tweakabelle
Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007 From: Sydney Australia Status: offline
|
What an appalling mish-mash of false generalisations and straw man arguments Ms Lu's paper is. One really expects better of a philosophy teacher. Her argument, such as it is, relies on a single claim, the claim that racism is "settled history" ie no longer relevant in today's world. In Ms Lu's words: "Conservatives tend to miss this because we see the Civil Rights story as settled history. We’re all pleased to have sloughed off the bigotry of our ancestors. Of course we want people to be judged “by the content of their character” and not by their skin" http://thefederalist.com/2014/05/02/why-liberals-think-conservatives-are-racist/ (emphasis added) So, if you believe Ms Lu, if you agree that racism is "settled history" and no longer a force in today's politics and social life, then read on and consider the rest of Ms Lu's paper on its merits. However, if you agree that racism is still a force to be reckoned with, that it is still operative in today's political and social worlds, then you must reject Ms Lu's claims in their entirety. Is there any one out there stupid enough to believe that racism is a spent force, that it is irrelevant to today's political and social life? If there is I have a cool looking Harbour Bridge here in Sydney that I can let you have for a song. I'll even throw in the Opera House to sweeten the deal for you.
_____________________________
|