Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Anotther school shooting.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Anotther school shooting. Page: <<   < prev  22 23 [24] 25 26   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Anotther school shooting. - 12/22/2013 10:59:55 AM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

I just think a federal requirement in all states for ownership is important.


I take exactly the opposite approach: repeal the 16th Amendment.

Those who wanted to do so could live in Mass, which would presumably be gun-free; I could remain in WV (and push for laws requiring all citizens to carry); we could both remain American.

Repealing the 16th also works for abortion and a host of other divisive national issues. The States were not intende to be carbon copies of each other dictated to by the feds.

While we're at it we can repeal the 17th also...

_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 461
RE: Anotther school shooting. - 12/22/2013 11:27:35 AM   
EdBowie


Posts: 875
Joined: 8/11/2013
Status: offline
Quit the non-stop lying, I argued against a semi-auto ban by pointing out that very thing..
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

FR

The shooting event which prompted this particular discussion was carried out by someone armed with a manual action shotgun, molotov cocktails, and a machete. What does a semi-auto ban have to do with anything?



_____________________________

Reading for understanding, instead of for argumentation, has its advantages.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 462
RE: Anotther school shooting. - 12/22/2013 12:38:28 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie

Why do you think that 20 - 30 is an unreasonable number to have carry permits?

I'm not envisioning the little red schoolhouse, I'm talking about a school of 1,000 or more kids, and a hundred or more employees.

As far as track record, I only know that Arkansas passed such a law, and most schools in that state opted out on a faculty vote.


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

You're probably right about spending the money. If we dropped the gun free zones designations and just let school employees who have permits carry, there wouldn't be any additional costs. However if this is adopted by most schools, I'm sure some Zimmerman type of fuck up would eventually happen though certainly nothing to the extent of 30 teachers running around waving guns.

Now I'm curious what the history has been with the 3 states and parts of Texas that have been allowing concealed carry in their schools. I believe Utah has recently approved it and it's under consideration in other states.



Statistically with 100 teachers no more than 4 or 5 would be expected to have permits.
When you consider that educators tend to be liberal it could be even less.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to EdBowie)
Profile   Post #: 463
RE: Anotther school shooting. - 12/22/2013 12:49:51 PM   
EdBowie


Posts: 875
Joined: 8/11/2013
Status: offline
And for every hundred teachers, how many coaches, bus drivers, maintenance people, clerical staff, and so on?

The worst case scenario is still undesirable with even a handful of untrained people, especially the very people who would think that their 16 hours CCW class equipped the to be effective is n active shooter situation.

Part of the overall US gun culture is a widespread belief that all American males are born experts at driving, lovemaking, holding their liquor, and conquering evil in a crisis...

Reality disagrees.


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie

Why do you think that 20 - 30 is an unreasonable number to have carry permits?

I'm not envisioning the little red schoolhouse, I'm talking about a school of 1,000 or more kids, and a hundred or more employees.

As far as track record, I only know that Arkansas passed such a law, and most schools in that state opted out on a faculty vote.


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

You're probably right about spending the money. If we dropped the gun free zones designations and just let school employees who have permits carry, there wouldn't be any additional costs. However if this is adopted by most schools, I'm sure some Zimmerman type of fuck up would eventually happen though certainly nothing to the extent of 30 teachers running around waving guns.

Now I'm curious what the history has been with the 3 states and parts of Texas that have been allowing concealed carry in their schools. I believe Utah has recently approved it and it's under consideration in other states.



Statistically with 100 teachers no more than 4 or 5 would be expected to have permits.
When you consider that educators tend to be liberal it could be even less.



_____________________________

Reading for understanding, instead of for argumentation, has its advantages.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 464
RE: Anotther school shooting. - 12/22/2013 1:05:03 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie

And for every hundred teachers, how many coaches, bus drivers, maintenance people, clerical staff, and so on?

The worst case scenario is still undesirable with even a handful of untrained people, especially the very people who would think that their 16 hours CCW class equipped the to be effective is n active shooter situation.

Part of the overall US gun culture is a widespread belief that all American males are born experts at driving, lovemaking, holding their liquor, and conquering evil in a crisis...

Reality disagrees.


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie

Why do you think that 20 - 30 is an unreasonable number to have carry permits?

I'm not envisioning the little red schoolhouse, I'm talking about a school of 1,000 or more kids, and a hundred or more employees.

As far as track record, I only know that Arkansas passed such a law, and most schools in that state opted out on a faculty vote.


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

You're probably right about spending the money. If we dropped the gun free zones designations and just let school employees who have permits carry, there wouldn't be any additional costs. However if this is adopted by most schools, I'm sure some Zimmerman type of fuck up would eventually happen though certainly nothing to the extent of 30 teachers running around waving guns.

Now I'm curious what the history has been with the 3 states and parts of Texas that have been allowing concealed carry in their schools. I believe Utah has recently approved it and it's under consideration in other states.



Statistically with 100 teachers no more than 4 or 5 would be expected to have permits.
When you consider that educators tend to be liberal it could be even less.



For starters with 1000 students you would have not more than 40 teachers, to be generous 1 dozen more for clerical and maintenance , bus drivers don't count.
That gives us 52 people. Only about 5% of people get permits so you have maybe 3.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to EdBowie)
Profile   Post #: 465
RE: Anotther school shooting. - 12/22/2013 1:15:25 PM   
EdBowie


Posts: 875
Joined: 8/11/2013
Status: offline
Try 80 teachers per 1,000 students (schools teach more than one subject these days), plus administrators, plus the people I listed below. 12 to run the cafeteria, the physical plant, transportation, and all clerical? Nope, doesn't add up.

And bus drivers, etc. aren't employees? Says who?

And none of that addresses the fact that even a smaller pool of armed people with only CCW training, are more dangerous to everyone else during an active shooter situation.


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie

And for every hundred teachers, how many coaches, bus drivers, maintenance people, clerical staff, and so on?

The worst case scenario is still undesirable with even a handful of untrained people, especially the very people who would think that their 16 hours CCW class equipped the to be effective is n active shooter situation.

Part of the overall US gun culture is a widespread belief that all American males are born experts at driving, lovemaking, holding their liquor, and conquering evil in a crisis...

Reality disagrees.


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie

Why do you think that 20 - 30 is an unreasonable number to have carry permits?

I'm not envisioning the little red schoolhouse, I'm talking about a school of 1,000 or more kids, and a hundred or more employees.

As far as track record, I only know that Arkansas passed such a law, and most schools in that state opted out on a faculty vote.


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

You're probably right about spending the money. If we dropped the gun free zones designations and just let school employees who have permits carry, there wouldn't be any additional costs. However if this is adopted by most schools, I'm sure some Zimmerman type of fuck up would eventually happen though certainly nothing to the extent of 30 teachers running around waving guns.

Now I'm curious what the history has been with the 3 states and parts of Texas that have been allowing concealed carry in their schools. I believe Utah has recently approved it and it's under consideration in other states.



Statistically with 100 teachers no more than 4 or 5 would be expected to have permits.
When you consider that educators tend to be liberal it could be even less.



For starters with 1000 students you would have not more than 40 teachers, to be generous 1 dozen more for clerical and maintenance , bus drivers don't count.
That gives us 52 people. Only about 5% of people get permits so you have maybe 3.



_____________________________

Reading for understanding, instead of for argumentation, has its advantages.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 466
RE: Anotther school shooting. - 12/22/2013 1:49:24 PM   
lovmuffin


Posts: 3759
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL:

Part of the overall US gun culture is a widespread belief that all American males are born experts at driving, lovemaking, holding their liquor, and conquering evil in a crisis...


Crap, if I only had the holding my liquor one.

_____________________________

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world." Unknown

"Long hair, short hair—what's the difference once the head's blowed off." - Farmer Yassir

(in reply to EdBowie)
Profile   Post #: 467
RE: Anotther school shooting. - 12/22/2013 3:05:44 PM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Statistically with 100 teachers no more than 4 or 5 would be expected to have permits.


One armed responder is better than none.

