quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

The story in the Post says the Oath Keepers were hired as security by a news service for protection. They are also offering their service to business owners. I do not blame them for doing so... they are not on the streets pointing weapons for show but providing a needed service.

So Joe grossly distorted the story, what a shock.

Well, his source was NPR. Given the history of destruction in the area, I especially liked the St. Louis County Police Chief Jon Belmar calling the presence of the Oath Keepers "unnecessary and inflammatory". Seriously? But looting and rioting isn't "unnecessary and inflammatory"? And when the Columbia MO Police Officers Association's Facebook page on August 9th remembered Darren Wilson, "an innocent and persecuted officer," it was called "offensive" and "insensitive" by both the Columbia Police Chief and the Mayor. Yeah fuck, the truth is what's offensive and insensitive to these people.

K.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

The truth gets in the way of the narrative.

The activist group Organization of Black Struggle defended the actions of Tyrone Harris — the man who opened fire upon and was then shot by police officers in Ferguson, Mo. on Sunday night — by shifting the initial blame back upon the police department.

“It was a poor decision to use plain clothes officers in a protest setting,” Kayla Reid, a field organizer for the group, said on Monday. “It made it difficult for people to identify police officers, which is essential to the safety of community members.”

During the ensuing chaos, Harris approached an unmarked police van and opened fire on the vehicle. Officers got out, opened fire and chased after the fleeing Harris. He would eventually turn and fire a second salvo of shots at the officers, at which point he was shot several times. ~Source

Because the police don't care about the safety of the black community.

K.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Well another update on black lives matter in Ferguson... This was not an accidental drive by shooting... this child and mother were targeted... WHAT IN THE HELL IS WRONG WITH THESES PEOPLE?

Well another update on black lives matter in St. Louis. Last week a 93 year old hero of WWII a Tuskegee airman became disorientated and pulled over to call for help... a black man jumped in his car and robbed him... He tried to follow the robber but got lost. He pulled over to ask for help and two black men kicked him from his car and took off with it... In the same area a 3 year old shot himself in the head because a family member left a loaded pistol under the pillow... a loaded shot gun on the floor and a loaded automatic on the nightstand... then put the child on the bed and left... This is the same area a black man was shot dead in an intersection.

The police decided to step up policing actions in the area and when two men came from a dug house... one with two weapons and the other with one and pointed them at police... the resulting fire killed one of the assailants... what do the police get for risking their lives to protect them.... ROITS... WHAT IN THE HELL IS WRONG WITH THESES PEOPLE?

Butch

quote:

And people wonder why some areas are reduced to anarchy.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
And nine people were arrested in the "protests" about that last shooting, with people declaring that the police just gunned the guy down without reason, he was apparently another "good kid" who would never pull a gun on the cops.

In other news, it would appear that BLM agitator Shaun King is another Rachel Donezal. CNN's Don Lemon reports that a family member of King's has told the network that both of Shaun's parents are white!
http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/20/us/shaun-king-controversy/
K.

• A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  
• Personal Responsibility
  
• Help for the truly needy
  
• Limited Government
  
• Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
  

quote:

WHAT IN THE HELL IS WRONG WITH THESES PEOPLE?

quote:

Lynching, the practice of murdering people by extrajudicial mob action, occurred in the United States chiefly from the late 18th century through the 1960s. Lynchings took place most frequently against African-American men in the southern U.S.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Bullshit...Please show me where history from the 18th century excuses the actions of the murderers who shoot 9 year old children or rob and hijack 93 year old men... tell me how the history of the 18th century can justify 130 black on black murders in my area...all the way from 3 year old children to 90 year old grandmothers... Bullshit again...there is no excuse and no blame but themselves.

Butch

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Bullshit...Please show me where history from the 18th century excuses the actions of the murderers who shoot 9 year old children or rob and hijack 93 year old men... tell me how the history of the 18th century can justify 130 black on black murders in my area...all the way from 3 year old children to 90 year old grandmothers... Bullshit again...there is no excuse and no blame but themselves.

Butch

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Bullshit...Please show me where history from the 18th century excuses the actions of the murderers who shoot 9 year old children or rob and hijack 93 year old men... tell me how the history of the 18th century can justify 130 black on black murders in my area...all the way from 3 year old children to 90 year old grandmothers... Bullshit again...there is no excuse and no blame but themselves.

Butch

Dont you get it, butch? For some people, history excuses EVERY SINGLE VIOLENT thing the black people do. Worse yet, their leftist defenders will say "yes, rioting is wrong BUT"..."Yes, looting and burning is wrong BUT"..."Yes, assault of/shooting at police officers is wrong BUT" and you just know they're going to give you a reason that blames the victims of the rioting, looting, burning, assault, shooting. Sometimes, that answer is "memory" like it's the perfect one-word answer. It isn't. It's...as you called it...bullshit.

Let's look at another group. From the 1600's until today, women have been treated wrongly and...in many cases...horrifically. What do you suppose would happen if women were to rise up and began this same pattern of violence? Would the left condemn? Or support with their "BUT" answers?