rundown....0 black hosts  2 hosts no minorities
Andrea Mitchell..........0 black hosts
Dylan Ratigan.............0 black hosts
Hardball.....................0 black hosts
The Ed Show.............0 black hosts
Olberfurher................0 black hosts
Maddow....................0 black hosts

In MSNBC's defense I will say they win the Ugly Anchor Award, so they got that going for them[:D]


What in the fuck does the NY Times board of directors or the staff at MSNBC have to do with the topic?

Other than a blatant attempt to divert a topic that certain people do not want to discuss.

If you and Sanity want to debate hiring practices at major media outlets then start a thread for that, it has no relevance to this subject.




brainiacsub -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/19/2010 2:23:57 PM)

rml, these two peanuts couldn't begin to explain all the reasons why whites are represented disproportionately greater over blacks among the ranks of professionals and white collar workers. Please don't encourage them to start a thread.




mnottertail -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/19/2010 2:26:47 PM)

Well, if that is the case, wouldn't the crashers want to be overwhelmingly white so they blend?, ala: 'yeah, vinny you blend' 




Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875