_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 468
RE: Anotther school shooting. - 12/22/2013 3:27:22 PM   
MsMJAY


Posts: 515
Joined: 3/17/2013
Status: offline
I think some people are not considering the complete chaos that happens when a school shooting occurs.
When an officer arrives on an active shooter scene he or she has no idea who the shooter is. He doesn't know if the shooter is an outsider, a student or a faculty member. There are people running and screaming, people laying on the floor injured or dead and sometimes alarm bells or partial power outages that screw with the officer's hearing and visibility. Plus he is going to be at a heightened state of arousal because he is going into a life threatening situation.

The only way the officer(s) will know who the shooter is, is the fact that the shooter is in civilian clothes and has a gun. They have no other means of identifying him or her. That means if a teacher or principal is walking through the building with a gun when a school shooting is in progress, he or she will most likely get shot by the police. And given the situation, if a teacher or principal shoots at the active shooter, they have just as much chance of hitting an innocent student as they have of hitting the active shooter.

I am not saying they should or should not be armed. I am only saying that we should consider the multitude of risk factors that play into it.


quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie

And none of that addresses the fact that even a smaller pool of armed people with only CCW training, are more dangerous to everyone else during an active shooter situation.


quote:


(in reply to EdBowie)
Profile   Post #: 469
RE: Anotther school shooting. - 12/22/2013 3:31:28 PM   
Darkdog


Posts: 29
Joined: 6/30/2005
Status: offline
Yes, in the "everyone is armed" scenario, there would be a lot of do-gooders shooting at each other.

(in reply to MsMJAY)
Profile   Post #: 470
RE: Anotther school shooting. - 12/22/2013 4:22:19 PM   
igor2003


Posts: 1718
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie

For the 3rd time, that was brought up in the context of American spree shootings of the type currently making headlines, not all shootings, ever. I haven't made the absolute claim that no one has ever been shot on a private campus, I'm examining the large difference in frequency.


quote:

ORIGINAL: igor2003


The arguments to which I was responding, both pro and con, were based around whether private schools were safer and whether private schools do or do not suffer from shootings. I was simply pointing out that shootings do occur at private schools. Kids, teachers, parents, etc. all still do get disgruntled at private schools, just like public school, and sometimes do turn to guns as a means of expressing their ire. As EdBowie tries to argue in his response to my post, private schools, so far, for the most part have not suffered from "spree" killings, though as in the case of Oikos, with, I believe, 7 dead, even private schools have that problem too. Just because there haven't been "a lot" of spree killings at private schools is probably just a matter of numbers as much as anything else. There are many more public schools, with many more students, teachers, and families involved, making them much more likely to have been the site for any shootings, including spree killings. As far as private schools being "safe" from shootings...that, to me, appears to be a myth.

So...in response to BamaD...there are fewer shootings at private schools, but I think in large part that is simply because there are not nearly as many people involved.

And in response to EdBowie...Private schools do have spree shootings, as shown by Oikos. There may be others. What I provided was the results of a very quick search, and is in no way presented as a complete list. I'm relatively certain that more examples might be found if a person wanted to take the time to look for them.

For anyone to say that my short list "proves" anyone's point (other than to show that private school shootings do exist) is ridiculous.




Please take a comprehensive reading course. My original post was not directed at YOU specifically or ANYTHING YOU POSTED. It was directed at the general debate over the safety of private schools versus public schools and whether or not gun violence took place at private schools. I know you probably want everything to be about you, but I assure you...this wasn't. So, whether it is the 3rd, 4th, or 100th time...THIS WAS NOT ABOUT YOU.

_____________________________

If the women don't find you handsome they should at least find you handy. - Red Green

At my age erections are like cops...there's never one around when you need it!

Never miss a good chance to shut up. - Will Rogers


(in reply to EdBowie)
Profile   Post #: 471
RE: Anotther school shooting. - 12/22/2013 7:19:56 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
I don't know why you're arguing with me. I don't think armed guards are workable.
But I don't think they cause the problems you paint either. Memory says there have been armed civilians at several of the recent incidents.




quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie

Zimmerman didn't attack a school.

