Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

The Anti-Feminism Bias


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> The Anti-Feminism Bias Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
The Anti-Feminism Bias - 7/23/2010 2:38:55 PM   
porcelaine


Posts: 5020
Joined: 7/24/2006
Status: offline
Greetings,

I would like to have a constructive discussion on the current wave of anti-feminism within the BDSM community. While I'm not advocating either side, I've noticed a peculiar bias among its female proponents. Ironically their derision is directed towards the submissive woman that embraces feminism on some level. To the degree where her supposed behavior towards dominant men - which renders him trod upon or victimized - is heavily denounced. Strangely enough, the identical acts when performed by the dominant male towards a submissive woman are lauded.

I'm left to wonder if the root behind their disgust is truly indicative of their beliefs regarding feminism and its affect on men as a whole, or relates to attributes perceived in other submissive persons that they deem unacceptable and inappropriate.

Q: Have you noticed a similar bias in the behavioral differences between the roles and sexes? And if so, what is your opinion?

As always, I look forward to your feedback.

~porcelaine


_____________________________

His will; my fate.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: The Anti-Feminism Bias - 7/23/2010 2:43:58 PM   
hlen5


Posts: 5890
Joined: 3/2/2008
Status: offline
I think it might be part of the curent feminism backlash in general. I have seen many responses that show me the (generic, not you porcelaine) poster's orientation is completely male identified, but I can't think of any instances you are describing.

_____________________________



My fave Thread: http://www.collarchat.com/m_2626198/mpage_1/tm.htm

One time "Phallus Expert Extraordinaire"

(in reply to porcelaine)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: The Anti-Feminism Bias - 7/23/2010 2:52:28 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
Porcelaine,

One of the most interesting things to study about feminism is its opponents.  It's a really, really fascinating case-study of sustained propaganda - sustained, that is, with furious energy, for more than a century.  I was forced into a position of having to teach it to post-grads . . . and, hell, did I have to mug up a lot.  I had to unlearn years of drivel that had been rammed down my throat . . .  I'd quite seriously propose Anti-Feminist Propaganda as a post-grad option all of its own . . . .

Long story behind all that.  Anyway, this could be an interesting thread.  Good OP! 

< Message edited by PeonForHer -- 7/23/2010 3:14:42 PM >


_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to porcelaine)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: The Anti-Feminism Bias - 7/23/2010 2:55:19 PM   
AQuietSimpleMan


Posts: 1410
Joined: 11/15/2009
Status: offline
What I see on-line is rarely Feminism, it is Female Superiority or Female Dominance as a natural order.

What I find interesting is how Feminism comes out sideways for some people. How it appears that if a woman is not in a position of authority to some degree she is somehow a blight on the woman's movement.

I have no issue with Feminism. But for some I do see it as an "ISM" it is akin to an obsession. It isn't about their beliefs it's about forcing the view on others.

What I think is strange is how stringly it gets discussed in the BDSM world considering I would see submission as an act of Feminism. I would see it as an ultimate act of doing what a woman chooses to do, considering it is a self imposed surrender, it is her choice no one told her that is all she was good for in fact for the last 40 Years women have been told over and over and over that they can be and do anything they want to do.

Perhaps it is the XY I got, I just don't get the argument as it applies to feminism. Now how it applies to personal choice sure I get that....... the question is if Feminism is about empowerment through personal choice how is BDSM not the ultimate expression of personal choice? The Choice to give up that Choice.

QSM

_____________________________

Guy Stud =Vs= Girl Slut ~~ Debate ENDED!

"If a Key opens many locks, then it is a Master Key, If a Lock is opened by lots of keys, then it is a Shitty Lock"

(in reply to porcelaine)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: The Anti-Feminism Bias - 7/23/2010 3:03:37 PM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
Short answer, I think a lot of the bias is because of a few that label themselves a being a feminist. There was a dominant woman that used to post on the forums regularly, that would have turned me off the idea completely, if she and her behaviour was the only example I was given. I think there are just so many misconceptions and generalizations, that it gets so muddled as to what it even means.

Long answer.....I am going to think some more.


_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to AQuietSimpleMan)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: The Anti-Feminism Bias - 7/23/2010 3:11:40 PM   
Operative


Posts: 1
Joined: 7/20/2010
Status: offline
Feminism has produced arrogant and delusional people that are not helpful to people around them. I'm not sure about what OP is trying to say exactly, but derision towards submissive women is inappropriate. 

