Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: moderation interpretation?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: moderation interpretation? Page: <<   < prev  27 28 [29] 30 31   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 9:18:28 AM   
HannahLynHeather


Posts: 2950
Joined: 4/4/2011
From: where it's at
Status: offline
quote:

Taking shots when they know they don't have to face the music anymore.
fuck man, you're often witty, sometimes funny, usually biting, always snarky, and occasionally right. but face the music? puleeez, you just ain't that fucking brilliant, sorry to be the one to burst your bubble (that's a fucking lie, i  love bursting bubbles), but you're just another self important asshole on the net, pretty much like everybody else.

you don't post anything of any more value than anybody else, and usually your contribution is a lot fucking less valuable than others'. most of your "music" is akin to barney's. new words but the same old fucking tune.


_____________________________

clique? i don't need no stinking clique!

fuck a duck ~w. disney

My Twitter: http://twitter.com/HannahFuck

i hope you enjoyed the post, and as always my friends....have a nice day

(in reply to Icarys)
Profile   Post #: 561
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 9:19:08 AM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

It is my personal choice not to post, because I know there are those that know who I am, and I never want there to be the appearance of impropriety since I am the supervisor of  the whole site. That is not a site directive, that is my personal choice. Some of the moderators may or may not have user accounts that post on the boards, some do not.


I respect this very much.... not that it matters how I feel...lol


I feel the same way.


_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 562
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 9:23:50 AM   
HannahLynHeather


Posts: 2950
Joined: 4/4/2011
From: where it's at
Status: offline
quote:

The only ones I hide are the perpetually boring.
fuck. i didn't know one could hide their own posts.

sorry, just couldn't fucking resist that one.



_____________________________

clique? i don't need no stinking clique!

fuck a duck ~w. disney

My Twitter: http://twitter.com/HannahFuck

i hope you enjoyed the post, and as always my friends....have a nice day

(in reply to RapierFugue)
Profile   Post #: 563
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 9:25:51 AM   
needlesandpins


Posts: 3901
Status: offline 		fr

to ChatteParfaitt, GreedyTop, LillyBoPeep and pD.....THANK YOU! i'm glad that at least some can see what i'm saying. i really was wondering why some were finding it hard to understand.

needles

(in reply to LillyBoPeep)
Profile   Post #: 564
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 9:27:20 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus

I have only read a page or two of this thread... I am leaping in to say that the HIDE function is my friend, and I have no fear of using it. I don't have all that many people on hide, but it is so wonderful to be able to ignore them utterly. Unless someone quotes them.


This.... I use it extremely sparingly, and usually only when it is a person that delights in personal attacks and likes to bait using an Achilles heel. I just don't have room on my screen for it.

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to LadyHibiscus)
Profile   Post #: 565
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 9:28:18 AM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HannahLynHeather

quote:

The only ones I hide are the perpetually boring.
fuck. i didn't know one could hide their own posts.

sorry, just couldn't fucking resist that one.







_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to HannahLynHeather)
Profile   Post #: 566
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 9:31:00 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

There are many times when I see a post and have a flash back to the Charlie Brown animated short movies.

"Wha wha wha wha, wha, wha wha wha....."

Cuz that is just about how it registers in my brain.



Yeah, I have had that experience too, I thought perhaps I was beginning to suffer from ADD stage II, adult onset attention deficit disorder


_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 567
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 9:35:55 AM   
needlesandpins


Posts: 3901
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

It is my personal choice not to post, because I know there are those that know who I am, and I never want there to be the appearance of impropriety since I am the supervisor of  the whole site. That is not a site directive, that is my personal choice. Some of the moderators may or may not have user accounts that post on the boards, some do not.


I respect this very much.... not that it matters how I feel...lol


I feel the same way.



yep i'll go with that.

i've seen on other sites how things can get very tricky with mods/admin posting. i think it's a tough choice to decide whether to post as a mod or not. i think it depends on the people who are the mods in the first place as to how that would be viewed in a site. on another site there was a male mod who appeared to be very ego driven in his modding. but then he'd also post as a member. the problem was that sometimes you couldn't tell if he was psoting with his mod's hat on, or as a standard member. it also felt at times as though he did it deliberately to catch people out by being boarderline antaganistic as a member, but then slap down and ban members when they came back at him or questioned him about it. it was suggested by several members of that forum that mods should have either two accounts, or state whether posting with the hat on.

as said, it's a touch choice as to which would work best.

needles

(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 568
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 9:37:20 AM   
HannahLynHeather


Posts: 2950
Joined: 4/4/2011
From: where it's at
Status: offline 		hey i call a thread i start "my thread" (well actually i call it "my fucking thread"). and i don't give a flying fuck if anybody likes it or not.

this is one of the few cases where i don't care what others think of the words i chose to express myself.

but there's a big fucking but.
starting a thread gives me no fucking right to control the fucker. i can point out when some twat has misunderstood what my intent was, but if i post about how good fucking fruit loops are, and everybody else wants to talk about how much they like fucking boring old corn flakes, that's just to fucking bad for me. and if the mods decide they don't want people talking about corn flakes on a fruit loops thread, then that's the way it is, even if i was enjoying the corn flakes talk, or was learning something useful from it.

it may be my thread but i get no say in what goes on in it. look at lucy's fucking usps/canadian postal strike thread for fuck's sake. its about 4 different unrelated things. all originally having some sort of fucking vague connection to do with canada, but fuck all to do with the usps or the fucking strike..


_____________________________

clique? i don't need no stinking clique!

fuck a duck ~w. disney

My Twitter: http://twitter.com/HannahFuck

i hope you enjoyed the post, and as always my friends....have a nice day

(in reply to needlesandpins)
Profile   Post #: 569
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 9:38:05 AM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania


quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

There are many times when I see a post and have a flash back to the Charlie Brown animated short movies.

"Wha wha wha wha, wha, wha wha wha....."

Cuz that is just about how it registers in my brain.



Yeah, I have had that experience too, I thought perhaps I was beginning to suffer from ADD stage II, adult onset attention deficit disorder



While never formally diagnosed.........I am classic ADD. So maybe!


_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 570
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 9:39:07 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline 		I think it is more likely just good ole fashioned boredom...


_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 571
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 9:40:13 AM   
Icarys


Posts: 5757
Status: offline
quote:

sorry to be the one to burst your bubble (that's a fucking lie, i love bursting bubbles), but you're just another self important asshole on the net, pretty much like everybody else.


I hate to burst your bubble about bursting my bubble but if you knew me, you'd know I feel I'm no different in many ways than the next person..I have all the shitty character flaws that others probably have..I'm just more likely to admit them but have no problem pointing out another's while remembering I DO have them..Should I be so kind and not call a duck a duck if they're quaking.

I'd love to stay and chat till the wee hours of the morning about my bubbles and so forth but I've got some money to make.

Have a good day and Hannah? Fuck off. (Just for you)


_____________________________

submission - the feeling of patient, submissive humbleness - the state of being submissive or compliant; meekness.

Alaska Bound-The Official Countdown Has Started!
http://tinyurl.com/872mcu3
http://alturl.com/mog7m

(in reply to HannahLynHeather)
Profile   Post #: 572
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 9:41:31 AM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Icarys

Should I be so kind and not call a duck a duck if they're quaking.


You get your kicks terrifying ducks?

You heartless bastard.

(in reply to Icarys)
Profile   Post #: 573
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 9:45:09 AM   
HannahLynHeather


Posts: 2950
Joined: 4/4/2011
From: where it's at
Status: offline
quote:

Have a good day and Hannah? Fuck off. (Just for you)
thanks! and fuck you too.

you know, if i ever get to alaska i just might.

course i'm pretty fucking sure we'd both insist on the other being gagged.


_____________________________

clique? i don't need no stinking clique!

fuck a duck ~w. disney

My Twitter: http://twitter.com/HannahFuck

i hope you enjoyed the post, and as always my friends....have a nice day

(in reply to Icarys)
Profile   Post #: 574
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 10:14:08 AM   
needlesandpins


Posts: 3901
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HannahLynHeather

hey i call a thread i start "my thread" (well actually i call it "my fucking thread"). and i don't give a flying fuck if anybody likes it or not.

this is one of the few cases where i don't care what others think of the words i chose to express myself.

but there's a big fucking but.
starting a thread gives me no fucking right to control the fucker. i can point out when some twat has misunderstood what my intent was, but if i post about how good fucking fruit loops are, and everybody else wants to talk about how much they like fucking boring old corn flakes, that's just to fucking bad for me. and if the mods decide they don't want people talking about corn flakes on a fruit loops thread, then that's the way it is, even if i was enjoying the corn flakes talk, or was learning something useful from it.

it may be my thread but i get no say in what goes on in it. look at lucy's fucking usps/canadian postal strike thread for fuck's sake. its about 4 different unrelated things. all originally having some sort of fucking vague connection to do with canada, but fuck all to do with the usps or the fucking strike..



