SilverBoat
Posts: 257
Joined: 7/26/2006 Status: offline
|
FR ... ... At this point, I expect aquittal, or a hung jury, in large part because of incompetent prosecution attorneys. Their failure to object at critical points of testimony, such as the badgering of Martin's phone contact, the professor instructing on legal definitions, etc, might well be pivotal lapses. The judge should have dumped the whole mess for mistrial already. ... The defense, expectedly, is trying to exclude consideration of Zimmerman's actions prior to the first moment of physical contact with Martin. They see that as framing the issue in a way that puts Martin attacking and overcoming Zimmerman, and Zimmerman firing in 'self-defense', with the previous minutes of Zimmerman pursuing Martin discounted as relevant to the shooting. ... The prosecution, in a broader framing of events, include consideration of Zimmerman's pursuit of Martin for several minutes despite being advised otherwise by police dispatch, while Martin was running away. The critical point in that, as any reasonable person would concede, is whether Zimmerman's actions amount to inciting the physical altercation with Martin. And the further point, of whether Zimmerman's (as he claims) getting the worst of a fight he started (as he claims he didn't), justifies his killing Martin in a struggle over the weapon. ... Of interest, the defense succeeded in badgering the not-so-bright phone contact, and managed to inject some ostenible uncertainty, along with the legal 'instruction' (which the judge should have halted). On the prosecution side, testimony so far has established some patterns of calculated lying by Zimmerman, (such as his denying knowledge of self-defense law on which the professor gave him an "A"). ... Frankly, if Zimmerman isn't convicted of at least manslaughter, justice won't have been served, and he really should get at least 2nd-degree murder. He armed himself with a concealed weapon, and chased down an unknown person he'd profiled by race and appearance. The person (Martin) asks why Zimmerman is following him, and (at least so far) Zimmerman has never claimed to avoid or attempt to avoid escalating further confrontation. ... We'll probably never know the whole truth about the final moments of Martin's life, as it's obvious that Zimmerman has hedged or outright lied with intent to frame himself within the legalese of 'self-defense' ... ...
|