And I don't know when the last time you were inside a school, but they also have employees like bus drivers, maintenance and janitorial crew, lunch room and clerical staff.... I highly doubt these people are 8-1 anti-gun.

In any case, the untrained CCW holder shooting the wrong person worst case scenario would hold true with even a small number .

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Teachers at the college level break 8-1 democrat. At the highschool level its not as bad - in the neighborhood of 4:1.
Most teachers are women.

The demographics are such that even in a school of 50-100 teachers you will have probably at most 2-3 people with permits. Mostly in rural areas, or women that have been victimized before. I just do not see a situation occurring where you will have 20-30, unless you are paying for guards - and no school district can afford that much per school anyway.

This is why even in when they vote mandatory carry, most schools opt out.

Regarding the zimmerman kind of fuck up.
If you wanted to mandate that schools were concealed carry - it might work. It would lower the chance of random zimmerman types attacking.

But I don't think it solves the fact that the biggest cause of this kind of violence is student -on - student bullying or violence.

Which more or less I think occurs because we take juvenile delinquents and force them into school. Hard to expect them to become angels.

My proposed solution:

A). Carry law - as above.
B). Small juvie schools oriented around vocational training. Wood, Metal shop etc.
C). Better screening.




quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie

Why do you think that 20 - 30 is an unreasonable number to have carry permits?

I'm not envisioning the little red schoolhouse, I'm talking about a school of 1,000 or more kids, and a hundred or more employees.

As far as track record, I only know that Arkansas passed such a law, and most schools in that state opted out on a faculty vote.


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

You're probably right about spending the money. If we dropped the gun free zones designations and just let school employees who have permits carry, there wouldn't be any additional costs. However if this is adopted by most schools, I'm sure some Zimmerman type of fuck up would eventually happen though certainly nothing to the extent of 30 teachers running around waving guns.

Now I'm curious what the history has been with the 3 states and parts of Texas that have been allowing concealed carry in their schools. I believe Utah has recently approved it and it's under consideration in other states.








(in reply to EdBowie)
Profile   Post #: 472
RE: Anotther school shooting. - 12/22/2013 7:22:38 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
Butch,

I noticed you very carefully did not reply to my query on your position.
Is it therefore OK to give a mental health exam to a woman that wants an abortion?

I mean its the same standard, no? Both the gun owner and the person seeking an abortion want to engage in a constitutionally protected activity.

I bring this up to give you some insight on just how repugnant your suggestion is.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 473
RE: Anotther school shooting. - 12/22/2013 7:29:47 PM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

The only way the officer(s) will know who the shooter is, is the fact that the shooter is in civilian clothes and has a gun. They have no other means of identifying him or her. That means if a teacher or principal is walking through the building with a gun when a school shooting is in progress, he or she will most likely get shot by the police. And given the situation, if a teacher or principal shoots at the active shooter, they have just as much chance of hitting an innocent student as they have of hitting the active shooter.


This is also a problem for detectives and, especially, for those undercover officers who cannot/do not carry shields. They can be anywhere at any time...
Officers responding to a school shooting should, however, know that their school district allows armed teachers and that they may encounter armed Good Samaritans.
It does complicate the situation; there's no getting around that, but there are ways to ameliorate it. Having officers meet faculty, etc....

_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to MsMJAY)
Profile   Post #: 474
RE: Anotther school shooting. - 12/22/2013 7:47:33 PM   
MsMJAY


Posts: 515
Joined: 3/17/2013
Status: offline
This is true, but detectives receive a high level of training for their situations and accept a very high level of risk as a natural consequence of their jobs. Teachers and Principals will not have that level of training. How many of them are going to want to assume that level of risk as a "natural consequence" of their jobs? Maybe some will, but it is really a lot to ask of someone whose job is an educator.

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

The only way the officer(s) will know who the shooter is, is the fact that the shooter is in civilian clothes and has a gun. They have no other means of identifying him or her. That means if a teacher or principal is walking through the building with a gun when a school shooting is in progress, he or she will most likely get shot by the police. And given the situation, if a teacher or principal shoots at the active shooter, they have just as much chance of hitting an innocent student as they have of hitting the active shooter.


