Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Where is God ?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Where is God ? Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Where is God ? - 12/7/2010 7:33:43 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain

Perhaps this letter will clarify the matter.

Perhaps if you quoted more of the article it would, yes... (bold added).

John Brooke, emeritus professor of science and religion at Oxford University, said the letter lends weight to the notion that "Einstein was not a conventional theist" ...he expressed a sense of wonder at the universe and its mysteries — what he called a "cosmic religious feeling" — and famously said: "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." But he also said: "I do not believe in the God of theology who rewards good and punishes evil. My God created laws that take care of that. His universe is not ruled by wishful thinking, but by immutable laws."

And speaking as if he had you personally in mind... (bold added)

Then there are the fanatical atheists whose intolerance is the same as that of the religious fanatics, and it springs from the same source... They are creatures who can't hear the music of the spheres... In the view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognise, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what makes me really angry is that they quote me for support for such views. ~The Expanded Quotable Einstein, Princeton University Press

Are we done here yet?

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 12/7/2010 7:36:17 PM >

(in reply to Brain)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Where is God ? - 12/7/2010 9:31:27 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

First of all Einstein is on top of that list. He is on record as saying that he "does not believe in a living god" Religious people, even in his day, try to say he was religious. He was not, so I'm not going to even bother with the rest of the list.


I do believe both Master Kirata and Master Ron took care of this one. My thanks to both!

quote:

Secondly, religious people always want to go back in time to include scientist that were religious. People were taking baby steps to learn the origin of the universe. From birth they were taught that god did it. Indoctrination is a hard thing to shake.

I Googled to find out how many scientist were atheist, but I was going to have to sift through page after page of religious blogs trying to prove that scientist are religious. I'm not going to waste my time. I know a study came out awhile back and the result was that most scientist are atheist. And there is a direct link to higher education and atheism. Draw your own conclusions from the data, but please don't change it to feel better about your belief.



Took me all of five minutes to find an interesting research study. Doubtful you will read it, but here it is anyways.

http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/050811_scientists_god.html

Scientists' Belief in God Varies Starkly by Discipline

By Robert Roy Britt, LiveScience Staff Writer

posted: 11 August 2005 02:24 pm ET

About two-thirds of scientists believe in God, according to a new survey that uncovered stark differences based on the type of research they do.

The study, along with another one released in June, would appear to debunk the oft-held notion that science is incompatible with religion.

Those in the social sciences are more likely to believe in God and attend religious services than researchers in the natural sciences, the study found.

Nearly 38 percent of natural scientists -- people in disciplines like physics, chemistry and biology -- said they do not believe in God. Only 31 percent of the social scientists do not believe.

In the new study, Rice University sociologist Elaine Howard Ecklund surveyed 1,646 faculty members at elite research universities, asking 36 questions about belief and spiritual practices.

"Based on previous research, we thought that social scientists would be less likely to practice religion than natural scientists are, but our data showed just the opposite," Ecklund said.

Some stand-out stats: 41 percent of the biologists don't believe, while that figure is just 27 percent among political scientists.

In separate work at the University of Chicago, released in June, 76 percent of doctors said they believed in God and 59 percent believe in some sort of afterlife.

"Now we must examine the nature of these differences," Ecklund said today. "Many scientists see themselves as having a spirituality not attached to a particular religious tradition. Some scientists who don't believe in God see themselves as very spiritual people. They have a way outside of themselves that they use to understand the meaning of life."


As far as my justifying my belief, i dont believe i ever have, nor have i felt a need too do so. My belief is just that, mine. I dont ask you or anyone else to subscribe. Nor have i gone into a great amount of detail of what it is, exactly, that i do believe.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to lickenforyou)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Where is God ? - 12/7/2010 10:06:46 PM   
pyroaquatic


Posts: 1535
Joined: 12/4/2006
From: Pyroaquatica
Status: offline
God is Everywhere. Well, parts of god. At one point God was in a singular location. For some reason known only to a conscious god the omnipresent being decided to self-destruct.

This dust of God slowly began to reconstruct. Right now it is at the point where God asks questions like 'Where is God'?
-----
I am very spiritual and I also consider myself of a scientific mindset.

Truth-while there are no absolutes-depends on where you are looking from. No one has all of the answers but I cannot claim I know nothing.

I know SOMETHING but it is incomplete. I've looked everywhere for the missing piece.
Getting closer everyday and it does not matter what denomination you cast your self under.
----
So I just asked God what God prefers to be called.

It is the silence cast between OHM, the space between spaces. It is the face I had before my parents were born and the emptiness inside of the cup.

if you think your nonsense is better than my nonsense id say you have a problem.




_____________________________

You are what your deep, driving desire is.
As your desire is, so is your will.
As your will is, so is your deed.
As your deed is, so is your destiny.
-Brihadaranyaka Upanishad IV.4.5

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Where is God ? - 12/7/2010 10:08:16 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
~chuckles

Since this is in response to me, i will respond. I never said it was better,simply better for me.



_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to pyroaquatic)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Where is God ? - 12/7/2010 10:14:28 PM   
pyroaquatic


Posts: 1535
Joined: 12/4/2006
From: Pyroaquatica
Status: offline
My point exactly. and it was not targeted to you specifically. People need to smile and be happy just being instead of showing how one delusion is better than another. The loss of ego is not a terrible thing.

love binds us.
death separates us.

mew mew mew... mew mew mew mew....
dog dog dog dog dog.


_____________________________

You are what your deep, driving desire is.
As your desire is, so is your will.
As your will is, so is your deed.
As your deed is, so is your destiny.
-Brihadaranyaka Upanishad IV.4.5

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Where is God ? - 12/7/2010 10:15:53 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
lol... im a slave... what ego?

< Message edited by tazzygirl -- 12/7/2010 10:16:20 PM >


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to pyroaquatic)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Where is God ? - 12/7/2010 11:59:40 PM   
Charles6682


Posts: 1788
Joined: 10/1/2007
From: Saint Pete,FL
Status: offline
I consider myself to be spiritual,non-religious.I believe there is a God.A God of my own understanding.

_____________________________

Charley aka Sub Guy

http://www.Facebook.com/SubGuy

https://Twitter.com/SubGuy6682

(in reply to Aneirin)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Where is God ? - 12/8/2010 1:18:10 AM   
lickenforyou


Posts: 379
Joined: 3/13/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

I don't understand the first quote, he saith. I miss the point of the second, he saith. Shall we go like this? Or shall we just conclude that you can't defend your claims and have nothing to offer except empty pronouncements.

K.







The point that Einstein was clearly trying to make in the statement "The most beautiful and most profound experience is the sensation of the mystical. It is the sower of all true science" is that the feeling of something mystical prompts people to discover what is behind things not understood. Not that the mystical EXISTS.


_____________________________

I changed my profile name to - toserveonlyYou - but am having trouble posting in the forums with that profile.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Where is God ? - 12/8/2010 1:43:48 AM   
lickenforyou


Posts: 379
Joined: 3/13/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

First of all Einstein is on top of that list. He is on record as saying that he "does not believe in a living god" Religious people, even in his day, try to say he was religious. He was not, so I'm not going to even bother with the rest of the list.


I do believe both Master Kirata and Master Ron took care of this one. My thanks to both!

quote:

Secondly, religious people always want to go back in time to include scientist that were religious. People were taking baby steps to learn the origin of the universe. From birth they were taught that god did it. Indoctrination is a hard thing to shake.

I Googled to find out how many scientist were atheist, but I was going to have to sift through page after page of religious blogs trying to prove that scientist are religious. I'm not going to waste my time. I know a study came out awhile back and the result was that most scientist are atheist. And there is a direct link to higher education and atheism. Draw your own conclusions from the data, but please don't change it to feel better about your belief.



Took me all of five minutes to find an interesting research study. Doubtful you will read it, but here it is anyways.

http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/050811_scientists_god.html

Scientists' Belief in God Varies Starkly by Discipline

By Robert Roy Britt, LiveScience Staff Writer

posted: 11 August 2005 02:24 pm ET

About two-thirds of scientists believe in God, according to a new survey that uncovered stark differences based on the type of research they do.

The study, along with another one released in June, would appear to debunk the oft-held notion that science is incompatible with religion.

Those in the social sciences are more likely to believe in God and attend religious services than researchers in the natural sciences, the study found.

Nearly 38 percent of natural scientists -- people in disciplines like physics, chemistry and biology -- said they do not believe in God. Only 31 percent of the social scientists do not believe.

In the new study, Rice University sociologist Elaine Howard Ecklund surveyed 1,646 faculty members at elite research universities, asking 36 questions about belief and spiritual practices.

"Based on previous research, we thought that social scientists would be less likely to practice religion than natural scientists are, but our data showed just the opposite," Ecklund said.

Some stand-out stats: 41 percent of the biologists don't believe, while that figure is just 27 percent among political scientists.

In separate work at the University of Chicago, released in June, 76 percent of doctors said they believed in God and 59 percent believe in some sort of afterlife.

"Now we must examine the nature of these differences," Ecklund said today. "Many scientists see themselves as having a spirituality not attached to a particular religious tradition. Some scientists who don't believe in God see themselves as very spiritual people. They have a way outside of themselves that they use to understand the meaning of life."


As far as my justifying my belief, i dont believe i ever have, nor have i felt a need too do so. My belief is just that, mine. I dont ask you or anyone else to subscribe. Nor have i gone into a great amount of detail of what it is, exactly, that i do believe.


I don't know who Master Ron is, but I can assure you Master Kirata didn't take care of anything for you.

And the study you cite has problems. The research was funded by the Templeton Foundation. The head of the foundation, John Templeton, Jr. is an evangelical christian. And the the woman heading the study, Elaine Howard Ecklund,is on a crusade to push religion into science. And as far as I can tell she only included scientist from the U.S. in her study. She also states that scientist who were brought up in religious households were more likely to be religious, which backs one of my original points.

I also didn't ask you what you believe. I simply responed to your assertion that it does no harm to believe where there is no proof.

I also have never said that there is definetly no god or gods. I am a true atheist. There is not one shred of credible evidence to suggest that there is a god. So, I don't believe.


_____________________________

I changed my profile name to - toserveonlyYou - but am having trouble posting in the forums with that profile.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Where is God ? - 12/8/2010 5:38:07 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
No God, No Moral Compass?

He rejects the idea that scientists who reject religion are arrogant. "We know how many mistakes we've made," Dr. Weinberg said. And he is angered by assertions that people without religious faith are without a moral compass.

In any event, he added, "the experience of being a scientist makes religion seem fairly irrelevant," he said. "Most scientists I know simply don't think about it very much. They don't think about religion enough to qualify as practicing atheists."

Most scientists he knows who do believe in God, he added, believe in "a God who is behind the laws of nature but who is not intervening."

Kenneth R. Miller, a biology professor at Brown, said his students were often surprised to find that he was religious, especially when they realized that his faith was not some sort of vague theism but observant Roman Catholicism.

Dr. Miller, whose book, "Finding Darwin's God," explains his reconciliation of the theory of evolution with his religious faith, said he was usually challenged in his biology classes by one or two students whose religions did not accept evolution, who asked how important the theory would be in the course.

"What they are really asking me is "do I have to believe in this stuff to get an A?,' " he said. He says he tells them that "belief is never an issue in science."

"I don't care if you believe in the Krebs cycle," he said, referring to the process by which energy is utilized in the cell. "I just want you to know what it is and how it works. My feeling about evolution is the same thing."

For Dr. Miller and other scientists, research is not about belief. "Faith is one thing, what you believe from the heart," said Joseph E. Murray, who won the Nobel Prize in medicine in 1990 for his work in organ transplantation. But in scientific research, he said, "it's the results that count."

Dr. Murray, who describes himself as "a cradle Catholic" who has rarely missed weekly Mass and who prays every morning, said that when he was preparing for the first ever human organ transplant, a kidney that a young man had donated to his identical twin, he and his colleagues consulted a number of religious leaders about whether they were doing the right thing. "It seemed natural," he said.

Using Every Tool

"When you are searching for truth you should use every possible avenue, including revelation," said Dr. Murray, who is a member of the Pontifical Academy, which advises the Vatican on scientific issues, and who described the influence of his faith on his work in his memoir, "Surgery of the Soul" (Science History Publications, 2002).

Since his appearance at the City College panel, when he was dismayed by the tepid reception received by his remarks on the incompatibility of good science and religious belief, Dr. Hauptman said he had been discussing the issue with colleagues in Buffalo, where he is president of the Hauptman-Woodward Medical Research Institute.

"I think almost without exception the people I have spoken to are scientists and they do believe in the existence of a supreme being," he said. "If you ask me to explain it - I cannot explain it at all."

But Richard Dawkins, an evolutionary theorist at Oxford, said that even scientists who were believers did not claim evidence for that belief. "The most they will claim is that there is no evidence against," Dr. Dawkins said, "which is pathetically weak. There is no evidence against all sorts of things, but we don't waste our time believing in them."

Dr. Collins said he believed that some scientists were unwilling to profess faith in public "because the assumption is if you are a scientist you don't have any need of action of the supernatural sort," or because of pride in the idea that science is the ultimate source of intellectual meaning.

But he said he believed that some scientists were simply unwilling to confront the big questions religion tried to answer. "You will never understand what it means to be a human being through naturalistic observation," he said. "You won't understand why you are here and what the meaning is. Science has no power to address these questions - and are they not the most important questions we ask ourselves?"

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/23/national/23believers.html?pagewanted=3&_r=1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_thinkers_in_science

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_scientists_and_philosophers ....... by country no less!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_science_and_religion_scholars

It goes on and on and on. Your assertion that you could not find a list of atheists scientists is bs.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_atheists_(science_and_technology)

Its ok, though, i found one for you... and no theistic attachments, imagine that!

quote:

First of all Einstein is on top of that list. He is on record as saying that he "does not believe in a living god" Religious people, even in his day, try to say he was religious. He was not, so I'm not going to even bother with the rest of the list.


Im sorry you are too lazy to do your own research. But, here ya go. Read up first. There are some truly intelligent people on these boards. Just because a source isnt something you dont approve of (Templeton) isnt a reason to discount them. Much has been written about that group. And those who have attemped to slam them have actually agreed their bias .. well... here you go, you can read it for yourself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Templeton_Foundation#Accusations_of_conservative_orientation

Now, do make sure you read the whole thing, else you will fail the exam.

< Message edited by tazzygirl -- 12/8/2010 5:39:44 AM >


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to lickenforyou)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Where is God ? - 12/8/2010 10:35:42 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lickenforyou

the feeling of something mystical prompts people to discover what is behind things not understood. Not that the mystical EXISTS.

So sayeth thou, eh?

A knowledge of the existence of something we cannot penetrate, of the manifestations of the profoundest reason and the most radiant beauty - it is this knowledge and this emotion that constitute the truly religious attitude; in this sense, and in this alone, I am a deeply religious man. ~Albert Einstein

I'll give you one thing, you're a glutton for punishment. Keep it up.

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 12/8/2010 10:43:14 AM >

(in reply to lickenforyou)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Where is God ? - 12/8/2010 11:57:08 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
But it must not be assumed that intelligent thinking can play no part in the formation of the goal and of ethical judgments. When someone realizes that for the achievement of an end certain means would be useful, the means itself becomes thereby an end. Intelligence makes clear to us the interrelation of means and ends. But mere thinking cannot give us a sense of the ultimate and fundamental ends. To make clear these fundamental ends and valuations, and to set them fast in the emotional life of the individual, seems to me precisely the most important function which religion has to perform in the social life of man. And if one asks whence derives the authority of such fundamental ends, since they cannot be stated and justified merely by reason, one can only answer: they exist in a healthy society as powerful traditions, which act upon the conduct and aspirations and judgments of the individuals; they are there, that is, as something living, without its being necessary to find justification for their existence. They come into being not through demonstration but through revelation, through the medium of powerful personalities. One must not attempt to justify them, but rather to sense their nature simply and clearly.

The highest principles for our aspirations and judgments are given to us in the Jewish-Christian religious tradition. It is a very high goal which, with our weak powers, we can reach only very inadequately, but which gives a sure foundation to our aspirations and valuations. If one were to take that goal out of its religious form and look merely at its purely human side, one might state it perhaps thus: free and responsible development of the individual, so that he may place his powers freely and gladly in the service of all mankind.

There is no room in this for the divinization of a nation, of a class, let alone of an individual. Are we not all children of one father, as it is said in religious language? Indeed, even the divinization of humanity, as an abstract totality, would not be in the spirit of that ideal. It is only to the individual that a soul is given. And the high destiny of the individual is to serve rather than to rule, or to impose himself in any other way.

If one looks at the substance rather than at the form, then one can take these words as expressing also the fundamental democratic position. The true democrat can worship his nation as little as can the man who is religious, in our sense of the term.

