RE: Don't bloody well touch me!!!

Join Our Community

Collarchat.com

Home Login Search

RE: Don't bloody well touch me!!!

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Don't bloody well touch me!!!

Page: << < prev 25 26 [27] 28 29 next > >>

Login

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Don't bloody well touch me!!! - 11/27/2010 5:07:21 AM

Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
But please carry on with your rant. I am sure all the "self-professed dommes and doms could use a good laugh.

That line of his did rather make me sit up and boggle I must say.

I mean, where is it written that just because someone is dominant that they must also be rebellious? Or even libertarian?

I guess I sort of am (rebellious, libertarian), but in a British sort of way.

"SMASH THE SYSTEM! ... er ... if that's ok with you? I mean ... if you want your system then I fully support your right to have it, of course I do, but I think we could certainly chip a little bit of it off even if we don't go in for a full-on system smashing ... well ok maybe certainly is putting it a bit strong but definitely maybe, subject to consultation with yourselves of course, I mean the last thing I'd want to do is railroad through a system smashing without at least a two thirds majority ... actually better make it three quarters to be on the safe side ... oh but then that still leaves quite a few people out in the cold doesn't it? Well ok, maybe if we get a working group together to talk through some system smashing options and ..."

(in reply to thishereboi)

RE: Don't bloody well touch me!!! - 11/27/2010 5:16:15 AM

Posts: 52100
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Savannah, GA
Status: offline

*gigglesnort*

_____________________________

polysnortatious
Supreme Goddess of Snark
CHARTER MEMBER: Lance's Fag Hags!
Waiting for my madman in a Blue Box.

(in reply to RapierFugue)

RE: Don't bloody well touch me!!! - 11/27/2010 5:18:19 AM

Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

What's funny is someone comparing being patted down to starving. But please carry on with your rant. I am sure all the "self-professed dommes and doms could use a good laugh.

I'd be interested in hearing more about that comparison myself.

Do tell.

(in reply to thishereboi)

RE: Don't bloody well touch me!!! - 11/27/2010 5:24:06 AM

Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

What's funny is someone comparing being patted down to starving. But please carry on with your rant. I am sure all the "self-professed dommes and doms could use a good laugh.

I'd be interested in hearing more about that comparison myself.
Do tell.

Well, you are the one who made it, so why don't you explain

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

That's OK. No different than others saying that they have no issue with those starving for a job, any job, being that they are so unqualified elsewise, putting hands on intimate places of those never accused of any wrongdoing in their life, or regardless of any observable implication to do whatever harm.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert

This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi

(in reply to Edwynn)

RE: Don't bloody well touch me!!! - 11/27/2010 5:27:18 AM

Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline

Hmmm. I think I got the attributions wrong then?

Yeah I did ... it was Edwynn who said that, or so it appears.

< Message edited by RapierFugue -- 11/27/2010 5:30:21 AM >

(in reply to Edwynn)

RE: Don't bloody well touch me!!! - 11/27/2010 5:30:02 AM

Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

What's funny is someone comparing being patted down to starving. But please carry on with your rant. I am sure all the "self-professed dommes and doms could use a good laugh.

OK. I looked back and found the word.

Amazing it is that someone has never before seen or read the expression "starving for ... (something) ...

OK. It was somehow taken as me claiming that someone was actually starving.

So you need to introduce yourself to reading.

We get it.

(in reply to thishereboi)

RE: Don't bloody well touch me!!! - 11/27/2010 5:32:55 AM

Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

*gigglesnort*

Honestly, my assessment was closer to "me" than is sensible to think about.

I'm sort of like a cross between Genghis Khan and Michael Foot sometimes. Even I worry me, and I am me.

