LafayetteLady
Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007 From: Northern New Jersey Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Iamsemisweet Thank you for explaining appeals. However, I have and will continue to file appeals when the judge is acting inappropriately, and like a jerk, if I believe it prejudices my client. Denying someone access to the courtroom is abuse of discretion, and can be appealed. There are more than enough cases where a defendant has been distracting enough, the judge has had them removed and they watched via closed circuit television. No prejudice involved. Also, did you watch the video? Better yet, did you pay attention? It was a closed courtroom. She was asked to leave not simply because she was breastfeeding, but because she was not a party to the case, but a witness. So the whole "denying someone access" didn't happen. quote:
Fortunately, judges in my County would not behave in such a manner. If family law courts don't want people bringing their kids to court, then the courthouse needs to be prepared to provide childcare. It is that simple. Someone can't be denied justice just because they can't find a babysitter. What planet do you live on? The court doesn't care if you don't have transportation to get to court, why should they be bothered about your childcare issues? It isn't like anyone is told the day before, they receive plenty of notice. It is the party's case to make appropriate arrangements. On those occasions when it was completely unavoidable in Family Court, the court has asked the parents to wait outside with their child, and has been helpful WHILE their particular appearance was occurring. quote:
Honestly, having sat through a few hundred dockets in my life, and seeing the hubbub and noise (these aren't dignified procedures), I have trouble believing the wheels of justice will grind to a halt if a mother discreetly feeds her baby. In fact, I would expect her to do so. I don't mean jerking out a tit for all the world to see, but beneath a towel or blanket, I can't imagine what the problem is. They are not full of hubbub and noise on the East coast, I can assure you. When that judge is on the bench, people aren't making noise. quote:
People are intimidated and made nervous by the courts. It is wrong for a judge to take action to deny anyone, including (gasp) a nursing mother, access to the courtroom. It just might not be as easy as some suppose to fight your way to the front of the courtroom (with a screaming baby) and let the clerk know you were leaving, so when your case was called, when you wouldn't be declared a failure to appear. And then, where the hell are you supposed to go? Is it less distracting to nurse in the hallway? More and more people are appearing pro se now, because they can't afford counsel. The courtrooms need to be made more user friendly, not less. Only in America do we supposedly revere motherhood, but make it so hard to be a mother. What could possibly be shameful about a mother providing care for her child? When did the judge deny access? She was told to wait outside until her testimony was needed. She wasn't a party to the case, so she had no need to sit in the court room at all. A judge can close a court room any time he/she feels like it, especially in Family Law cases. People are so intimidated, they show up in bootie shorts and sandals, or guys with tank tops and baseball hats. Yea, sure, I'm going to buy that. It isn't nearly as difficult as you are trying to make it out to be to get the attention of the BAILIFF, not the clerk and notify them of the situation. Especially in a closed courtroom, which is what this was. Don't play like this was the calendar call and she was risking being marked not present. It's a crock you are reaching for to support your theories. It ain't flying.
|