This is also a problem for detectives and, especially, for those undercover officers who cannot/do not carry shields. They can be anywhere at any time...
Officers responding to a school shooting should, however, know that their school district allows armed teachers and that they may encounter armed Good Samaritans.
It does complicate the situation; there's no getting around that, but there are ways to ameliorate it. Having officers meet faculty, etc....


(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 475
RE: Anotther school shooting. - 12/22/2013 7:58:01 PM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

How many of them are going to want to assume that level of risk as a "natural consequence" of their jobs? Maybe some will, but it is really a lot to ask of someone whose job is an educator.


AFAIK, the discussion is not about asking anyone to assume any risk whatsoever; rather it is about allowing those who wish to assume that risk to do so legally.

_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to MsMJAY)
Profile   Post #: 476
RE: Anotther school shooting. - 12/22/2013 8:29:31 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Is it therefore OK to give a mental health exam to a woman that wants an abortion?

I mean its the same standard, no? Both the gun owner and the person seeking an abortion want to engage in a constitutionally protected activity.


Apples and oranges...she can't shoot someone, or herself, with her baby. They are not the same standard and you are wrong to say, in my opinion, the dangerously mentally ill have a constitutional right to bear arms. Just as the blind cannot legally drive a vehicle the mentally ill should not legally own a weapon.
It has nothing to do with constitutional rights it is simply a safety issue. If by some medical procedure the blind regain their sight they would be eligible for a drivers license as would the mentally ill regain the right to own firearms if they were deemed competent.

When you apply for a drivers license you must take and pass a vision test...nothing unconstitutional in that so why would a mental competency test for gun ownership be any different?

Butch

< Message edited by kdsub -- 12/22/2013 9:08:15 PM >


_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 477
RE: Anotther school shooting. - 12/22/2013 8:42:53 PM   
MsMJAY


Posts: 515
Joined: 3/17/2013
Status: offline
No matter how I worded it, it doesn't change the fact that it is a very high level of risk for a non-law enforcement employee to assume as part of their job.

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

How many of them are going to want to assume that level of risk as a "natural consequence" of their jobs? Maybe some will, but it is really a lot to ask of someone whose job is an educator.


AFAIK, the discussion is not about asking anyone to assume any risk whatsoever; rather it is about allowing those who wish to assume that risk to do so legally.


(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 478
RE: Anotther school shooting. - 12/22/2013 9:24:09 PM   
igor2003


Posts: 1718
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsMJAY

No matter how I worded it, it doesn't change the fact that it is a very high level of risk for a non-law enforcement employee to assume as part of their job.

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

How many of them are going to want to assume that level of risk as a "natural consequence" of their jobs? Maybe some will, but it is really a lot to ask of someone whose job is an educator.


AFAIK, the discussion is not about asking anyone to assume any risk whatsoever; rather it is about allowing those who wish to assume that risk to do so legally.




In going back through the posts it looks like the "risk" you are talking about is the risk of being shot by a police officer if the officer sees them with a gun...is that right? Do you really think THAT risk is greater than sitting in classroom, trying to shield a bunch of kids when the shooter walks up to them, puts a gun in their face, and pulls the trigger? Nope...no risk there. And next to no way at all of putting up any kind of defense, for themselves, or for the kids they are trying to protect.


_____________________________

If the women don't find you handsome they should at least find you handy. - Red Green

At my age erections are like cops...there's never one around when you need it!

Never miss a good chance to shut up. - Will Rogers


(in reply to MsMJAY)
Profile   Post #: 479
RE: Anotther school shooting. - 12/22/2013 9:29:12 PM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

it is a very high level of risk for a non-law enforcement employee to assume as part of their job.


No one, anywhere, has suggested that being armed should/would/could be " part of their job"

Again, we are discussing allowing teachers to go armed; you are the only one discussing requiring them to do so.

I can explain it to you; I cannot understand it for you.

_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to MsMJAY)
Profile   Post #: 480
Page:   <<   < prev  22 23 [24] 25 26   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Anotther school shooting. Page: <<   < prev  22 23 [24] 25 26   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.299