Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Mono vs poly?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Mono vs poly? Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Mono vs poly? - 8/26/2013 10:51:41 PM   
ChatteParfaitt


Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011
From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana
Status: offline
The entire post was in reply to me, but I can see you merely want to engage in a pissing contest.

Sorry, don't do water sports with strangers.

_____________________________



(in reply to SerWhiteTiger)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: Mono vs poly? - 8/26/2013 10:55:55 PM   
SerWhiteTiger


Posts: 437
Joined: 8/12/2013
From: Why is my name Florida? That's a state!
Status: offline
No, that line you quoted was from post #89 in response to njlauren.

As for pissing contests, I've been nothing but nice to you and you've been nothing but hostile to me and others in this thread. I'm trying to understand why.

< Message edited by SerWhiteTiger -- 8/26/2013 10:56:43 PM >

(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: Mono vs poly? - 8/26/2013 10:56:00 PM   
ChatteParfaitt


Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011
From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana
Status: offline
You're telling this forum he did not say that?

I quoted him.

But since you prefer to dandle with semantics instead of debating substance, I'll point out that your terminology was incorrect, it should have been 'self actualized'.

Save the pissing contest for someone willing to play.



_____________________________



(in reply to MarcEsadrian)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: Mono vs poly? - 8/26/2013 11:04:57 PM   
SerWhiteTiger


Posts: 437
Joined: 8/12/2013
From: Why is my name Florida? That's a state!
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MarcEsadrian


quote:

ORIGINAL: SerWhiteTiger
Of course, that comment you quoted was in response to someone else's post, not yours, so I have no idea why you feel the need to say you didn't imply that.


It seems par for the course with this thread. All sorts of stuff that was never said or implied is being found in between the lines, nonetheless. Enjoy.


Yes, it is. Is that standard for D/s discussions here?

(in reply to MarcEsadrian)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: Mono vs poly? - 8/26/2013 11:20:41 PM   
MarcEsadrian


Posts: 852
Joined: 8/24/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SerWhiteTiger
Yes, it is. Is that standard for D/s discussions here?


Not always. You can have sane discussions here when certain individuals are participating, some of whom have contributed to this very thread. You'll learn who to ignore and who to actually read fairly early on. I think you're figuring it out already, lol.

_____________________________

Omnes una manet nox

Founder, Humbled Females

(in reply to SerWhiteTiger)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: Mono vs poly? - 8/26/2013 11:49:36 PM   
SerWhiteTiger


Posts: 437
Joined: 8/12/2013
From: Why is my name Florida? That's a state!
Status: offline
Okay, I think I may see the problem here.

ChatteParfaitt, do you realize that some people actually want to be slaves, crave to be slaves, and that it's not simply a step "above" submissive or some progression from submissive but something else entirely? This isn't some way of comparing relationships and saying, "ours is Master/slave and yours isn't, hahaha, we're better than you," but that's how you seem to be taking it.

Have you ever read any Gor books? I'm not entirely on board with the whole Gor thing, but they do display the BDSM slave mentality.

Long ago, before I was a Dominant, and merely a top with only limited experience, a girl I was in a relationship with introduced me to the Gor books. This girl was begging me, through this act and many others, for me to make her my slave. This is not expression. This is not roleplaying. This is not some way of claiming to have a superior relationship. This girl had fantasized about this all her life and truly wanted to be my slave, just like in the Gor books. If you have not read any, you might want to do so. It could be very educational.

I wish that I had been able to realize at the time that she wanted me to enslave her. It would have saved us both a lot of misery. I kept trying to treat someone who wanted to be my slave as if she were my equal in a relationship, and it drove her absolutely nuts and trainwrecked our relationship. Do you hear what I'm saying? Me not making a girl my slave trainwrecked our relationship. Can you even understand that? You said that all the doms in this thread don't understand what it's like to be a female submissive, and that's true. But I very much doubt that you understand what it's like to crave to be a slave. You probably don't even believe that people actually want it. I had a very hard time realizing it myself. That girl certainly was completely and totally incapable of actually telling me flat out that she wanted to be a slave. After all, what if I had looked at her in horror and disgust when I realized she was serious? Can you understand this girl?

