Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: "Free" Healthcare in Massachusetts


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: "Free" Healthcare in Massachusetts Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: "Free" Healthcare in Massachusetts - 3/29/2011 6:28:37 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aynne88

Kittinsol!!!!!!!!!!!!  



Thank you, you darling - I missed all of you, except for RealOne, and a couple of others, but then God told me that since I was the beneficiary of health insurance, I ought to come clean and come back to the boards to bring the good word, and tell all that Viagra for men over what the Lord deemed the normal age of procreation (35 and under, alas, you guys) should no longer be a tax-deductible benefit. So, all of you impotent bastards who can't get a hard-on because your dicks are flaccid, well... stick a stick down it.

You guys... I'm sowwy... but it was always, and kind of, ever, either, come back as the Angel of Death, or stay away... you guys. And I can't ever shut up :-D.



_____________________________



(in reply to Aynne88)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: "Free" Healthcare in Massachusetts - 3/29/2011 6:30:15 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

Viagra for men over what the Lord deemed the normal age of procreation (35 and under, alas, you guys) should no longer be a tax-deductible benefit.
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aynne88

Kittinsol!!!!!!!!!!!!  



Thank you, you darling - I missed all of you, except for RealOne, and a couple of others, but then God told me that since I was the beneficiary of health insurance, I ought to come clean and come back to the boards to bring the good word, and tell all that Viagra for men over what the Lord deemed the normal age of procreation (35 and under, alas, you guys) should no longer be a tax-deductible benefit. So, all of you impotent bastards who can't get a hard-on because your dicks are flaccid, well... stick a stick down it.

You guys... I'm sowwy... but it was always, and kind of, ever, either, come back as the Angel of Death, or stay away... you guys. And I can't ever shut up :-D.



OOOOOOh and yess, shes back
Love it love it love the snip tooLMAO


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: "Free" Healthcare in Massachusetts - 3/29/2011 6:35:34 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

OOOOOOh and yess, shes back
Love it love it love the snip tooLMAO



I am only quoting God .

Healthcare is a human right, not a privilege.

LOVE YOU LUCY!!!

_____________________________



(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: "Free" Healthcare in Massachusetts - 3/29/2011 6:36:24 PM   
ThatDamnedPanda


Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

God told me that since I was the beneficiary of health insurance, I ought to come clean and come back to the boards to bring the good word, and tell all that Viagra for men over what the Lord deemed the normal age of procreation (35 and under, alas, you guys) should no longer be a tax-deductible benefit. So, all of you impotent bastards who can't get a hard-on because your dicks are flaccid, well... stick a stick down it.


Tell the lord to go fuck a cherub. I don't procreate; I just do it for a hobby.


quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol
You guys... I'm sowwy... but it was always, and kind of, ever, either, come back as the Angel of Death, or stay away... you guys. And I can't ever shut up :-D.


Cool! Does that mean you wear all black and stuff like that now?


_____________________________

Panda, panda, burning bright
In the forest of the night
What immortal hand or eye
Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?


(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: "Free" Healthcare in Massachusetts - 3/29/2011 6:36:37 PM   
flcouple2009


Posts: 2784
Joined: 1/8/2009
Status: offline
"Perhaps the report’s most troubling finding is that the state relies on the honor system when determining who is eligible for free care — and does not review an applicant’s assets, or even require a Social Security number to verify income, citizenship or address, Sullivan said."

It doesn't take genius to start finding the problems here.

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: "Free" Healthcare in Massachusetts - 3/29/2011 6:40:57 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

Cool! Does that mean you wear all black and stuff like that now?



Things have changed. I have made connections. Come to me, and see how much fun it is to tell God to go and fuck a Cherubim :-D .

_____________________________



(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: "Free" Healthcare in Massachusetts - 3/29/2011 6:45:41 PM   
ThatDamnedPanda


Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline
Sounds scary as hell.

I'll be right there.


_____________________________

Panda, panda, burning bright
In the forest of the night
What immortal hand or eye
Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?


(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: "Free" Healthcare in Massachusetts - 3/29/2011 6:46:16 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: flcouple2009

"Perhaps the report’s most troubling finding is that the state relies on the honor system when determining who is eligible for free care — and does not review an applicant’s assets, or even require a Social Security number to verify income, citizenship or address, Sullivan said."

It doesn't take genius to start finding the problems here.


