Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: The decline of collarme


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: The decline of collarme Page: <<   < prev  52 53 [54] 55 56   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The decline of collarme - 1/10/2013 3:48:28 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

Maybe another fuckyou thread, see who gets pulled and not.

Incidentally, anyone know if the "you rule" applies to second person singular, second person plural, fourth person singular, some combination, or all of the above?

ETA: And whose bright idea was it to make three different pronouns homonymic anyway?

IWYW,
— Aswad.



Finally! Something I cant be blamed for.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 1061
RE: The decline of collarme - 1/10/2013 4:01:55 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Finally! Something I cant be blamed for.


I think you're confusing me with Nick.

IWYW,
— Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 1062
RE: The decline of collarme - 1/10/2013 4:07:21 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Oh no! There is no way I could ever make that mistake.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 1063
RE: The decline of collarme - 1/10/2013 4:56:52 PM   
littlewonder


Posts: 15659
Status: offline


Me Me!! I've never been on a time out, never banned and only a few gold letters. I must be one of those spesul ones.

_____________________________

Nothing has changed
Everything has changed

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 1064
RE: The decline of collarme - 1/10/2013 4:59:09 PM   
Level


Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
Its cause you speal gud!

_____________________________

Fake the heat and scratch the itch
Skinned up knees and salty lips
Let go it's harder holding on
One more trip and I'll be gone

~~ Stone Temple Pilots

(in reply to littlewonder)
Profile   Post #: 1065
RE: The decline of collarme - 1/10/2013 5:01:14 PM   
littlewonder


Posts: 15659
Status: offline
yaaayy!!!!

_____________________________

Nothing has changed
Everything has changed

(in reply to Level)
Profile   Post #: 1066
RE: The decline of collarme - 1/10/2013 5:09:38 PM   
WinsomeDefiance


Posts: 6719
Joined: 8/7/2007
Status: offline
I've never been moderated, or banned or whatever. I think the last (and probably only) gold mail I received, was from Mod 11 and it was polite and to the point.

(in reply to littlewonder)
Profile   Post #: 1067
RE: The decline of collarme - 1/10/2013 5:42:40 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
I got a "last warning" for asking if a poster had been sniffing glue.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to WinsomeDefiance)
Profile   Post #: 1068
RE: The decline of collarme - 1/10/2013 5:44:35 PM   
Extravagasm


Posts: 230
Joined: 9/22/2004
Status: offline
This struggling equivocation about "personal attacks" is a way dishonest defense, to say the least. Is it, or is it not, conceivable to raise OPEN focus on an apparent primary TOS violation, without it being a personal attack on the person themselves? Of course it's possible.

If and when that happens in a sterile way, should it be moded away? Not ideally. Unless this site simply doesn't care about its primary TOS --- meaning those TOS not tucked away in the mind of the beholder or in research pages --- but TOS in enlarged print on various regular access pages. Such as underage use, proper rights to posted pics, financial exchange.

Tazzy says mods hesitate if a violator might come back under a new profile. But that would mean admins have little real clout at all. Enforce more waiting period for new approvals. Heaven forbid that successive profiles would need to be disallowed for the same reason. What if they kept coming back with price lists for children? Time to give up on that too?

Really this idea of what-do-ya-do-then? is precisely what gives forth to other members helping expose. Its not frivolous, because this huge forum thread began over dissatisfaction with the way mods handled Hill stepping up, including a situation when barred persons came back under new profiles.

Another thought for CM: When experienced members step up, consider inviting them to be mods instead of just shooing them back.

(Waits to be sure he doesn't hear any wrenches clicking:) Ciao

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 1069
RE: The decline of collarme - 1/10/2013 5:53:58 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Tazzy says mods hesitate if a violator might come back under a new profile.


No I didnt. I said why bother deleting a profile? They will come back with a new one. Isnt it better to only have to deal with accounts that are known to cause trouble than to try and figure out the new ones too?

Way to completely misstate me. Which is code for something else... but you arent worth the violation.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Extravagasm)
Profile   Post #: 1070
RE: The decline of collarme - 1/10/2013 5:55:47 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder



Me Me!! I've never been on a time out, never banned and only a few gold letters. I must be one of those spesul ones.

me either..