Or maybe you understand it exactly and are raging at all of us because your own Dom hasn't realized that that's what you want and taken you? Is Marc correct in his assertion that you're just jealous?

Or maybe you're just trolling?

I dunno. There's a huge disconnect between how you're responding to people in this thread and what they're actually saying. You came into this thread and have done nothing but insult and attack people while claiming that you want to help. And yet you feel attacked by me when I'm doing nothing but trying to help you. To be fair, Marc isn't trying to help you. He doesn't think it's worth the effort.

< Message edited by SerWhiteTiger -- 8/26/2013 11:53:00 PM >

(in reply to SerWhiteTiger)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: Mono vs poly? - 8/27/2013 4:30:08 AM   
ChatteParfaitt


Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011
From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana
Status: offline
I have insulted or attacked no one. That was debating and stating my opinion in a highly assertive manner. If you can't handle that, please feel free to put me on ignore.

I'll have to decline a reading of the Gor books, sci fi fantasy makes for poor relationship philosophy.



_____________________________



(in reply to SerWhiteTiger)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: Mono vs poly? - 8/27/2013 4:53:55 AM   
searching4mysir


Posts: 2757
Joined: 6/16/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SerWhiteTiger

Okay, I think I may see the problem here.

ChatteParfaitt, do you realize that some people actually want to be slaves, crave to be slaves, and that it's not simply a step "above" submissive or some progression from submissive but something else entirely? This isn't some way of comparing relationships and saying, "ours is Master/slave and yours isn't, hahaha, we're better than you," but that's how you seem to be taking it.

Have you ever read any Gor books? I'm not entirely on board with the whole Gor thing, but they do display the BDSM slave mentality.

Long ago, before I was a Dominant, and merely a top with only limited experience, a girl I was in a relationship with introduced me to the Gor books. This girl was begging me, through this act and many others, for me to make her my slave. This is not expression. This is not roleplaying. This is not some way of claiming to have a superior relationship. This girl had fantasized about this all her life and truly wanted to be my slave, just like in the Gor books. If you have not read any, you might want to do so. It could be very educational.

I wish that I had been able to realize at the time that she wanted me to enslave her. It would have saved us both a lot of misery. I kept trying to treat someone who wanted to be my slave as if she were my equal in a relationship, and it drove her absolutely nuts and trainwrecked our relationship. Do you hear what I'm saying? Me not making a girl my slave trainwrecked our relationship. Can you even understand that? You said that all the doms in this thread don't understand what it's like to be a female submissive, and that's true. But I very much doubt that you understand what it's like to crave to be a slave. You probably don't even believe that people actually want it. I had a very hard time realizing it myself. That girl certainly was completely and totally incapable of actually telling me flat out that she wanted to be a slave. After all, what if I had looked at her in horror and disgust when I realized she was serious? Can you understand this girl?

Or maybe you understand it exactly and are raging at all of us because your own Dom hasn't realized that that's what you want and taken you? Is Marc correct in his assertion that you're just jealous?

Or maybe you're just trolling?

I dunno. There's a huge disconnect between how you're responding to people in this thread and what they're actually saying. You came into this thread and have done nothing but insult and attack people while claiming that you want to help. And yet you feel attacked by me when I'm doing nothing but trying to help you. To be fair, Marc isn't trying to help you. He doesn't think it's worth the effort.



Sounds to me like she needed psychological therapy if she was taking poorly written fiction and wanting to making it real for her.


_____________________________

No longer searching -- found my one and only right here on CM


(in reply to SerWhiteTiger)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: Mono vs poly? - 8/27/2013 5:35:32 AM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
Where? Post number where I said they had the right to do anything. Either put up or recant for inserting this shit into the discussion and then saying I said something I did not. That is dishonest. You are either projecting because of "discussions" elsewhere, or you are purposefully doing it to prove some point.

The only right I have mentioned is the one where an owner in a non-negotiated inter personal relationship can do as they please in relation to the OP. I do not see death and dismemberment in the OP, do you?