Are there lawyers in the US who know how to write laws to eliminate that shit?
Why arent they being used, this is poor, too damn poor to be amusing
Seems to me thats where most of the issues are, not the poor people or the illegals but the dumbarse  heavily paid  lawyers, yet the poor suffer
AGAIN



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to flcouple2009)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: "Free" Healthcare in Massachusetts - 3/29/2011 6:50:01 PM   
Hippiekinkster


Posts: 5512
Joined: 11/20/2007
From: Liechtenstein
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster

Ditto!


Hippie!
Yep, still here, sweetie, and still as Progressive as ever. I have to carry the torch. I have the dumbest hardcore rightards on block, as it's pointless to engage them, and they have nothing to say I want to read. An old buddy of mine has a group "Politics und Current Events" at the place with the white type on a black background. I think you (and Panda, and Tweaky, and many others who can think clearly) would like it. Some excellent discussions. A couple posters, who lean towards Libertarianism, have gotten me thinking about a different way of viewing the Constitution. Notr saying they've convinced me, but my mind is open. See. that is the difference between the Progressives I've seen here and B.com and FL, and people like Sanity and heritic and Willbur. We are able to change our positions upon the acquisition of new information. With them, cognitive dissonance rules, and they reject other information out of hand as it conflicts with their dogma. They are truly slaves to their programming. They think they are free-thinkers, but cannot even see how they are just running a script.

Anyway, glad to see you back.


_____________________________

"We are convinced that freedom w/o Socialism is privilege and injustice, and that Socialism w/o freedom is slavery and brutality." Bakunin

“Nothing we do, however virtuous, can be accomplished alone; therefore we are saved by love.” Reinhold Ne

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: "Free" Healthcare in Massachusetts - 3/29/2011 7:40:44 PM   
maybemaybenot


Posts: 2817
Joined: 9/22/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: flcouple2009

"Perhaps the report’s most troubling finding is that the state relies on the honor system when determining who is eligible for free care — and does not review an applicant’s assets, or even require a Social Security number to verify income, citizenship or address, Sullivan said."

It doesn't take genius to start finding the problems here.


Are there lawyers in the US who know how to write laws to eliminate that shit?
Why arent they being used, this is poor, too damn poor to be amusing
Seems to me thats where most of the issues are, not the poor people or the illegals but the dumbarse  heavily paid  lawyers, yet the poor suffer
AGAIN




Despite my opposition to Public Healthcare, I do have the ability to look at things from both sides. You have absolutely no idea how bad healthcare in Massachusetts is and how Romneycare is killing us. If this " plan " we have is so flipping wonderful... why do we have the highest premiums in the US and the fastest rising healthcare costs ?

People who aren't familiar with Romneycare think it's like univeral healthcare. It is not. Romneycare simply means you are mandated to have healthcare insurance, no matter what. You must purchase it. If that be thru work, so be it. If you fall into a category that makes you eligible for one of the state plans, you also pay for that, and they are not cheap for someone on a Disability check or a limited income. You must also pay your co pays to MDs and for your prescriptions, and the prescription plan is a tiered system, so you may be paying big bucks for your " free healthcare ". Something as simple as Lantus Insulin is a top tier medication.

Romenycare was instituted to insure everyone has coverage, it did not address cost. Cost is not a part of Romneycare. Insurers can still charge as much as they want and increase as they want, and that's exactly what they are doing. Why not ? They have a nice little pool of fish who are forced to pay whatever they say or be fined by the State. As a result the costs just keep going up.

The insurance companies are getting richer and richer and we are paying out the nose for crappy insurance. Over the last few weeks there has been quite a few scandels about BCBS of Mass. It is coming to light exactly how Romnneycare has done nothing but serve the insurance companies, not the people. Business are leaving this state in droves in part due to Romneycare, they cannot afford to keep their employess insured.

mbmbn

< Message edited by maybemaybenot -- 3/29/2011 7:42:43 PM >


_____________________________

Tolerance of evil is suicide.- NYC Firefighter

When tolerance is not reciprocated, tolerance becomes surrender.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: "Free" Healthcare in Massachusetts - 3/29/2011 7:49:36 PM   
WyldHrt


Posts: 6412
Joined: 6/5/2008
Status: offline
quote:

I think I have heard this story before,the thing is in the version I heard,it was a welfare mother driving around in a pink convertible Cadillac.Do you think these stories are being authored by the same folks? Ideologically speaking of course.

Umm... ask anyone who has been an EMT for any length of time and they can tell you that some people do use ambulances as a taxi service. We had a couple of 'frequent flyers' that called every 2-3 weeks. I don't know why you seem to find it so unbelievable that they would continue to do so under the MA plan, where the state pays for it.


