Rochsub2009
Posts: 2536
Status: offline
|
This thread seems to have gone completely FUBAR, but I'll jump in anyway. To the OP: Don't send anybody money. Period! Do as some have suggested and find the local kinky folks. They may be hard to find in your area, but they're there. You may even have to drive a few hours to get to them, but it will be worth the effort. I like the fact that you're seeking to be mentored. It's not necessary, but it's a very good way to learn (IMO). To the rest of you who are arguing over "mastery": I think you're using the term "master" in reference to different things, and that's where the problem is coming from. In my opinion, one can master a skill. That is what some of you are referring to. Frankly, I don't think one can consider their self to be a master of a skill until they have put in time and effort practicing that particular skill in order to master it. There are many aspects of BDSM that I wouldn't even consider participating in with someone who hadn't put in the proper amount of training. For example, decorative bondage is something that you don't just grab a rope and claim to be a master at. It's hard and takes lots of practice. Similarly, suspension can be dangerous, and I wouldn't want to be suspended by someone who hadn't learned how prior to playing with me. Different types of impact play (whips, floggers, etc.) also fall into this category. Knife play, fire play, breath play, etc. are also areas that can be dangerous, and I wouldn't want someone with no clue of what they're doing to bring a knife near my throat or testicles. Skill is measurable. It can be tested. It's easy to determine whether someone is a master at a skill. Others are referring to a completely different type of "mastery". They're talking about being able to master THEM. That's a completely different thing. While it is a valid thing to look for in a partner, it is not nearly so easy to measure as skills are. For example, have you ever been with a man or woman who was very experienced sexually, and past partners bragged about how good they were. But when you slept with him/her, it was pretty blah? That's because personal response to another individual is just that; personal. For some of you, if Matthew McConaughey (sp?) walked in the room, the mere sight of him would make you wet. He would have "mastered" you by simply walking into the room. Others might not react to him at all. Personal attraction is completely biochemical. It's about as individualized as it gets. So the person who you claim is so "masterful" because he mastered you, might not have the same effect on his next partner. Does that make his mastery over you any less real? No, but it also implies that his mastery is not universal. Remember that one move that you used to do on your former girlfriend/boyfriend that used to send him/her into convulsive orgasms? Yet, when you tried it on the next girlfriend/boyfriend, it didn't work. Does that mean that you lost your mastery? Or does it mean that you were never a master in the first place? IMO, using the term "master" in a context of interpersonal relationships is a false premise. Being able to generate a biochemical response in YOU does not necessarily mean that he/she can do it in anyone other than you. Therefore, the term "master" is being falsely applied. That doesn't negate the fact that he f*cked you/aroused you/spanked you/licked your pussy better than anyone else ever has. But what he/she did to you was completely biochemical. It was a personal response which cannot be quantified. So how then do we test him/her to determine their "mastery"? Moreover, when their next partner thinks they're lame, does that make your response to that person any less valid? I think not.
|