< Message edited by RapierFugue -- 11/27/2010 5:54:19 AM >

(in reply to GreedyTop)

RE: Don't bloody well touch me!!! - 11/27/2010 5:41:21 AM

Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

If this is the best you can do at twisting, you are not going to last long here. But thanks for the laugh anyway.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert

This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi

(in reply to Edwynn)

RE: Don't bloody well touch me!!! - 11/27/2010 5:42:53 AM

Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

What's funny is someone comparing being patted down to starving. But please carry on with your rant. I am sure all the "self-professed dommes and doms could use a good laugh.

I'd be interested in hearing more about that comparison myself.
Do tell.

Well, you are the one who made it, so why don't you explain

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

That's OK. No different than others saying that they have no issue with those starving for a job, any job, being that they are so unqualified elsewise, putting hands on intimate places of those never accused of any wrongdoing in their life, or regardless of any observable implication to do whatever harm.

You are actually telling us all here that you've never seen this expression before.

Wow.

Never seen such expression as , e.g "starving for attention," or "starving for a solution," et. al.

OK

Just wanted to make sure.

But I don't have the inclination to explain it further here, if that's alright.

(in reply to thishereboi)

RE: Don't bloody well touch me!!! - 11/27/2010 5:44:46 AM

Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

Is that what I said? And you have the balls to talk about other people and their reading ability

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert

This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi

(in reply to Edwynn)

RE: Don't bloody well touch me!!! - 11/27/2010 5:47:19 AM

Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn
But I don't have the inclination to explain it further here, if that's alright.

Ah you're talking about that one ... ok the one that boggled me was "Not to say that watching all these self-professed "Dommes" and "Doms" going so instantly face-down, ass-up on this one did not provide the greatest amusement, forget the exposure as fakes, but I wish I could ...".

To me that's saying that, if you're dominant (of whatever stripe) then your reactions to libertarian issues must be a certain way or you're "not real" or a "fake"? Am I reading that right?

You did say that didn't you? NB: I’m not trying to start a fight in a phone box, I'm merely curious.

(in reply to Edwynn)

RE: Don't bloody well touch me!!! - 11/27/2010 5:57:39 AM

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RapierFugue

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn
But I don't have the inclination to explain it further here, if that's alright.

Ah you're talking about that one ... ok the one that boggled me was "Not to say that watching all these self-professed "Dommes" and "Doms" going so instantly face-down, ass-up on this one did not provide the greatest amusement, forget the exposure as fakes, but I wish I could ...".

To me that's saying that, if you're dominant (of whatever stripe) then your reactions to libertarian issues must be a certain way or you're "not real" or a "fake"? Am I reading that right?

You did say that didn't you? NB: I’m not trying to start a fight in a phone box, I'm merely curious.

thats the way I read it
what a utter load of bollocks.
he is just trying to slag off anyone who cant swallow his dribble

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to RapierFugue)

RE: Don't bloody well touch me!!! - 11/27/2010 5:57:45 AM

Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline

I did not realize that it was a 'libertarian' issue.

I appear to be stuck in this common sense and logic mode.

I pointed out a perceived discrepancy in logic between the professed outlook of some vs. their reaction and apparent accession to this intrusion upon civil sensibilities.

I didn't mean for it to get all so complicated for some.

I'm glad that it doesn't take such pains to explain to everyone.

(in reply to RapierFugue)

RE: Don't bloody well touch me!!! - 11/27/2010 6:01:29 AM

Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

he is just trying to slag off anyone who cant swallow his dribble

I am the one refusing to swallow dear.

You can take all you like for yourself, just don't expect others to swallow so easily.

< Message edited by Edwynn -- 11/27/2010 6:02:42 AM >

(in reply to Lucylastic)

RE: Don't bloody well touch me!!! - 11/27/2010 6:04:23 AM

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

No you are casting aspersions about peoples responses and how un dommly it makes them just because I dont find it out of order, now Im deemed weak
I dont see your point of view so Im the one that is bending over and taking it
no, not at all
I do travel, I do have experience in the last ten years, considering some of the other things Ive been thru in life I dont see it the same way you do, that doesnt mean Im falling for anything it also doesn't mean Im going to let you slag off other dommes and doms, just because you cant handle other opinions.

edited for dumbass typo and refining sentence

< Message edited by Lucylastic -- 11/27/2010 6:09:46 AM >

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Edwynn)

RE: Don't bloody well touch me!!! - 11/27/2010 6:09:12 AM

Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline

I'm not going to let you or others slag off on saying "piss off" to everyone else, whatever their own sensibilities about it, just because you have no issue with it personally.