_____________________________

"MotherFUCKER!" is NOT a safeword!!"- Steel
"We've had complaints about 'orgy noises'. This is not the neighborhood for that kind of thing"- PVE Cop

Resident "Hypnotic Eyes", "Cleavage" and "Toy Whore"
Subby Mafia, VAA Posse & Team Troll!

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: "Free" Healthcare in Massachusetts - 3/29/2011 7:50:00 PM   
maybemaybenot


Posts: 2817
Joined: 9/22/2005
Status: offline
Just as another example of how ridiculous Romneycare is :
A married couple whom one spouse has been carrying both parties on their healthcare enters into a divorce or separtaion. The insuring spouse cannot drop the other partner and must continue to keep them covered, even if the other spouse refuses to pay their portion of the cost. No matter how long the divorce takes. That would be part of the divorce settlement to recoup your money. How would you like to be forced to insure a lying, cheating, abusive POS after you have tossed him or her out ?

That's just one of the great things that Romneycare has done for us.
mbmbn

_____________________________

Tolerance of evil is suicide.- NYC Firefighter

When tolerance is not reciprocated, tolerance becomes surrender.

(in reply to maybemaybenot)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: "Free" Healthcare in Massachusetts - 3/29/2011 7:55:46 PM   
maybemaybenot


Posts: 2817
Joined: 9/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WyldHrt

quote:

I think I have heard this story before,the thing is in the version I heard,it was a welfare mother driving around in a pink convertible Cadillac.Do you think these stories are being authored by the same folks? Ideologically speaking of course.

Umm... ask anyone who has been an EMT for any length of time and they can tell you that some people do use ambulances as a taxi service. We had a couple of 'frequent flyers' that called every 2-3 weeks. I don't know why you seem to find it so unbelievable that they would continue to do so under the MA plan, where the state pays for it.



WyldHrt:

That is a huge bugaboo of mine, the abuse of ambulance services. Even prior to Romneycare. I worked at a long term care facility that was exactly 2 blocks from the hospital. The long term care facilty had their own van. 9 out of 10 times they called an ambulance for routine services, like a follow up appointment, a wound care visit etc. BAck then, about 8 years ago, a one way trip two blocks was a cost of $ 700 to the taxpayers and more if they needed oxygen or other skilled services.
And we wonder why we are in the mess we are in... soo much of it has to do with waste.

mbmbn

_____________________________

Tolerance of evil is suicide.- NYC Firefighter

When tolerance is not reciprocated, tolerance becomes surrender.

(in reply to WyldHrt)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: "Free" Healthcare in Massachusetts - 3/29/2011 8:10:50 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WyldHrt

quote:

I think I have heard this story before,the thing is in the version I heard,it was a welfare mother driving around in a pink convertible Cadillac.Do you think these stories are being authored by the same folks? Ideologically speaking of course.

Umm... ask anyone who has been an EMT for any length of time and they can tell you that some people do use ambulances as a taxi service. We had a couple of 'frequent flyers' that called every 2-3 weeks. I don't know why you seem to find it so unbelievable that they would continue to do so under the MA plan, where the state pays for it.

Perhaps I wasn't clear enough...I did not mean to imply that I doubt that there are in fact some cases of welfare mothers driving cadillacs nor do I doubt that some abuse the system and do in fact use ambulance services as taxi's....What I should have stressed,and do firmly believe,is that for ideological reasons the frequency of these situations are blown out of proportion to the point where the gullible start swearing that this is the norm ....rather than the exception.
In other words...not all,are even most welfare mothers drive caddy's....and I will bet most ambulance runs are legitimate.
Now shall we strive to plug up the loopholes that allow some to take advantage of the system...of course we should,but while doing so we should be just as concerned that our "fixes" do not deny those that qualify and are truly needy from receiving those services that they need.



_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to WyldHrt)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: "Free" Healthcare in Massachusetts - 3/29/2011 8:20:54 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Despite my opposition to Public Healthcare, I do have the ability to look at things from both sides. You have absolutely no idea how bad healthcare in Massachusetts is and how Romneycare is killing us. If this " plan " we have is so flipping wonderful... why do we have the highest premiums in the US and the fastest rising healthcare costs ?


Bottom line, said Dr. Marylou Buyse, president of the insurers’ trade group, the Massachusetts Association of Health Plans, is that the high cost of health insurance is not necessarily the insurer’s fault.

“The increase [in Massachusetts premiums] is attributed to an increase in charges by physicians and hospitals,’’ Buyse said, referring to a 2008 state report that tracked the trend from 2002 to 2006.

