Rule
Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: GregoryMK Can you spot the core logical flaw here? It's rather simple: one cannot, and is under no obligation to prove a negative. I cannot prove that I have no wart on my nose. There must be a negative in there somewhere, not so? (Musicmystery will know.) So I do not have to prove that I cannot prove that I have no wart on my nose, not so? quote:
ORIGINAL: GregoryMK If you assert that a thing exists, say little green men from mars or deities, then in a logical argument you must prove that it exists. Why? I have seen a huge spaceship. Why must I prove that it existed? How? quote:
ORIGINAL: GregoryMK Belief in the existence of a thing, absent a proof of it's existence is an irrational belief. Hey! I have seen that spaceship - and now you call me irrational? You may be right philosophically, but credible you aint. quote:
ORIGINAL: GregoryMK Failure to believe in something that has no proof of it's existence is entirely logical. Please prove that you exist. quote:
ORIGINAL: GregoryMK Is it reasonable to believe in a deity? That depends of course on which definition of "reasonable" you choose. Um, I rather think it depends on how the diety is defined. Way back in some nearly forgotten thread I defined my pillow as being God. I assure you that my pillow exists. If you won't believe that my pillow exists, you may be reasonable, but you would also be wrong. quote:
ORIGINAL: GregoryMK If you select "based on logic and reason" then no it is not. But I saw that spaceship and per my definition my pillow is God. quote:
ORIGINAL: GregoryMK St Augustine spent years of effort trying to create a logical proof for the existence of the Christian god and failed miserably. His proof contains a huge jump into illogic assuming that if there is something we cannot understand, it must be god. I suspect that to be a negative in some way. Musicmystery? If it is a negative, you cannot use that as an argument. Anyway, he didn't have my pillow. quote:
ORIGINAL: GregoryMK This leap in "logic"is all to easily disproven. Back when Augustine was writing, people got sick and died. We could not understand why. Skip forward a couple of centuries, and we have modern epidemiology, where we understand the germ theory of disease. Disease wasn't God's will after all, it is caused by nasty things called virii and bacteria. But until we attained more knowledge about the world, it was beyond our reason and understanding, but it wasn't god. Muwhahahaha! That shows the limits of logic and reason; um, of your logic and reason. quote:
ORIGINAL: GregoryMK If you select fairness, then in a society that holds that it is fair to allow others their beliefs it is. I am a bit dull. I have failed to comprehend what you are saying here. If it is fair to allow others their beliefs, then it is fair? Truly? Allow? Rather dictatorial, isn't it? And they ought to be grateful to be allowed, of course. Allow me to troll a bit, while I tongue in cheek: All men with a circumcised penis ought to be castrated. It will improve the genepool. (I am serious about the improving; I am not serious about the castrating - them poor bastards do not need any further genital mutilation.) quote:
ORIGINAL: GregoryMK Is belief in a god or gods logical and reasonable? No. is a belief in a god or gods fair and reasonable. Yes. two different definitions of reasonable however. Let's not confuse them. I am thoroughly confused. I have got a book here somewhere with the proceedings of a court in Greece where Apollo and Athena were in attendance. I must try to find it and read it; I have been postponing that for years now.
< Message edited by Rule -- 6/20/2010 4:00:54 AM >
|