NiceGuyNihilist
Posts: 194
Joined: 3/25/2011 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: AneNoz I realize that this was posted in the Ask a Master forum, and addressed to male dominants, but as it seems that the practice here is for anyone to reply to any thread, I will reply. There are three points in your post, which I wish to address. quote:
Logically, if women are the inferior sex, and if it's a disgraceful thing for a man to be fucked, then it's more disgraceful for a man to be fucked by a woman than by a man because it implies willing surrender to a natural inferior. First: There is no such thing as a superior or inferior sex. They are by nature complimentary equals. Second: There is no disgrace in any act from which consenting adults derive pleasure. If a man was not meant to derive pleasure from being penetrated, then his rectum would be devoid of the nerve endings which render such penetration pleasureable. If you enjoy such penetration it is simply because you have freed your self of the chains of social convention which teach that there is shame inherent in any act between lovers, and allow your body to give you all the joys of which it is capable. quote:
do you have contempt for submissive males, and if so, why? Third: A person who has contempt for another based merely on the forms by which that other takes the pleasure which is promised us all in life does so because they are threatened by the one they feel contempt for. It is a defensive strategy to enable the first to feel stronger and superior to that which they fear. Be at peace Aneka I appreciate your post because you obviously wrote it in a spirit of kindness and assurance, but I'm afraid you've partially misunderstood me. When I wrote this: Logically, if women are the inferior sex, and if it's a disgraceful thing for a man to be fucked, then it's more disgraceful for a man to be fucked by a woman than by a man because it implies willing surrender to a natural inferior. I was not describing my own view, but making my best attempt to fully adopt the perspective of the guy who had contempt for men who submit to women, so that I could understand him. Believe me, I am secure about the validity of my pleasure. :) Also, it doesn't logically follow that because anal penetration can be pleasurable, asses were designed to be penetrated. Trees weren't made for the sake of the bears that scratch their backs on them. But the point hardly matters here; I find no more shame in my pleasure than a bear does in his. And that's exactly why I have the confidence, as a guy with a mile-wide submissive streak, to open a civil discussion with dominant men who have certain opinions of submissive men. I do appreciate the compassion which obviously pervades your philosophy, even if I find it less than logically convincing. And by the way, you're fucking hot.
|