What, then, in all this, is the function of education and of the school? They should help the young person to grow up in such a spirit that these fundamental principles should be to him as the air which he breathes. Teaching alone cannot do that.

If one holds these high principles clearly before one's eyes, and compares them with the life and spirit of our times, then it appears glaringly that civilized mankind finds itself at present in grave danger, In the totalitarian states it is the rulers themselves who strive actually to destroy that spirit of humanity. In less threatened parts it is nationalism and intolerance, as well as the oppression of the individuals by economic means, which threaten to choke these most precious traditions.

A realization of how great is the danger is spreading, however, among thinking people, and there is much search for means with which to meet the danger--means in the field of national and international politics, of legislation, or organization in general. Such efforts are, no doubt, greatly needed. Yet the ancients knew something- which we seem to have forgotten. All means prove but a blunt instrument, if they have not behind them a living spirit. But if the longing for the achievement of the goal is powerfully alive within us, then shall we not lack the strength to find the means for reaching the goal and for translating it into deeds.


Einstein's Ideas and Opinions, pp.41 - 49

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: Where is God ? - 12/8/2010 12:57:17 PM   
lickenforyou


Posts: 379
Joined: 3/13/2005
Status: offline
it is this knowledge and this emotion that constitute the truly religious attitude; in this sense, and in this alone, I am a deeply religious man. ~Albert Einstein

It's obvious that you are just not capable of comprehending what he is saying. I can't help you with that.


_____________________________

I changed my profile name to - toserveonlyYou - but am having trouble posting in the forums with that profile.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: Where is God ? - 12/8/2010 1:20:29 PM   
hertz


Posts: 1315
Joined: 8/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lickenforyou

quote:

ORIGINAL: hertz

quote:

ORIGINAL: lickenforyou

quote:

ORIGINAL: hertz

quote:

I know a study came out awhile back and the result was that most scientist are atheist. And there is a direct link to higher education and atheism. Draw your own conclusions from the data, but please don't change it to feel better about your belief.


Here's another study...

quote:

A study of more than 700,000 adults showed that those who scored top grades at school were four times more likely to develop bipolar disorder than those with average grades.
The Independent


I'll leave you to draw the conclusion yourself...



Here's more of that study...

"School pupils with low exam grades also had an increased risk of developing bipolar disorder later in life"

You're still at risk



You Fail. Sadly.



Ha ha ha, just gave up there, huh?



No - it's just that I am looking for a grown-up conversation about the subject. As far as I am concerned, you gave up the argument as soon as you started with the stoooopid insults.

(in reply to lickenforyou)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: Where is God ? - 12/8/2010 1:20:46 PM   
lickenforyou


Posts: 379
Joined: 3/13/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

No God, No Moral Compass?

He rejects the idea that scientists who reject religion are arrogant. "We know how many mistakes we've made," Dr. Weinberg said. And he is angered by assertions that people without religious faith are without a moral compass.

In any event, he added, "the experience of being a scientist makes religion seem fairly irrelevant," he said. "Most scientists I know simply don't think about it very much. They don't think about religion enough to qualify as practicing atheists."

Most scientists he knows who do believe in God, he added, believe in "a God who is behind the laws of nature but who is not intervening."

Kenneth R. Miller, a biology professor at Brown, said his students were often surprised to find that he was religious, especially when they realized that his faith was not some sort of vague theism but observant Roman Catholicism.

Dr. Miller, whose book, "Finding Darwin's God," explains his reconciliation of the theory of evolution with his religious faith, said he was usually challenged in his biology classes by one or two students whose religions did not accept evolution, who asked how important the theory would be in the course.

"What they are really asking me is "do I have to believe in this stuff to get an A?,' " he said. He says he tells them that "belief is never an issue in science."

"I don't care if you believe in the Krebs cycle," he said, referring to the process by which energy is utilized in the cell. "I just want you to know what it is and how it works. My feeling about evolution is the same thing."

For Dr. Miller and other scientists, research is not about belief. "Faith is one thing, what you believe from the heart," said Joseph E. Murray, who won the Nobel Prize in medicine in 1990 for his work in organ transplantation. But in scientific research, he said, "it's the results that count."

Dr. Murray, who describes himself as "a cradle Catholic" who has rarely missed weekly Mass and who prays every morning, said that when he was preparing for the first ever human organ transplant, a kidney that a young man had donated to his identical twin, he and his colleagues consulted a number of religious leaders about whether they were doing the right thing. "It seemed natural," he said.

Using Every Tool

"When you are searching for truth you should use every possible avenue, including revelation," said Dr. Murray, who is a member of the Pontifical Academy, which advises the Vatican on scientific issues, and who described the influence of his faith on his work in his memoir, "Surgery of the Soul" (Science History Publications, 2002).

Since his appearance at the City College panel, when he was dismayed by the tepid reception received by his remarks on the incompatibility of good science and religious belief, Dr. Hauptman said he had been discussing the issue with colleagues in Buffalo, where he is president of the Hauptman-Woodward Medical Research Institute.

"I think almost without exception the people I have spoken to are scientists and they do believe in the existence of a supreme being," he said. "If you ask me to explain it - I cannot explain it at all."

But Richard Dawkins, an evolutionary theorist at Oxford, said that even scientists who were believers did not claim evidence for that belief. "The most they will claim is that there is no evidence against," Dr. Dawkins said, "which is pathetically weak. There is no evidence against all sorts of things, but we don't waste our time believing in them."

Dr. Collins said he believed that some scientists were unwilling to profess faith in public "because the assumption is if you are a scientist you don't have any need of action of the supernatural sort," or because of pride in the idea that science is the ultimate source of intellectual meaning.

But he said he believed that some scientists were simply unwilling to confront the big questions religion tried to answer. "You will never understand what it means to be a human being through naturalistic observation," he said. "You won't understand why you are here and what the meaning is. Science has no power to address these questions - and are they not the most important questions we ask ourselves?"

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/23/national/23believers.html?pagewanted=3&_r=1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_thinkers_in_science

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_scientists_and_philosophers ....... by country no less!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_science_and_religion_scholars

It goes on and on and on. Your assertion that you could not find a list of atheists scientists is bs.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_atheists_(science_and_technology)

Its ok, though, i found one for you... and no theistic attachments, imagine that!

quote:

First of all Einstein is on top of that list. He is on record as saying that he "does not believe in a living god" Religious people, even in his day, try to say he was religious. He was not, so I'm not going to even bother with the rest of the list.


Im sorry you are too lazy to do your own research. But, here ya go. Read up first. There are some truly intelligent people on these boards. Just because a source isnt something you dont approve of (Templeton) isnt a reason to discount them. Much has been written about that group. And those who have attemped to slam them have actually agreed their bias .. well... here you go, you can read it for yourself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Templeton_Foundation#Accusations_of_conservative_orientation

Now, do make sure you read the whole thing, else you will fail the exam.


I NEVER said that I couldn't find a list of atheist scientist. Please read my ACTUAL arguments. And, I never said there weren't any religious scientist in other countries. We were talking percentages.

And, LOL the Wiki link you gave me confirmed that secular scientist finds the Templeton Foundation biased. And, of course, you look at who's funding and wh's conducting the study. That's how science works.

And lastly, to address ANOTHER argument that I never made. I'm sure there are intelligent people on these boards...


_____________________________

I changed my profile name to - toserveonlyYou - but am having trouble posting in the forums with that profile.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: Where is God ? - 12/8/2010 1:25:24 PM   
LadyNTrainer


Posts: 1584
Joined: 5/20/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

No God, No Moral Compass?

He rejects the idea that scientists who reject religion are arrogant. "We know how many mistakes we've made," Dr. Weinberg said. And he is angered by assertions that people without religious faith are without a moral compass.


This.  I do not generally believe in anything that has not been published in a peer reviewed journal, but I do have a very strict code of ethics. In general, I think I conduct myself as a better citizen because of my completely secular sense of self respect, personal honor and dignity than I see a lot of religious people acting out of a supposed fear of going to Hell. 


_____________________________

Your dominant Personal Trainer for fitness and body shaping in the lifestyle. Let my fetish be your motivation.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: Where is God ? - 12/8/2010 1:54:50 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lickenforyou

It's obvious that you are just not capable of comprehending what he is saying.

He's saying that you're wrong in just about every claim you've made about him.

Get over it.

K.





< Message edited by Kirata -- 12/8/2010 1:55:35 PM >

(in reply to lickenforyou)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: Where is God ? - 12/8/2010 2:57:05 PM   
lickenforyou


Posts: 379
Joined: 3/13/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: lickenforyou

It's obvious that you are just not capable of comprehending what he is saying.