(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: The Anti-Feminism Bias - 7/23/2010 3:17:17 PM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Operative

Feminism has produced arrogant and delusional people that are not helpful to people around them. I'm not sure about what OP is trying to say exactly, but derision towards submissive women is inappropriate. 


I suggest you do a thread search with the word and you will surely begin to understand what the OP is saying.


_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to Operative)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: The Anti-Feminism Bias - 7/23/2010 3:21:39 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
TBH, Operative, I've had half an eye towards feminists who've been anti-fem-sub - but rarely found them.  Not in the BDSM world.  It's sort of peculiar, and counterintuitive, but quite cheering for me, that fact. 

Likewise, I've never - not even once - been given grief from a male Dom for the fact that I, myself, am a submale. 

Sometimes it's so, so uplifting when people don't act the way you half-expect that they will . . . .

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Operative)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: The Anti-Feminism Bias - 7/23/2010 3:56:28 PM   
IronBear


Posts: 9008
Joined: 6/19/2005
From: Beenleigh, Qld, Australia
Status: offline
Sadly as so often happens, extremists can influence the thinking of many unthinking people. Perhaps one of the issues I had and have with the Gorean Fraternity, is not so much the Male Dominance as much as with many, the anti male sub/slave as being abhorrent to the Natural order. Now a fair number of my friends are sub/slaves of both genders and I see within them not only the desire to submit and serve but also the strength of will and character to do so and to do so openly.

Y'see it matters not a jot if in my home I am the domanant or alpha person and it matters not if I state with accuracy that in the Victorian period (remember women didn't have the vote or indeed many rights under law including property ownership) the man of the home is it's ruler. Historically many great and slightly lesser homes were owned and run by powerful women (Dominants virtually) who happened to be a damned side smarter that the average bear and understand the rules of the game especially in society so were excellent manipulators.  What has happened since? Women coming into business and especially corporate management, becoming airline pilots, police detectives etc faced the same old boy's club determined to close ranks against them and belittle their efforts (oft to the detriment of the business or profession).

It is likely that such opposition had been encountered in the earlier days of BDSM but I don't know for sure. However the Women's Lib movement liberated many women but it swung way to far and together with the PC folk undermined the good manners of a bygone era when men did show respect for women, not because they are the weaker sex but because you always treat a lady with respect no matter if you disagree with her politics or choice of dress or even her choice of food or friends. I'm not refering to here on CM, but generally, I find that when you use courtesies and show some modicum of respect, it eventually comes back and even can and indeed oft does encourages others to follow suite. I haven't foune an anti feminism bias here I have found some individuals show clearly their bias for or against feminism per se


_____________________________

Iron Bear

Master of Bruin Cottage

http://www.bruincottage.org

Your attitude, words & actions are yours. Take responsibility for them and the consequences they incur.

D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: The Anti-Feminism Bias - 7/23/2010 3:59:41 PM   
Elisabella


Posts: 3939
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: porcelaine

Greetings,

I would like to have a constructive discussion on the current wave of anti-feminism within the BDSM community. While I'm not advocating either side, I've noticed a peculiar bias among its female proponents. Ironically their derision is directed towards the submissive woman that embraces feminism on some level. To the degree where her supposed behavior towards dominant men - which renders him trod upon or victimized - is heavily denounced. Strangely enough, the identical acts when performed by the dominant male towards a submissive woman are lauded.

I'm left to wonder if the root behind their disgust is truly indicative of their beliefs regarding feminism and its affect on men as a whole, or relates to attributes perceived in other submissive persons that they deem unacceptable and inappropriate.

Q: Have you noticed a similar bias in the behavioral differences between the roles and sexes? And if so, what is your opinion?

As always, I look forward to your feedback.

~porcelaine



I'd probably be considered part of that anti feminist wave, because I think in it's current incarnation feminism is either utterly meaningless ("anything a woman chooses to do is feminist"), no longer needed ("feminism is about being able to work outside the home and vote") or completely batshit insane ("men are the root of all evil and if we lived in a female run society there would be no war" or some shit) so I'll try to answer your question.

While I try my hardest to look at people as individuals rather than their stats, I definitely judge people of different genders differently. I've heard feminist rhetoric that boils down to "why are women judged more harshly for sleeping around" and I think, well, because it's dumber for a woman to sleep around, seeing as how she can get PREGNANT and it's going to be hard to build a family with "that guy I met at the bar, John or Jack or someone."

That being said I don't really see a need to protect the poor helpless men from the evil bitches. I kinda want to smack people who see it that way, first of all because the awesome subversive power of feminine wiles is a glorious tradition stretching back through the ages and we haven't died out as a species yet, and secondly because I think people should be who they are, and if a guy isn't seeking out an alpha uber dom role chances are that's not what he wants out of life and I have no right to "save" him from his own choices.

