Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: George Zimmerman Update...


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: George Zimmerman Update... Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: George Zimmerman Update... - 7/4/2012 8:48:41 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Louve00


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Louve00


Yes, you have responded this way more than once to me. My problem with the credibility of Zimmerman's story is he's proven himself dishonest, for whatever the reason may be, we may not be able to believe his account or his belief of the situation and the story of the other side is unable to be heard to know whether Zimmerman had just cause. All Zimmerman has proven to me is his incredibility. If he was part of an organized neighborhood watchman (which it has been said he was a self appointed watchman), he shouldn't have been carrying a gun, he shouldn't have pursued a suspect, only reported them and perhaps waited and watched until police arrived.

Without the testimony of the dead defendant we can't hear the testimony of why or how Zimmerman defied his job description which no one is assuming he did, just that Martin must have somehow provoked Zimmerman to do that. So we need more evidence to know what happened to say for certain IMO.


The problem with that is that Zimmerman doesn't have to prove anything. There is to date no evidence to disprove his story and the prosicution has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was not, in his mind simply defending himself. No such evidence seems to exist. You can distrust a man but doyou send himto prison for that? Martins death is awful but that fact alone does not and a number of people on here (not you ) have made that very claim. He was not pursuing Martin, he was following which you have to do to whatch someone who is moving just prior to the confrontation (and this is suported by both 911 transcripts and Martins gf) Zimmerman lost track of Martin then with Martin saying he wouldn't run and Zimmerman having lost track they came back together. Then it hit the fan.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 7/4/2012 8:54:39 PM >

(in reply to Louve00)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: George Zimmerman Update... - 7/5/2012 3:05:18 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle
the trivial injuries Zimmerman sustained AS HIS ATTACK WAS BEING REPELLED BY HIS VICTIM

What attack? There is no evidence at all that Zimmerman attacked Martin. Stop making up things. And get over it.


Given the precedent in the Amadou Diallo trial, Zimmerman's threatening motions -- WHICH HE ADMITS MAKING -- are legally equivalent -- in terms of Trayvon Martin's right to self-defense -- as any other attack. Don't blame me. Blame the Jury.

It's almost as if Zimmerman PLANNED on hunting a kid, but was too stupid to realize that his actions are pretty much transparent since he forgot one little fact. Trayvon Martin's girlfriend was LISTENING to him approach Trayvon, and HEARD the exact opposite of the stupid movie dialog Zimmerman claims Martin to have said.

But hey, there are people out there who still think Adolph Hitler got a bad rap, so people who think Zimmerman is a Good Guy? Doesn't surprise me a bit.

< Message edited by farglebargle -- 7/5/2012 3:08:30 AM >


_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: George Zimmerman Update... - 7/5/2012 3:12:47 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
quote:

The problem with that is that Zimmerman doesn't have to prove anything.


ANY self-defense claim involves Zimmerman's testimony on the stand. Once he's up there, he's open to cross-examination on EVERY THING HE'S SAID OR DONE.

So, if Zimmerman is going to claim self-defense, He is going to have to prove a whole lot of things. FIRST among them that his prior lies don't affect his current credibility. I don't see Zimmerman selling that to a Jury, personally. SURE Paypal won't let you transfer > 10k in a shot ( reduces their paperwork ), but why transfer from bank account to bank account the same SHADY NUMBERS, when you could just transfer all 47 grand in one shot?

I mean, if you're not doing anything shady, why NOT transfer all the money in one shot.

And that whole "George Zimmerman doesn't trust the court" thing is going to come back and hurt him... If he didn't trust, and tried to mislead the court then, why would he trust the court, and be honest now? Because he got his bail revoked for a short time? I'm not seeing any incentive to be honest on Zimmerman's side, and KNOWING HE'S A LIAR, he doesn't get the benefit of the doubt. He has to work for it.

I look forward to watching the proceedings with eagerness.

< Message edited by farglebargle -- 7/5/2012 3:13:40 AM >


_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: George Zimmerman Update... - 7/5/2012 3:19:50 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun

Of course, it doesn't matter how injured he was, it only matters how reasonable his fear of great imminent injury was.


Why do you persist in omitting the word REASONABLE, which is in the statute, and very important given Zimmerman's UNREASONABLE actions? Perhaps you know that Zimmerman's acts and perceptions weren't reasonable, and you need to try to gloss over it in hopes that people won't notice that the standard you're invoking differs from the actual law in material ways.

