RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department

RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 8:39:31 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: jin99 Riiiiiight, the Dept of Justice is so racist, whites are several times more likely to be convicted of a crime, arrested for minor drug use, and gets the death. Oh wait, it's the blacks who're disproportionately punished for the same crime. Apparently you dont understand what the DoJ does.

TheHeretic -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 9:50:10 PM)
to the thread in general What sort of time frame are you talking on that bet, Wilbur? End of the month? End of the long, hot summer? Right after the election, maybe, as a token sacrifice? I'm not even sure if Holder will go at all, but with his mouth, I'm not putting money on that. He is a symptom of the administration's disconnect from public reality. I see a puppet. The Panther intimidation case is a fair point for public discussion. I just hope other radicals (of any stripe) are not emboldened by this. That sort of behavior wouldn't go over well here. As for this witness, who can truly be sure? Levi Johnston has recently recanted all his slanders of the Palin family, and all those lies about Sarah just seemed so true, didn't they?

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 11:06:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheHeretic to the thread in general What sort of time frame are you talking on that bet, Wilbur? End of the month? End of the long, hot summer? Right after the election, maybe, as a token sacrifice? I'm not even sure if Holder will go at all, but with his mouth, I'm not putting money on that. He is a symptom of the administration's disconnect from public reality. I see a puppet. The Panther intimidation case is a fair point for public discussion. I just hope other radicals (of any stripe) are not emboldened by this. That sort of behavior wouldn't go over well here. As for this witness, who can truly be sure? Levi Johnston has recently recanted all his slanders of the Palin family, and all those lies about Sarah just seemed so true, didn't they? Time frame...later of 6 months or 2 months after the close of any official inquiry into the allegations. I didnt pay any attention to Levi Johnston so I have no idea if he lied then, is lying now, or how true his lies seemed.

Jeffff -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/8/2010 4:08:34 AM)
Of course not. You only read things that agree with your position. Anything that might disagree does not provide the validation your tiny mind needs. You are really quite unbelievable.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/8/2010 8:47:38 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Jeffff Of course not. You only read things that agree with your position. Anything that might disagree does not provide the validation your tiny mind needs. You are really quite unbelievable. What is unbelievable is 1) Your lack of logical thought...How could I know if something agrees with my position or not without reading it? 2) Your reading comprehension, as evidenced in this thread once again 3) That you have nothing better to do with your life than stalk me. Fucking moron.

JstAnotherSub -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/8/2010 9:26:37 AM)
Will, I aint gotta possum in this fight, but I wonder if me and Jeff took the same evlin wud reddin comprenshun cors, cause I thought you took the bet too.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/8/2010 9:30:37 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: JstAnotherSub Will, I aint gotta possum in this fight, but I wonder if me and Jeff took the same evlin wud reddin comprenshun cors, cause I thought you took the bet too. No, you just haven't bothered to read the posts in context. Besides, Jeffffffffff's misreading is intentional more often than not, just so he can find another excuse to post something devoid of content.

Jeffff -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/8/2010 11:55:19 AM)
Not really. In this case I was following along as it occurred. I actually believed a bet to be in place. As for the rest of your nonsense, you have repeatedly taken indefensible positions. When called on them, you offer the same old weak crap. If you actually are educated, you should seek a refund. If you are admired in your field, I would wish to know what it is so I can avoid it if possible.

Moonhead -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/8/2010 12:33:08 PM)
Bizarro logic? Non Euclidean physics? Astrology? UFOlogy?

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/8/2010 1:25:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Jeffff Not really. In this case I was following along as it occurred. I actually believed a bet to be in place. As for the rest of your nonsense, you have repeatedly taken indefensible positions. When called on them, you offer the same old weak crap. If you actually are educated, you should seek a refund. If you are admired in your field, I would wish to know what it is so I can avoid it if possible. I have never taken an indefensible position and you have never tried to refute a position Ive taken with anything but snark. As far as youre reading of this thread, try reading the following knowing DG is ignored: Me to Kendoll: What odds will you give me on Holder resigning/being forced out over this? Kendoll to me: 50k to 1 Me to Kendoll: Deal. Who is going to hold the money? I vote for Mercnbeth. Kendoll to me: What money? ie he's backing out You to me: I can't believe Wilbeur won't take the bet. Me to you (not knowing DG offered one): I said Id take the bet. Its Kendoll thats backing out. If it isnt obvious to you that I was talking about Kendall's chickening out then you just dont want to.

Jeffff -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/8/2010 1:29:43 PM)
It is now, it was not at the time. As for positions, why don't you tell me again about supply side economics and job creation. Or explain some physics for me. You are a sad, sad man

domiguy -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/8/2010 1:35:25 PM)
I would love to see the photo of any woman that would be willing to be seen with wilbur......I am willing to bet she is hideous.

domiguy -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/8/2010 1:36:32 PM)
I accidently repeated the post about what type of a gal would actually be seen with Wilbur.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/8/2010 1:52:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Jeffff It is now, it was not at the time. As for positions, why don't you tell me again about supply side economics and job creation. Or explain some physics for me. You are a sad, sad man Supply side: Heres several articles supply side success Heisenbergs uncertainty principle correctly stated is that a particle DOES NOT HAVE a particular momentum (not speed, the first common mistake) and location. Rather, the momentum and location are a probability distribution. "Indeed, this minimal interpretation leaves open whether it makes sense to attribute precise values of position and momentum to an individual system. Some interpretations of quantum mechanics, e.g. those of Heisenberg and Bohr, deny this;" Eliminating the double negative and awkward structure: Heisenberg says that it makes no sense to attribute precise values of position and momentum to an individual system. That goes far beyond saying that you cant measure them. It is the inevitable result of wave/particle duality. Kudos for at least admitting you didnt see the context of the wager nonsense until I pointed it out to you. Now find something else meaningless to stalk me with.

domiguy -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/8/2010 1:57:36 PM)
Why would a piece of shit, like yourself, even mention that Holder would be fired if there was only at best a 10% chance of that happening. Are all of your opinions based upon so little facts or equally as poor of a chance of coming to fruition? What a douchebag.

Jeffff -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/8/2010 2:14:25 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: domiguy Why would a piece of shit, like yourself, even mention that Holder would be fired if there was only at best a 10% chance of that happening. Are all of your opinions based upon so little facts or equally as poor of a chance of coming to fruition? What a douchebag.

JstAnotherSub -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/8/2010 2:21:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: domiguy I would love to see the photo of any woman that would be willing to be seen with wilbur......I am willing to bet she is hideous. I resent the implication that me or one of my other hideous sisters would be seen with him.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/8/2010 2:25:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: JstAnotherSub quote: ORIGINAL: domiguy I would love to see the photo of any woman that would be willing to be seen with wilbur......I am willing to bet she is hideous. I resent the implication that me or one of my other hideous sisters would be seen with him. Thats another bet Id take from DG if I thought he had more than 2 cents to his name.

Jeffff -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/8/2010 2:26:28 PM)
The more precisely the position is determined, the less precisely the momentum is known in this instant, and vice versa. --Heisenberg, uncertainty paper, 1927 This is a succinct statement of the "uncertainty relation" between the position and the momentum (mass times velocity) of a subatomic particle, such as an electron. This relation has profound implications for such fundamental notions as causality and the determination of the future behavior of an atomic particle. That is Heisnberg, not another source commenting on it. I'll get back you to in the other.

Aynne88 -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/8/2010 2:27:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: domiguy I would love to see the photo of any woman that would be willing to be seen with wilbur......I am willing to bet she is hideous. come on man...the bitch is hawt. http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2010-01-14-RacistTeabagger.jpg

Page: << < prev 4 5 [6] 7 8 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875