The Commonwealth Fund report concluded that a number of changes, including limits on insurance companies’ administrative costs and profits, as well as changes in the way doctors and hospitals are paid, could bring better-quality patient care and could reduce national costs by an average of 1 to 1.5 percentage points per year over the next decade. That translates to a savings of $2 trillion to $3 trillion nationally, the report said.


http://www.boston.com/news/health/articles/2009/08/22/bay_state_health_insurance_premiums_highest_in_country/?page=2

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to maybemaybenot)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: "Free" Healthcare in Massachusetts - 3/29/2011 8:35:41 PM   
fmfclwu


Posts: 74
Joined: 5/3/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: maybemaybenot

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: flcouple2009

"Perhaps the report’s most troubling finding is that the state relies on the honor system when determining who is eligible for free care — and does not review an applicant’s assets, or even require a Social Security number to verify income, citizenship or address, Sullivan said."

It doesn't take genius to start finding the problems here.


Are there lawyers in the US who know how to write laws to eliminate that shit?
Why arent they being used, this is poor, too damn poor to be amusing
Seems to me thats where most of the issues are, not the poor people or the illegals but the dumbarse  heavily paid  lawyers, yet the poor suffer
AGAIN




Despite my opposition to Public Healthcare, I do have the ability to look at things from both sides. You have absolutely no idea how bad healthcare in Massachusetts is and how Romneycare is killing us. If this " plan " we have is so flipping wonderful... why do we have the highest premiums in the US and the fastest rising healthcare costs ?


We have the highest premiums because we insure the most people (over 97%) and have the highest standards of coverage in the nation.  When you get more in services, of course you pay more.  Our costs are NOT the fastest growing in the nation - in fact, the individual plan market, which you claimed was so unaffordable, has risen only 2% per year since implementation (Source).  Scare stories about how the cost of the program keeps rising neglect to mention that these cost increases are offset by decreases in the Health Safety Net Fund, which reimburses hospitals for emergency care provided to the uninsured. 

And for anyone arguing that more government involvement always means higher costs, you really need to take your blinders off and look at the rest of the world sometime.  Out of all the UN Countries, the U.S. spends a higher portion of its GDP on healthcare than any other nation except East Timor.  Forget the developed world, we are SECOND TO LAST in the world at controlling health care costs.  And if government involvement always meant higher costs, we would expect a positive correlation between the percentage of healthcare paid for by a government, and the overall cost.  Turns out the correlation works the other way:







Attachment (1)

(in reply to maybemaybenot)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: "Free" Healthcare in Massachusetts - 3/29/2011 9:01:02 PM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: flcouple2009

Howie Carr Show

That makes it fucking gospel then doesn't it.




FLCPL, you guys keep asking me for links or referances then, when I supply them its; "Oh that guy, he's a liar!"
" that' doesn't count," or "he has no credibility."
Do you want links or not?

"Oh!!! The New York Times! You're ok Popeye!" I wouldn't insult your intelligence by linking the NYT.
"Jason Blair said that,....." "Oh, good sourse Popeye!"

< Message edited by popeye1250 -- 3/29/2011 9:03:45 PM >


_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to flcouple2009)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: "Free" Healthcare in Massachusetts - 3/29/2011 9:05:31 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
Gotta love fmfclwu for at least coming up with real numbers (one has to hope that one does the dirty job numbers for one, and that if one is wrong, that one will blame the unions), if not for a semblant of those. Or whatever.

This country is done with the silly "those good for nuffin' are turnin' up for health care in limos" bullshit. We can afford tax cuts for (b)millionaires, but otherwise, this country is done sustaining those good for nuffink turnink up for free health care in limos on the back of nukular fewl bullshit!!!

_____________________________



(in reply to fmfclwu)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: "Free" Healthcare in Massachusetts - 3/29/2011 9:10:23 PM   
Edwynn


Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline



FR


Whatever of this increased cost, waste, etc. can be attributed to Romneycare or not, I can well assure that most other states are are now and have been experiencing rising medical costs and insurance rates and wastefulness and unnecessary procedures, etc. just fine without Romneycare, TVM.

So yes, it actually could be considered a redundancy in that regard.




< Message edited by Edwynn -- 3/29/2011 9:14:25 PM >

(in reply to fmfclwu)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: "Free" Healthcare in Massachusetts - 3/29/2011 9:11:38 PM   
fmfclwu


Posts: 74
Joined: 5/3/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250
I wouldn't insult your intelligence by linking the NYT.


And yet you cite an unconfirmed anecdotal story from a random caller to a conservative talk radio show?

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: "Free" Healthcare in Massachusetts Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.129