mnottertail
Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Powergamz1
Feel free to back up any of your assertions with something other than hallucinations.
Here you go you ignorant lying twatwaffle, time to come down off your hallucinations of you possessing more than a slobbering cretinous empty brainpan.
quote:
ORIGINAL: Powergamz1
Sure, we know, whenever you post something, you never said it... it's a given, right?
Just like your 'fucking illegals' desperation ploy.
You'll say anything to keep your racist game going.
(post 1227)
quote:
ORIGINAL: Powergamz1
Already done, with direct links the last time you lied and claimed you never posted anything about 'fucking illegals'.
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4494465
(post 1249)
Here is the post you point to as the quote when you claimed to be a convicted child molester.
quote:
ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
Powergame's point is that there are ethical obligations that bind the prosecution, and all parts of the chain. Police offices have to get a warrant. They have to mirandize you. Grand juries have to be convened for certain actions. Prosecution must give you full discovery. Judges are not allowed to confer with one lawyer without the other present. Etc.
So the power of the state is constrained in numerous ways. No self incrimination. Trials by jury. Probable cause. Reasonable doubt.
things like evidentiary law, where heresay isn't admissable.
etc.
As is the power of the defense, they may not avoid discovery, they may not knowingly lie, they must live with trials by jury, they must create reasonable doubt...and so on.
Nice apology elide regarding the very cretinous social and political faux pas made by untutored shithouse lawyers that claim that Criminal Justice 101 informs you that Prosecutors are exempt from the code of ethics that keeps their license. Why aren't we jerking cards, do you know how many of these fuckin illegal throats are not phoning it in over in the prosecutors office?
^^^^^mnottertail (post 69)
----------------------------------
Why aren't we jerking cards, do you know how many of these fuckin illegal throats are not phoning it in over in the prosecutors office?
continuing on in post #1252 I even explained it to you, in a fashion such that a profoundly mentally deficient person like yourself should be able to comprehend, regardless of your conviction for child molestation:
<explaining to twatwaffle>
You are the only one posting racist rants, impugning people based on your extremely pathetic language understanding, looks like less than third grade.
Weapons grade stupid shit ain't gonna get you up out of the bottom of the two holer.
But I will give you an overview. Fucking (a word which was freely used in polite society at its inception and meant then what it does now) came to be vulgar (which is interesting, based on what vulgar actually means).
illegal (that was based on your foolish cant that prosecutors may not prosecute with zeal)
throats.........ok, that is; but you are going to have to look this word up; a 'colloquialism'.
I will give you some examples and hope you catch on, but I fear you lack the mental capacity:
Common colloquialisms for lawyers include but are not limited to:
ambulance chaser
esquire
mouthpiece
necktie
throat
briefcase
skirt
and so on.
Try to piece it together, I know you can do it, quit diddling your pud, it may help clear your mind sufficiently to form a simple English concept that has escaped you somewhere about first grade......
fucking illegal throats.
Lawyers, mirable dictu, are not a race, and that is secondary to your inability to understand simple English.
Piece it together wihout spewing your usual cretinous racist asswipe. Racist.
</explaining to twatwaffle>
_____________________________
Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30
|
RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread