RE: moderation interpretation?

Join Our Community

Collarchat.com

Home Login Search

RE: moderation interpretation?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: moderation interpretation?

Page: << < prev 28 29 [30] 31 32 next > >>

Login

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 11:47:30 AM

Posts: 3204
Joined: 9/6/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: HannahLynHeather

it may be my thread but i get no say in what goes on in it. look at lucy's fucking usps/canadian postal strike thread for fuck's sake. its about 4 different unrelated things. all originally having some sort of fucking vague connection to do with canada, but fuck all to do with the usps or the fucking strike..

It's just how we Canadians effin roll ROFLMAO

_____________________________

~Resident Sadist Approved~

Take the pain
Take the pleasure
I'm the master of both
Close your eyes, not your mind
Let me into your soul
I'm gonna work it 'til your totally blown

(in reply to HannahLynHeather)

RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 11:48:37 AM

Posts: 3901
Status: offline

watch out for the big white balls Ron lol

needles

(in reply to mnottertail)

RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 11:49:49 AM

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

Rovers are definitely a bitch to deal with.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to needlesandpins)

RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 12:02:30 PM

Posts: 9410
Joined: 4/18/2005
Status: offline

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OhmLXHtT1A8

_____________________________

You know it's going to be a GOOD blow job when she puts a Breathe Right strip on first.

Pick-up artists and garbage men should trade names.

(in reply to mnottertail)

RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 12:04:55 PM

Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
It's not needed anyway because, as Red mentioned, if somebody is going over the line, you'll have notes in your own mail from other forum users who are seeing the same thing that you do.

Do people really do that, that often? I am not surprised, but since I don't get that sort of email, I would be surprised that it happens with any frequency. And I think I've only written someone about forums a time or two. Once to you, I believe.

Of course there is always the off chance that I am the one they are pissing and whining about!

_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to LadyPact)

RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 12:05:55 PM

Posts: 8098
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ModTwentyOne
often we only know there is a problem if someone hits the report button.

I am sure that if someone hits the report button an alarm goes off in your house, e. g. like a fire alarm...right?

Gosh, I can see you jumping out of bed at night, cause someone pressed that button due to the alarm going off

_____________________________

RIP 08-09-07

The PAST is history, the FUTURE a mystery, NOW is a gift - that's why it's called the PRESENT

www.butyoudontlooksick.com/navigation/BYDLS-TheSpoonTheory.pdf

(in reply to ModTwentyOne)

RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 12:13:10 PM

Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline

Flashing red lights also.

_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to Phoenixpower)

RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 12:17:26 PM

Posts: 3901
Status: offline

but do they have poles to slide down?

needles

(in reply to LaTigresse)

RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 12:18:35 PM

Posts: 6873
Joined: 12/29/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
It's not needed anyway because, as Red mentioned, if somebody is going over the line, you'll have notes in your own mail from other forum users who are seeing the same thing that you do.

Do people really do that, that often? I am not surprised, but since I don't get that sort of email, I would be surprised that it happens with any frequency. And I think I've only written someone about forums a time or two. Once to you, I believe.

Of course there is always the off chance that I am the one they are pissing and whining about!

i've only had that happen once, after a certain imbecile "pretty boy" made a snarky remark about my dead M. DarkSteven wrote me a nice message, but other wise, no, people don't seem to be seeing the same things half the time, so i don't think they're writing each other about it all that often either.

_____________________________

Midwestern Girl

"Obey your Master." Metallica

(in reply to LaTigresse)

RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 12:23:50 PM

SylvereApLeanan

Posts: 8275
Joined: 11/1/2007
From: Hell
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LillyBoPeep

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
It's not needed anyway because, as Red mentioned, if somebody is going over the line, you'll have notes in your own mail from other forum users who are seeing the same thing that you do.

Do people really do that, that often? I am not surprised, but since I don't get that sort of email, I would be surprised that it happens with any frequency. And I think I've only written someone about forums a time or two. Once to you, I believe.

Of course there is always the off chance that I am the one they are pissing and whining about!

i've only had that happen once, after a certain imbecile "pretty boy" made a snarky remark about my dead M. DarkSteven wrote me a nice message, but other wise, no, people don't seem to be seeing the same things half the time, so i don't think they're writing each other about it all that often either.

I've had it happen a few times. Not lots, but enough to know it happens. I'm always suspicious of the people who claim that "lots" of people agree with them in email. When I see that, I know it for the BS it is. More often, someone will comment on something I've said and we'll start a discussion in private messages that moves away from the original thread topic.

_____________________________

Sylverë
Dark Muse
30 Fluffy Points
Grumpy Cat is my spirit animal.
Shadow Governess & Mean Girl

"There's something that doesn't make sense. Let's go and poke it with a stick."— The Doctor

(in reply to LillyBoPeep)

RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 12:25:36 PM

Posts: 8098
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

Flashing red lights also.

not to mention the vibration alarm matt, which is underneath their mattress to ensure they really wake up...

_____________________________

RIP 08-09-07

The PAST is history, the FUTURE a mystery, NOW is a gift - that's why it's called the PRESENT

www.butyoudontlooksick.com/navigation/BYDLS-TheSpoonTheory.pdf

(in reply to LaTigresse)

RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 12:33:11 PM

Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LillyBoPeep

i've only had that happen once, after a certain imbecile "pretty boy" made a snarky remark about my dead M.

Fuck's sake ... some people really are lower than a snake's arse :(

(in reply to LillyBoPeep)

RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 12:44:53 PM

Posts: 32566
Status: offline

Not going to quote everyone here.

LaT, yep, you did. Same time frame, different matter on the one that I received the most about. That one didn't garner "lots" but I can assure you that you weren't alone.

"A lot" is a relative term, Syl. I think we all get the random comment on a post here or there. When seven or eight people contact you about the interaction, rather than the content of the subject, that's pretty high in comparison.

Even though it has happened and probably will happen again, it's usually not over a single comment. We're talking the big type of train wrecks here. I don't mention it on the thread that's generated the personal communications. I figure it's like anything else. If you know that you've done it, you should probably realize that other people have done it, too. In most cases, you just don't know what other people had a reaction to like the one you did on the instance that you wrote someone to mention.

_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to Phoenixpower)

RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 12:55:12 PM

Posts: 6873
Joined: 12/29/2010
Status: offline

oh there was one other time when i think of it, because of one of the most recent "trainwreck threads." maybe people who are more "dialed in" or have been here longer have more of a sense of camaraderie that they express that way. i dunno. but i still don't believe it really happens all that much.

_____________________________

Midwestern Girl

"Obey your Master." Metallica

(in reply to LadyPact)

RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 12:57:29 PM

SylvereApLeanan

Posts: 8275
Joined: 11/1/2007
From: Hell
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

"A lot" is a relative term, Syl. I think we all get the random comment on a post here or there. When seven or eight people contact you about the interaction, rather than the content of the subject, that's pretty high in comparison.

Yes, I'd consider that to be "lots" of comments for just one incident/thread. To be more clear, I think back channel posts of this nature are the exception rather than the norm. That's what I mean when I say it doesn't happen a lot but it does happen. I get suspicious when people insinuate the majority of readers agree with them and are just reluctant to post said agreement for fear of invoking the wrath of "Teh Powah Clique". That's when I start calling BS.

_____________________________

Sylverë
Dark Muse
30 Fluffy Points
Grumpy Cat is my spirit animal.
Shadow Governess & Mean Girl

"There's something that doesn't make sense. Let's go and poke it with a stick."— The Doctor

(in reply to LadyPact)

RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 1:34:21 PM

Posts: 6707
Joined: 8/5/2008
Status: offline

Oops double posted and messed up quotes while I was at it.

< Message edited by NuevaVida -- 6/21/2011 1:37:35 PM >

_____________________________

Live Simply. Love Generously. Care Deeply. Speak Kindly.

(in reply to sexyred1)

RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 1:42:41 PM

Posts: 6707
Joined: 8/5/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LillyBoPeep

i've only had that happen once, after a certain imbecile "pretty boy" made a snarky remark about my dead M. DarkSteven wrote me a nice message, but other wise, no, people don't seem to be seeing the same things half the time, so i don't think they're writing each other about it all that often either.

I remember that horrible post. Way over the line.

I don't send or receive emails about bickering or attacking posts at all. I've reported a post or two in my day, but my email is clear of the nonsense.

_____________________________

Live Simply. Love Generously. Care Deeply. Speak Kindly.

(in reply to LillyBoPeep)

RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 2:25:24 PM

Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ranja

about the moderators and being anonymous...
if they are... then how do any of the users know who they are?
and how does anybody know that there are more than one for sure...
and how does anybody know the site is owned by more than one person...
and who are they?
and how does anybody know the site owner is not the moderator too...
and it seems he might be operating under an inconspicuous user name too
or maybe many

maybe i am totally scitzophrenic... maybe i am the only person here

Edit to add (no the answer is not really important at all, that is my whole point)

Am I the only one who thinks this sounds theological almost?

_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."

(in reply to ranja)

RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 2:29:06 PM

Posts: 6873
Joined: 12/29/2010
Status: offline

LOOK AT THE BEAUTY OF A NEWLY FORMED AVATAR AND TELL ME THAT MOD DOESN'T EXIST!!!!

_____________________________

Midwestern Girl

"Obey your Master." Metallica

(in reply to DarkSteven)

RE: moderation interpretation? - 6/21/2011 2:36:58 PM

Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

quote:

ORIGINAL: ranja

about the moderators and being anonymous...
if they are... then how do any of the users know who they are?
and how does anybody know that there are more than one for sure...
and how does anybody know the site is owned by more than one person...
and who are they?
and how does anybody know the site owner is not the moderator too...
and it seems he might be operating under an inconspicuous user name too
or maybe many

maybe i am totally scitzophrenic... maybe i am the only person here

Edit to add (no the answer is not really important at all, that is my whole point)

Am I the only one who thinks this sounds theological almost?

Well it does actually bring up a few excellent points that I sort of discussed early on.

The whole.....well I know who Mod XYZ is. I am going to make it obvious, and be all smoochy suck assy flirty and Mod XYZ flirts back showing that they indeed are not anonymous to everyone...... it's kinda off.

< Message edited by LaTigresse -- 6/21/2011 2:37:41 PM >

_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to DarkSteven)

Page: << < prev 28 29 [30] 31 32 next > >>

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: moderation interpretation?

Page: << < prev 28 29 [30] 31 32 next > >>

Jump to:

New Messages	No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages	Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages	Locked w/o New Messages

Post New Thread

Reply to Message

Post New Poll

Submit Vote

Delete My Own Post

Delete My Own Thread

Rate Posts

Collarchat.com © 2024

Terms of Service

0.109