(in reply to porcelaine)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: The Anti-Feminism Bias - 7/23/2010 4:20:31 PM   
solestria


Posts: 29
Joined: 4/11/2010
Status: offline
I'm pretty strongly feminist.  The kinksters I associate with and get along well with also tend to be feminist, and many or those are dominant men and submissive/slave women.  Where I have issues is when people assume that all women are submissive, or that I'm submissive *because* I am a woman, or that all men are naturally dominant, or some such variant.  I have seen a lot of that in CM profiles (including the ever-popular "I believe men should be men and women should be women" trope, whatever that's supposed to mean--I assume it refers to traditional gender roles).

Honestly, I can't take seriously anyone who claims that men are somehow victimized by feminism.  I think such a claim belies serious ignorance of both feminism itself, of privilege and the way it works, and of our current social fabric.

(in reply to Elisabella)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: The Anti-Feminism Bias - 7/23/2010 4:21:35 PM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline
Really good question and one which I know you're expecting to produce a pretty mixed bag of responses.

<blather>

I get the (very subjective) impression that there's a general backlash against feminism taking place within society as a whole. While I dread the thought of an interesting thread like this descending into "politics and religion", there are a number of very outspoken anti-feminist (often but not always from the political <and sometimes the religious> right).

I think the backlash occurs when the people that fought for freedoms become disconnected from the people that subsequently enjoy those freedoms. There's a, probably understandable, "what was the fuss all about" sense that seems to appear. In an earlier thread I made the point that my grandmother dreamt about having choices, my mother fought for them, and my female cousins are enjoying them. Gen Y Women can be forgiven for wondering what the fuss was about - they were born after the major battles had been fought and won.

Personally I think that this is the most dangerous time for any movement - whether it's one that champions equality on the basis of gender, race, or sexuality.

When my cousins sneer (well, one of them in particular) at the marches my mum went on, I try to remind her that a) Even in the liberal west women still earn very significantly less than men (even accounting for career breaks) and that b) Feminism and women's rights are a distant dream in many countries.

I have the same worries about Racism and discrimination against gays and lesbians - The battle is so far from being over in these areas too.

Without wishing to come over all Che Guevara - "there are still battles to be fought and wars to be won on the road to equality" <Comrades!>

</blather>

The derision, by some, that is focussed on women who identify as both submissive and feminist is a legacy of an older orthodoxy, in which to be sexually submissive (or overly feminine for that matter) was seen as heresy, and women who admitted to enjoying it were branded as simply "victims of the patriarchy".

I personally think this is utter bollocks - but the arguments that say "porn degrades women" or "prostitution is fiscal rape" aren't that easy to throw away.

Take me for example - I absolutely believe that feminism is about a woman's right to make choices. Choices about what to do with her body, how to behave, how to dress. And, to accept the consequences of those actions too of course.

But - if a woman chooses genital mutilation (which a tiny number of western woman have done), or to wear the burqa - I'm in there shouting "that degrades women, and you're only choosing to do it because you're a victim of the patriarchy.

So - I'm not entirely consistent in my own thinking...

So back to BDSM.... I don't think that you could properly argue that BDSM doesn't have more than its share of sexist patriarchal men. I'd say it has a considerable number of them. Nor is it possible to argue that BDSM, at least to a casual observer, does much to promote sexual equality - In "classic" BDSM imagery a woman submits, or a man is in some way "feminised". I know that that's not necessarily the truth of BDSM (not entirely), but I'd be hard pressed to argue the opposite hypothesis "BSDM promotes feminism".

Another example is prostitution - On one hand I defend a woman's right to make money by selling sex if she chooses, on the other I would want to defend a vulnerable woman against being forced into prostitution (and lets be clear - women are trafficked, in the vast majority of cases, by men).

The extremes of this are easy - Young girl taken from village, sold in Bangkok for $5 a pop = Very bad. Middle class woman sells her time and sexual services for $500 / hour = Girl Power. But there's a continuum in between... what about the woman who "chooses" to sell her body to feed an addiction to drugs - or better (since I'm sure some would say "serves the druggie right") what about the woman who "chooses" to sell her body to feed her children. Is that right or wrong?

BDSM is such a varied community - on every side of the gender / orientation die you'll find different motivations, level self confidence, and attitudes to gender, race and sexuality.