Yes the D type has the ability to screw over the s type because of the power they wield, but that is not unique to just this type of inter-personal relationship, that is part of all relationships. There is often unwritten common sense that goes with things in life, I just do not see the sense in telling someone to use their curling iron for external use only when speaking of how to curl hair. Get it?

As far as "real life slavery" goes, that is a personal definition. There was chattel slavery, which is illegal now, but there are ways to make people slaves if you bother to read about that type of psychological conditioning.


quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren
Both you and the other guy were saying the M has the right to do anything they wish, and that could easily include doing what I just said, and it goes on in some quarters. Emotional damage may not be as horrible as physical damage, but it is damage nonetheless. An M who has a sub who is claustrophobic and decides to lock them in a box could end up driving them into a psychotic state or into a catatonic one, when you take on the M role with the idea you can do anything, you literally are taking on the power to screw someone up, hurt them, and that is my point, that claiming 'absolute power' to do what they wish, because that is what an M is, has potential issues with it.



_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: Mono vs poly? - 8/27/2013 5:45:42 AM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
Absolutely it is being implied. When someone replies to a particular poster, then tosses in the inference, it is the same as lying. Chatte thinks it is a rant, but it is calling her and some other posters out for their dishonest method of discussion. These "M" types they are ranting about have not posted in this discussion, but they are damn well going to infer and imply that what some of us mean is these nefarious M types meaning on things they have read elsewhere or experienced else where.

It could easily be solved by attributing the things people actual post to them and then you can bitch about the off the wall stuff and attribute it to these phantom M types, that will likely not happen.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MarcEsadrian


quote:

ORIGINAL: SerWhiteTiger
Of course, that comment you quoted was in response to someone else's post, not yours, so I have no idea why you feel the need to say you didn't imply that.


It seems par for the course with this thread. All sorts of stuff that was never said or implied is being found in between the lines, nonetheless. Enjoy.



_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to MarcEsadrian)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: Mono vs poly? - 8/27/2013 5:54:13 AM   
ChatteParfaitt


Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011
From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana
Status: offline
My dishonest method of discussion, how droll !

I have more than once pointed out that some of the responders on this thread replied the way they did b/c there are so many (mostly online) persons who style themselves as a master and are anything but.

But you know, if the shoe fits, by all means lace that puppy up and wear it.



_____________________________



(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: Mono vs poly? - 8/27/2013 6:17:37 AM   
Spiritedsub2


Posts: 3315
Joined: 7/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt
...

I'll have to decline a reading of the Gor books, sci fi fantasy makes for poor relationship philosophy.

If you don't feel like reading those books, you could save time and just watch reruns of
I Dream of Jeanie...

_____________________________

Don’t grieve. Anything you lose comes round in another form.
~ Rumi

Laughing Dolphin

(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: Mono vs poly? - 8/27/2013 6:19:23 AM   
ChatteParfaitt


Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011
From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana
Status: offline
I loved that show, I always wanted to be Jeanie and say 'master' all mushy and google-eyed. Then I grew up.

I do love her outfits though.

_____________________________



(in reply to Spiritedsub2)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: Mono vs poly? - 8/27/2013 6:48:11 AM   
Spiritedsub2


Posts: 3315
Joined: 7/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt
...
I do love her outfits though.

My favorite Halloween costume.

_____________________________

Don’t grieve. Anything you lose comes round in another form.
~ Rumi

Laughing Dolphin

(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: Mono vs poly? - 8/27/2013 6:55:57 AM   
ChatteParfaitt


Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011
From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana
Status: offline
Mine, too !!

And you should see my belly dancing costumes. I'm listening to some bd music right now, for some odd reason I find it soothing.

ETA: Just a bit, right?

< Message edited by ChatteParfaitt -- 8/27/2013 6:56:53 AM >


_____________________________



(in reply to Spiritedsub2)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: Mono vs poly? - 8/27/2013 8:37:38 AM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
Real good back peddle and excuse to infer the things you do, applying them to the ones that are posting. Maybe we should add the lack of taking responsibility as one of those traits people need to look for. Now continuing bitching about things not evident in this discussion.

Droll and truth are not the same.


quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt

My dishonest method of discussion, how droll !

I have more than once pointed out that some of the responders on this thread replied the way they did b/c there are so many (mostly online) persons who style themselves as a master and are anything but.

But you know, if the shoe fits, by all means lace that puppy up and wear it.





_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: Mono vs poly? - 8/27/2013 8:40:24 AM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
A bigoted opinion, and anyone different than you has not grown up. I kind of left that style of discussion behind in high school so maybe your definition of growing up and mine are different.



quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt

I loved that show, I always wanted to be Jeanie and say 'master' all mushy and google-eyed. Then I grew up.

I do love her outfits though.



_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: Mono vs poly? - 8/27/2013 9:37:43 AM   
SerWhiteTiger


Posts: 437
Joined: 8/12/2013
From: Why is my name Florida? That's a state!
Status: offline
Oh dear. No respect for the forum rules either, I see.

"Keep the discussions civil and mature, and do not insult the kinks, preferences, lifestyles, etc. of others. "

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: Mono vs poly? - 8/27/2013 9:48:48 AM   
SerWhiteTiger


Posts: 437
Joined: 8/12/2013
From: Why is my name Florida? That's a state!
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: searching4mysir


quote:

ORIGINAL: SerWhiteTiger

Okay, I think I may see the problem here.

ChatteParfaitt, do you realize that some people actually want to be slaves, crave to be slaves, and that it's not simply a step "above" submissive or some progression from submissive but something else entirely? This isn't some way of comparing relationships and saying, "ours is Master/slave and yours isn't, hahaha, we're better than you," but that's how you seem to be taking it.

Have you ever read any Gor books? I'm not entirely on board with the whole Gor thing, but they do display the BDSM slave mentality.

Long ago, before I was a Dominant, and merely a top with only limited experience, a girl I was in a relationship with introduced me to the Gor books. This girl was begging me, through this act and many others, for me to make her my slave. This is not expression. This is not roleplaying. This is not some way of claiming to have a superior relationship. This girl had fantasized about this all her life and truly wanted to be my slave, just like in the Gor books. If you have not read any, you might want to do so. It could be very educational.

I wish that I had been able to realize at the time that she wanted me to enslave her. It would have saved us both a lot of misery. I kept trying to treat someone who wanted to be my slave as if she were my equal in a relationship, and it drove her absolutely nuts and trainwrecked our relationship. Do you hear what I'm saying? Me not making a girl my slave trainwrecked our relationship. Can you even understand that? You said that all the doms in this thread don't understand what it's like to be a female submissive, and that's true. But I very much doubt that you understand what it's like to crave to be a slave. You probably don't even believe that people actually want it. I had a very hard time realizing it myself. That girl certainly was completely and totally incapable of actually telling me flat out that she wanted to be a slave. After all, what if I had looked at her in horror and disgust when I realized she was serious? Can you understand this girl?

Or maybe you understand it exactly and are raging at all of us because your own Dom hasn't realized that that's what you want and taken you? Is Marc correct in his assertion that you're just jealous?

Or maybe you're just trolling?

I dunno. There's a huge disconnect between how you're responding to people in this thread and what they're actually saying. You came into this thread and have done nothing but insult and attack people while claiming that you want to help. And yet you feel attacked by me when I'm doing nothing but trying to help you. To be fair, Marc isn't trying to help you. He doesn't think it's worth the effort.



Sounds to me like she needed psychological therapy if she was taking poorly written fiction and wanting to making it real for her.



And many would say that exact same thing about everyone involved in BDSM. But you apparently think it's okay to be judgmental and condescending towards the parts of this lifestyle you don't like?

(in reply to searching4mysir)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: Mono vs poly? - 8/27/2013 9:54:33 AM   
SerWhiteTiger


Posts: 437
Joined: 8/12/2013
From: Why is my name Florida? That's a state!
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt

I have insulted or attacked no one. That was debating and stating my opinion in a highly assertive manner. If you can't handle that, please feel free to put me on ignore.

I'll have to decline a reading of the Gor books, sci fi fantasy makes for poor relationship philosophy.




How about you not dodge the question?

Do you recognize that some want to be slaves?

(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Mono vs poly? Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.227