tazzygirl
Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: kdsub quote:
The suggestion says to me, lets place them on immediate moderation and then determine if they did something wrong based upon a complaint? Yes but keep in mind this is an issued complaint that would be addressed anyway under the present procedures. Now at times the thread is locked and sometimes disappears until the mod can check the entries by the posters involved. The reason for the In Moderation room is there may still be some inappropriate posts still visible but the thread discussion can continue until a judgment is made and the appropriate entries deleted. But no information will be lost or the flow of the thread interrupted. The whole idea is to keep the threads alive…punish those guilty of breaking tos…with as little interruption as possible. Butch I dont hold with making people responsible based simply upon a complaint without ensuring the complaint is valid. Beyond that, I think its simpler for them to do as they are now, lock the thread until t hey can review it. Those who complain about long posts disappearing... and I mean this as no dig to anyone who did complain, I have done the same and lost much information.... its far simpler to simply copy before posting.... if the thread is locked, the info can still be pasted to a word program until the thread is unlocked. I started doing that when we were having so many issues with hitting "Ok" and the system erroring out.
< Message edited by tazzygirl -- 1/9/2013 8:26:57 PM >
_____________________________
Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt. RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11 Duchess of Dissent 1 Dont judge me because I sin differently than you. If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.
|