Hannah, i'm not sure if you're just talking there or have misunderstood me, but i have no problem with the way a thread goes once started. i have seen others who do and within the thread ask for moderators to do something about it. i like threads that are left alone to run wherever as long as it's not a complete bitchfest or illegal, so hence asking if it would be possible for an explanation. i get the mods are busy, but it doesn't have to be indepth, just maybe along the lines of; moderated due to request, or complaint, or content and such. not just from a personal 'this thread is off topic' type thing.

but my questions/thoughts and so on were sorted out along way back in the thread so all good.

i didn't actually lucy's thread as it was about canada so not really something i could comment on. your way of writing though is what i was trying to say last night. the use of Lucy's thread is where the context of implied ownership comes from, figuratively speaking, as opposed to actual. others seem to not have been able to see that as my point.

i do like your avatar btw

needles

(in reply to HannahLynHeather)
Profile   Post #: 575
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 10:39:43 AM   
NuevaVida


Posts: 6707
Joined: 8/5/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HannahLynHeather

course i'm pretty fucking sure we'd both insist on the other being gagged.



Ok now that's just damned funny.

_____________________________

Live Simply. Love Generously. Care Deeply. Speak Kindly.



(in reply to HannahLynHeather)
Profile   Post #: 576
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 10:43:00 AM   
HannahLynHeather


Posts: 2950
Joined: 4/4/2011
From: where it's at
Status: offline 		i was mostly just commenting on the whole fucking "my thread" bullshit.

yup, this is needles' moderation thread as opposed to anybody else's. if some pedantic twat wants to type out "the thread on moderation started by needles" just to satisfy their own weird sense of the proper use of the fucking language, then go for it. but i'm too fucking lazy, and fuck it, everybody knows what i mean.


_____________________________

clique? i don't need no stinking clique!

fuck a duck ~w. disney

My Twitter: http://twitter.com/HannahFuck

i hope you enjoyed the post, and as always my friends....have a nice day

(in reply to needlesandpins)
Profile   Post #: 577
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 11:16:58 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline 		I think Hannah probably nailed it on the 'My Thread' deal.  Once a thread gets started, if the OP wants to try to keep it on track, the best you're really going to do on the matter is attempt to interact on it with the folks who are responding and try to keep the intent of the topic clear.  I happen to think it's also a great mini lesson on stepping into the shoes of a Mod on a very small scale.  Now the onus is on the creator of the thread to walk that fine line between good discussion of the topic as well as the insights that came to other people as a result and what really is a hijack.  If you want a free flow of ideas, you're not going to try to stifle anybody who expands beyond fruit loops because whatever you wrote up is going to be thought about in different ways and spark things in other people. 

From the other side of it, if you think the whole thing is going to far and you find folks are just being abusive, you're watching the thread that you created and that nifty report button works.  From what I understand, no, the Mods aren't going to discuss their decision with you in any way that reflects their dealings with another poster, which is pretty much the way it should be.  Nobody here really would want that to happen if it were the reverse.  (In other words, how the whole thing was being handled if you were the offender.)  It's not needed anyway because, as Red mentioned, if somebody is going over the line, you'll have notes in your own mail from other forum users who are seeing the same thing that you do.

I did also want to take a moment to thank the OP for starting this thread.  No matter how we individually feel about posts being pulled or moderation, I think these discussions give us a chance to understand it better.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to HannahLynHeather)
Profile   Post #: 578
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 11:40:37 AM   
Wolf2Bear


Posts: 3204
Joined: 9/6/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ranja

again... i don't mind a good exchange at all, so the tell tale reporting person is just an over sensitive interfering little so and so in my opinion, if they can't stomach the content of what they are reading then i think they should just stay off the boards all together... go to a site about fluffy teddybears or growing pretty flowers or something.

about the moderators and being anonymous...
if they are... then how do any of the users know who they are?
and how does anybody know that there are more than one for sure...
and how does anybody know the site is owned by more than one person...
and who are they?
and how does anybody know the site owner is not the moderator too...
and it seems he might be operating under an inconspicuous user name too
or maybe many

maybe i am totally schizophrenic... maybe i am the only person here

Edit to add (no the answer is not really important at all, that is my whole point)


I really don't feel it is all that important whether the moderators do or don't have alternate accts on this site. The explanations given by VAA is sufficient enough for this poster. It is solely up to an individual to reveal if they have more than none account.


_____________________________

~Resident Sadist Approved~

Take the pain
Take the pleasure
I'm the master of both
Close your eyes, not your mind
Let me into your soul
I'm gonna work it 'til your totally blown

(in reply to ranja)
Profile   Post #: 579
RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 11:44:00 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		"Who is Number One?"
"You are Number Six"
"We want information"
"You won't get it!"
"By hook or by crook, we will..."


Be Seeing you...............

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Wolf2Bear)
Profile   Post #: 580
Page:   <<   < prev  27 28 [29] 30 31   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: moderation interpretation? Page: <<   < prev  27 28 [29] 30 31   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078