dcnovice -> RE: A or B, not yes or no. (11/12/2012 11:32:49 AM)
|
quote:
One is run by a church that I don't have any sort of contact with, but the other is operated by a really decent sort of guy that I do know. His central focus is a privately funded "recovery ranch," west of town, where homeless addicts can go and live for a while, when they leave rehab centers. They are the staff for the food and clothing distribution center. I sit on the mock interview panel he does as part of the job training, and help the guys come up with better answers to the questions potential employers may ask. That sounds like a really cool program! quote:
What does he think of government action? A percentage of the guys who come will stay a few weeks, then bail back across the county line, where they can then report to the welfare office that they have sought treatment for their "disease," and get right back on the handout train for another two or three years, while they are running a Social Security disability claim for their incurable addiction. Sigh. I fear, alas, that there will always be some who try to game the system, whether public or private. Did he give you a sense of what percentage of the guys do that? That sad reality acknowledged, I think it's important to distinguish between two questions: (a) How do we prevent abuses of the safety net, public or private? and (b) Can the private sector effectively address poverty entirely on its own?
|
|
|
|