Personally - I actively look for sane, sorted, independent women for whom submission is a choice. Luckily there are plenty out there. But there are also plenty out there for the old stylee mysogynist as well.

I'll stop now, since I'm still blathering






_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to porcelaine)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: The Anti-Feminism Bias - 7/23/2010 4:32:27 PM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

I'd probably be considered part of that anti feminist wave, because I think in it's current incarnation feminism is either utterly meaningless ("anything a woman chooses to do is feminist"),


Yes this definition is a tad "over-broad"

quote:




no longer needed ("feminism is about being able to work outside the home and vote")


I really do disagree with you on this. Women still earn far less than men (even if you account for their career delaying choice to have sprogs), I'd also respectfully point out that in many countries women don't have the right to work outside the home (even for 33% less than men as they do in the west) or vote for that matter.

quote:



..or completely batshit insane ("men are the root of all evil and if we lived in a female run society there would be no war" or some shit) so I'll try to answer your question.


Easy tiger... you're describing my mum.

Although, to be fair - the mad-eyed, braless, hairy-armpitted bull-feminists of the 70's and 80's are in a minority now (and my mum has become more tolerant of waxing and lipstick).


quote:


While I try my hardest to look at people as individuals rather than their stats, I definitely judge people of different genders differently. I've heard feminist rhetoric that boils down to "why are women judged more harshly for sleeping around" and I think, well, because it's dumber for a woman to sleep around, seeing as how she can get PREGNANT and it's going to be hard to build a family with "that guy I met at the bar, John or Jack or someone."


AHA! Gotcha - see! My mum would so pounce on this. She'd say "You're a victim of patriarchy. So it's ok that if the woman gets pregnant she suffers all the consequences? The man who got her pregnant doesn't have to? SO it's the woman's job to 'build the family'? The social taboo against female sexual liberation is because society places more responsibility on the woman's shoulders."

Now I'm only saying what my batshit insane feminist Mum would say - but really... can't you see just a little of her point?


_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to Elisabella)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: The Anti-Feminism Bias - 7/23/2010 4:33:51 PM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline
Well your reply was a fuck-sight better than mine!

_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to solestria)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: The Anti-Feminism Bias - 7/23/2010 4:39:34 PM   
Elisabella


Posts: 3939
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml

I really do disagree with you on this. Women still earn far less than men (even if you account for their career delaying choice to have sprogs), I'd also respectfully point out that in many countries women don't have the right to work outside the home (even for 33% less than men as they do in the west) or vote for that matter.


I'm in bed on a little laptop right now but when I get on my real computer and have an actual mouse I'll go look up some stats for you, I remember reading that when everything is equal (education, field, hours worked per week, etc) women make only 5% less than men and that could be explained by men being more aggressive about salary and raises.

ETA - I agree with you about women in the rest of the world but I was talking mostly about western feminism applied to western women's lives.

quote:


Easy tiger... you're describing my mum.

Although, to be fair - the mad-eyed, braless, hairy-armpitted bull-feminists of the 70's and 80's are in a minority now (and my mum has become more tolerant of waxing and lipstick).


Hahaha the ones that get me are the ones who choose to be celibate lesbians because they don't want to admit they're attracted to men.

No I am not making that up.

quote:


AHA! Gotcha - see! My mum would so pounce on this. She'd say "You're a victim of patriarchy. So it's ok that if the woman gets pregnant she suffers all the consequences? The man who got her pregnant doesn't have to? SO it's the woman's job to 'build the family'? The social taboo against female sexual liberation is because society places more responsibility on the woman's shoulders."

Now I'm only saying what my batshit insane feminist Mum would say - but really... can't you see just a little of her point?



Yes if a woman gets pregnant she does suffer all the consequences.

She gains weight. She gets nauseous. She's at risk for pregnancy related diseases. An abortion could sterilize or kill her. Giving birth could sterilize or kill her. A natural delivery will tear thin sensitive flesh, a c section cuts the flesh open.

Men can go their whole lives not knowing they have a kid. The obligations for fathers are purely social in nature, taking care of the kid is something he "should" do.

Dealing with a pregnancy is not optional for women. It's in your fucking body. No matter what you do about it, you're going to do something, and if it is "sexist" that's nature's fault, not the patriarchy's.

< Message edited by Elisabella -- 7/23/2010 4:40:12 PM >

(in reply to crazyml)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: The Anti-Feminism Bias - 7/23/2010 4:47:38 PM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella


Hahaha the ones that get me are the ones who choose to be celibate lesbians because they don't want to admit they're attracted to men.

No I am not making that up.



