frunandsins
Posts: 81
Joined: 10/7/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
Anal sex is a dangerous sexual behavior and can cause serious internal injuries, countless infections, twisted bowel, etc, etc., etc. Just ask your doctor. Your repeat of the same statement without any substantiation is remarkable. It's as if you doubted that I managed to read your first post. Perhaps you can offer anecdotes of things going wrong like you described? Because I am pretty sure you cannot back that claim up with published and reliable sources. I would gladly trade anecdotes with you on this issue. As for asking my doctor - I don't need to. I know enough about anal sex before I got him as a doctor. I was a peer sex educator in college. Also, my doctor is gay and he enjoys bottoming. Enough said? Also, let us just examine the statement: "Anal sex is a dangerous sexual behavior." If I have read your posts correctly, you're offering this as one reasons why you will not entertain the idea of receiving anal. If I read you incorrectly, please feel free to explain. If not, then my response to that is below. First, it apparently is not so dangerous that you would not fuck a woman in the ass, as you described before in the difference in sensation and your preference in fucking a woman in the vagina rather than in her ass. So at some level, you accept that when done correctly, it will not endanger the recipient to an unacceptable level. The alternative is to assume that you think it's too dangerous to carry out and you just didn't care about the safety of your sub. I don't think you're that kind of person, so I think the first scenario is far more likely. At the worst, self-administered anal stimulation will definitely be almost free of that risk, save for accidents. Therefore, it is not a very convincing reason. Second, almost all of the kinks that are common in this community carry a risk. The presence of risk itself is hardly a good reason to abstain from the activity. Choking, impact play, predicament bondage, or even regular bondage, rough fucks, suspensions, temporary body mods, fire play, needle plays, sounding, breath control, permanent body mods, the list goes on, for activities that carry risks. Hell, "Driving is a dangerous daily activity" is also true, given the rate of automotive accidents. The important part is to minimize the risk through education and precaution. So, care to offer a different reason? On a different topic: quote:
Through history men and women had different roles. Women ruled in the home men ruled outside the house. For the most part they were happy. Love and family were the cornerstones of human development centenaries before farming. This is a gross misrepresentation of history. In ancient Greece and Rome, women did not rule inside the house. They have duties to carry out to maintain the daily operation of the household, and depending on the social class they have varying degrees of public duties. But the men were always the final decision maker for all the mattes. The Latin term Pater Familias refers to this role explicitly. Love is also a rather uncommon occurrence. Ancient Greeks considered women devoid of the faculty for high level logic and reasoning, and they proposed true love is the platonic love between two men of equal intellectual status. The Romans continued much of that same line of thought. In ancient Chinese culture, love is defined more as a comfortable obedience and supplication of the wives, and not the love as we would envision today. There are other examples in other cultures, as well as examples where women did have some influence outside of their homes, too. Your summary of what happened in the past reads more like a fan fiction than an actual anthropological or historical description.
_____________________________
To each, their own kinks, and may they suffer beautifully.
|