UllrsIshtar
Posts: 3693
Joined: 7/28/2012
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ARIES83
Wasn't really a threat, more like playfully responding to the outlandishness of the question, as I would with any of my female friends.
But if it's not appreciated so be it, it won't happen again.
Also, I was under the impression knuffeltje meant something like cute, cuddly plaything in your native tounge. If I blundered and referred to you in a derogatory way or something, I apologise. 
It means 'tiny teddy bear' or 'tiny cuddle' though it's not so much that which annoyed me, as it was the reference to curiosity being unbecoming in a kajira, and the implication that as a slave (which I am not fyi) I better shut my mouth of be punished for continuing the line of questioning you started.
Don't worry about it, I said it wasn't appreciated, and you didn't went into a hissy fit, tone can be hard to read in text, especially when you don't know a person personally, so we cool man. 
How was the question outlandish though? You're asking me if I consider anal penetration dominant or submissive, now I'm trying to figure out the same thing about you. You've already indicating that you don't consider 'being fucked up the butt' a position of dominance, so now I'm trying to figure out if that's due to the submissive doing the acting or it being because of the act itself.
If you consider all anal penetration submissive, no matter whether its done by you yourself or not, then that answers my question immediate, and I didn't need to ask any of the below. If not, we get into interesting gray territory.
For example would a slave tied up in a mummification bag, so they are unable to even wiggle around, wearing a dildo gag be in a position of dominance over the Top satisfying themselves on the subs mouth?
If not, then where is the line?
What about if the sub is bound tightly, but still able to bob their head? Is it now an act of penetration that puts the position of power with the submissive?
How about if they sub is only has their wrists bound behind their back, is otherwise free to move, and is ordered to penetrate the top with a dildo gag? Is the act of penetration now dominant or not? Does it make a difference if the Top uses pain from say a cattle prod to force the reluctant sub to obey and complete the penetration?
What if the sub is not bound at all, and only is wearing the dildo gag? Is following the order to penetrate the Top now an act of dominance?
What if instead of wearing a dildo gag the sub is ordered to pick up a hand held dildo and penetrate the Top with that?
What if instead of using a manual dildo the sub is ordered to wear a strap-on?
Where does being penetrated become an act of submission if the Top is in control over the what, where, how and why? Is it the penetration itself that does it, or the fact that the sub is doing the manual labor?
And if it's the act of penetration itself that signifies submission, is it therefore impossible for a gay male Top to ever receive penetration from his slaves without loosing dominance? What about a lesbian female Top who enjoys vaginal and/or anal intercourse with her lovers by means of strap-ons? Can she be anally penetrated without being in a submissive position?
Are only straight male Tops unable to receive penetration in a dominant fashion? And if so, why?
< Message edited by UllrsIshtar -- 3/27/2014 8:41:18 PM >
_____________________________
I can be your whore
I am the dirt you created
I am your sinner
And your whore
But let me tell you something baby
You love me for everything you hate me for
|
RE: Dominant men recieving strap-on sex? - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread