RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s?

Collarchat.com

Home Login Search

RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s?

Page: << < prev 89 90 [91] 92 93 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 11/4/2013 5:22:29 PM

RowdySoul

Posts: 2
Joined: 10/18/2013
Status: offline

What makes you qualified to judge others? Mr dink22?

(in reply to dink22)

Profile

Post #: 1801

RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 11/4/2013 5:27:06 PM

OsideGirl

Posts: 14412
Joined: 7/1/2005
From: United States
Status: offline

Actually, it's just reached a point that when he posts the majority of us just roll our eyes and say, "Oh, goody. He's ranting about FinDommes.... again."

_____________________________

Give a girl the right shoes and she will conquer the world. ~ Marilyn Monroe

The Accelerated Velocity of Terminological Inexactitude

(in reply to RowdySoul)

Profile

Post #: 1802

RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 11/4/2013 5:33:44 PM

dink22

Posts: 171
Joined: 5/18/2005
Status: offline

I don't "judge." I use reasoning. If "financial domination" was a true fetish, why has it NEVER been listed on CM as a BDSM interest?

Case closed.

(in reply to RowdySoul)

Profile

Post #: 1803

RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 11/4/2013 5:54:39 PM

lizi

Posts: 4673
Joined: 2/1/2009
Status: offline

You've been proved wrong on this before. Emetophilia, feederism, formicophilia, lactophilia, and oculolinctus are genuine fetishes and are not in CM's fetish list. CM does not purport to have a list of every fetish out there.

Your butthurt is tiresome.

(in reply to dink22)

Profile

Post #: 1804

RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 11/4/2013 5:57:27 PM

dink22

Posts: 171
Joined: 5/18/2005
Status: offline

Look, insulting me, or trying to ridicule me, simply doesn't change logic or reality. It might make you feel better, but it's a kind of reaction that says clearly, on a psychological level, "I DON"T WANT TO FACE THE TRUTH!!!" Because it's uncomfortable. Because it doesn't flatter you. Because life is easier if you tell yourself it's simply NOT the truth. That you are right in everything you do.

Such is financial domination.

(in reply to dink22)

Profile

Post #: 1805

RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 11/4/2013 5:59:02 PM

searching4mysir

Posts: 2757
Joined: 6/16/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dink22

Look, insulting me, or trying to ridicule me, simply doesn't change logic or reality. It might make you feel better, but it's a kind of reaction that says clearly, on a psychological level, "I DON"T WANT TO FACE THE TRUTH!!!" Because it's uncomfortable. Because it doesn't flatter you. Because life is easier if you tell yourself it's simply NOT the truth. That you are right in everything you do.

Such is financial domination.

Then are Emetophilia, feederism, formicophilia, lactophilia, and oculolinctus not genuine fetishes?

_____________________________

No longer searching -- found my one and only right here on CM

(in reply to dink22)

Profile

Post #: 1806

RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 11/4/2013 6:03:21 PM

dink22

Posts: 171
Joined: 5/18/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lizi

You've been proved wrong on this before. Emetophilia, feederism, formicophilia, lactophilia, and oculolinctus are genuine fetishes and are not in CM's fetish list. CM does not purport to have a list of every fetish out there.

Your butthurt is tiresome.

Well that would be fine --IF-- Half the women signing up as new "dommes" were into those fetishes and said so. But that's obviously not the case. Maybe 1 in 50, at best, is into that stuff.

But better than half the new female profiles on CM for dominant women say, pretty much specifically, that they are financial dominants. So I'm sorry, but your point just doesn't score with logical minds.

(in reply to lizi)

Profile

Post #: 1807

RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 11/4/2013 6:06:37 PM

searching4mysir

Posts: 2757
Joined: 6/16/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dink22

quote:

ORIGINAL: lizi

You've been proved wrong on this before. Emetophilia, feederism, formicophilia, lactophilia, and oculolinctus are genuine fetishes and are not in CM's fetish list. CM does not purport to have a list of every fetish out there.

Your butthurt is tiresome.

Well that would be fine --IF-- Half the women signing up as new "dommes" were into those fetishes and said so. But that's obviously not the case. Maybe 1 in 50, at best, is into that stuff.

But better than half the new female profiles on CM for dominant women say, pretty much specifically, that they are financial dominants. So I'm sorry, but your point just doesn't score with logical minds.

What does quantity have to do with whether or not something is a valid fetish? Are BJs not a fetish because they are popular among male dom profiles?

_____________________________

No longer searching -- found my one and only right here on CM

(in reply to dink22)

Profile

Post #: 1808

RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 11/4/2013 6:12:50 PM

stef

Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dink22

I don't "judge." I use reasoning. If "financial domination" was a true fetish, why has it NEVER been listed on CM as a BDSM interest?

Of course, because whether or not this website lists something as a fetish is the determining factor for whether it is "true" or not.

quote:

Case closed.

Then why do you cry endlessly about it?

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to dink22)

Profile

Post #: 1809

RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 11/4/2013 6:17:46 PM

VideoAdminChi

Posts: 3086
Joined: 8/6/2012
Status: offline

quote:

Saying you are a "working Fin Domme" in your signature is advertizing on the forums, ya' think?

The current guidance on advertising in signature lines pretty much boils down to "no affiliate links."

(in reply to ResidentSadist)

Profile

Post #: 1810

RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 11/4/2013 6:20:20 PM

OsideGirl

Posts: 14412
Joined: 7/1/2005
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dink22

I don't "judge." I use reasoning. If "financial domination" was a true fetish, why has it NEVER been listed on CM as a BDSM interest?

Case closed.

And once again, you are trying to speak for the owners of this site which you have not met or even spoken to.

The reality is that not a single person here could list every fetish and you're trying to use a stranger's list to justify your hatred.

We get it. You don't like FinDommes. Beating the dead horse isn't going to change anyone's position on the subject. So, why don't you just stop beating the horse?

_____________________________

Give a girl the right shoes and she will conquer the world. ~ Marilyn Monroe

The Accelerated Velocity of Terminological Inexactitude

(in reply to dink22)

Profile

Post #: 1811

RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 11/4/2013 6:26:44 PM

stef

Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RowdySoul

What makes you qualified to judge others? Mr dink22?

He's an "expert" on financial domination because the only way he can get someone to dominate him is when a significant amount of money changes hands.

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to RowdySoul)

Profile

Post #: 1812

RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 11/4/2013 6:27:07 PM

dink22

Posts: 171
Joined: 5/18/2005
Status: offline

Some of you are just going to permanently be in denial. I can't help that. You brought that upon yourselves and you want to live in a make-believe world.

I didn't take you into it, and it's not my job to get you out of it. It's YOUR problem, not mine.

But all you have to do is look at all the "dominant female" profiles are new in any given day and you keep seeing financial domination. So, evidently, as a BDSM interest, financial domination is more popular than collars, leashes, spankings and even bondage.

Yet it's not listed. "But, but but," you protest, "neither is Emetophilia." Oh. Okay. Guess I somehow missed all the profiles clamoring for Emetophilia.

How stupid of me. I guess my point was moot.

(in reply to stef)

Profile

Post #: 1813

RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 11/4/2013 6:28:43 PM

RowdySoul

Posts: 2
Joined: 10/18/2013
Status: offline

What makes you qualified to judge others? I don't know why everyone is so excited. Everyone that has a career or works is paid and prostitutes them self. A lawyer, a judge, an athlete a hairdresser all selling ones self. Why is it for me to judge them or the girl next door that gives her body or abuses another for money? I don't do it but hurray to them for finding their place in the world. I hope we all find a way to earn a living that pleases and allows flexibility.

(in reply to dink22)

Profile

Post #: 1814

RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 11/4/2013 6:28:52 PM

stef

Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dink22

How stupid of me. I guess my point was moot.

I can find nothing here to disagree with.

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to dink22)

Profile

Post #: 1815

RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 11/4/2013 6:32:18 PM

dink22

Posts: 171
Joined: 5/18/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: RowdySoul

What makes you qualified to judge others? Mr dink22?

He's an "expert" on financial domination because the only way he can get someone to dominate him is when a significant amount of money changes hands.

I would refer you to my earlier post about insulting me/trying to ridicule me. Evidently you didn't catch that one.

< Message edited by dink22 -- 11/4/2013 6:33:29 PM >

(in reply to stef)

Profile

Post #: 1816

RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 11/4/2013 6:34:45 PM

stef

Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline

It was equally moot.

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to dink22)

Profile

Post #: 1817

RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 11/4/2013 7:36:10 PM

lizi

Posts: 4673
Joined: 2/1/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dink22

Look, insulting me, or trying to ridicule me, simply doesn't change logic or reality. It might make you feel better, but it's a kind of reaction that says clearly, on a psychological level, "I DON"T WANT TO FACE THE TRUTH!!!" Because it's uncomfortable. Because it doesn't flatter you. Because life is easier if you tell yourself it's simply NOT the truth. That you are right in everything you do.

Such is financial domination.

I did not insult you or ridicule you. I said you've tried that reasoning before, which you have, and I pointed out the fact that other fetishes are not listed in the CM list. Which is a fact. This is not insulting or ridiculing, it is stating fact. Of course my point scores with logical minds because it is factual. Your point however would not score with people looking for logic because it is false.

(in reply to dink22)

Profile

Post #: 1818

RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 11/4/2013 7:52:46 PM

evesgrden

Posts: 597
Joined: 6/9/2012
Status: offline

quote:

Then are Emetophilia, feederism, formicophilia, lactophilia, and oculolinctus not genuine fetishes?

They are if they meet any of the following from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fetish

Full Definition of FETISH
1
a : an object (as a small stone carving of an animal) believed to have magical power to protect or aid its owner; broadly : a material object regarded with superstitious or extravagant trust or reverence
b : an object of irrational reverence or obsessive devotion : prepossession
c : an object or bodily part whose real or fantasied presence is psychologically necessary for sexual gratification and that is an object of fixation to the extent that it may interfere with complete sexual expression

If finances do that for a domme, I imagine it applies.

Diamonds are a girl's best friend.... not exactly a new concept. Plenty of women think that way.... not all are dommes but for many it's a condition of the relationship; a condition of the "benefits".

_____________________________

What you permit, you promote.

(in reply to searching4mysir)

Profile

Post #: 1819

RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 11/4/2013 8:37:56 PM

Zonie63

Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dink22

I don't "judge." I use reasoning. If "financial domination" was a true fetish, why has it NEVER been listed on CM as a BDSM interest?

Case closed.

I don't know that this would close the case, as I wouldn't consider CM's interest list to be the final word on the matter. I think even on the very first page of this thread, someone noted that there was no committee or anything that decides what is a legitimate fetish or not.

In any case, it would appear that the powers that be on CM ostensibly approve of the findomme profiles and consider it to be a legitimate fetish, otherwise all the findomme profiles would disappear. As to why they don't have it listed as a BDSM interest - I don't know; maybe it wouldn't be a bad idea.

To be honest, I don't really bother much with the profiles side anymore; seems like a waste of time to wade through all that.

As to whether or not it's a "true fetish," who can say? One argument which has been used here is that financial domination is no different than what men and women have been doing for thousands of years. Men giving money and gifts to women is not exactly something new. It seems it's not unlike marriage, but then that begs the question: Is marriage a true fetish?