Selfishness does not the best argument make, nor is it in the least attractive.

You've already made it clear that you could give a frick what anybody else's grandmother might be subjected to.

We get that.

That is not the same as coming up with antything logical or responsible about it.

< Message edited by Edwynn -- 11/27/2010 6:14:10 AM >

(in reply to Lucylastic)

RE: Don't bloody well touch me!!! - 11/27/2010 6:12:10 AM

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

No one has said piss off
I can certainly understand why some are upset, however, the drama llamas(eg you) are rabid frothing and attacking blindly
where has anyone said they dont give a shit about anyone elses feelings?
assume...go ahead
It doesnt make you right

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Edwynn)

RE: Don't bloody well touch me!!! - 11/27/2010 6:23:21 AM

Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn
I appear to be stuck in this common sense and logic mode.

Well yes ... and yet and at the same time ... no.

What sort of issue it is isn't the point. What you appeared to say was that if someone labels themselves as dominant then they have to take a certain stance on every issue (which for the purposes of this discussion you can call "stroppy", "libertarian", "pro-personal freedom", whatever – it doesn’t actually matter what the stance is) and always have that stance, or risk being labelled as "fake" or “un-domly” (is that a word? It should be – I could do with the royalties).

Now either that's not what you meant, in which case I'd appreciate it if you posted some sort of either clarification or retraction, or that's exactly what you meant, in which my personal opinion is that you are 100% incorrect.

As it stands you're coming across as a somewhat stroppy bunny, as witnessed by the somewhat sarcastic tone of your reply to me when I've merely asked (politely) for clarification. If you want a full-scale slanging match then by all means continue, but the person who loses out in that case is you, because it just makes you look rather foolish, and not a little childish. Note that my views on this matter have been 100% consistent from Post One; namely I'm firmly of the opinion that this "security" regime is unfair, unconstitutional and impacts the rights and freedoms of those subjected to it. However, to go from there to "and anyone who doesn't stand up and be counted or who disagrees with me isn't a proper dom!" is, in my opinion at least, absolutely woofing mad.

(in reply to Edwynn)

RE: Don't bloody well touch me!!! - 11/27/2010 6:26:57 AM

Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I can certainly understand why some are upset, however, the drama llamas(eg you) are rabid frothing and attacking blindly

Do you even know how to pronounce "llama", or even "jicama"?

If so, then I'd make you a great blender smoothie, and even leave out the llama.

Jicama, avocado, mango, and some coconut milk, with a little bit of mint, ...

Just slap me.

If I'd thought of this earlier then we'd be having good blender parties rather than this other nonsense...

Sorry then.

< Message edited by Edwynn -- 11/27/2010 6:28:51 AM >

(in reply to Lucylastic)

RE: Don't bloody well touch me!!! - 11/27/2010 6:30:53 AM

Posts: 52100
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Savannah, GA
Status: offline

Jeez.. this must be a personal record.. 4 'blocks' in less than 2 weeks..

_____________________________

polysnortatious
Supreme Goddess of Snark
CHARTER MEMBER: Lance's Fag Hags!
Waiting for my madman in a Blue Box.

(in reply to Edwynn)

Page: << < prev 25 26 [27] 28 29 next > >>

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Don't bloody well touch me!!!

Page: << < prev 25 26 [27] 28 29 next > >>

Jump to:

New Messages	No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages	Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages	Locked w/o New Messages

Post New Thread

Reply to Message

Post New Poll

Submit Vote

Delete My Own Post

Delete My Own Thread

Rate Posts

Collarchat.com © 2024

Terms of Service

0.047