That said, you discount Trayvon Martin's fear of Great Imminent Bodily Harm or Death given Zimmerman's admission of making a threatening motion as if towards a weapon AFTER chasing and approaching him at night.

I wonder why you think Zimmerman's fear to be more important that Martin's.

Please explain that discrepancy. On the face of it, it looks like a racist bias, given Martin's REASONABLE FEAR is (A) Reasonable and (B) IS CAUSED BY ZIMMERMAN'S PURSUIT, APPROACH, AND THREATENING MOTIONS, and I'm trying to understand it.

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to Raiikun)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: George Zimmerman Update... - 7/5/2012 3:33:18 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle
Given ... Zimmerman's threatening motions

You still have not answered my questions about various actions. Probably because you suspected a trap. Indeed, my questions were a trap:

quote:

Is tying your shoelaces a threatening gesture?

Indeed it is: a firearm might be hidden in an ankle holster.

quote:

Is pulling on your ear a threatening gesture?

Indeed it is: a throwing knife might be in a sheath below the back of the neck.

quote:

Is burping a threatening gesture?

Indeed it is: the person may be infected with a lethal germ that spreads in this way.

In short: any and all gestures may be perceived as threatening gestures, even the blinking of an eye. (Magnum was faced with a martial artist who blinked before he struck. In a short scifi story by Bryce Walton the armless and legless proponent controlled the weapons in the heavily armed room he lived in with his eyes.)

Thus gestures have no significance. Only an actual threat has significance.

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: George Zimmerman Update... - 7/5/2012 3:50:35 AM   
DeviantlyD


Posts: 4375
Joined: 5/26/2007
From: Hawai`i
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Head injuries like when your head bounces off a hard surface. Direct correlation between a gym floor and a pavement.



Comments like these speak to the lack of medical education of the poster.

Elaborate rather than ridicule, both are hard flat sufaces. and I know that the textures are different corelates to, rough equivelance, not identical.



How am I ridiculing you? I'm stating a fact that you don't have a medical background and that is easy to deduce from your statement.

A closed head injury, like the one your son sustained, sort of proves the point that Zimmerman couldn't have experienced the sort of skull bashing he claims. I don't know if you've seen it or not, but there is a video of a walk through Zimmerman did the next morning with police officers. In that video he states that his head was partly on the sidewalk and partly on the grass. If Martin had been slamming Zimmerman's head down the way Zimmerman describes, hitting that edge would have provided far more trauma than a couple of lacerations to the back of his head. I find it difficult to believe he wouldn't have had a fractured skull, never-mind a concussion, and yet there were no references to that in the medical report from what the media has indicated. Having his head smashed repeatedly against the sidewalk would have meant his brain would have been shaken inside the skull, impacting against the inner walls of the skull itself. That degree of injury isn't something a person can so easily get up and walk away from. There is zero doubt in my mind that Zimmerman is lying about Martin smashing his head against the sidewalk. His injuries just do not correspond with his description.

_____________________________

ExiledTyrant's groupie. Catering to his ego since May 26, 2007. :D

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: George Zimmerman Update... - 7/5/2012 3:54:08 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
Tying your shoelaces isn't threatening UNLESS you've chased after and confronted someone at night, right?

CONTEXT. It's important, and when I answered your questions with a response considering the appropriate CONTEXT, then I had considered the matter settled. But I guess you needed to get your example, however inapplicable in this CONTEXT, off your chest.

Hope it makes you feel better, because it doesn't advance your argument.

CONTEXT is also what turns the REASONABLENESS test. Which is why so many choose to just ignore the REASONABLE part of the statute.

But in this context, it's clear that any trivial injuries sustained by Zimmerman were sustained as Trayvon Martin was exercising his right to self-defense. You'd have to completely ignore the unreasonable nature of Zimmerman's acts otherwise.

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: George Zimmerman Update... - 7/5/2012 3:57:36 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Head injuries like when your head bounces off a hard surface. Direct correlation between a gym floor and a pavement.



Comments like these speak to the lack of medical education of the poster.

Elaborate rather than ridicule, both are hard flat sufaces. and I know that the textures are different corelates to, rough equivelance, not identical.



How am I ridiculing you? I'm stating a fact that you don't have a medical background and that is easy to deduce from your statement.

A closed head injury, like the one your son sustained, sort of proves the point that Zimmerman couldn't have experienced the sort of skull bashing he claims. I don't know if you've seen it or not, but there is a video of a walk through Zimmerman did the next morning with police officers. In that video he states that his head was partly on the sidewalk and partly on the grass. If Martin had been slamming Zimmerman's head down the way Zimmerman describes, hitting that edge would have provided far more trauma than a couple of lacerations to the back of his head. I find it difficult to believe he wouldn't have had a fractured skull, never-mind a concussion, and yet there were no references to that in the medical report from what the media has indicated. Having his head smashed repeatedly against the sidewalk would have meant his brain would have been shaken inside the skull, impacting against the inner walls of the skull itself. That degree of injury isn't something a person can so easily get up and walk away from. There is zero doubt in my mind that Zimmerman is lying about Martin smashing his head against the sidewalk. His injuries just do not correspond with his description.


And the Paramedic specifically described NO evidence of disorientation or concussion. They SPECIFICALLY evaluated him for that.

So, even putting aside Zimmerman's provocation of the entire incident, Zimmerman's reactions certainly weren't reasonable. REASONABLE would have been obeying his explicit and specific training to not confront anyone. As seen in the handbook admitted into evidence. INTENTIONAL, DELIBERATE, WILFUL ACT. Which is why it's a murder trail, and not a manslaughter trial.

Zimmerman KNEW better, and the prosecution can prove it.

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to DeviantlyD)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: George Zimmerman Update... - 7/5/2012 4:41:40 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
Those are good points.

(in reply to DeviantlyD)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: George Zimmerman Update... - 7/5/2012 4:50:39 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle
Tying your shoelaces isn't threatening UNLESS you've chased after and confronted someone at night, right?

I dunno. I do not comprehend your question.

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle
CONTEXT. It's important, and when I answered your questions with a response considering the appropriate CONTEXT, then I had considered the matter settled. But I guess you needed to get your example, however inapplicable in this CONTEXT, off your chest.

Hope it makes you feel better, because it doesn't advance your argument.

CONTEXT is also what turns the REASONABLENESS test. Which is why so many choose to just ignore the REASONABLE part of the statute.

But in this context, it's clear that any trivial injuries sustained by Zimmerman were sustained as Trayvon Martin was exercising his right to self-defense. You'd have to completely ignore the unreasonable nature of Zimmerman's acts otherwise.

Striking first is not a Christian thing to do. Isn't it the Christian way to first turn the other cheek? It is my impression that Martin struck first.

I wasn't there. I do know that shit happens, unwantedly. It is the Law of Murphy at work. Deal with it.

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: George Zimmerman Update... - 7/5/2012 4:56:39 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle
Zimmerman's reactions certainly weren't reasonable. REASONABLE would have been obeying his explicit and specific training to not confront anyone. As seen in the handbook admitted into evidence. INTENTIONAL, DELIBERATE, WILFUL ACT. Which is why it's a murder trail, and not a manslaughter trial.

Zimmerman KNEW better, and the prosecution can prove it.

You argue from the point of view of a dominant or a submissive. You are a dominant, yes? That is a logical point of view, not a reasonable point of view.

I do not know what is the constitution of Zimmerman's mind. It seems to me that he was afraid, panicked. Definitely not a dominant, him.

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: George Zimmerman Update... - 7/5/2012 5:44:58 AM   
Raiikun


Posts: 2650
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

ANY self-defense claim involves Zimmerman's testimony on the stand.



Wright v. State

A self-defense instruction for the charge of battery on a police officer can be supported by circumstantial evidence from which a jury could infer that the defendant believed that his conduct was necessary to defend himself from an officer's use of excessive force in making an arrest. See Johnson v. State, 634 So. 2d 1144, 1145 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). To raise self-defense, a defendant [**5] does not have to testify directly about his intent behind an act occurring in the past, or that he made a conscious decision to defend himself in a certain way. Not remembering an event does not preclude the possibility of either an intentional act or an accident. From the circumstances surrounding an arrest made with excessive force, a jury might infer that a defendant reasonably believed that responsive force was reasonable and necessary and, therefore, proper. As the second district stated in Kilgore v. State, 271 So. 2d 148, 152 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972)

quote:

Once he's up there, he's open to cross-examination on EVERY THING HE'S SAID OR DONE.


Wrong. In Florida, they're only allowed to cross examine on the same topics brought up on direct examination. Lester shot the prosecution down on 4/20 about that, when Zimmerman made his apology, and the prosecution tried to cross about his statements to police. He was leashed in and made to only ask questions in regards to the apology.

The bond hearing issue, paypal accounts, etc, are likely to not be admissible at trial, according to some of the Florida resident legal types (Nejame comes to mind as saying that).

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: George Zimmerman Update... - 7/5/2012 5:46:46 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
I'm arguing from the point of view of the PROSECUTION. Which is, of course, the relevant context.

Christian? Jesus is a fucking pussy. MY G-D SMITES FIRST, THEN SORTS 'EM OUT.

See Also: The Bible ( what you'd call "The Old Testament" as if there's some other one... )



_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: George Zimmerman Update... - 7/5/2012 5:46:52 AM   
Raiikun


Posts: 2650
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle



Why do you persist in omitting the word REASONABLE, which is in the statute


Funny you should say that, when the post you quote has the word REASONABLE in it.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun, in the post you quoted

Of course, it doesn't matter how injured he was, it only matters how reasonable his fear of great imminent injury was.


< Message edited by Raiikun -- 7/5/2012 5:47:13 AM >

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: George Zimmerman Update... - 7/5/2012 5:52:36 AM   
MasterJohnSteed


Posts: 217
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline
IRREGARDLESS...

If zimmerman is innocent or guilty. They will find him guilty because

1. They don't want rioting
2. That if they do find him innocent then Obama will start screaming racism an violation of his civil rights and have him brought up on federal charges.

The fact is Mr. Zimmerman is DOOMED why?? because he wasn't black when he shot a black teenager.

If Zimmerman was as black as his victim, this would be a non story and you know it!!

(in reply to Raiikun)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: George Zimmerman Update... - 7/5/2012 7:07:26 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
regardless. irregardless is unacceptable.

and your number two reason is straight out of the cretinism for dummies manual.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to MasterJohnSteed)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: George Zimmerman Update... - 7/5/2012 7:18:56 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle
I'm arguing from the point of view of the PROSECUTION. Which is, of course, the relevant context.

From a logical, but unreasonable point of view, therefore.

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle
Christian? Jesus is a fucking pussy.

Indeed, Jesus was a kind soul endeavoring to better the human condition.
The meek will inherit the Earth.

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle
MY G-D SMITES FIRST, THEN SORTS 'EM OUT.

Ah yes, you are Jewish are you not? Methinks that you have a chip on your shoulder. I recommend that you speedily convert to Christianity and - if possible - that you subsequently convert to post-Christianity. I assure you that if your pagan god was around, he would recommend the same - and smite you if you did not obey him.

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle
See Also: The Bible ( what you'd call "The Old Testament" as if there's some other one... )

Tsk, tsk. There is that chip again. There is a time and a place for everything. The approximately thousand year reign of that pagan god served its purpose; after that new goals were being strifed for.

Climb out of that pit you people with mutilated penises have been trapped in for 2600 years! There is a fresh wind up here and the view is spectacular. There is a ladder... if only you believe.


< Message edited by Rule -- 7/5/2012 7:19:59 AM >

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: George Zimmerman Update... - 7/5/2012 8:07:37 AM   
igor2003


Posts: 1718
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun


quote:

ORIGINAL: igor2003

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

You have proclaimed the diallo case to be murder to claim it as proof that Martin was justified to attack based on that precident makes you a hypocrite.

When did you hold the seance to find out what Diallo was thinking?


Martin didn't attack.  He DEFENDED himself from Zimmerman's attempt to detain him.



Zero proof of that.

The State still has not shown a single piece of evidence that disproves George's story of being pinned to the ground after having his nose broken and his head banged against concrete, etc.

If the State cannot refute that, George goes free.


There are no actual pictures of the incident or eye witnesses to the start of the physical encounter, so if that is what you mean by "proof" then you are right.  But there are several individual statements which, when put together, make a very compelling argument that Zimmerman did, in fact, try to detain Martin.

First, let's take Zimmerman's statements.  On the night of the shooting Zimmerman says he saw Martin emerge from the bushes and approach him.  The next day, during his walk through he changes his story and says he didn't see where Martin came from.  In either event, they were at the top of the "T" when the altercation began. 

According to Zimmerman on his walk through, Martin approaches and asks, "Yo, you got a problem, Homie?" (or similar words...I'm not going to bother looking up the exact quote right here.)  Zimmerman replies "I don't have a problem," to which Martin says, "Well you do now," at which point he hits Zimmerman, breaking his nose and knocking him to the ground.  Martin then jumps on Zimmerman, pummeling him, bashing his head, etc. etc. until Zimmerman pulls his gun and shoots Martin.

According to the EMT report, Martin's body was located behind 2831 Retreat View Circle.  The woman that lives at 2831 Retreat View Circle later said in a TV interview that Martin was shot in her back yard.  From what I can see in the various maps and satalite photos of the area, the area behind 2831 Retreat View Circle appears to be some 50 feet or so away from the top of the "T".  This indicates, yet again, that there are flaws in Zimmerman's statements, and it could not have happened as Zimmerman claims.

Now, lets look at what DeeDee has to say in her interview.  First, she wants Martin to continue running, but she says she can tell he is very tired and breathing real hard and says he tells her he isn't going to run any more.  They then talk about him "going back".  Some people think this means "go back to where Zimmerman is" but I think when you look at the context, and take into account DeeDee's sometimes unusual phraseology she is talking about Martin "going back" to the townhouse where he is staying.

My own belief is that it is during this time that Martin has hidden in the bushes while he catches his breath...a belief that is supported by Zimmerman's own statement that he saw Martin emerge from the bushes. 

Next, DeeDee says Martin gets scared and says she can tell because Martin starts to talk "real low" (in a whisper) and tells her that "the man" is getting real close.  If Martin was "returning" from near the townhouse where he was staying in order to confront Zimmerman there would have been no need for the whispering nor his concern about "the man" getting close.

Martin, out of breath from running and realizing he is about to be "found" anyway, steps out of the bushes and asks Zimmerman why he is following him.  Instead of simply answering Martin's question he asks, in what DeeDee describes as an angry voice, "What are you doing here?" after which it sounds to her like someone is shoved and Martin's headset comes off.

But, what has been ignored is that this is NOT the last of what DeeDee hears!  Just before Martin's phone goes dead she hears Martin yell, "Get off!  Get off!"

Now...the witnesses from the nearby residences have claimed that they heard the altercation travel, from north, near the "T" in a southerly direction.  At one point one of the witnesses (and I admit I don't remember which one) said he (she?) saw one person chasing another though they didn't know who was chasing whom.  (I also admit that this may even be one of the statements that was later changed...their stories change almost as often as Zimmerman's.)

Now, you put all of this together...

We know Zimmerman didn't get hit and knocked down at the "T".  We know that for some reason Martin was yelling "Get off!  Get off!"...my own guess, as supported by the surrounding incidents is that Zimmerman was grabbing at him in an attempt to detain this "asshole" to keep him from being one of the ones that "always get away".  And we know that the altercation then moved south (as in one person chasing another in the direction of "home" and safety for Martin.) to the area behind 2831 Retreat View Circle where Martin was finally shot.

This, all put together, STRONGLY suggests that Zimmerman did, indeed, try to wrongfully detain Martin, and that Martin struck Zimmerman as a result.


Lastly, as to Zimmerman's self-defense claim.  I can't and won't argue as to Zimmerman being held down and being on the losing end of a fist fight, and I'm sure that the prosecution is very well aware of the problems surrounding claims of self-defense in Florida.  And yet they apparently do think they have a case.  I can see the possibility of several areas where the prosecution may have a basis for their case, though I freely admit that it is just supposition and speculation on my part.  For instance, was his "fear" legitimate, or is it a self-serving claim, made by a person shown to be unreliable in his statements, in his attempt to get out of trouble?  Was he illegally carrying a firearm while under the influence of temazepam and adderall?  Was he in violation of Martin's rights?  There may be, and most likely are, other possibilities.  I do think SYG is out of the question since he was actively pursuing the person he eventually shot.

_____________________________

If the women don't find you handsome they should at least find you handy. - Red Green

At my age erections are like cops...there's never one around when you need it!

Never miss a good chance to shut up. - Will Rogers


(in reply to Raiikun)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: George Zimmerman Update... - 7/5/2012 8:45:30 AM   
Raiikun


Posts: 2650
Status: offline
In other words, zero evidence to disprove self defense.

(in reply to igor2003)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: George Zimmerman Update... - 7/5/2012 8:55:31 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
LOL.as much or more evidence than Zimmerman has to prove it was self defense on his part.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Raiikun)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: George Zimmerman Update... Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094