I am a very good girl.. ..the only gold letters i got told me mine had been pulled cuz i quoted a post that was a violation & pulled, so not "my bad".. I have never even been warned or nothin'

I feel sorta unloved now..

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to littlewonder)
Profile   Post #: 1071
RE: The decline of collarme - 1/10/2013 6:24:31 PM   
Extravagasm


Posts: 230
Joined: 9/22/2004
Status: offline
LOL. Thanks for not violating me. I'll try to reciprocate over time :)

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 1072
RE: The decline of collarme - 1/10/2013 6:41:21 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
~smiles

Doubtful. You have been wrong more than once on this thread. Aren't you tired of that yet?

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Extravagasm)
Profile   Post #: 1073
RE: The decline of collarme - 1/10/2013 7:01:32 PM   
Extravagasm


Posts: 230
Joined: 9/22/2004
Status: offline
A bit tired at the hour tazz. But no, since I'm eccentric, I never tire of numerous people mistakenly thinking I'm wrong. You, of course, could be right that I'm wrong. But I know I'm not wrong in thinking I'm right :)

PS. Just saw a new thread asking whether to send money to a Mistress. Was going to reference them to you, but I though better of it, LOL. Anyway, nice jostling with you. I know you're not really one and the same with the mod squad, though sometimes its hard to remember. Be well.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 1074
RE: The decline of collarme - 1/10/2013 7:13:53 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Ah, well, lets see.

You assumed you knew what I was saying... wrong.

You assumed this wasnt a business... wrong.

And you presented a law that only affects businesses that make at least 500,000 a year in slaves... this one? very very doubtful.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Extravagasm)
Profile   Post #: 1075
RE: The decline of collarme - 1/10/2013 7:53:08 PM   
Extravagasm


Posts: 230
Joined: 9/22/2004
Status: offline
REALLY tazz, I AM going to bed now. Not sure you were typing clearly this time, but I'll answer this last time.

Your first sentence --- introductory panache.

Your second sentence --- way over the top. Clueless what I was thinking.

Your third sentence --- vastly misquotes me.

Your fourth sentence --- I can't for the life of me figure out what you're saying. Seems rad typo or something.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 1076
RE: The decline of collarme - 1/10/2013 8:07:29 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
grins.. well.....we dont sell products.... so all we have to sell is slaves.

Ok, obviously you missed the joke there.

But, yes, it only applies if sales are more than $500,000 a year.

I am sure we will be having this discussion again one day.. and I have a long memory.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Extravagasm)
Profile   Post #: 1077
RE: The decline of collarme - 1/11/2013 4:52:36 AM   
VideoAdminAlpha


Posts: 3876
Joined: 7/25/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC

The purpose of this thread is to explore a tangent I picked up from the "a thread on moderation" thread. I noted many of the regulars lamenting some sort of decline in collarme. Given that I happen to like this site I thought I'd ask for people's thoughts on this that are NOT related to moderation.

What has changed?
Do you have any thoughts for how to improve things?



Has this thread been allowed off topic long enough so that we are not accused of not allowing drift?? Can we please get back to the original topic, no offense, that is NOT related to moderation??

_____________________________


You can't please all the people all of the time.Unfortunately there are times you cannot please any of them :( You can only do your best, and hope they realize that.


(in reply to JeffBC)
Profile   Post #: 1078
RE: The decline of collarme - 1/11/2013 5:49:46 AM   
Level


Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
Censorship!

Hmmm... it goes back to mainly I like CM...

_____________________________

Fake the heat and scratch the itch
Skinned up knees and salty lips
Let go it's harder holding on
One more trip and I'll be gone

~~ Stone Temple Pilots

(in reply to VideoAdminAlpha)
Profile   Post #: 1079
RE: The decline of collarme - 1/11/2013 5:51:56 AM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

Maybe another fuckyou thread, see who gets pulled and not.

Incidentally, anyone know if the "you rule" applies to second person singular, second person plural, fourth person singular, some combination, or all of the above?

ETA: And whose bright idea was it to make three different pronouns homonymic anyway?

IWYW,
— Aswad.



Finally! Something I cant be blamed for.



Actually, you can be blamed..

But I got you beat... people blame me for the black death of the middle ages and Socrates committing suicide.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 1080
Page:   <<   < prev  52 53 [54] 55 56   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: The decline of collarme Page: <<   < prev  52 53 [54] 55 56   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.933