He's saying that you're wrong in just about every claim you've made about him.

Get over it.

K.






Einstein is playing STAR TREK Tridimensional Chess.

I'm playing regular chess.

You're playing checkers.

Like I said, I can't help you.


_____________________________

I changed my profile name to - toserveonlyYou - but am having trouble posting in the forums with that profile.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: Where is God ? - 12/8/2010 2:59:11 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

First of all Einstein is on top of that list. He is on record as saying that he "does not believe in a living god" Religious people, even in his day, try to say he was religious. He was not, so I'm not going to even bother with the rest of the list.


I do believe both Master Kirata and Master Ron took care of this one. My thanks to both!

quote:

Secondly, religious people always want to go back in time to include scientist that were religious. People were taking baby steps to learn the origin of the universe. From birth they were taught that god did it. Indoctrination is a hard thing to shake.

I Googled to find out how many scientist were atheist, but I was going to have to sift through page after page of religious blogs trying to prove that scientist are religious. I'm not going to waste my time. I know a study came out awhile back and the result was that most scientist are atheist. And there is a direct link to higher education and atheism. Draw your own conclusions from the data, but please don't change it to feel better about your belief.



Took me all of five minutes to find an interesting research study. Doubtful you will read it, but here it is anyways.

http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/050811_scientists_god.html

Scientists' Belief in God Varies Starkly by Discipline

By Robert Roy Britt, LiveScience Staff Writer

posted: 11 August 2005 02:24 pm ET

About two-thirds of scientists believe in God, according to a new survey that uncovered stark differences based on the type of research they do.

The study, along with another one released in June, would appear to debunk the oft-held notion that science is incompatible with religion.

Those in the social sciences are more likely to believe in God and attend religious services than researchers in the natural sciences, the study found.

Nearly 38 percent of natural scientists -- people in disciplines like physics, chemistry and biology -- said they do not believe in God. Only 31 percent of the social scientists do not believe.

In the new study, Rice University sociologist Elaine Howard Ecklund surveyed 1,646 faculty members at elite research universities, asking 36 questions about belief and spiritual practices.

"Based on previous research, we thought that social scientists would be less likely to practice religion than natural scientists are, but our data showed just the opposite," Ecklund said.

Some stand-out stats: 41 percent of the biologists don't believe, while that figure is just 27 percent among political scientists.

In separate work at the University of Chicago, released in June, 76 percent of doctors said they believed in God and 59 percent believe in some sort of afterlife.

"Now we must examine the nature of these differences," Ecklund said today. "Many scientists see themselves as having a spirituality not attached to a particular religious tradition. Some scientists who don't believe in God see themselves as very spiritual people. They have a way outside of themselves that they use to understand the meaning of life."


As far as my justifying my belief, i dont believe i ever have, nor have i felt a need too do so. My belief is just that, mine. I dont ask you or anyone else to subscribe. Nor have i gone into a great amount of detail of what it is, exactly, that i do believe.



LMAO at including "political scientists" in a study of scientists.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: Where is God ? - 12/8/2010 3:01:40 PM   
lickenforyou


Posts: 379
Joined: 3/13/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hertz


quote:

ORIGINAL: lickenforyou

quote:

ORIGINAL: hertz

quote:

ORIGINAL: lickenforyou

quote:

ORIGINAL: hertz

quote:

I know a study came out awhile back and the result was that most scientist are atheist. And there is a direct link to higher education and atheism. Draw your own conclusions from the data, but please don't change it to feel better about your belief.


Here's another study...

quote:

A study of more than 700,000 adults showed that those who scored top grades at school were four times more likely to develop bipolar disorder than those with average grades.
The Independent


I'll leave you to draw the conclusion yourself...



Here's more of that study...

"School pupils with low exam grades also had an increased risk of developing bipolar disorder later in life"

You're still at risk



You Fail. Sadly.



Ha ha ha, just gave up there, huh?



No - it's just that I am looking for a grown-up conversation about the subject. As far as I am concerned, you gave up the argument as soon as you started with the stoooopid insults.


Actually, it was a pretty good insult. And, it was in response to you copying and pasting the first negative study you could find on intelligent people. Now that was immature.


_____________________________

I changed my profile name to - toserveonlyYou - but am having trouble posting in the forums with that profile.

(in reply to hertz)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Where is God ? Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.051