Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case - 9/25/2012 11:00:35 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

No-one is mentioning it because since Trayvon Martin was completely innocent of any wrongdoing, it is irrelevant. Also, see my response below...

Um no, it goes to Zimmer's state of mind as the watchman.

quote:

BUT... Isn't everyone saying that Zimmerman was NOT acting in the capacity of the Neighborhood Watch, since he was supposedly going to the store on a personal errand.

Well, isn't that like condemning the fireman for stopping to put out a fire while on his way to the store?

quote:

Can't have it both ways. Either he was Neighborhood watch AND VIOLATING THE RULES BY BEING ARMED, or he wasn't. Pick one and stick with it, please.


He had a carry permit. Right? So he did not violate florida carry law. Did he violate a rule for carrying as a watchman? Well, you said he was not a watchman because he was on his way to the store. You can't have that both ways. Anyway, it seems a trivial violation. Am I wrong?

quote:

A witness who hasn't recanted her testimony claims that Zimmerman approached Martin. Which isn't what you said there...


Is this the girlfriend on the phone? The accused is entitled to confront the witness in court. You can hang him afterwards.

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case - 9/25/2012 11:05:23 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

If only Zimmerman DNA is on the gun and holster, his claim and those of others that Martin attempted to take the gun seem to be far fetched.

This was the leap of false reason to which I originally objected. No one, as far as I know claimed Martin grabbed the gun. If that were the claim your point would be a good one, but that is not the claim, is it?

(in reply to Nosathro)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case - 9/25/2012 11:06:50 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
There when you were on the moon it was bandied about in the ensuing lightheadedness of the pop of earth up thru the atmosphere without your celestial body to keep us in proper orientation (and so much shit was flying those days I dont know what stuck, and I damn sure aint gonna look it up......) that one of the many tales that Zimmie had told was that Martin had his hand on the gun which is what caused Zimmie to fear for his life, and it was not the black face and the hood and the paranoia that caused him to shoot the 16 year old.   I guess the kid must have been retarded though, huh?   Beating the dogshit out of this guy like that and didnt take that gun off him, and allowed Zimmerman whilst having his head smashed like a pumpkin and his nose shattered like windshield glass from a golf club, let Zimmerman reach down there for his gun, bring it up and shoot him, he was that intent on being on top of him, did Zimmy kinda have to pat his knee to let him at the gun or was it in his back that he reached for it, and Martin not notice that as he is raining these sledgehammer blows down on him?

I have what could only be described as reasonable doubts.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case - 9/25/2012 11:27:37 AM   
igor2003


Posts: 1718
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
As for Zimmer's causing the entire incident, I wonder why no one in these discussions ever acknowledges that the community suffered several break-ins by young black males, giving Zimmer cause as neighborhood watch to take the action he did: calling the police and seeking after the activities of Martin. Profiling? Yes. But, in this instance perhaps justifable.


I think that in other threads other people as well as myself have said more than once that Zimmerman was right to call in what he considered suspicious activity to the police. But that is where his involvement should have ended. His conversation with the police clearly indicates that he did not want another of "these assholes" to get away, and his actions after calling the police escalated matters to the point that the confrontation ensued and ended in Martin's death.

Perhaps Zimmerman's profiling of Martin was justifiable. It is what he did after that that he should be held accountable for.

edited for typos...and I probably still did not catch all of them.

< Message edited by igor2003 -- 9/25/2012 11:31:08 AM >


_____________________________

If the women don't find you handsome they should at least find you handy. - Red Green

At my age erections are like cops...there's never one around when you need it!

Never miss a good chance to shut up. - Will Rogers


(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case - 9/25/2012 11:35:05 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

that one of the many tales that Zimmie had told was that Martin had his hand on the gun which is what caused Zimmie to fear for his life, and it was not the black face and the hood and the paranoia that caused him to shoot the 16 year old.


Never heard Zimmer say that Martin had his hand on the gun. Zimmerman says Martin was on top of him, slamming his head against the ground when he grabbed his gun from a holster before Martin could get it.

The thing about the black face and the hoodie came out from the news broadcasts and commentors remarks while protests were being lead by the Rev Whotzizname. Sure, racism is still a passionate issue in America. I abhor it as much as any Progressive Lefty, but there is no evidence only conjecture.

quote:

Beating the dogshit out of this guy like that and didnt take that gun off him, and allowed Zimmerman whilst having his head smashed like a pumpkin and his nose shattered like windshield glass from a golf club, let Zimmerman reach down there for his gun, bring it up and shoot him, he was that intent on being on top of him, did Zimmy kinda have to pat his knee to let him at the gun or was it in his back that he reached for it, and Martin not notice that as he is raining these sledgehammer blows down on him?


I heard Zimmer say that his jacket fell open and the holster was exposed. Otherwise, who knows the logistics of the dance that occurred except those who were there. You are constucting the story out of air.

Yeah, and you know reasonable doubt don't mean shit unless you are on the jury and doubt the State proved its case. Ask Casey Anthony.


(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case - 9/25/2012 11:42:03 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

I think that in other threads other people as well as myself have said more than once that Zimmerman was right to call in what he considered suspicious activity to the police. But that is where his involvement should have ended. His conversation with the police clearly indicates that he did not want another of "these assholes" to get away, and his actions after calling the police escalated matters to the point that the confrontation ensued and ended in Martin's death.


You make some good points. Maybe his involvement shoulda ended. He claims he was seeking an address is why he was walking down the street when Martin attacked him. Sounds pretty lame, but reality can be lame at moments. He did not want another of "these assholes" to get away confirms the impact of past community problems. We shall see if his actions after he called the police are more determinative then his fear while he was lying on his back. That may be the nexus of the issue.

(in reply to igor2003)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case - 9/25/2012 12:01:22 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
~FR~

I heard it takes more than quick contact to leave DNA from the hand onto a surface.
It is not like fingerprints.
Does anyone know otherwise???

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case - 9/25/2012 1:40:46 PM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
Does it matter? Given that Trayvon Martin had reasonable fear for his life the moment Zimmerman approached and made a furtive moment as if towards a weapon ( which he was carrying at the time, and which he claims was a movement towards his cellphone ).

At that moment, when Zimmerman approached and reached for a potential weapon, Trayvon Martin had every legal right to defend himself, however futile and ineffective that defense turned out to be against his attacker.

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case - 9/25/2012 1:44:47 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Well, any reasonable man that may wear a hooded sweatshirt or be of any part black should fear for his life and beat Zimmerman to death upon sight, with a fuckin baseball bat.

Clearly, they have reason to fear for their life if he is present within sight of them. 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case - 9/25/2012 2:30:47 PM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
Nice try at a reductio-ad-absurdum. But no dice. Zimmerman's choice to follow and confront Trayvon Martin, and then while doing it making a move towards a potential weapon are in no way applicable to your scenario.

Your scenario, of course, presumes that Trayvon Martin committed an unprovoked criminal assault upon George Zimmerman. Preposterous given Zimmerman's admitted actions.

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case - 9/25/2012 2:35:33 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
I will figure that for vince.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case - 9/25/2012 2:44:46 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Does it matter? Given that Trayvon Martin had reasonable fear for his life the moment Zimmerman approached and made a furtive moment as if towards a weapon ( which he was carrying at the time, and which he claims was a movement towards his cellphone ).

At that moment, when Zimmerman approached and reached for a potential weapon, Trayvon Martin had every legal right to defend himself, however futile and ineffective that defense turned out to be against his attacker.


Okay, so you concede Martin attacked Zimmerman first. Glad we have that sorted.

The furtive movement bullshit is the same one that police use to justify gunning down innocent black men and mental patients in urban centers.

The four white officers involved, all veterans with at least five years on the force, were in the area looking for a rape suspect. An attorney for the officers said they believed Diallo had a gun, though police found only a beeper and his wallet at the scene.

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case - 9/25/2012 3:19:47 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
Thank you I will keep that in mind.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case - 9/25/2012 3:26:39 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Does it matter? Given that Trayvon Martin had reasonable fear for his life the moment Zimmerman approached and made a furtive moment as if towards a weapon ( which he was carrying at the time, and which he claims was a movement towards his cellphone ).

At that moment, when Zimmerman approached and reached for a potential weapon, Trayvon Martin had every legal right to defend himself, however futile and ineffective that defense turned out to be against his attacker.

The presumption that Martin thought Zimmerman was going for a gun when it was only a cell phone does not, even if correct, in any way negate Zimmermans right to defend himself. He could not be responsible for what Martin thought.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 9/25/2012 3:27:23 PM >

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case - 9/25/2012 4:13:44 PM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Does it matter? Given that Trayvon Martin had reasonable fear for his life the moment Zimmerman approached and made a furtive moment as if towards a weapon ( which he was carrying at the time, and which he claims was a movement towards his cellphone ).

At that moment, when Zimmerman approached and reached for a potential weapon, Trayvon Martin had every legal right to defend himself, however futile and ineffective that defense turned out to be against his attacker.


Okay, so you concede Martin attacked Zimmerman first. Glad we have that sorted.

The furtive movement bullshit is the same one that police use to justify gunning down innocent black men and mental patients in urban centers.

The four white officers involved, all veterans with at least five years on the force, were in the area looking for a rape suspect. An attorney for the officers said they believed Diallo had a gun, though police found only a beeper and his wallet at the scene.


You *are* aware that the Diallo killers were all found NOT GUILTY? Therefore, Trayvon Martin wouldn't be guilty of anything, would he, for doing the EXACT SAME THING.

So, since Trayvon Martin is innocent of any wrongdoing in the incident, George Zimmerman is wholly responsible.


_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case - 9/25/2012 5:06:02 PM   
igor2003


Posts: 1718
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
You make some good points. Maybe his involvement shoulda ended. He claims he was seeking an address is why he was walking down the street when Martin attacked him. Sounds pretty lame, but reality can be lame at moments. He did not want another of "these assholes" to get away confirms the impact of past community problems. We shall see if his actions after he called the police are more determinative then his fear while he was lying on his back. That may be the nexus of the issue.


When Zimmerman got out of his vehicle and chased Martin he wasn't looking for any address...he was following Martin, which he admitted to the officer on the phone. In a subdivision with only (if I remember correctly) three streets it is hard to believe he didn't know where he was located, especially if he even semi-regularly patroled those streets as part of the Neighborhood Watch program. At first he said he would meet the police at his vehicle, to which he could have returned immediately, but then he asked that the police to call him when they got there and he would give his location at that time, indicating that he had no intention of returning to his vehicle. Why? He had already told them where to find his vehicle and he didn't need any further address. The only plausible reason is that he was going to continue looking for Martin and didn't know where he would be when the police got there. This, AFTER the police admonished him about not following Martin.

This all plainly indicates Zimmerman's vengful attitude and actions.

Then, if you watch and listen to Zimmerman's walk-through conducted the next day, and you listen to his account of what happened while he was lying on his back, it simply doesn't add up.

First, he claims he was getting his head bashed. Yes, he had some very minor cuts and abrasions, but certainly not anything in line with his head being "bashed" on concrete. Also, look at the location of the cuts. They are very high on his head. If a person is getting his head "bashed" he is going to be trying to move his head into a position that will lessen the impact. That means trying to tuck his chin and tilt his head foreward, which would expose the LOWER part of the back of his head, not the upper part where the lacerations were located. The minor wounds are considerably more consistant with someone arching their neck backwards while on concrete, trying to throw off someone that is sitting astride them.

Now, it seems to be a fairly generally accepted fact that Martin was sitting astride Zimmerman. Zimmerman claims that he was being beat so severly that he feared for his life. For Martin to even come close to having enough leverege to cause that kind of harm, whether through bashing, pummeling, or smothering, he had to be sitting high enough on Zimmerman's body that his knee and/or calf would have been hiding the weapon at Zimmerman's waistband. Had he been sitting far enough down Zimmerman's body so that the weapon was exposed he could not have been getting enough leverage to cause any kind of serious harm. So, which was it? Zimmerman want's to convince us that it was magically both ways and that Martin had such keen night vision that he was able to see the weapon even though it was so dark that one of the witnesses said he saw two people running but couldn't identify who they were. So how did Martin see and identify the weapon in the heat of battle when it was that dark?

Again, it just doesn't add up.

As you said, we'll see what comes out in court. But from what I have seen so far, if he walks away it will be a very gross miscarriage of justice, and hopefully it will prompt the states with "stand your ground" laws to tweak them so that people can't harass someone, then shoot them and claim self-defense when it doesn't turn out the way they expect.

_____________________________

If the women don't find you handsome they should at least find you handy. - Red Green

At my age erections are like cops...there's never one around when you need it!

Never miss a good chance to shut up. - Will Rogers


(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case - 9/25/2012 5:46:37 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

The only plausible reason is that he was going to continue looking for Martin and didn't know where he would be when the police got there. This, AFTER the police admonished him about not following Martin.

Yes, sure. It is very possible he wanted to look for Martin. He said he didn't want him to get away like the others.

quote:

This all plainly indicates Zimmerman's vengful attitude and actions.

"vengeful" is your value judgment only. One might just as easily say he was diligent.

quote:

The minor wounds are considerably more consistant with someone arching their neck backwards while on concrete, trying to throw off someone that is sitting astride them.


That's a good argument. It might be true. It might also be true that during the course of panic and distress Zimmer did not get the details straight. He wasn't taking notes, yanno. You neglected to mention that he was yelling for help.

quote:

Now, it seems to be a fairly generally accepted fact that Martin was sitting astride Zimmerman. Zimmerman claims that he was being beat so severly that he feared for his life. For Martin to even come close to having enough leverege to cause that kind of harm, whether through bashing, pummeling, or smothering, he had to be sitting high enough on Zimmerman's body that his knee and/or calf would have been hiding the weapon at Zimmerman's waistband. Had he been sitting far enough down Zimmerman's body so that the weapon was exposed he could not have been getting enough leverage to cause any kind of serious harm.

Lacking a video we are both blowing speculation outta our arses here. But let me counter your argument, which is a sensible one, with if Martin were high in the saddle he would have had Z's arms pinned, so it is hard to figure how Zim got to his gun and then fired into Martin's chest. Martin was a big kid. Six feet at least. So, he coulda been astride Zimmer's waist and able to punch his face. Zimmer was much smaller. I guess the angle of the bullet's trajectary will be an issue.

quote:

As you said, we'll see what comes out in court. But from what I have seen so far, if he walks away it will be a very gross miscarriage of justice, and hopefully it will prompt the states with "stand your ground" laws to tweak them so that people can't harass someone, then shoot them and claim self-defense when it doesn't turn out the way they expect.


I share your concern. I don't much like driving around south florida suspecting that every other car has a gun in it. On the other hand, I know a few ladies who carry because they worry about being accosted in mall car parks, which has happened.

But look, what upset me is that Zimmerman was painted as Evil by an outpouring of media and street demonstrations. The Sanford police were derilect in brushing this aside and bear responsibility for the public reaction. We will see if justice is served by the court. It's the best way I think.

(in reply to igor2003)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case - 9/25/2012 5:57:07 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

You *are* aware that the Diallo killers were all found NOT GUILTY? Therefore, Trayvon Martin wouldn't be guilty of anything, would he, for doing the EXACT SAME THING.

From whose testimony did the furtive move come?

quote:

So, since Trayvon Martin is innocent of any wrongdoing in the incident, George Zimmerman is wholly responsible.

Yeah, it is possible that Martin was innocent when he got on top of Z and punched him. It is also possible that both are innocent, or both could carry guilt. The innocence of one does not logically and of necessity impute guilt to the other. Where did you get that idea?

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case - 9/25/2012 6:00:38 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

The presumption that Martin thought Zimmerman was going for a gun when it was only a cell phone does not, even if correct, in any way negate Zimmermans right to defend himself. He could not be responsible for what Martin thought.

QFT

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case - 9/25/2012 7:23:54 PM   
Raiikun


Posts: 2650
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: igor2003


I think that in other threads other people as well as myself have said more than once that Zimmerman was right to call in what he considered suspicious activity to the police. But that is where his involvement should have ended.


And while on phone with the dispatcher, he was asked twice to let them know if Trayvon does anything else, then he gets out of the vehicle in direct response to being asked where Trayvon is running.

Then when the dispatcher realized that and advised him he didn't have to follow, George agrees, and evidence strongly indicates that George stopped following. He spent the rest of the call arranging contact with police without any knowledge of where Trayvon was, and then Trayvon comes back and they meet 30 seconds walk from George's vehicle. So there really is nothing to indicate that George did anything wrong or illegal. Nothing on that call indicated that George ever had any intent to personally run into or confront Trayvon.

(in reply to igor2003)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

1.012