Oh I know for a fact that you're not making that up. I shared a house with five of them when I was at college. Scared the shit outta me.

quote:



Yes if a woman gets pregnant she does suffer all the consequences.

She gains weight. She gets nauseous. She's at risk for pregnancy related diseases. An abortion could sterilize or kill her. Giving birth could sterilize or kill her. A natural delivery will tear thin sensitive flesh, a c section cuts the flesh open.

Men can go their whole lives not knowing they have a kid. The obligations for fathers are purely social in nature, taking care of the kid is something he "should" do.

Dealing with a pregnancy is not optional for women. It's in your fucking body. No matter what you do about it, you're going to do something, and if it is "sexist" that's nature's fault, not the patriarchy's.


Oh, yes - you have me on the pregnancy bit - Even my mom didn't try to blame the patriarchy for the physical effects of pregnancy, she did blame the patriarchy just a leetle for my old man's casual attitude to being a father though.

The point I'm making is why is it her "fault" and why does the man not bear any responsibility? Why is it ok that a man who makes a woman pregnant doesn't at least have some share in the consequences?



< Message edited by crazyml -- 7/23/2010 4:48:43 PM >


_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to Elisabella)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: The Anti-Feminism Bias - 7/23/2010 4:55:16 PM   
Elisabella


Posts: 3939
Status: offline
quote:

Oh, yes - you have me on the pregnancy bit - Even my mom didn't try to blame the patriarchy for the physical effects of pregnancy, she did blame the patriarchy just a leetle for my old man's casual attitude to being a father though.

The point I'm making is why is it her "fault" and why does the man not bear any responsibility? Why is it ok that a man who makes a woman pregnant doesn't at least have some share in the consequences?


Well I'm not saying it's her fault and that the man shouldn't take care of his child, I'm just saying that since the pregnancy itself is so intense for the woman it might do her some good to be more circumspect about it than a man would be.

I think parents should take care of their kids. But I also think that if 2 people have anonymous sex that ends in pregnancy, John will go on his merry way not even knowing that random girl he hooked up with is pregnant whereas the rest of Jane's life is going to be affected by her abortion/miscarriage/child. So speaking as a woman, I find it disturbing that so many women want to be able to "fuck like a man" or whatever, because it's just not the same.

Just talking about pregnancy and avoiding STD discussion - the worst thing that could happen to a man from casual sex is having to pay a lot of child support. The worst thing that could happen to me? Bleeding to death on an operating table. Perspective, you know?

(in reply to crazyml)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: The Anti-Feminism Bias - 7/23/2010 4:58:03 PM   
solestria


Posts: 29
Joined: 4/11/2010
Status: offline
quote:

I've heard feminist rhetoric that boils down to "why are women judged more harshly for sleeping around" and I think, well, because it's dumber for a woman to sleep around, seeing as how she can get PREGNANT and it's going to be hard to build a family with "that guy I met at the bar, John or Jack or someone."


I really don't think that's it.  Yes, women do bear more physical consequences than men (potential pregnancy and larger risk of STD contraction), but I don't think that accounts for the double standard.  With all the women on birth control of various forms, that double standard still exists regardless.  I think it has to do with controlling women's sexuality far more than the more practical consequences, which can be vastly minimized with proper protection; and yet, the stigma doesn't lessen with that.

(in reply to Elisabella)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: The Anti-Feminism Bias - 7/23/2010 5:01:27 PM   
Elisabella


Posts: 3939
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: solestria

I really don't think that's it.  Yes, women do bear more physical consequences than men (potential pregnancy and larger risk of STD contraction), but I don't think that accounts for the double standard.  With all the women on birth control of various forms, that double standard still exists regardless.  I think it has to do with controlling women's sexuality far more than the more practical consequences, which can be vastly minimized with proper protection; and yet, the stigma doesn't lessen with that.


Not to be flippant but most men I've met, if given the option to control women's sexuality, would lean in favor of "more slutty" rather than "wait until marriage."

Also I judge people by this double standard and I'm not interested in controlling women's sexuality at all.

(in reply to solestria)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: The Anti-Feminism Bias - 7/23/2010 5:03:02 PM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline
I have to concede the "perspective" point when it comes to pregnancy, plainly.

But bringing up a child doesn't stop when it's born.. Yes the woman does take on discomfort and a very real (but relatively low) risk to her health for 9 months - and I really do not want to belittle that. But again... my mom would say "So, all the man has to do is pay child support, while you sit at home with it, bathe it, feed it, put it to bed?





_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to Elisabella)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> The Anti-Feminism Bias Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.219