crumpets
Posts: 1614
Joined: 11/5/2014
From: South Bay (SF & Silicon Valley)
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze
I don't think the OP gets that "because he can do it" or "because it's there" doesn't make others uncomfy. There are a few tries to rationalize why, but it doesn't seem to touch the substance of WHY it makes people uncomfy.
Um... maybe you need to re-read what I wrote?
Do you see the way it was written? (Hint: Look up "irony")
It was clearly a facetious play on words - providing an example that simply reading a profile was, by your logic, similar to what you expressed as your idea of "stalking".
I was trying to show you, in a satirical way, how ridiculous your idea of stalking was.
The fact that you actually (apparently?) DID consider it creepy stalking, is what surprised me.
I wasn't being serious. It was clearly irony, by way of a tongue-in-cheek derisory example.
The sad thing is that I didn't start out to prove that you women make absolutely no (logical) sense, but your reaction to my clearly tongue-in-cheek look at AAkasha's profile scares me.
On the one hand, you deplore than men don't read your profile.
Yet, on the other hand, you deplore when they do.
Unless your post above was also facetious, then I would have to conclude that you took the fact that I simply read the profile, and you blew that wholly out of proportion.
I intended on showing how disproportionate your thoughts were compared to the actions taken.
I just didn't expect you to actually think it was stalking to just read the profile!
It was just an example to show you how ridiculous your thinking process is.
Sheeesh. Now you scare me.
I hope people like you are not in positions of power on our courts and in the government.
quote:
ORIGINAL: AAkasha
Well. this all makes me uneasy. What next, you geolocate my location and share with all?
Awww. C'mon.
Let's be serious here. You need to re-read what I wrote and HOW I wrote it in that post.
You guys are nuts if you call that tongue-in-cheek satire of my five-minute look at your profile "stalking".
I wrote that entire post, specifically using those words facetiously to show that your thinking is totally out of whack with logic.
The fact is that I skimmed in seconds each of your writings, which, by the way YOU put on the web (and which you make money off of, I don't know how much, but when I tried to skim more, it asked me to "join", and explained why). You wrote the stories. You (and your friend, Miss Blue) put that stuff out there.
So, um, you're subsequently uneasy when someone actually READS your profile?
And, since you suggest people visit your web page in your profile, you're then subsequently "uneasy" when someone actually visits your web page?
You guys are verifiably nuts in that you make absolutely no (logical) sense whatsoever.
I sure hope you're not in any government position of authority, or we're doomed.
You're 0% logic and 100% emotion.
NOTE to technologists, which you said you were in your web site... I used my home IP address, on purpose, when I visited your web page because I wanted to see if you noticed that, since you could then know a lot about me (much more than I about you, for example), all of which is contained within the well-known abilities of the HTTP protocol if your web site is so designed to capture that information. (HINT: You can narrow the visitor down to the unique browser used, which would transcend IP addresses, for example.)
quote:
ORIGINAL: AAkasha
For someone noting that you are extremely intelligent, why not do the OBVIOUS "right thing" and actually attribute what you posted on your journal to me? For more than 20 years I have been posting on the web.
OK. Now you're doubly nuts, although you may just be super sensitive, since you purport to make money off that web site.
First off, I'd be GLAD to attribute the concept illustrated to you (why wouldn't I? I already said I got the idea from another profile).
I just didn't use your name because without your permission, I have absolutely no desire to list your name on my profile.
So, if you send me an email, I'll be GLAD to directly attribute the concept to you. Sheesh. Why would I care not to?
But, that's not the point anyway, since I didn't "copy" your words; I just understood (and agreed with) the concept you were promoting.
Given that I enjoyed the concept, I merely re-wrote the concept into a three-step scenario of my own choosing.
Bear in mind, I'm not trying to make money off of it, nor am I even trying to get kudos for the idea.
I clearly attributed the idea to an unamed profile, and, I also just as clearly wrote my own story into the words, as you can see for yourself.
In essence, I plucked a handful of short 4-word utterances from the wealth of your pages, and then I weaved my own story around those sets of 4-simple words (such as "don't stop" and "make me cum ... again", which didn't duplicate in the least what you wrote, but, which mirrored the concept that you described (i.e., that of the woman who knows what she wants and tells the man curtly what to do "until [she] cums".
If you're so worried that my journal entry is gonna kill your revenues, then let me know that by email also, and I'll simply delete it (sheesh).
quote:
ORIGINAL: AAkasha
You also sort of hinting that you can tell a lot when you read all my content. Most of my content is behind a pay wall (it was all free for more than 10 years) - I have written more than 750 stories to date.
About half of what I write I fictionalize to throw off stalkers. My car make, my age, my friends. The only thing authentic is lust.
Ummm... Whooosh.
In this case, you proved my point beyond my wildest possible expectations!
My post was clearly intended as a humorous play on the fact that you guys consider ANYTHING whatsoever, even just visiting a public pay-for-reading profile as STALKING!
quote:
ORIGINAL: AAkasha
Despite your keen reading ability, I bet you could not come close to developing a profile of who I am and what I am like, including my relationships with my partners and friends. I think you over estimate yourself. Whatever you do, if you do this, email it to the address on my sigline, do not post it. That's really unethical.
You really need to re-read my post.
Look at the words.
Look at the way it was written.
Given I spent more time writing the post than I did looking up your EXTREMELY PUBLIC web site, which you, yourself, admonish users to visit in your Collarspace profile, I was just jokingly stating that you guys would consider it creepy stalking if someone just simply read your profiles before contacting you and followed your instructions (notice I didn't call you "Mistress", for example).
That you actually considered reading your profile, following your instruction, and skimming your public pay-to-read web page creepy stalking is what's crazy.
I was simply stating, purely facetiously, by way of example, that you'd probably consider reading your entire profile creepy stalking - and - much to my surprise - you actually did!
You guys are verifiably nuts.
Actually, in reality, you're not nuts. You're paranoid.
You put stuff in a profile and on the web, and then, you get creeped out when someone actually reads it.
All emotion. No logic.
< Message edited by crumpets -- 11/3/2015 12:46:31 PM >
|
RE: What do senders do that they can so quickly POUNCE ... - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread